How the Tigers fail as a franchise
In years past (meaning under Sparky Anderson) you were assured that the Tigers would try their best, even if they didn't make the playoffs or not. Then you had all those years after Sparky left where the franchise was mis-managed and made to look ridiculous. Now today, we're assured of a team that can out to an early lead in their division a lot of the time.
So where does all the pessimism come from?
It seems fairly easy to me. What happens if the Twins should get a homestand while the Tigers go on a road trip? Or, better yet, if the Tigers have to play 3 games at Minnesota?
You might remember the three games the Tigers did play at Minnesota in May, all of which they lost. In that game, there were two blown saves from the bullpen followed by a reliever who lost the game outright. Granted that Willis did start the game, but Detroit didn't win the other games when he wasn't starting either. Check it out:
http://detroit.tigers.mlb.com/news/wrap.jsp?ymd=20090513&content_id=4700242&vkey=wrapup2005&fext=.jsp&team=away&c_id=det
But I'm not done. Here's further proof of how much the Tigers are in danger.
July 1, 2006 Record: 55-26
September 30, 2006 Record: 95-66
In Between Record: 30-40
July 1, 2007 Record: 47-33
September 30, 2007 Record: 88-74
In Between Record: 41-41
July 1, 2008 Record: 42-41
September 30, 2008 Record: 74-88
In Between Record: 32-47
Maybe you can tell me what cause there is for optimism? I don't see any. Is it that our bullpen is so much worse than last year? Is it that we can't nail down any good 4 or 5 starters? Is it that we simply can't play well on the road and constantly get outmatched in Minnesota?
Or wait, I know? How about spending all kinds of money for players to do nothing? I did some digging and this is what I found (2009 salaries):
Jeremy Bonderman- 12.5 million
Dontrelle Willis- 10 million
Nate Roberston- 7 million
Carlos Guillen- 10 million
Magglio Ordonez- 18.97 million
That's right, you guessed it! The Tigers are paying 58.47 million dollars to five players for them to do next to nothing or to sit on the DL. This figure is larger than the total salaries of three teams (Marlins, Padres and Pirates).
Without those contracts the Tigers would have a total team salary lower than...the Nationals.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Bless You Boys writing staff. However, it does reflect the views of this particular fan, which is as important as anything else written here at BYB.
0 recs |
180 comments
Comments
So ...
I guess I can conclude that you will no longer be following the Tigers this year? While I am trying to resist the temptation to outright blast you for this post I do want to add a thing or two. First, while this doesn’t completely follow your formula, in 2005 we started 50-50 and finished 20 games under .500. So your right to point out that we have trended towards having bad second halfs for four consecutive years. I don’t have an answer for this except to point out that it’s a new year. You also forgot that we are paying 14 million for Shef so almost half of this team’s payroll is going toward virtually nothing. That is embarassing.
So, let’s look at how the Tigers succeed as a franchise. We have a ton of young players we are rotating in and out of the roster with varying success. I think our bullpen improved this week with Dolsi and Fu getting called up. Perry is still a possibility to help as well if he can start throwing strikes again in AAA. Maggs is still capable of getting hot and we should find out before the All- Star break if Gullien will be contributing anymore this season. Are defense is solid. JV, Jackson, and Porcello have not only been great this year but they provide a great young core for our rotation. And, oh yeah, WE ARE IN FIRST PLACE! We currently have a 4 game lead and this was a year that many thought we would not be competitive. We also have a great fan base and regardless of how this ends there is no reason for any Tiger fan not to be enjoying this season. Have there been bad and even ridiculus moments (15 runs walked in!) but despite all that we are in first place and so far this baseball team I would argue that no team has established itself as being great. If we collapse in the second half again then so be it. I see a lot of things that this team can build around and those bad contracts will eventually go away.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 1:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You’re right, I did forget about Sheffield, which makes the case even worse. But I’m going to continue hoping that the Tigers can turn things around, despite all the evidence that seems to suggest they won’t.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ummmm
I really don’t want to rip you on this because clearly there are some embarassing things surrounding this team … but when your write that you are "going to continue hoping the the Tigers can turn things around " What are you refering too? This isn’t the Lions. The Tigers have been atleast relevant if not competitive for 4 consecutive years. They are currently in first place. They have 3 quality young pitchers in the rotation. They have a superstar at first base who is 26 years old. Grandy is only 28. We have seen a number of young players this year that have shown the potential to be quality major leaguers one day. This isn’t the Lions. The Tigers are trending in the right direction. I am not sure what else there is to say about it.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not really convinced...
You guys are going to have to come up with something better than “we’re in first place, so don’t complain.”
-We’ve got a General Manager who is spending ludicrous amounts of money on nothing.
-We’ve got a manager in Leyland who hasn’t won a division since 1992.
-We’ve got (as a team) a history of failing in the second half.
Well, maybe you can tell me what young hitter is coming up out of the system that’s worth taking a look at? Nobody seems good enough to have won a starting job every day. It’s just a constant platoon for players who wouldn’t make the grade if they had to start 140 games a year.
I’ll be the first person to eat my share of crow if history doesn’t repeat itself. But (so far), there’s nothing that convinces me this will be the case.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 2:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Winter
Do me a favor and summarize your thoughts by choosing one of the following statements:
“I am enjoying these seasons for what it is regardless of if this team makes the playoff”
or
“This season is lost! We need to blow up this team and start from scratch”
I don’t expect either statement to be a perfect representation of your opinion but I am curious as to which one you would choose.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 3:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I suppose...
I think I’m tending towards the second opinion. I like the starting rotation, I think the bullpen is ridiculously bad and there are only three or four guys in the lineup that I’d want to keep.
However, if it turns out that I’m wrong, I’ll be more than glad to apologize. It’s just that….the evidence seems to point towards this Tigers team slumping a lot in the second half and failing to make the playoffs yet again.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I feel like I have been respectful throughout this post
but if that’s true then go root for a different team. Seriously, I am aware of the trends even more so than you (considering you left out 2005). I am aware of the bad contracts even more so than you (considering you left out Shef). I can’t believe you would knock Leyland for having not won a division since 1992. That’s true, but I bet there are plenty of managers who would like to say that they have been to 2 world series since then and won one. As for the GM, name me one GM in baseball who hasn’t taken on a bad contract. Are you aware of how much Barry Zito or Alfonso Soriano is making? You started this whole post by saying the Tigers fail as a franchise. Really? What is the level they need to acheive to not fail? It seems to me like you might be more comfortable being a Yankee fan if you would prefer to see this year’s team blown up as opposed to enjoying watching a competitive team who is in first place and watching young players mature and feeling like there is a strong core of guys under 30 to build around.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's very simple really...
The Tigers need to go and win the division this year. No second-half slump, no excuses of “oh we’ll do better next year” which is just about what I’ve heard for the longest time. I’ve been following this franchise for a long time and they were really like the Detroit Lions for a number of years and then Alan Trammell comes along only to inherit a team that was being burdened by money having been paid to people who did nothing (ie, Bobby Higginson). Then Leyland comes along and it’s happy city, this is finally a team that’s figured it out right? Well, maybe not so much.
There are some good young players on the team, but the reality of it is that some of the Tigers best players of the last few years have come from other organizations (ie, Jackson, Cabrera, Ordonez, Pudge, etc). I like Verlander and Porcello, I think there’s a huge upside there. But it doesn’t mean much if there’s nobody in the bullpen that can be counted on to hold a lead. This seems even more frustrating to me when the Tigers could still have Tim Byrdak, Aquilino Lopez and one or two others. Instead, the decision was made to keep Dontrelle Willis, to keep Nate Robertson and take on Brandon Lyon, who appears to be a mop-up guy at best.
I don’t like the Yankees and never will. I think they’re a horrible franchise that would never succeed if they didn’t have all that money to spend. Conversely, I think the Tigers have been mismanaged and would being a lot better if all that money that’s been sunk into their useless players could go elsewhere to a few players who would make an active difference on this team (ie, Torii Hunter, Trevor Hoffman, and so on).
The desire of the young talent to suceed and their eagerness to win is what drives this franchise. It certainly isn’t the decisions that come down from the front office as far as who to keep and who to let go.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait
the Tigers fail as a franchise because some guys got injured?
by MackAveKurt on Jun 28, 2009 5:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That and because of some fluky statistical trends
Come on Kurt, get on the ball!
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jun 28, 2009 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nope
Nate Robertson and Dontrelle Willis are on the DL because they both haven’t been pitching well. Guys get “injured” because they struggle in the major league level so then they go put some time in the minor league level to get things straightened out. Carlos Guillen is the only guy I know of that’s legit injured. Bonderman was put back on the DL because they didn’t think he’s ready.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because Bonderman was RECOVERING FROM AN INJURY!
