Edgar Renteria's Hardly Arbitrary Arbitration Dilemma
Our Thanksgiving holiday was extended a bit here at BYB, so pardon us while we catch up on some of the pertinent news over the next couple of posts. Could this be the last time I get to use this Edgar Renteria photo? I've grown kind of attached to it, you know.
The Detroit Tigers, however, would no longer like to be attached to Renteria, and cut the cord with him for good yesterday by declining to offer him arbitration. And in doing so, they lose out on any draft picks (two, to be exact) that would've been received as compensation for Renteria's Type A free agent status.
Smart move? Well...
There was obviously a risk in offering Renteria arbitration, in that he might pownce on a one-year contract in which he'd likely be awarded something in the $9 million range (the salary he was paid last season). If the Tigers were interested in paying Renteria that much - or interested in him being their shortstop again, for that matter - they might have just picked up his contract option. (Although not picking up the option would've saved Detroit at least $2 million, regardless.) And we wouldn't have ever had to deal with the words "Julio Lugo."
As Billfer points out, such a risk could've been lessened by releasing (or trading) Renteria during the spring if the Tigers decided they didn't want him. But really, why go through all that trouble if Renteria wasn't actually wanted in the first place? Would the draft pick compensation have been worth the hassle? Perhaps, but possibly bringing two starting shortstops to Lakeland in February seems excessive.
But if Renteria has more lucrative offers on the table (such as the rumored two-year deal from the Giants), he more than likely would pass on arbitration with the Tigers, take the bigger contract elsewhere, and Detroit would have themselves a couple of draft picks to stockpile the farm system with. Winner, winner, turkey dinner.
A more troubling possibility was brought up by Lee (and echoed by Big Al), who wonders if the Tigers didn't even flirt with paying Renteria $9 million because they can't afford it. Otherwise, why not at least offer a contract when the team hasn't found a replacement at shortstop yet? But maybe Dave Dombrowski is confident he'll get someone who's at least a defensive upgrade, and would therefore prefer to spend that money on that player (or on, say, the bullpen). Maybe.
The most vexing thing about this whole situation, of course, is that this now means that Jair Jurrjens and Gorkys Hernandez were traded for one sub-par season from Renteria. A starting pitcher who surely could've helped the Tigers last season and for years to come (though I wonder if Armando Galarraga negates that loss), and a center fielder who could've instead been traded for pitching help were both squandered. Dombrowski took a huge risk, and when the end result wasn't a World Series championship, it blew up right in his face.
Maybe that's made him gun-shy on taking any risk at all this winter.
Comments
Renteria/Money
DD is not much of a risk taker and he looks through his rearview too much. Tiger’s strenght now is drafts pick since free agents first choice is not Detroit. I think also money could be an issue and I wonder if the Tigers lost money last year? There will be massive layoffs coming from the Big 3 shortly so that too will probably effect season ticket sales. DD must be on a small budget to work with or he would have taken the risk on Renteria. I think also the price of free agent markets are dropping by the day.
by Barry2 on
Dec 2, 2008 10:12 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Money
IMO, Renteria probably would have chosen to stay in Detroit and that’s something no one wanted to see. He was a terrible disappointment and I don’t think another year would have made him better. We need pitching and a good defensive SS.
by densogirl on
Dec 2, 2008 10:45 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Gallactically Stupid Choice
It’s hard for me to believe that this was purely a money move. A week ago (and maybe even still) we were in the running for a SS that’s going to cost $7.25m next season (Jack Wilson) which is only about $1m less than Rents would have cost. Furthermore if payroll is that big of an issue one would expect that Dombrowski would try to dump some of the $106m owed over the next two seasons to Ordonez, Sheffield, Guillen, Inge, Robertson and Willis.
Now we’re put in a position where we have to get a sub-par SS on the market (because really, what SS worth having will sign a one year contract?) or give up even more prospects in a trade. In the end acquiring Renteria might cost this team Jurrjens, Hernandez, 2 picks and a few more guys from our farm team.
Unless Dombrowski is orchestrating some brilliant trade it’s hard to look at this position positively.
by MacRae on
Dec 2, 2008 11:08 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs







