Was Curtis Granderson a Victim of Bad Coaching?
Last week, we swapped posts with Pinstripe Alley, trying to get some local opinion on the players involved in the Curtis Granderson trade to the Yankees. (If you missed it, here's jscape2000's post about Austin Jackson and Phil Coke.)
In my post about Granderson, I mentioned my theory that Jim Leyland messed with Grandy's head early in the season by moving him down in the order to more of a run-producing spot. That seemed to get Granderson in a power-hitting mindset, and that stayed with him once he moved back to the leadoff spot.
That prompted Ed Valentine to share something he heard, that several inside the Tigers' organization think the problem wasn't Leyland, but rather with hitting coach Lloyd McClendon.
Valentine's source (we really have to get one of those here at BYB) added that Miguel Cabrera and Magglio Ordonez eventually refused to work with McClendon, following the lead of Placido Polanco. This lines up nicely with what Bill Ferris mentioned at The Detroit Tigers Weblog, about Granderson and several other Tigers hitters making the trek down to Toledo to work with Mud Hens' batting coach Leon Durham.
That prompts two obvious questions: 1) Why is McClendon still the hitting coach? And 2) Why isn't Durham in Detroit?
McClendon, according to Valentine's source, is Leyland's "buddy," which makes it sound as if he's in no danger of losing a spot on the coaching staff. And there have been rumblings that Durham's past keeps him from getting a position with a major league team. (Strange that Mark McGwire apparently doesn't encounter the same obstacles, though he's presumably innocent until proven guilty.)
But if one of the reasons Granderson was traded was because the Tigers didn't see him improving as a hitter (particularly against left-handed pitching), it's especially mind-blowing that they'd go for that option, rather than trying to "coach him up." (Granted, that may be oversimplifying the situation, as finances were another of the presumed reasons for making this deal.)
Perhaps that explains some of the spin ("Oh, Granderson was a flawed player!") that's been pushed out through the media in the past couple of weeks. IImplications of cronyism among Leyland's coaching staff are also quite troubling.
Of course, we'll know more if Granderson improves under Kevin Long's tutelage in New York. But ultimately, whether this is true or not, it makes a situation that's already been tough enough to digest among Tigers fans even more indigestible.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Leyland - McClendon - Lamont
We talked about how come mcclendon couldn’t help the hitters many times this past season. Players like Granderson, Inge, Thames, Clete, etc trying to pull everything for a 500 foot homerun instead of going with the pitch and hitting to all fields like Polanco, Cabrera, Maggs, Raburn, and Carlos.
The triumvirate in the subject heading, imo, will be gone after 2010. I look for Brookens to take over as manager and the Tigers will promote coaches like Leon Durham from their minor league teams.
A case similar to pitching coach chuck hernandez, just not meant to be put in a position to help players for lack of qualifications. The longer they are-were in the coaching positions, the more the outcome (players numbers) went south.
Can em all
Brookens in 2010 would be nice, though I would have liked Manny Acta this year. Have Durham serve as hitting coach and Brookens replace the rest of the staff.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
How can the front office let this crap happen?
When was the team going down to Toledo? 3 am? Or maybe that’s where Miggy really was during the Chicago series and the team created the domestic dispute story to cover up the embarrassment of their big leaguers going to their farm coaches.
yeah...
How do big league players get down to Toledo for instruction without someone making a story out of it?
My Music: new song up! (mp3 site isn't working, hopefully download available soon.)
My Blog: Inside A Head
Before we get too deep into the McClendon/Leyland bashing...
I feel I should point out that the Mud Hens hitters had much the same problems the Tigers did: striking out too much and stranding runners.
It's a system-wide problem
That being said, a coach like Durham can help players bust slumps (Ordonez, Polanco) or rework swings (like I still believe McClendon did with Inge). Yes, the plate discipline thing needs to be addressed, but the appropriate time to do so is at A or Hi-A, the front office (putting a premium on players that can take a walk in the draft) and quite possibly in a roving Minor League hitting instructor.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by David Tokarz on Dec 23, 2009 12:28 AM EST up reply actions
We must get over this...
Repeat after me:
“It will be okay.”
Again:
“It will be okay.”
Okay.
Relax. He’s gone. We sold high. It’s okay.
Sceptical . . .
It seems odd that a Yankee blogger has an inside source on the Tigers, who will tell him a story about what’s really going on with the team that no one else in the media knows.
Perhaps I didn't word it well
But the source isn’t “on” the Tigers.
by Ian Casselberry on Dec 22, 2009 8:59 PM EST up reply actions
"A source close to the Tigers" . . .
. . . is what Ed Valentine’s article says. Perhaps “on” the Tigers overstates his claim, but he’s plainly claiming to have an inside source, somebody in a position to observe first -hand the players’ interactions with McClendon.
