Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage Of New York's Victory Celebration

Justin Time? Verlander Signs

With 10 days to settle on a contract before going to arbitration, the Detroit Tigers and Justin Verlander took care of the most concerning item of business remaining before Spring Training was to begin in Lakeland.  Verlander agreed to a one-year, $3.675 million deal this afternoon, thus keeping Dave Dombrowski's streak of not going to arbitration with a player intact. 

Verlander was seeking $4.15 million, while the Tigers countered with a $3.2 million offer.  Meeting somewhere in the middle seemed like a reasonable assumption, if the two sides were to reach a settlement.  But Verlander's request was already pretty fair, considering what Cole Hamels and Zack Greinke recently signed for, so Detroit got him at a good price. 

Interestingly, the Tigers and Verlander did not discuss a long-term contract during these negotiations, and won't do so until after the 2009 season.  Over the last couple of years, one-year contracts with Fernando Rodney and Miguel Cabrera were precursors to longer deals signed weeks later.  Verlander is eligible for free agency after the 2011 season.

[Thanks once again to MSU4LIF for the headline suggestion.  He's becoming the go-to guy for catchiness.]

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Worth every penny if the old Justin shows up

Verlander has two fastballs, one around 91 to 93 m.p.h and another around 98 m.p.h to 100 m.p.h. That is very unique. This guy has basically two change ups, one at 92 m.p.h and one at 83 m.p.h. It is bothersome to watch a continue 95 m.p.h fastball during the whole game when he could do so much more. There can only be one Jack right?

by Barry2 on Feb 3, 2009 9:55 PM EST reply actions  

Barry

Considering what guys like Robertson and Willis have done to earn their money, I would say Verlander is worth every penny even if he only wins 11 games again.

by Todd1005fm on Feb 4, 2009 6:36 AM EST reply actions  

Todd

I never understand those contracts and you can throw Gary in their too. Why would the Tiger brass waste their payroll on #5 starters and a player that also get hurt a lot. This is a real crime that has happen, look at the free agency market. You might be able now to pick up Abreu for 8 million a year or Dunn for even less. This would help solve the left handed batting problem. Apparantly they did not learn anything from the 06 series. Tiger brass biggest problem is they fail to learn economics. They should have saw the U.S economy back in 07 was going to be in bad shape going forward and for sure saw the Michigan economy was in trouble. GM has been in trouble for years.

by Barry2 on Feb 4, 2009 8:59 AM EST reply actions  

Barry

I honestly didn’t have a problem with the Sheffield signing at the time; I understood what the Tigers were trying to do. But along the way, Sheff got hurt and has never been the same player. Now the Tigers have little choice but to keep him or release him and pay the bulk of his salary.

If the Tigers didn’t want to pay Verlander $4 million a year, I can’t see why they would be interested in Abreu or Dunn. Both probably have something left in the tank, but are definitely on the down sides of their careers. Would just end up being another Sheffield IMO.

by Todd1005fm on Feb 5, 2009 6:47 AM EST reply actions  

Todd

I never like Sheffield deal because they needed a left handed bat at that time and Sheffield always got hurt throughout his career. What I was saying about Dunn or Abreu is if didn’t have Gary on the payroll than they could offer one to two year contract to them.

by Barry2 on Feb 5, 2009 9:53 AM EST reply actions  

Barry

That’s a good point Barry, but would an Abreu or a Dunn be in place of Sheffield, or would you need to find a spot for them in an already crowded OF?

If Abreu and Dunn had been free agents at the same time that Sheffield signed, your point would be more valid. I guess I believe less in the whole righty vs lefty hitter for your lineup topic. If a guy can hit, a guy can hit, no matter the pitcher.

by Todd1005fm on Feb 6, 2009 8:57 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Quick Rules

Do:

  • Treat others like you'd like to be treated.
  • Stick to the topic being discussed.
  • Make arguments based on facts, not emotion.
Don't:
  • Confuse BYB with talk radio, your blog or your social networking web site of choice. We're a baseball community.
  • Feed the trolls.

Commenting Code of Conduct


Managing Editor

Dsc0178-l_small Kurt Mensching

Deputy Editors

Meatcomputer-1_small BigAl

Sparky_anderson_wall_small handsomerob1

5532934019_b5fa57ae98_small allikazoo

Contributors

Hpim0067_small Tigerdog1

6m2bts_small Melissa Heyboer

Moderators

Be050826_small NCDee

Sifl_and_olly_small 13194013