Kind of like what happened to Placido Polanco in August of 2006. Don’t suppose losing your second baseman is good for a team, do you?
Or maybe Bonderman’s and Rogers’ elbow problems in 2007?
I gotta tell you, you didn’t gain a lot of credibility by ignoring those things altogether.
by MackAveKurt on Jun 28, 2009 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well now
If I wanted people to like me, I never would have posted this to begin with. I really could care less what some people I’ve never met think about my opinions.
I don’t know if blaming the player’s injuries on the overall slump of a team in the second half every year really accounts for everything. Okay, so why was Nate Robertson given a ton of money. And what about Willis? How do you account for Brandon Lyon making the team despite giving up 4 HR that one game in spring training?
There are deeper issues at work here than just a few people getting hurt. As you may have noticed, we don’t have Bonderman this year. Just the same, everyone has not allowed me to forget we’re in first place. How is it that didn’t happen in 2006 or 2007?
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"I really could care less what some people I’ve never met think about my opinions."
Then what is the purpose of this thread?
by Tagne13 on Jun 28, 2009 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because apparently he does care...
And wants to have his word heard, which might not always be the case.
Bonderman and Robertson’s DL stints are for apparent non-injuries. I didn’t know having surgery to remove a blood clot and to remove a cyst, are no longer legit injuries. Did you ever think that the cyst in Robertson’s elbow could be the reason he has pitched so poorly? Nate stated that he’s felt numbness from his elbow all the way through to his ring finger. I’m not doctor or trainer, but I think that would effect your grip on the ball.
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ummm
How do the Tigers fail as a franchise? The Tigers have one of the better front offices in baseball that has drafted quality players in the last 4-5 seasons and turned down deals that other teams have foolishly made. Sure, there have been questionable deals made (Renteria for Jurrjens and Gorkys) but at least there weren’t overly stupid deals made (Soriano for Jurrjens and Maybin only to see Soriano subsequently leave and sign in Chicago).
The contracts you reference were offered years ago, and the only truly questionable deal is Willis. My assumption of Willis’ extension was to buy out his arbitration years at a rate cheaper than a re-vamped Willis would earn in arbitration (which is why Florida dumped him to begin with).
Nate Robertson’s contract is questionable but he had come off a solid 2006 season in which Leyland ran him out there as the Game 1 pitchers in the ALDS and ALCS. It’s hard finding quality left handed pitchers and when you do, you pay them. $7m isn’t exactly breaking the bank, it just seems like it is now.
Bonderman’s contract is a no brainer. 24-25 year old guy without a history of injuries at the time, near the top of the AL in strikeouts, on his way to becoming a top of the rotation guy for years to come… you gotta pay him or he leaves.
Magglio’s contract was signed years ago and every year he’s been worth it until this year. The incentives are stupid but the Tigers offered it so they have to pay for them if he reaches them.
Guillen has earned his contract every year as well until this season. Considering he was a SS at the time he signed his deal, his extension was worth it. The guy has hit all over our lineup and driven in timely runs for this team since being acquired.
Detroit is not a failure of a franchise. They don’t go out and hand blank checks to guys (Pavano) just to sign a name. Renteria wasn’t really a bad deal if he would’ve produced at his 2007 numbers. Detroit needed a SS since Guillen could no longer play the position.
Obviously not winning 100 games a year and signing free agents who 70 games into the season make your hindsight kick in and say “damn we could’ve had Torii Hunter and his 17 homeruns if Detroit would’ve signed him” even though Granderson is only 28 and this team’s centerfielder.
Trevor Hoffman? please.
The only guy I wish this team would’ve acquired was Mark DeRosa, but the team needs a left handed bat. Every team needs a solid left handed bat, so a left handed hitter is expensive.
All teams make questionable moves and trades, and Detroit is no different. The good thing is, year in and year out the teams makes good picks in the draft and is not afraid of signability which a lot of teams are. This offseason was one of the best in recent history by acquiring “glue” guys and going to back to basics. Last year they tried to outhit everyone and obviously that didn’t work.
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 5:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Apparently...
You didn’t realize that Trevor Hoffman was an example. He wasn’t the only closer on the market in the off-season. But I guess a guy with a 1.99 ERA this year and 571 career saves wouldn’t be valuable to a team trying to make a playoff right?
This year’s off-season may or may have been good, but the point is this franchise has been bogged down for bad decisions going back many years.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ask Brewers fans how they feel about Hoffman right at the moment
His outings have been as exciting as Zumaya’s lately…
And if you want to talk about closers and allow me to focus the window in on hand picked stats that bolster my case, let me just point out that Fernando Rodney’s ERA in save situations is somewhere around 1.00
oh, and 95-55 = 40, rather than the 30 stated in reference to the last few months of 2006. .500 baseball isn’t great, but it’s better than .420 baseball.
Official BYB Juju Consultant...now accepting rally creature applications!
by ahtrap on Jun 28, 2009 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if I trust Rodney
Rodney has been a good closer, that’s true. But what we need more than anything else is a middle reliever. I think if you look at it that way, then it’s a little baffling why Lyon was the best this franchise came up with.
Hopefully Fu Te-Ni turns out to be a good player, because I’m a little nervous about this team’s ability to keep a lead over the long term.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lyon was the best this franchise could come up with?
You’re not upset that they didn’t sign Kerry Wood though right?
because they apparently wanted Kerry Wood as well, or did you forget to read that article? Do you also realize that free agents are specific “types” as well, so if Wood is considered a “Type A” you lose draft picks? So let’s say this is 2007, you’d give up Porcello’s potential for Trevor Hoffman and his 571 career saves? I bet you would.
get bent. Hindsight is 20/20 and if Dombrowski had a time machine he’d go back and keep Jurrjens and not sign Willis to his extension.
In the mean time, learn a thing or 2 about the value of players and the positions they play. Read up on contracts for young players and how teams like the Marlins trade players before they hit arbitration to keep salaries low (Cabrera) or trade players because they know they’re going to lose them while packaging them with high salaries (Beckett and Lowell)
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know what
I hated Lyon too at first but in his last 10 appearences he has pitched 13 1/3 innings, given up 1 earned run walked 4 and recorded 10 strikeouts. That’s good enough that I no longer run for the antiacid tablets when he comes in. I too hope Ni can give some quality innings but if you look at Lyons most recent outings and then look at what Kerry Wood is doing for the Indians or JJ Putz for the Mets, or how about the entire bullpen that the Cubs overhauled I thinks easy to see that we did not make the worst bullpen moves this offseason.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Correct me, please, if I am worng...
But, Winter, if Rodney is so bad as a closer, than why is he the only closer in baseball to have not blown a save yet this year?
I bet you’d rather have Jose Valverde, whose is 6/10 in save opps.
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trevor Hoffman
From what I remember, the Tigers were one of the teams interested in signing Hoffman.
Coming off of a year where his homeruns given up inflated, and his innings and games pitched went down. His era went up while his save totals went down… I’m glad Detroit didn’t overspend to get another guy on the tail end of his career to come in a close out games who also hasn’t been healthy the full year.
It’s not about how many career saves the guy has, it’s about his ability to pitch. Torii Hunter, another one of your prime examples, plays Centerfield at or near a gold glove level. Granderson, our centerfielder, plays at a gold glove level. Why would Hunter want to sign in Detroit if the position he’s in is filled? Why would Granderson want to RE-SIGN or EXTEND his deal after giving up his position for a player who is 4 years older than he is?
You win some and you lose some. The Tigers have won more recently than they’ve lost.
It’s unfortunate when the team starts to become successful and the bandwagoners (which apparently you are one) jump on and cry about how the team can’t stay successful year in and year out. The front office makes mistakes, it’s not the failure of the franchise. Teams sign guys all the time that play under the value of their deal but Ivan Rodriguez and Magglio signed here when guys didn’t want to play in Detroit, so they had to overpay. Now that the team is successful somewhat, they can lure others here as well.
Be grateful that the team still has a solid base of homegrown talent and a scouting department that’s heralded as one of the best in the game. For a team that does not go out of it’s way to sign japanese or dominican talent at 16, they sure as hell pick a lot of can’t miss guys who seem to make a more immediate impact than most teams (Porcello, Verlander, Zumaya, Perry, etc). Once they can scout hitting, it’ll be all over for the rest of the American League Central.
The team would’ve never made it to the World Series in 2006 had Juan Gonzalez signed the contract that was offered to him in 2000. Had he signed that contract, you wouldn’t be here bitching about the franchise because you wouldn’t be a fan and half of the other clowns like you would be Yankee fans or Red Sox fans still.