He’s asking us to believe that not only does he have such a source, but that no one else has one—that his source “close to” the Tigers is better than anyone else’s—because no one else his reporting this story.
Allowing such a source to remain anonymous implies that the source has reason to fear retaliation if his identity as the source of the leak becomes known to the Tigers. Valentine publishing the article implies that his connection to the source is sufficiently obscure that the Tigers won’t figure it out—e.g., it’s not going to be the case that Valentine’s brother is a Tiger clubhouse attendant. So again, the question is, how did Valentine acquire a better source with the Tigers than anyone else?
I dont know Valentine's source
but I’m confident that at least some of his information is correct because I’ve heard similar rumblings from multiple sources.
As for why this hasn’t been brought up by the Tigers media, it could be a number of things. Mostly, this isn’t life and death stuff and probably isn’t worthy of an investigative journalism piece. The media is privy to a ton of information that you don’t read about. Secondly, no player is going to go on the record bashing his coach while the coach and player are on the same team. Without comments from players it doesn’t make for much of a news story. If McClendon would have been fired, this would have come to light.
my contention is this...
while it may not gather a national headline, it would probably be news worthy for just the Toledo area. Since we have some Toledo natives among us who frequent Mud Hens games, we probably would have heard this.
Am I completely disregarding the possibility? I’m trying not too. I’m trying to say that this scenario is extremely unlikely, especially when everything is news.
My Music: new song up! (mp3 site isn't working, hopefully download available soon.)
My Blog: Inside A Head
I've been saying
for the longest time that Lloyd should be gone. I find it sad that he’s still here and that Van Slyke was made the preverbial sacrificial lamb. Lloyd is still here because Leyland is still here. The only reason Hernandez got canned is because pitching sucked so bad in ’08 there was no one else to blame and even Jimmy knew that. Bring back Van Slyke keep Brookens and take it from there.
Really makes you wonder if the Andy Van Slyke spoke out against McClendon and that’s the reason he elected to “pursue other opportunities.”
My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.
Now I write at Bless You Boys.
Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.
Yeah, I just threw up in my mouth a little
by mich_n_trum84 on Dec 22, 2009 9:47 PM EST up reply actions
apparently a little was just the beginning, there was much more to follow, still queezy
by mich_n_trum84 on Dec 22, 2009 10:00 PM EST up reply actions
Could be worse
Could be a Red Sox uniform
by SabreRoseTiger on Dec 22, 2009 9:53 PM EST up reply actions
I loathe them both equally
Also I believe Grandy’s smiles are manufactured
by Detroitchik on Dec 22, 2009 10:18 PM EST up reply actions
Pinstripes . . .
. . . make poor Curtis look fat.
The more I think about it, the more I'm not really buying this
Something about it doesn’t make sense from a motive perspective. I haven’t quite put my finger on it yet, but I will if I put more thought into it.
Something doesn't add up
So Detroit found it easier to trade Granderson then it was to improve their hitting coach? Detroit doesn’t find it important to give their best players the best coaching (available to Detroit)?
This all seems odd. Either hitting coaches don’t really mean a lot, or I’m missing something. I can’t imagine where the team would allow Leyland’s loyalty to a coach allow them to put an inferior or less-prepared team on the field.
Or maybe the front office truly has lost its mind. I’m not discounting that possibility either.
www.tigergeist.com
Personally, I subscribe to the “hitting coaches don’t mean a lot” theory.
My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.
Now I write at Bless You Boys.
Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.
by Mike Rogers on Dec 22, 2009 10:23 PM EST up reply actions
I'm inclined to agree
(See my comment above regarding the Mud Hens hitters)
by SabreRoseTiger on Dec 22, 2009 11:04 PM EST up reply actions
I would too, except
Most of our starters were batting under .250 and I think that’s the area where a hitting coach is needed. Watch the slumping batter’s mechanics, change a couple things, simplify the game and watch the BA go up. Most of our starting lineup had pretty lousy numbers at the plate down the stretch, I’m sure that there was someone out in the baseball world that could have provided some useful nuggets for our guys to break out.
I chalk that up to most of the starters not being that good in terms of batting average, age, or a change in batted ball tendencies.
My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.
Now I write at Bless You Boys.
Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.
by Mike Rogers on Dec 23, 2009 12:08 AM EST up reply actions
Agree in part
I think hitting coaches can help at the margins, or with young players who haven’t developed, or with veterans like Inge looking to make a change. It’s an overall small impact, yes, but it’s still an impact.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by David Tokarz on Dec 23, 2009 12:30 AM EST up reply actions
I think Granderson's issues are all mechanical.
In several interviews he said he concentrates on OBP when leading off. The down-in-the-order theory seems to share the same premise as the home-run-derby theory, which doesn’t resonate much with me.
