The Quest For Relief Revisits J.J. Putz
One year after losing out on trading for reliever J.J. Putz, could the Detroit Tigers get another chance to add him to their bullpen?
After the New York Post reported on Thursday night that the Mets planned to buy Putz out of his contract option for 2010, the team made it official yesterday. Though Putz hasn't yet officially filed for free agency, he's expected to do so. (Re-signing with the Mets hasn't been ruled out, and they have exclusive negotiating rights with him until November 20.)
Putz is still recovering from surgery in early June, which removed a bone spur from his pitching elbow. Working in a set-up role, he was able to pitch in only 29 games for the Mets this season, finishing with a 1-4 record, 5.22 ERA, 19 strikeouts, and 19 walks in 29.1 innings.
Tigers general manager Dave Dombrowski sounds as if he'd prefer a veteran closer for next season. Re-signing Brandon Lyon or Fernando Rodney is a possibility, but the free agent market could end up pricing both of them out of the Tigers' range. (Rodney has already said he's hoping for a three-to-four-year deal.) If that's the case, Detroit will have to look elsewhere, so we're dusting off The Quest For Relief for yet another offseason.
And The Quest could begin with Putz. At his best, he was a dominating closer. Between 2006 and 2007, Putz racked up 76 saves in 85 opportunities, with 186 strikeouts and 16 walks in 150 innings. But he's struggled with elbow and rib cage injuries the past two seasons, limiting him to 76 games. (And his elbow gave him problems in prior seasons, as well.) This is what compelled the Mets to decline Putz's 2010 option.
The Tigers went after him hard last winter, but backed off when the Mariners wanted both Matt Joyce and Jeff Larish. As it turns out, Detroit needed a third team involved to give Seattle the centerfielder they wanted. When the Mets were able to get the Indians to give up Franklin Gutierrez, they swooped in and got Putz.
But the Tigers ended up salvaging a deal for Edwin Jackson out of those negotiations, which was an excellent consolation prize. (Especially when Putz was done by June.)
So is this a possibility the Tigers should pursue? (Most of the team's beat writers seem to think so, as does MLB Trade Rumors.) Putz presumably wouldn't cost much, as teams wouldn't want to spend big money on an injury risk. He'd probably be willing to sign a one-year deal (maybe with an option) to prove he can make it through a full season healthy. (The Tigers being his hometown team might not hurt, either.) And if he stays healthy, the Tigers might have themselves a closer.
To me, Putz seems far too risky to be Detroit's only option for that role. If a team doesn't know who the guy is in the ninth inning, it can screw with their confidence. Look at each of the eight playoff teams; their closers were established for the stretch run. (Though the Cardinals and Rockies took a while to settle on a guy.)
Would the Tigers be able to sign Putz and Lyon? Or are they confident enough in Ryan Perry or Joel Zumaya to take over if Putz's elbow fails him again? Which direction would make you feel most comfortable?
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
A pitcher with recent injury issues?
Sounds like he’s right up the Tigers’ alley.
by Elfuego51 on Nov 8, 2009 10:09 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'd like to see them re-sign Lyon
But if that were to happen, I wouldn’t mind seeing Putz there as a setup guy/fill-in closer.
by SabreRoseTiger on Nov 8, 2009 10:12 AM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
+1
Lyon gets an arb offer and a 2-3 year contract with the closer job guaranteed unless he screws something up, and Putz gets signed on a 1yr incentive deal to setup and provide Lyon with an incentive to not screw up.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Nov 8, 2009 12:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He attacks the strikezone for sure.
356 K’s in 352 innings career. 299 hits in the same amount of innings, but only 33 home runs. His walk numbers aren’t too bad either.
The only way I give a deal is if it’s one year with an option at some sort of home town discount. That could leave some room to resign Lyon as well.
Personally though, I think our main focus should be resigning Lyon. We know what he can do I’d like to see him as our closer because I think he can handle the stress of it.
My Music: Some Sorta Giant
by madpoopz on Nov 8, 2009 10:25 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
That's basically how I feel as well
You just said it a lot better than I did.
by SabreRoseTiger on Nov 8, 2009 11:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh B.Lyon,
remember at the beginning of your tenure as a tiger and you sucked that one time? I’m so glad that changed.
by wepri31 on Nov 8, 2009 12:55 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Go with Lyon
Before the team goes running off trying to sign greener grass elsewhere, see what they currently have. If Putz would be cheap for a single year, to push Lyon and give him some help and advice, then that could work out very well.
"While there's life, there's hope." --Cicero
by Baroque on Nov 8, 2009 2:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Lyon did well and if he is resigned deserves a shot at closing.
That said: Putz can be really good.
by 13194013 on Nov 8, 2009 8:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
As Usual
You all bring up great points…
I will miss the roller coaster named Fernando Rodney. However, I think we all agree that he had a decent year last season but he’s not our guy. Especially at his three to four year demands.
As long as Brandon Lyon doesn’t demand to much…I’m all for bringing him back. He redeemed himself from an aweful spring training and terible first month of the season.
I feel like if we can sign Putz to a “cheap-ish” incentive based contract, then heck yeah! I consider anyone who aquires him lucky. It’s a low risk high reward situation. He could mentor Perry for one and also compete for the closer job.
I’m pretty much saying the same thing as you guys, I kinda wonder though…is both Lyon and Putz even feasible?
by JAYRC on Nov 8, 2009 8:53 PM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
As long as we have $10-12 million to spend this offseason
That should be enough for SS and the bullpen and maybe a rehabbing starter if we’re lucky.
I’d like Lyon back, as well as Putz or a cheap bullpen acquisition as well as a new SS and maybe Bedard, Harden or Duchscherer as an extra starter (because does anyone believe that Bondo and Nate can hold down the back of the rotation next year?).
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Nov 8, 2009 9:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If we still have money after the hypothetical relief corps/SS signings for a rehabbing starter
And it were down to the three names you mention, I’d take Bedard simply on the basis of him being a lefty.
That said, if all else fails, we’ve still got Bonine and Armando (provided he’s healthy).
by SabreRoseTiger on Nov 8, 2009 10:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: starters
Duchscherer or Bedard would make me very VERY happy!
I guess I just feel like my dream of Mr Illitch opening up the wallet more is just that… A DREAM.
It’s hard to blame him though if the payroll does indeed not increase.
One of those two would indeed be nice!
by JAYRC on Nov 9, 2009 2:37 AM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
It’s all about cost. If he’s cheap, and it’s a 1-year deal, then yes, make a play for him. However, he’s not worth getting into a bidding war over. Bullpens are the toughest thing to predict and project and, because of that, should be built as cheaply as possible.
I’m talking something like 1 year, $1-2.5 mil MAX for Putz. His healthy is a question (his mechanics, if I recall correctly aren’t aiding in keeping him healthy) and because of his elbow/arm problems his velocity and K numbers are in their decline phase. I think any decent chunk of money spent on him will be lamented by about May, most likely.
And now at Beyond the Boxscore and Project Prospect!
by Mike Rogers on Nov 9, 2009 2:43 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
This sounds about right
We seem to forget the wave of bullpen arms coming from the 08 draft, so the ‘pen shouldn’t be a huge concern until our internal options fail us.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Nov 10, 2009 12:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Putz
But if it’s a decision between Putz or a 4th starter or a SP like Carl Pavano, or a SS like Orlando Cabrera… I’m not picking Putz!
A lifelong Tigers fan
by ewild on Nov 9, 2009 9:51 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 
