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another thing on Hoffman
perhaps I am wrong, but I remember seeing something from him suggesting that he did not want to come to Detroit. I also don’t blame DD for not wanting to take another chance on a Troy Percival type. I never killed DD for the Percival deal because I believed it was more of statement about the teams willingness to try and win than it was about receiving quality production. It ended up being a bad deal but not bad enough that it would prevent us from making a run to the World Series the following year.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was wondering
how Angels fans will feel when Torri Hunter gets to year 5 of the 90 million dollar deal he signed. Probably about the same way Winter feels about Maggs. Seriously Boney, while I agree with every word in your post I am content to accept that this guy doesn’t get it. There are some fans out there that believe there is some magic wizard out there that we can get who will never sign a guy to a bad contract, will never make a bad trade and will put together a team that wins 100 games every year because it’s so easy. And as far as Maggs goes, in ’06 he hit the home run that sent us to the World Series, ’07 he finished second in the MVP voting and ’08 he hit .317 w/ 21 hrs and 103 RBI. Clearly after a bad start to ’09 DD should have known better than to ever sign him.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As they get older then....
It’s really about a lack of foresight on the part of the Tigers managment.
Do you expect a 35-year old outfielder to hit the same way he did when he was 25? Then why give him a long contract or an increasing amount of money as you go?
And, I’ll mention some of the other bonehead moves that Dumbrowski has made since the 2006 season.
-Trading away Jair Jurrjens and Omar Infante for Edgar Renteria
-Trading Ivan Rodriguez for Kyle Farnsworth
-Not re-signing Aquilino Lopez
-Signing Brandon Lyon in the first place
-Accepting Dontrelle Willis as part of the Cabrera trade.
The way I see it, this franchise has lost more than it has gained from Dumbrowski’s deals. Miguel Cabrera and Edwin Jackson are great players, but you need more than two guys to make it work. It’s been clear for years that the biggest weak point of the Detroit team has been its bullpen and that continues to unaddressed. I’m not sure if bringing up people from the minors is the right solution. I hope so, but I’m doubtful.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Omar Infante was traded (to the Cubs) for Jacque Jones because the Tigers needed a left handed bat. What has Infante done? Well he went from the Cubs to the Braves for table scraps…
Jair Jurrjens and Gorkys Hernandez were traded for Edgar Renteria (who contended for a batting title in 2007).
Pudge Rodriguez for Farnsworth was a wash. Pudge did NOTHING for the Yankees, and they both had expiring contracts.
Aquilino Lopez? lol who’s he pitching for this year? The only reason his ERA wasn’t higher than 3.55 last year was because he gave up runs to baserunners he inherited.
Brandon Lyon? Here’s a guy who has had seasons where he saved 27 and 35 games. He has pitched better of late.
And accepting Willis in the Cabrera deal.. if you really understood how trades worked you would know that there was likely a 99% chance that any team acquiring Cabrera had to take Willis because the Marlins wanted to dump his salary just like they did with Mike Lowell in the Beckett deal.
Perhaps you should stick to the Pittsburgh Pirates, and their fantastic franchise.
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Steroid and all...
…it’s still rather difficult to hit a baseball, regardless of the amount of steroids you take, but didn’t Barry Bonds perform better after he turned 35?
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're a freaking idiot
Brandon Lyon has put up an ERA+ of 115 and has been one of our best relievers this year. Dontrelle Willis suffered at the hands of the horrible Marlins defense in 2007, and nobody could have called his breakdown. Dombrowski was praised for resigning Robertson and Bonderman to the contracts that he did because at the time he was beating the going rates for free agent #3 and #2 starters respectfully. Lopez overperformed last year- note how he doesn’t have a job this year. Think there’s a reason for that?
As far as Jurrjens /Hernandez- nobody knew that Jurrjens could perform as well as he has- I’m a prospect guy and it boggled my mind. So he screwed up once. And Pudge-Farns was just bad all around.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jun 28, 2009 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is a guy out there...
…and he’s 12 yrs old and playing his xbox360. That GM, will never make a bad move that he can’t get out of.
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Other side of things
Why not praise the management for getting us an AMAZING 2nd starter in Edwin Jackson.
How about Miguel Cabrera? He’s having a great season this year, and had a so/so season last year(bad at first, great at the end).
IMO Adam Everett has been a good fill in SS, and I think he’s worth having on the team. He hits OK for a 9th hitter, and is a good fielder.
Bonderman’s career is not over. I still have faith that he will be a starting pitcher for us in the future. Everyone knew long ago that the blood clot would require a lot of time to heal. So what, he needs more time, and being in 1st place with a decent lead allows us to give him more time to get into big league shape again. He had…3?(correct me if I’m wrong) starts in the minors before being moved up. I don’t consider that enough time to get ready to pitch against the best hitters in the world.
Magglio Ordonez has been great every year before this year.
Nate Robertson has never been the best pitcher, but IIRC he was .500 last season. I would take .500 from a 5th starter.
Last but not least, I give you the other side of the contracts, Brandon Inge. He has been amazing this year hitting for power(and hit a game winning homer today). He’s still the gold glove 3rd baseman, and he was given a big contract. Guess what? He’s improving.
by actioncuse on Jun 28, 2009 6:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Inge is lucky he's hitting
otherwise Winter would say he’s overpaid as well
Inge has been “overpaid” according to his standards every year of his recent extension until now…
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's about defense, you know?
Inge has always been a great defender. And not only could he play third, he could also play outfield and catcher. He made up for not hitting with his defense in the field.
To make a comparison, Rick Dempsey was an Orioles catcher for many years, never did anything offensively, but because he was good behind the plate, they kept him on the team. It’s entirely possible to win with pitching and defense, after all.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
According to Winter Inge may be underpaid. If I am following his logic, contracts are only judged on current production and circumstances that were around at the time the deal was signed do not apply.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 6:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And yet?
Isn’t it possible to restructure a deal based on a player’s current performance and give them more money if you want?
Anyways, whatever a player gets paid is fine, just as long as they produce. You can pay a guy 20 million dollars a year and if they’re a good player for your team, it’s worth it. On the other hand, if you pay a guy 4 million dollars and he does nothing, then it’s costing you too much.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
umm
it’s not football
You can extend a deal, but since the contracts are guaranteed you can’t just re-structure a deal. Only way to re-structure is if the player takes deferred money rather than all up front.
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and
according to you “re-structuring” or extending a deal to a player who is playing his position well and “producing” didn’t work out in Carlos Guillen’s case…
a shortstop who drives in 100 a year… not worth $10+ million? I’d like the see the roster of your franchise
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can have Guillen
I personally don’t want a left-fielder who is constantly injured and can’t play the infield anymore because of his mounting injuries. I’m just as happy with Adam Everett right now.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can have Guillen?
My team HAS Guillen.
Guillen wasn’t a left fielder until this year. Guillen has always been an infielder, whether it be first base, shortstop (primarily in Detroit) or third base (last season).
Guillen’s contract is because of his hitting ability and the position that he played at the time. Sure, Dombrowski could’ve said “you know Guillen, we dont want to extend you 4 years because you’re not going to play SS all 4” but he likely said “this guy’s versatile enough to where we can move him around and keep his bat in the lineup”.
Guillen doesn’t play shortstop anymore but when he did, he played (and hit) at an all star level.
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well that's fine but....
If he’s not a shortstop, don’t call him one you know?
And I guess he could have made a good DH, but healthy players are surely better than injured ones.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he was when he signed his freaking contract you dolt
when he signed his deal, he was one of the top SS in the American League. An ALL Star who batted in the middle of the lineup and hit .300 and drove in 80-100 a year.
You don’t get that from most of the shortstops in the league. You don’t think he would get $10m+ on the free agent market?
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do you have players in mind
Obviously what you say is true, who are thinking of?
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No one in particular
I wasn’t thinking of anyone really.
It’s just that good players, you can’t pay them enough. Bad players, you’re always giving them too much.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why
long ago the players association negoitated for and got guaranteed contracts. So if a player “earned” a contract that paid “X” number of dollars per year and then got hurt or otherwise just saw his production decrease he still gets paid. No need to debate whether that is right or wrong (the flip side of this is NFL players getting cut without warning and losing out on millions whether it’s fair or not). The point is you are holding DD accountable and calling this franchise a failure for some contracts that look bad right now. Contracts that look bad because players are either hurt (Gullien, Bondo) or are not prodcutive this year after 3 great years (Maggs). As mentioned above the team made some smart moves this off-season. Jackson was a great pick up, Everett and Laird have sured up the defense. I still like the Anderson move as well. So why again is this franchise such losers?
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So you don't understand yet?
When you come right down to it, Bonderman was not anybody’s ace. He was always hittable and his saving grace was that he could work out of jams. At best, he was a 3 or 4 starter.