Maybe an established Tiger writer will read this McClendon rumor and do some investigating. It’s an interesting topic. Plus, the media loves a controversy.
Side thought: Could Granderson be part of a 1,000 run offense next year?
I'm not sure about this idea for a couple of reasons...
a) with all of the scrutiny of Maggs this season I can’t believe that we would not have learned about him ignoring the hitting coach (either before or after he turned it around)
b)I agree with Mike above. I don’t think the hitting coach makes that much of a difference. Reading quotes like this reinforce this my opinon: “I hate to say it, but a hitting coach is overrated,”— Derrek Lee.
c) There were a few signals that Granderson’s off-field accomplishments were not seen favorably by the Tigers’ brass. Leyland mentioned this earlier in the season and Al Kaline made a point of telling Jim Price on the day that Granderson received the Roberto Clemente award (of all days!).
I trust that DD traded Granderson on the high side. I don’t think a hitting coach will matter, but a manager that sits on Curtis and helps him to “focus” might make a huge difference with “my (ex) Tiger”
My thoughts here...
I think people are just looking for someone to blame at this point. Van Slyke may have gotten fired but it’s the hitting that got us into trouble and naturally the hitting coach is the guy to pit your pitch forks and torches at.
so maybe some facts: Lloyd McClendon was promoted to hitting coach in 2007. That year Curtis Granderson had his well known career year as a hitter. That year Magglio Ordonez also lead the league in batting average and doubles while smacking 28 home runs. Placido Polanco also had a very good year that season.
Back to Curtis: Following that 2007 season, Curtis batting average dropped in every following season but at the same time the amount of walks he took went up while his power numbers stayed stagnant for a season before spiking last season.
Other notable things on Lloyds tenure here: Both Polanco and Ordonez slumped at the beginning of the 2009 season. Each player managed to get their numbers back to being respectable.
These are all common facts, but worth remembering non the less. How likely is that a bad hitting coach got 3 players to have career years? How likely is it that big name ball players sneak down to Toledo for batting instruction without the media noticing? Isn’t it more likely that Curtis Granderson was maybe letting off field business be more important than the business giving him a paycheck?
If theres one person I think there is to blame for Curtis’ bad offensive year (which did include 30 home runs) it’s going to be Jim Leyland. Lloyd helps them swing the bat. His job does not extend off the field. Jims job is to make sure that his players are at their best physically and mentally for each and every game and that nothing is a distraction. Nobody wants to say “Curtis, stop being charitable.” But maybe something more should have been done by Jim.
(take note that I am among just a few people who actually like Jim Leylands methods. I’m unorthodox and I like that about him. But this is SOOOO not Lloyds burden to bear.)
My Music: new song up! (mp3 site isn't working, hopefully download available soon.)
My Blog: Inside A Head
Well said
And just so you know…I generally like Leyland too.
by SabreRoseTiger on Dec 22, 2009 11:46 PM EST up reply actions
Just for argument's sake:
If Polanco and Ordonez always ignored Lloyd (as what’s being alleged by the unnamed source), the hitting coach would have played no role in their career years. Speculating further, Granderson had developed a decent swing in the minors, used that swing during 2007, but he has since regressed due to McClendon’s tinkering.
I’m just rationalizing and trying to show correlation does not imply causation.
by StringTheory on Dec 23, 2009 12:14 AM EST up reply actions
Because there is that intangible, psychological, human element, it will be impossible to ever know for sure who is right
But you know what? That immeasurable element is what I love about baseball.
by SabreRoseTiger on Dec 23, 2009 12:20 AM EST up reply actions
by that very thought...
If Granderson essentially ignored Lloyd in 2007 during a career year….why would Curtis all of a sudden start listening to him in the years after?
My Music: new song up! (mp3 site isn't working, hopefully download available soon.)
My Blog: Inside A Head
If I've learned one thing from Ballbug...
It’s that Yankees bloggers consistently make up crap that, amazingly, never seems to end up panning out.
Mclendon should be gone!
Hitting is very difficult to teach,some say it’s an art,some say it’s technigue. Let’s just say it’s a combination of both. In both instances you need a coach who can spot your flaws and be diplamatically capable to get you to try his suggestions. As fans ,we can only hope there is always teaching going on , even in the majors. The question is, has the Tigers hitting improved or gotten worse since Legandary Lloyd arrived? I feel it’s the latter. I also think they could go outside the organization ,just like the pitching coach. Good hitting coaches are few an far between.
?
Why is Ian Casselberry’s comments are being deleted? lol
by Fien SHOULD CLOSE on Dec 24, 2009 11:45 PM EST up reply actions
Charlie Lau Made George Brett
and Lloyd MClendon DESTROYED the 2009 TIGERS!!!

by 
















