Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Will Rhymes 'Fine' After Being Hit By Pitch And Fainting

Polanco Signs Extension

Placido Polanco signed a four-year extension today.  The deal will pay him $18.4 million over the next four seasons.  His per-season average of $4.6 million is the same as his 2005 salary, determined in arbitration with the Phillies,  and makes me speculate that the negotiations were relatively acrimony-free.  (A nod to BYB member chrvoel for posting the news to this site practically as it was announced.)

There's a lot to like about the deal, which will keep Polanco in Tiger stripes until he's 33.  The most important one is his defense.  Polanco plays exceptionally well at second and third, and passably well at shortstop.  According to Baseball Prospectus' Polanco page (available for free until the end of Wednesday), Polanco was worth four Defensive Wins in 2004, a number that far surpasses the total put up by either 2004 Gold Glover (Bret Boone and Luis Castillo).  Polanco also provides excellent plate discipline and OBP at the top of the Tigers' lineup, something the team sorely lacked even before Brandon Inge's frightening reversion to the mean.  The move was a nice PR gesture, too, coming just two days after the team unloaded new fan fave Kyle Farnsworth.

How does the salary -- $4.6 million per - stack up with those of comparable MLB second basemen?  It's significantly less than Jose Vidro's $7.5 million per annum or Ray Durham's $7 million option for 2006, but significantly more than Mark Loretta's two-year, $5.75 million deal.  It's about the same as Castillo will make.  All-in-all, it's not any kind of bargain, but it's not entirely out of line with what baseball's other above-average veteran second-sackers will make.  (By the way, this under-construction site was useful in pulling together even this small amount of salary info.  Contract data is easy to find for basketball, but has been a bear to track down for baseball.)

There's something to dislike about the deal as well: its length.  Returning to Baseball Prospectus for a minute, the best resource for projecting baseball performance into the future, we should expect Polanco's offense to decline every year for the life of the contract and to decline sharply after next season.  His defense will get worse too, and sooner.  The Prospectus numbers were run before this season, however, and Polanco has already matched his predicted 2004 offensive output.  That means that if Prospectus re-predicted Polanco's future, the numbers would be different, and presumably more optimistic.  Still, it seems  unlikely that Polanco will be worth his $4.6 million in 2009, the last year of his deal - he'll probably be quite Walewanderish.  Something about him just doesn't bode well for graceful aging.

2009 is a long way off, however.  A two-year, $9.2 million contract would have been vastly more preferable, but Polanco is a good player who provides skills the Tigers don't have now and don't have on the immediate minor-league horizon.  Perhaps a shorter deal wasn't possible, or perhaps the Tigers are believers in Polanco's baseball longevity.  The contract is certainly good news for the 2006 Tigers, even if it might burden their successors a little bit.

In BYB housekeeping news, Polanco is now clearly a member of the Next Relevant Tiger Team.  Brandon Inge is hanging on by a thread, as every day he looks less and less like the third baseman for a contending team.  Do you still believe in Inge?  Am I jumping off the bandwagon too soon?  The NRTT now looks like this:

C -- Ivan Rodriguez
1B -- Chris Shelton
2B -- Placido Polanco
3B -- Brandon Inge
SS -- Carlos Guillen
LF -- [open]
CF -- [open]
RF -- Magglio Ordonez
DH -- [open]

SP -- [open]
SP -- Jeremy Bonderman
SP -- [open]
SP -- Nate Robertson
SP -- [open]

RP -- [open]
RP -- Franklyn German
RP -- Jamie Walker
RP -- Fernando Rodney
RP -- [open]
RP -- [open]

An ace starter and a big bopper of a left fielder would sure be nice, but there aren't many teams that would refuse either of those.

Comment 1 comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good Move
By chance, does anyone have the numbers on the contract situations for Inge and Shelton?

Our infield is looking solid.  I would still pursue a full time 3rd baseman in the offseason though...

by FLATigersFan on Aug 3, 2005 5:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Wake-forest-logo_small
Is Austin Jackson a top-five center fielder?
Hops_small
Closing Pitching Mystery Solved

Recent FanPosts

Amrita_rao_small
Elvis Andrus and Jurickson Profar
Img_1374_small
Scary moment for ex-Tiger Will Rhymes
Small
Austin Jackson: A mid-May appreciation
Tigers_logo_small
Advice on tickets, pre-game
Small
When is the time to trade Turner?
Small
Free Rob Brantly
Small
Is There a Best Way to Lose?
Small
Sports Talk Radio
Bilde_small
Porcello, Scherzer, and the Tigers Season

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Quick Rules

Do:

  • Treat others like you'd like to be treated.
  • Stick to the topic being discussed.
  • Make arguments based on facts, not emotion.
Don't:
  • Confuse BYB with talk radio, your blog or your social networking web site of choice. We're a baseball community.
  • Feed the trolls.

Commenting Code of Conduct


Managing Editor

Dsc0178-l_small Kurt Mensching

Deputy Editors

Meatcomputer-1_small BigAl

Sparky_anderson_wall_small Rob Rogacki

5532934019_b5fa57ae98_small allikazoo

Contributors

Good_to_great_leadership_image1-262x300_1__small Tigerdog1

Suss_small Matt Sussman

6m2bts_small Melissa Heyboer

Moderators

Be050826_small NCDee

Sifl_and_olly_small 13194013