There’s really no way to predict if a player is going to have a complete off-year like Magglio did, but on the other hand, I can’t see my way into paying a player that old that much money. 25 to 30 year olds should get the most money. If you’re a veteran, then you don’t get as much. That’s how you ensure that the most money goes to the players with the most capability of helping the team.
I would say the bottom line is, if you’re paying 110 million+ on a team and they can’t even the division for you, then something’s wrong.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
both the Tigers and White Soxes are spending 100+ million plus. The Red Sox and Yankees are spending even more. So how do we look at that.
And as for Maggs, lets go back to 2004, Maggs blew out his knee and while most people said he would make a full recovery teams seemed to be avoiding him. This was also a time when guys were getting incredible contracts. Carlos Beltran got 119 million. Adrian Beltre got a ridiculous contract. I believe we overpaid for Maggs but I also believe that it was necessary considering that at the time we were 17 years removed from making the playoffs. Maggs hit above .300 in ‘05 while missing a large portion of the season on the DL. He has had 3 great years since. He may still have something left in the tank but only time will tell on that. If he continues to struggle and the team benches him so they don’t have to pick his option than so be it. But I can’t believe a Tiger fan could say that it was a bad deal.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay...
The White Sox are failing as a franchise right now, same as the Yankees. Too much money plugged into old players while the real contributions come from the young guys. I certainly wouldn’t want Jim Thome on my team, 500 home runs or not.
If it would have meant that the Tigers would have been on top of the division every year without Magglio, then that’s what I would have had.
The only thing to hope for now is that he (at some point) recovers the form he once had and gives the team some production in exchange for all the money he’s getting.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why wouldn't you want Thome on your team?
he has double digit homers, solid on base percentage and a respectable batting average?
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Umm
Because I don’t know baseball
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thome right?
The guy who hit .245 last year, is hitting .244 this year and is a 39 year old left-handed hitter?
I bet the White Sox could do better if they tried. Thome certainly isn’t helping them win games, I can say that.
What good is it if you have a guy hitting 30 HR on your team and you don’t win the division?
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thome's not helpin them win games?
He doesn’t hit walkoff homeruns or cause opposing managers to get a lefty up in the pen before he wants to take his starter out?
He doesn’t make a general manager say “jesus, I may need to trade a good hitting minor leaguer for JP Howell just so I have a guy to pitch to left handed power”??
wow… amazing
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lefties
If you don’t have a left-handed reliever that can get lefties out then you’re in trouble, no matter what team you’re facing.
Thome will keep plugging away and hitting his dingers, but the bottom line is, all that money the franchise is giving him could have been invested in a starter, which is a more pressing need for the White Sox right now.
I’m doubtful that the White Sox will finish either in first or get the Wild Card this year. And if you look at it that way, then keeping Thome was a bust. At least from the standpoint of wins and losses.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jim Thome was traded to the White Sox along with $22 million dollars
the White Sox are paying virtually nothing for a left handed hitter that will hit 30+ homers in the middle of their lineup.
Listen to the talent the Sox gave up to the Phillies to get Thome:
Rowand (he’s in San Fran now)
Gio Gonzalez (he’s in Oakland now)
Daniel Haigwood?
I’d say getting a guy who will hit 30+ homers in your lineup for 3 guys who are no longer with the team you traded them to, along with getting $22 million to pay for him is a good deal.
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rowand!
I’d rather have Rowand, thanks. But….if that was the case, Posednik wouldn’t have been able to come back. :(
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if Winter is coming back to this
frankly I don’t blame him if he doesn’t, but how is does this guy kill the White Soxes for having Thome and then later kill the TIgers for not keeping Pena. Aren’t they basicly the same guy except Thome walks more?
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He kills about Pena
but doesn’t kill the Red Sox or the Yankees for the same mistake
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You'd rather have Rowand?
Rowand hits for absolutely no power, and is not a middle of the order presence.
I’d do this trade 9 out of 10 times in the same circumstance.
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The year Thome was traded for he OPS'd
1.014. He likes Chicago wants to retire there and with the current economy will likely sign a cheap contract next season to stay.
And if you think a starter is the White Sox most pressing need you haven’t really paid attention to your division rivals.
"I'm just here to provide street cred and a rosy outlook"- translation - unemployed life coach
by Tdogg on Jun 28, 2009 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is this a serious post?
A guy whose lowest OPS is .865 in 4 years and is .905 this year is not helping them win games?
"I'm just here to provide street cred and a rosy outlook"- translation - unemployed life coach
by Tdogg on Jun 28, 2009 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ummm....who won the AL Central last year????
oh yeah, the White Sox….White Sox have a World Series championship and at least two division titles in the last 5 years…how is it that they’re failing, exactly? just because they’re having a down year now? If either Jake Peavy or Roy Oswalt would have acquiesced to being traded to Chicago, they would have been instantly catapulted to favorite status for taking the division again….
Official BYB Juju Consultant...now accepting rally creature applications!
by ahtrap on Jun 29, 2009 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Bondo
Was worth the money. In case you haven’t noticed, #1 and #2 starters in MLB make 15 million plus. Bondo was given a deal that paid him roughly 10 million per at a time when many believed he could be a nice number two or three behind Verlander. I challenge you to find anyone who killed this deal when it was signed.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You had to give Magglio a contract
he would accept. When Maggs signed, nobody wanted to be a Tiger. You had to give he and Scot Boras the deal they wanted to get him in a Tigers uniform. When you examine a contract, you have to look at total production and total length, not just the value of any player on any given year. If you’re going to call a contract bad, it has to be a player who’s never performed up to his deal, ala Willis, not a player who played up to the deal for three years and has now dropped off in production. I’m sure, if Dombrowski has the choice, he’d have given Maggs a shorter deal for less money. He didn’t have that option, though. Why not base a contract’s value on how a player did that day, huh? Miguel Cabrera went 0-4 today. He even grounded into a double play. Based on today, the Cabrera contract is the worst one in baseball history, bar none, right? What’s that, you say? We’re basing the quality of his contract on it’s whole length, and not any given day? Then why is saying Maggs was a bad signing when based on one year any different?
by Trysdor on Jun 28, 2009 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think I explained already didn't I?
You can’t expect to throw money at aging players and win as a franchise. It should be obvious watching the Yankees stay at home in October or constantly get eliminated in the divisional rounds that their formula isn’t working. The older you get, the less money you should make.
I mean, really, we’re talking millions of dollars here. These players aren’t going to starve if they get a pay cut. What are they going to complain about if they don’t have as much money? That they can’t buy that country they had their eyes on?
Ryan Raburn makes around 400k a year, and that seems like a ton to me.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Detroit doesn't throw money at aging players
What aging players has Detroit thrown money at?
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Donald Fehr just retired
Call the MLB players union up. I’m sure they’d love to make you their head.
by Trysdor on Jun 28, 2009 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The older you get, the less money you should be making?
Since you believe that to be the case and that your production decreases as you get older, please walk into you bosses office tomorrow and tell him that you’d like to make less money (since I believe after reading your posts, that you are an older person) because you are older and your production isn’t what it was when you were younger.
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it's easy to understand
from the AP:
" One of baseball’s most promising young pitchers, Bonderman agreed to a $38 million, four-year contract on Monday — passing up a chance to become a free agent after the 2008 season.
“They gave me a good offer that will make my family comfortable,” Bonderman told The Associated Press. “We had a lot of success this year and I get along with all the players and the coaching staff, so this wasn’t that hard of a call for me.”
It’s easy to see a trend in Bonderman’s statistics that show his gradual improvement from his rookie year in 2003 (2 years removed from high school) until when he signed his extension.
It’s easy for a fan of a team that doesn’t like the Tigers to say “well, you know he’s nothing more than a 3 or 4 starter on other teams”. To say that this guy wouldn’t have gotten big money as a free agent is just stupid. Stats don’t lie, and his ERA went down, homeruns against went down, losses went down and strikeouts jumped in the 3 years prior to signing his extension. He is 26 years old dude.
Do you know anything about baseball, or the economics of it?
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again, you're a freaking idiot
Bonderman was a legitimate #2 in 2006, and in 2007 almost earned a trip to the All Star game. Forget that?
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jun 28, 2009 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Should have been an All Star in '05
But freaking Terry Francona added Matt Clement instead.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Winter
Are you sure your a Tiger fan?
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 7:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You know,
I’m really questioning whether am I or not anymore. Is this a team I want to follow? Is this a team worth following? I’ve got a lot of doubts.
I guess this year will determine whether I keep following the team or not, because if another second half slump is on the way, I might just give up.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll answer the question for you
you aren’t.
by Trysdor on Jun 28, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If that's what it means...
