"There’s a pretty established track record that most pitchers need to climb each rung of the ladder as part of the developmental process. It’s pretty rare to see a pitcher successfully jump from High-A to the majors, less so when he’s as young as Porcello. Granted, Porcello is a rare talent, which might make it possible.
But that he’s such a rare talent also works against the notion of jumping him up. It’s not as if he’s some fungible pitching prospect that can be cast aside if it doesn’t work out. Not only is it remarkably hard to find someone with his talent, they’ve also invested a ton in him up front. Isn’t it worth the wait until he’s fully ready? I know that there’s a lot of pressure to win right now, but if I’m the Tigers, I’d rather he have Jack Morris’ career, and not Mark Fidyrich’s career (and yes, I know that’s an extreme example – there’s plenty of data points in between)."
RotoWire.com's Jeff Erickson, discussing Rick Porcello's accelerated development in a post from yesterday.
almost 3 years ago
Ian Casselberry
3 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I'm nervous too, but I don't know about the logic
I think he means to say that young age makes a successful early transition more rare, not “less so.”
If Porcello shows he can’t handle the bigs right now, I’m not sure it’s that big of a deal. It will hurt the the Tigers, but is there any evidence to suggest it would be devastating for a young pitcher? If he deserves to be demoted, he will be. But he certainly ought to be able to bounce back. And when he does, he’ll be promoted.
I understand Erickson’s point, and it’s the main argument that the anti-Porcello (well, anti-Porcello-right-now) contingency has made. After watching him today, I think he’s got the stuff to pitch in the majors. Friend of mine at work made a great point, in that Leyland didn’t exactly have his A-squad backing him up on the batting side of the equation. With the home opener tomorrow, I’ll excuse that. I’d like to see how Porcello performs with a better lineup behind him.


