If being a Tiger fan means I follow everything blindly and believe in the team despite the fact they constantly present evidence that they cannot be believed in, then yes, that disqualifies me as a Tiger fan.
However, you can’t deny that this franchise is bogged down in paying tons of money to players who aren’t perfoming and many of the moves this GM has made for us simply haven’t worked out. Not all, but enough anyways.
If you want to defend your team no matter what happens, that’s fine. But I don’t see the point in defending a team that goes against all common sense this much.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Being a fan means not saying things like
“if they have a midseason slump or a down year, I’m done with them, they’re not worthy of my time.” That’s the exact opposite of being a fan.
by Trysdor on Jun 28, 2009 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's the point?
They’ve had a second half slump since forever now. Can you tell me why I should invest my time in a team that doesn’t go anywhere? Sentimentalism, perhaps? I’ve followed the Tigers for a long time now, but I feel I’m at the end of my rope with the way this franchise is currently being handled. It just doesn’t mean as much to say, “Let’s wait for next year” when next year is no better than the one previous.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nobody's forcing you to do anything
The Tigers slumping in the 2nd half has almost become a Detroit tradition…
Pistons losing in the Conference Finals…
Lions losing on Thanksgiving…
Red Wings winning the Cup…
Tigers playing below average in the 2nd half…
Be at the end of your rope all you want… but get there soon, so I have a chance to move up 1 spot in line to get tickets during a potential postseason run
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
None of us here follow our team blindly
We have countered arguments with you, yet you have no responses for anything you say other than “well, you know 100 million a year you know your team should be winning”.
The Yankees aren’t failing as a franchise, they have a brand new stadium they sign all the free agents they want they have talent in the minors. You know who’s failing as a franchise?
Baltimore
Pittsburgh
Washington
Colorado
Kansas City
Oakland
White Sox
Toronto
Reds
Brewers (for giving up way too much talent for 1 year rentals)
Padres
Indians
Seattle
anyone else? Compared to these clowns listed above, Detroit is run like a well oiled machine. At least we don’t have to worry about whether we can sign the draft picks we actually WANT (unlike Pittsburgh drafting a catcher who nobody had pegged for a 1st rounder)
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mostly...
What I see isn’t countering but you guys saying “Oh you know nothing,” “You’re not a fan”…
Most of which doesn’t make sense. Don’t imagine that just because you make 5 responses every ten minutes that I have to reply to them all.
Even ignoring all those other franchises that aren’t doing so well (and I’m not convinced that Washington is a failure in the long-term), you can’t deny that the Tigers actually lost money last year and that their attendance is down from where it was. And why? Because of their last place finish last year.
If you don’t win, fans won’t show up and you won’t sell concessions. Then you don’t make money. That’s basically what it comes down to. So I’d like to see the Tigers not slump so much in the second half every year and then we’ll see who is a failure and who isn’t.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've got it
Go be a Nationals fan. They’ve got Strasburg coming, Adam Dunn, Ryan Zimmerman. Looks like a model franchise in a small market.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have you?
It’s easy to confuse criticism with “not being a fan” whatever that means.
But I personally believe the absence of criticism is the same as stagnation and while I wouldn’t call this Tigers franchise stagnant, I would say that there are many things they could improve. As long as that’s the case, they should be trying to improve those things.
The moment you stop trying to make yourself better as a team, that’s when the bottom falls out.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How
Realisticly, what are the moves you would make to improve this franchise. Keeping in mind that any moves you suggest either need to be realistic in the eyes of other teams and need to stay within the boundaries of the collective bargaining agreement, what moves would you make.
I am not rallying on you because you are being critical. I am rallying on you because your criticism are on realistic. If you were reading just Boney’s posts you should be able to see that.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Tigers need a bat
I think the biggest thing the Tigers need right now is a clean up hitter or a third place hitter. I’m not exactly sure who would be available. I wouldn’t have wanted the Tigers to get DeRosa, even though he’s going to help the Cardinals.
The main thing is to keep this team’s offense from slumping every time it hits the road.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
there you go Winter!
there you go man! good job! I would pat you on the butt if we were having a beer right now
Detroit DOES need a bigger bat, from a corner outfield spot preferably…
Don Kelly and Josh Anderson just aren’t going to do it
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh my Lord
“The moment you stop trying to make yourself better as a team, that’s when the bottom falls out.”
Dombrowski has been trying to improve ever since the beginning of the season- Anderson’s acquisition was supposed to add a reliable defensive sub/4th OF with speed. He was pushed into starting duty because of Guillen’s injury. Look for more trades and pickups soon- the trade deadline is more than a month away. Dombrowski is not done dealing.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jun 28, 2009 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Small market?
since when is DC a small market? DC is only a small market because nobody goes to the games, because the team blows. You don’t see Daniel Snyder not being able to write checks for free agents do you?
The Nationals have been in “epic fail” mode ever since Bowden couldn’t give Alfonso Soriano away to the many teams that wanted him at the trade deadline a few years ago.
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
DC as a small market
that was a joke. I just figured if I was going to suggest they were doing well then it might sound better if I suggested they were in a small market. I’m not sure Winter would have been able to tell anyway.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
those other franchises that aren't doing so well?
WTF? None of those franchises have done well. The Washington Nationals and the future? You’re not convinced?
I see you do understand basic economics (team loses, fans don’t show up, blah blah blah). I see you might’ve missed the column in the newspapers after the Stanley Cup Finals where the owner (Mike Illitch) said he told Dombrowski to do what it takes to make this team a winner. That’s something the Lerner family has never done (along with their figurehead president Stan Kasten who got props for building the Braves even though they weren’t sh*t until Schuerholz arrived).
You ever hear the phrase “you have to spend money to make money”? “You have to give up talent in order to get talent”?
Washington’s franchise is an epic failure. They couldn’t sign their #1 pick last year because of a dispute over a few thousand dollars. I live in DC, I see their failure everyday.
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you don't see it then...
If you don’t see that the Nationals could be better than the record seems to indicate, then I guess you either don’t watch a lot of Nationals games or just don’t pay attention to what the team is doing internally. They’ve got the same GM who rebuilt the Braves back in the 90’s, and it’s happening the same way- through young pitching. When you build a franchise on youth, then you’ve got a chance.
Spending money to get money only works if you get a return on your investment.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Nationals don't have the same GM that built the Braves back in the day
the GM who built the Braves back in the day is currently an analyst on MLB Network.
The team president was part of the Braves, but he was also part of the Atlanta Hawks too who are a failure as a franchise too. He’s been a part of NHL teams as well, so I don’t think of him as a “baseball mind”.
I do watch Nationals games, I watch so many of them that I know STAN KASTEN is the team president and was never the general manager of the Atlanta Braves
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Using YOUR logic
the Tigers are not a failure as a franchise because they have the GM and manager who made the Marlins into a perennial contender, back in the day…
or am I wrong here?
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
slightly wrong
They spent a ton of money to win in ’97 and then ripped the whole thing apart. Leyland was not there before ’97 and then team was not competive again until 2003 (although it is worth noting the some of the deals DD made back then helped build the core for the ’03 team)
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and not being able to sign draft picks
whether you were a part of the Braves or not, means you are a failure as a leader in your organization.
The Nationals are the reason why Detroit was able to draft Rick Porcello so low in the first round.
teams like the Nationals are the reason why Justin Verlander went #2 overall instead of #1 because of “signability” concerns.
Adam Dunn is not young, and is already being dangled out there in the trade market for this deadline upcoming.
Trust me, my friend… I know about the Nationals. I wish they’d move them back to Montreal to get the curly W and the failure that goes along with it out of this area.
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So you know?
Then you know about how the Nats have the league lead in blown saves? Do you know what that signifies?
It means the starter keeps the team in the game and the offense gets the lead but some guy in the bullpen blows it for them. Try counting the number of losses that Nats relievers have, you might be surprised.
At least they were clever enough to get a new pitching coach when it was clear the one they had wasn’t doing the team any favors. Just look at Jordan Zimmermann now, he’s an ace.
But yeah, I’m probably going to switch teams at some point because I can’t stand the Tigers looking like they’re going to get there and then fall apart while I see in the current Nationals team a lot of potential. Of course, it’s just as likely they’ll repeat the mistakes of their past and let all their good players leave (ie, Pedro Martinez, Vladimir Guerrero).
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nats took 1 positive step
when Zimmerman agreed to his extension.
The Nationals have had a horrible bullpen from the start.
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
MacDougal?
You don’t think MacDougal is helping? They did take a series from the Yankees and then the Blue Jays. It seems like a step in the right direction.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
there's a reason MacDougal isn't pitching for half the teams he's pitched for in the last 3 years
because he flames out
he’ll prove his worth shortly.
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hes a fill in player for the roster
by BennieBladesFan on Jun 28, 2009 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder if..?
Nats fans would say the same thing about Fernando Rodney or Joel Zumaya?
But anyways, MacDougal is doing well in the closer’s role (for now) and that’s more than what they had before. Perhaps pitching for a team that doesn’t win has let Mike live outside his head a bit.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
...
Winter, I can’t even comment on your stupidity anymore. My comments, nor anyone elses, are even worth it.
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 8:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it?
Is it stupid to give your opinion- whether everyone else will agree with it or not- or to call someone dumb because they say something that disagree with?
You tell me, which is worse?
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're beyond disagreement though...
You are off in your own little world, maybe thinking that the Pirates or Nationals front office, is the Tigers.
Last I looked, 2 days ago, the Tigers had the 3rd best record in baseball.
Damn, the mismanaged front office for that.
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're not paying attention.
Didn’t I say “you have to do more than say we’re in first”?
I guess you missed it.
I think you also missed MacDougal having a 1.32 ERA with the Nats 14 appearances. Do I expect that to continue? No way.
But on the other hand, that’s a move that helped the team when it needed help (and it still needs more even so).
Attributing the franchise’s success to their win/loss record half way through the season doesn’t make sense to me. If things worked that way, the Rays and the Rockies would have never went to the world series. For that matter, the Tigers would have stayed in the cellar after the 2005 season.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about this stat...which you overlooked.
13.2 IP, 10 H, 7BB, 1 HBP, 5 R, 2 ER.
That line, without even looking at Rodney’s, just looks so much better. WOW, 3/3 in saves. Holy, crap, he might have 10 by the end of the season.
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't overlook it.
But what does it matter if the runs don’t score? And if they come across unearned, is that the pitcher’s fault or the teams?
No, I’m not claiming that he will lead the NL in saves, but what I am saying is that the franchise made a move that helped the team and flew in the face of all good sense and did what they thought was right…and so far, it’s working.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And so far...
Rodney is working too. And in my honest opinion, a lot better.
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
are you serious?
Nats fans would fall all over themselves for Zumaya or Rodney
Perhaps pitching for a team that doesn’t win? Ok so pitching for the White Sox and Royals hasn’t done it yet?
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It has actually.
Both of MacDougal’s years with the Royals in which he had over 60 games were both okay.
I don’t know why MacDougal hasn’t been a consistent player, but it seems like it’s a mental thing and when you go from a team that’s trying to win (even though the White Sox aren’t succeeding) to a team that’s not winning at all, there’s less pressure.
In any case, I highly doubt that the Nationals scouting staff said, “Hey, let’s get this washed up pitcher that never amounted to anything and make him our closer!”
I’d like to give them more credit than that.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well
the Nationals front office is the same front office that fined Elijah Dukes for being late to the ballpark, when he was signing autographs with little leaguers
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are they the same?
Are the scouting staff and the people who fined Dukes the same people?
Or is it wrong to expect a player to uphold his commitments and behave like a professional irregardless of what else he’s doing at the time?
It doesn’t wash with me. “Oh hey, I was signing autographs, so I can be as late as I want.”
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the Nationals scouting department has done nothing
except get caught up in an illegal Dominican skimming ring that included the now “resigned” Jim Bowden
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously
your hailing the Nats for taking series from the Yankees and the Blue Jays and your sick of the Tigers when they are in first place.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um...
Did you see the diary/front page post where I basically called for David Chadd’s head based on a couple picks I thought sucked? Did you notice I didn’t ever say I was going to quit following the Tigers? Stop being a crybaby and go away.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jun 28, 2009 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fare weather fan
I’ve never once questioned my loyalty to my teams
by msivits on Jun 29, 2009 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would accuse you of being Mike Valenti
based on the sheer level of negativity towards the tigers.
But I know Valenti has at least a basic idea of how contracts work in Major League Baseball, so you can’t be him.
by Trysdor on Jun 28, 2009 7:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Winter
I need to give you some respect. You have put up with a lot of crap here and you have taken it respectfully.
Still, you intial post sighted bad second halfs and the contracts of Gullien, Bondo, Willis, Maggs and Robertson as bad deals and why this team is a failure. You have since dealt with seen us appeal to you by explaining how MLB contracts work, that the deals in the context of when they were signed were reasonable (with the exception of Willis which no one this site will defend). We have also appealed to you regarding many of the good deals DD has made. You have sited that Leyland hasn’t won a division title since ’92 which I think is irrelevant since he has been to two world series since then. You have also implied that you may be shopping your fandom. Having spent most of the day on here defending yourself (and I apoligize if I am making you repeat yourself) what exactly is it that you need from the TIgers to respect the job they are doing. Is it as simple as just winning the division this year (which for the record you do not believe they will do? Are there realistic trades you think they can make? Should they fire DD? Should thye fire Leyland? What needs to happen for you not to think this franchise is a failure?
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 8:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Dombrowski is like 5 flights of steps up from Randy Smith
jesus…
If I ever see the Tigers trade with the Astros or Padres again, I will kill myself
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay thanks...
Yeah, there are a few things.
I don’t know if I’d fire Dumbrowski just yet. It’s the players who have to deliver. I think the problem might be with the scouting staff that doesn’t realize or can’t predict what a player will become or is turning into. The fact that Mike Hessman is Toledo’s biggest home run hitter seems to bear this out.
I would have fired Leyland by now, but that’s not my decision.
Winning the division (just once) is huge and I believe it would put the franchise “back on track” as it were. The problem with getting free agents and such is that most people don’t want to play for a loser. The talent will go where the wins are. This team needs to show that it can beat the Twins in Minnesota, it needs to show that it can play just as well on the road as it can at home. Until these things happen, winning the division seems like a stretch.
The Red Sox seem like the best franchise to me right now. They’ve got a very good bullpen, enormously deep starting pitching (so much so that they could trade someone and still be good) and they’re winning even though Pedroia is slumping and Nick Green is starting at short every day. That’s what a good franchise does- continues to win when presented with adversity. I haven’t seen that very much out of the Tigers.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So you didnt.....
……Like getting Cabrera for a bunch a scrubs?
by BennieBladesFan on Jun 28, 2009 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pena
If I had my way, I would have kept Carlos Pena. Although I admit that Cabrera is better. What I don’t like is that we had to take Dontrelle Willis and then had to keep starting him when it was plainly obvious that was absolutely finished.
Andrew Miller may or may not be improving. But he’s being given starts and he’s a lefty so he might blossom late (ie, Al Leiter). Cameron Maybin is hard to tell. He might turn into a AAAA player, but taking on Willis’ contract was just too much.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe......
….Only one more year left on the deal…..DD didnt sign Pavano to the huge contract……That was smart as he did jack in NY…..Plus he signed Everett to a 1 year deal worth 1 mil and he has been great at the plate and on defense…..Another great signing
by BennieBladesFan on Jun 28, 2009 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How has this gotten away without being shredded
Pena! His best year in Detroit was ‘04, he hit .241 with 27 hrs and 82 RBI. The next year he played in 79 games hit .235 with 18 hrs and 44 RBI. He also averaged two strikeouts for every walk he had with us. Then he spent a year with everyone’s model franchise … the Boston Red Sox who let him play in 18 games. Then he blew up with Tampa in ‘07 and since then he has had nice power numbers but habitual hits blew .250. This is the horse you want to ride? Seriously!?! We all hate Willis. We all get that that was a bad move. They put him on the DL and I personally will be surprised if he gets another turn in the rotation. If he does I will assume it’s because he has shown some improvement in rehab starts. Either way, Willis has been worth the trouble to have Miggy and if your implying you would rather have an all or nothing player like Pena at first then the combo of Miggy and Willis (who has be annoying but in reality has made fewer than a dozen starts) then your just dumb.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NOBODY
Would have kept Carlos Pena. The word bust surrounded him from when we acquired him from the A’s- after he got cut in 2006, I can’t remember a single expert who would have taken him. The Rays got incredibly lucky.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jun 28, 2009 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You don't want him?
I think what I’m hearing is that you don’t want a player who will give you thirty to forty homeruns a year and however many RBI’s right? The Tigers sure could use him about now, I’ll say that much.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hell no...
I’ll take Cabera at first. He’s 5 yrs younger than Pena. His career batting average is 61 points higher. His career OBP is almost 30 points higher. SLG% is 40 points higher. And his OPS is almost 75 points higher. Plus, he’s hit more HRs in 4 fewer seasons. And he’s won a World Series.
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Detroit didn't want him
Theo Epstein didn’t want him
Brian Cashman didn’t want him
Billy Beane didn’t want him
Jon Hart didn’t want him
Seems to me that there’s a lot of good baseball minds that didn’t want the guy… he’s all or nothing. A poor man’s Jim Thome in his prime, that’s it.
He may be hitting bombs but he’s hitting below .240
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In 2006 when we had him?
No way in hell. Now? Sure- we could bump Cabrera to LF.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jun 28, 2009 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Name a position.....
…..where the tigs havent filled in well due to injury?
by BennieBladesFan on Jun 28, 2009 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
WOW
Your going to Red Soxes on us. Of course they are a model franchise. They have two titles in the last 5 years. Of course there entire rotation came from other teams. David Ortiz, Jason Bay, JD Drew, Mike Lowell, Julio Lugo all came from other teams. And Lugo, Drew, Dice K and Ortiz all seem to be over paid at this point. They have a few quality players that came out of their farm system but so do we. If they slump in the second half (like they did in 2006) does that make them a failure with too many bad contracts?
Leyland has done well enough this year to deserve an extension, I have seen you mention their need for a bat but who is there to get. And be realistic because I look out there and I don’t see anyone that I am willing to give up anything for. As far as predicting production goes, if Gabe Kapler had been as good as advertised he would be a hall of famer. The fact remains that predicting production is exactly as it sounds. There are no guarantees and as a fan I am confident that the Tigers are doing the best they can.
One more thing, regarding the pitching, I would still like to see improvement there but I believe adding Rich Knapp was a great move. We got him from a division rival who historically developed pitchers who throw strikes. It’s not going to be an over night fix but it’s a move in the right direction.
Having read as many posts of yours as I could today I am still beleagured by your reasoning but I guess everyone is entitled to their opinion. If you truly aren’t happy with the product that the Tigers currently are though and the overwhelming amount of evidence that people have used to sway you isn’t working then perhaps the Red Soxes or Nationals remain a better fit for your fandom. At some point though if your going to be a fan you have to accept that the people in the organization know more than you, so even when they get some thing wrong they are still more qualified then you to do their job (unless we are talking about Matt Millen).
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also Winter....
…..The togers are playing great at home this year…..And they have 60% of there games after the break at home…..Much easier to hold a lead in a division playing home games.
by BennieBladesFan on Jun 28, 2009 8:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Twins vs. Tigers
The Twins and Tigers are both bad road teams and good home teams. That, I think, is pretty indisputable. The Twins have played more home games than road games. The tigers have played 7 more road games than home games. The Tigers have a four game lead. They’re in a good spot here. There’s nothing to indicate the Twins will be able to overcome the tigers other than “they’re the Twins, that’s what they do.” Twins haven’t won the division since 2006. They’re a 500 team, and that’s what they’ll be. Based on how the Tigers are playing, and the number of home games they have remaining, they should be an over 500 team pretty easily. The Tigs should be favored to win this division, absolutely so.
by Trysdor on Jun 28, 2009 8:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yup.....They will have.....
……played like 10 more road games then home games at the break….amybe even more…..I like there cahnces playing at home in August and September with Minn playing mainly on the road
by BennieBladesFan on Jun 28, 2009 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another Ting....
….Guillen should be back soon and I love the fact that his bat is coming back….that would be huge huge huge!!!….that was a good trade too Guillen For Santiago….So basically guillen for nothing!!!
by BennieBladesFan on Jun 28, 2009 8:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I must say,
if the point of this thread was to entertain, overwhelming success!
by MackAveKurt on Jun 28, 2009 8:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Cant Wait For Guillen.....
…..We miss his bat big time….Has such a great eye and can hit…..I see him as the sh and thames in right…..mags on the bench
by BennieBladesFan on Jun 28, 2009 8:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Billy Mays.....
……Died RIP……Sports at work is better then work at work
by BennieBladesFan on Jun 28, 2009 8:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That's 4...
Read that he was on a flight into Tampa last night that had a rough landing and he got hit in the head with something. Wonder if maybe that was the ultimate cause, maybe a brain Aneurism
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's 5 actually
in just the last couple weeks…David Carradine, Ed McMahon, Farrah, MJ, and the Oxi Clean dude
by Tagne13 on Jun 28, 2009 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Winter, please enlighten us.
And inform all the posters what this Tigers team would look like if you were in DD shoes? Give us your ultimate 25-man roster.
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 9:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't have it exactly right
but it sounds like we would have Pena at first instead of Miggy, either Kerry Wood, JJ Putz or Hoffman would be our closer. We would have already traded for bat to hit third (lets say Matt Holliday) Gullien, Robertson, Bondo, WIllis and Maggs would not be on the payroll. We would have Torii Hunter in left and we would try to fill out the rest of our roster with Nationals players.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 28, 2009 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Does that mean D-Young will be back?
Or is he no longer with the Nationals?
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exaggeration huh?
I think you’re exaggerating. I believe I clearly stated the need was for middle relief.
I’m not so sure about getting rid of Bonderman or Guillen- they might still be able to contribute in some fashion- but the Tigers missed out by not getting Torii Hunter. That’s your ideal third place hitter- at least for the next two or three years.
The only two Nationals players I would want see in Detroit are Jordan Zimmermann and Joe Beimel. I think Detroit has the Nationals beat at a lot of the position players this year. Ryan Zimmerman is probably better than Inge, but that seems about it. There’s no way I’d want Nick Johnson or Adam Dunn playing for Detroit in place of Cabrera.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Winter, I have no clue what you are saying anymore.
Your story changes from post to post. Do you even know what it is you want anymore, other than to blow up this current Tigers roster and insert the 2009 Washington Nationals roster.
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So the Tigers missed out on Torii Hunter?
how so?
Has Granderson not played up to your expectations? You’d upset the foundation by putting a veteran in your centerfielder of the future’s position? Why would you pay a guy in his early 30s 90 million over 5 years and be stuck with another Magglio situation? Hunter will not be worth $18 million in the last year of his deal just like Magglio isn’t worth his.
You have absolutely no clue.
Ryan Zimmerman is PROBABLY better than Inge? Why because Inge has 18 homers this season? No knock on Inge, but Zim is hitting near .300 with 13 homers on a team with virtually no protection around him.
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comparison
The only real glaring difference in stats between these 2 is doubles; Inge 7, Zimmerman 21. Batting Average’s are .271 and .299, respectively.
Inge makes his money at 3rd, not at the plate. Anything above .250, in my opinion,from Inge, is an added bonus.
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There
you got it exactly right, Torii Hunter is your ideal #3 hitter for the next two or three years. He has 4 years left on his deal at 18 million per. He is great defensive player but what will his production be like in the last year of his contract. He is a .274 career hitter who has one year in his career in which he hit 30+ plus homers and two years in which he has had 100+ RBI. For his career he strikes out nearly 3 times for every time he walks. He is probably having his best year right now but there is no way, following the logic you have presented throughtout this post, you can suggest he has a good deal. So come clean, do you have a man crush on Torii Hunter?
Also, no kidding you wouldn’t take any more than two current Nationals players in place of current Tigers. The Nationals are the worst team in baseball, they were the worst team the year before and the year before that. And I am going out on a limb here, I willing to bet they will be the worst team in baseball next year.
Earlier in this post you slammed everyone else on here for not being able to say anything more than your dumb or we are in first place so shut up stupid. If your going to drop names like Torii Hunter why don’t you support it with more than the fact that on June 28, 2009 he would look good in our line up. Also, we did offer a deal to Beimel, in fact going into the winter meetings we were considered the favorites to land him but he spurned us thinking he could land more money with a better team. He waited I believe until spring training and nobody was willing to come close to want he wanted and he eventually signed with the Nats because they came the closest to what he wanted.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 29, 2009 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We wanted Putz
but Cleveland put the kabosh to that. Is he still on the DL? They tried to get one of the best. I think this person is just worried we won’t win the division based on how many games the team has won compared to ‘06. Plus, the only “old” player they really overpaid for is Sheff. I wouldn’t want to be Mr. Dombrowski for all the money in the world. He is constantly tweaking, dealing and looking for the best talent for this organization. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn’t.
This person doesn’t sound like they’ve watched baseball for many years. We are very fortunate to have an owner like Ilitch. In spite of all the economic turmoil in Michigan, fans are still coming out for the games and as the Tigers continue to contend, more and more are coming to the park and buying tickets. I fully expect the Tigers to win the Division and will be disappointed if they don’t. Fortunately, we have a team and a franchise who feel the same.
"It's designed to break your heart. The game begins in the spring, when everything is new again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops, and leaves you to face the fall alone". A. Bartlett Giamatti
by densogirl on Jun 28, 2009 9:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Funny that.
I’ve been watching baseball since about 1986 or so.
I love it how you guys make conclusions without knowing all the facts and decide everything according to your own personal biases. Anyone that says anything against it is wrong, and the evidence given to support any claim doesn’t matter.
I think I’d call it blind faith. It’s good when you don’t have a team that shows itself to be a contender year in and year out. But it’s bad because it can leave you really disappointed if you put all your focus into getting behind something only to find out that it’s disappointing you repeatedly and making your faith an object of ridicule.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
86? That tells me everything!
"It's designed to break your heart. The game begins in the spring, when everything is new again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops, and leaves you to face the fall alone". A. Bartlett Giamatti
by densogirl on Jun 28, 2009 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Holy canoli
Quote: “There are some good young players on the team, but the reality of it is that some of the Tigers best players of the last few years have come from other organizations (ie, Jackson, Cabrera, Ordonez, Pudge, etc).”
In this sentence, Winter encapsulates his arguments that A) older players suck at baseball, and B) teams worth following are built from within (this last point was never actually articulated, but I think it’s implied above).
Ignoring a multitude of other nonsense arguments, I would point out two things. Torii Hunter and Trevor Hoffman. Winter thinks a non-failing franchise would have signed them. But they are old. They were not discovered by our scouts. Bringing them here would have only been a symptom of the problems Winter has diagnosed. And they would have started to be terrible at baseball soon and would have been overpaid because they are old (actually, I’d agree for once on that last one).
Point being, this thread is too crazy to even wrap your head around. But Kurt was right that it’s entertaining, if frustrating. Comments have doubled since I started reading.
by cloud wall on Jun 28, 2009 10:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You get a gold star
especially for the 3rd paragraph
by Tagne13 on Jun 28, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
That third paragraph is a beauty.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jun 28, 2009 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To Summarize-
Well I’ve tried to state my case in as plain and in as non-insulting a way as possible, but it seems that at every turn, a simple statement is met with the harshest of criticism. I really never expected to be called half the things I’ve been called…stupid, crybaby, etc.
I also found out that I’m leaning more towards the Nats than the Tigers. And that people only look at the standings of today and don’t look at the deeper issues going on with the team and how things might turn out down the line. I don’t see this team winning the division, I honestly don’t.
But since you guys don’t seem able to respond in a civilized manner to a criticism that was not even directed at any person here, I will take your advice and leave. Some of what I said might be wrong, some of it might right. I only know that I stated what I think and apparently it’s the greatest of sins to express an opinion that runs contrary to what’s already in someone’s mind.
It occurs to me that this is how truth-tellers are generally treated. First, they get scorned. Then, they get exiled. And then, if they really start persisting, they get burned at the stake. Well that’s the feeling I get, right or wrong.
As far as I can tell, this is a franchise that is simply not worth my effort or my time or anything. The only reason I posted here was to let off some steam about my frustrations with this franchise as a whole. I didn’t do it to make friends, and I didn’t do it to gain approval. But on the other hand, what I didn’t expect was the somewhat puerile behavior that resulted.
I will do as you all seem to suggest and keep my opinions to myself. Enjoy watching the Twins play in October.
by Winter on Jun 28, 2009 10:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Lean towards the Nats all you want.
The Nationals have NOTHING in the farm system that they can use to acquire proven talent. The Nationals have Ryan Zimmerman, maybe Jordan Zimmermann, and maybe just maybe Jesus Flores to build a team around.
Adam Dunn and his $10 million dollar a year contract will not gather much minor league talent at the trade deadline because of his contract, unless you eat the contract.
The Nationals are something like the 3rd most profitable organization in baseball, and as a baseball fan that should piss you off. Why? Because they spend no money to improve the talent on the field. They choose to not give a draft pick a hundred thousand dollars more than they anticipated, and they take advantage of the draft system and get back into the top 11 picks the following year (#1 overall and 11 overall).
They claim to go after Mark Teixera in the offseason, and they probably did. They scoffed at Zimmerman’s demands for a contract so much so that he almost said “F it” and left the front office at the table without signing.
The Lerner family owns a ton of prime real estate in the DC area. The Lerner family is very picky about who and what moves in to their properties and how you do business in their properties. They outbid others to own the newest attempt at professional baseball in the Washington DC area. They see how the Orioles have failed the local fanbase and proclaimed that they would not do the same. What they’ve done is built a new stadium, ripped off the city and taken advantage of the citizens, held the city hostage for that new stadium, invited fans of other teams to come to the games since their own “fans” don’t fill the seats, spell Nationals wrong on their own player jerseys and fail at fan appreciation nights by screwing up the fireworks display.
You can enjoy watching the epic failure that takes the field each night at Nationals Stadium. Whether the Twins make the playoffs or not in October is irrelevant because, at least our (well not yours anymore I guess) favorite team will be in contention most likely and will have the testicular fortitude to throw money down in an attempt to improve the team for who? Not themselves, not the city but.. the fans.
Something the Nationals ownership group or front office have yet to do. Stan Kasten was on the news the other night at a press conference where he proclaimed himself to be the Village Idiot. Stan’s also the man that you claimed to be the GM of the Atlanta Braves during their run in the 90s, which couldn’t be more false.
Stan was the president of the Atlanta Hawks, an organization that should be considered the laughingstock of the NBA. He was also the president of the Atlanta Braves where he oversaw the work that GENERAL MANAGER John Schuerholz did in the 90s. Stan also served as president of the Atlanta Thrashers of the NHL… Stan is a marketing genius. He knows how to make lame television commercials and come up with promo nights to get more butts in the seats. He’s not a general manager, and if he was, I’d be worried.
by Boney on Jun 28, 2009 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
--- Summer Glau
P.S. Don’t forget to check out the next season of the Sarah Conner Chronicles, this fall on Fox!
by Misopogon on Jun 29, 2009 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously?
Communication fail.
Take it from a debate coach and communications major: starting something with a harshly worded phrase like “Why the Tigers Fail as a Franchise”. Your content was wrong, but decent (you still haven’t answered my question about statistical noise). Had you picked a more neutral title, like “Why the Tigers Won’t Win The Central This Year”, you would have gotten away with a lot more than you did. Heck, your information about contracts is a valid point of debate, but if you’re going to stoop to the level you accuse us of being at, then you deserve everything you get in return.
Look, I’m new here, and this isn’t really my board yet, but I have a feeling that you’re trolling to try to bug the regulars here. It’s not nice- practice what you preach and be nice or go away. If you really want to engage in dialogue with the fans here, I doubt anyone will mind. It’s a pretty welcoming place.
If you’re not trolling and do want honest dialogue, I believe apologies are in order on my part. I can get carried away when dealing with those who I believe are upsetting the apple cart or being a nuisance, but I don’t want you to think I’m a jerk if you’re here for honest debate.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jun 29, 2009 1:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You have provided us with opinions
That is all. You have thrown out contract numbers without examining them in context. I respect that you are (or were) new to bless you boys and if you had followed this site over the past off-season you would realize we have all offered opinions on the things you seem to be so obstinate about. You have ignored every time someone has brought statistics into the conversation, you want Leyland fired with a detailed reason why or a suggestion of who could do better. And to top it off, you argue the Nats have a stronger future. Really? How’s Jim Bowden doing? Oh, that’s right he got chased out of town in March because the FBI was investigating him for stealing bonuses from Latin players. Now, I don’t follow the Nats closely enough to know if they have a full time GM or if they just have an interm. Either way, I suspect they will need atleast 2 years to fix problems created by Bowden. This past off-season they made bids to sign Texeria and other top free agents but no one wanted to sign with them despite the fact that they are in one of the top markets in baseball. Dunn waited until Feb. to sign because he was holding out to see if anyone else would offer him a deal. Because he is a bad defensive player and an all or nothing hitter no one else wanted him. This is the team you see nothing but a promising future for?
Best of luck to you Winter. For one day you have provide me with a lot of fun baseball talk. I would keep trying to engage you but some how I feel like all you are going read from my posts are that the Tigers are in first so blindly follow.
by tigerfaninChicago on Jun 29, 2009 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
***NEW FLASH***
This franchise doesn’t want you as a fan.
Good bye, enjoy your 100+ loss season the Nats will provide you this year.
by jryno on Jun 28, 2009 10:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll give you a second chance to answer this simple question, as either A - you chose to ignore it earlier, or B - you just happened to miss it
“I really could care less what some people I’ve never met think about my opinions.”
Then what is the purpose of this thread?
by Tagne13 on Jun 28, 2009 11:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
One question....
We had a July 1, 2006 Record of 55-26 and then a September 30, 2006 Record of 95-66
Is the “In Between Record” really 30-40?
by Detroit4lyfe on Jun 28, 2009 11:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This thread was like a moose farting
One day, it’s loud and stinks, the next day it’s gone.
by MackAveKurt on Jun 29, 2009 12:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














