Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Why So Timid, Armando? Indians 5, Tigers 4

Armando Galarraga seemed to be making so much progress in his past few starts.  Of course, getting better movement on his slider helped a great deal.  But more important was throwing strikes, pitching to contact, and trusting his defense to make plays behind him, rather than nibbling around the plate and trying to trick batters or miss bats. 

And for at least one key stretch in last night's ballgame, Galarraga relapsed into those old habits and it may have cost him and the Tigers a win.  In the third inning, after retiring the first two Indians hitters, Galarraga was far too cautious against the top of Cleveland's lineup. 

Falling behind Grady Sizemore 2-0 (though one of those pitches could've been called a strike), Galarraga needed to throw a strike and left a pitch out over the plate that Sizemore drove for a triple.  He stayed away from Victor Martinez, throwing sliders and change-ups low and away, and walked him on five pitches.  He came back at Shin-Soo Choo with fastballs, but again threw everything low and away, walking Choo on another five pitches.  That loaded the bases for Travis Hafner, and with Galarraga having to throw a strike, he teed up a fastball out over the plate (at this point, Cleveland's batters had to know that's where Galarraga was trying to throw the ball), and Hafner sliced it to left field for a single. 

You could say that Galarraga was victimized by bad luck, as Hafner's line drive bounced out of Ryan Raburn's glove as he tried to make a diving catch.  But the point is that it never should've come to that.  Had Galarraga pitched more aggressively - a point emphasized by both Jim Leyland and Gerald Laird in post-game comments - the worst that would've happened is that Cleveland would've tied the game instead of taking the lead. 

Star-divide

Kurt already transcribed several of Leyland's remarks on Twitter and his recap at Mack Avenue Tigers, but to underline the point, here's some of what the Tigers manager said about Galarraga:

"He pitched Sizemore like he's Babe Ruth, pitched Martinez like he's Babe Ruth, and pitched Choo like he was Babe Ruth."

"He's been here long enough to know that."

"If you're afraid to throw the ball over the late with two outs and nobody on base in the third inning, you've got problems."

Laird may have been a bit more polite, but no less critical:

"You get the first two outs of an inning, you got to close it out.  And we needed to be aggressive."

"We backed off a bit.  Instead of being aggressive, he got tentative with a man in scoring position."

Maybe the worst thing to happen to Galarraga is when he starts posting big strikeout numbers.  After doing so in April, he then seemed to become enamored with making hitters miss, rather than pitching to them.  Galarraga racked up seven strikeouts in his last outing, so did the same thing happen in his following start.  Did he start thinking he was a strikeout pitcher (something he hasn't been in his 1 1/2 seasons in Detroit)?  Or, as Leyland and Laird said, was he just too timid in his approach, instead of going after hitters?

Purr:

Galarraga isn't the sole reason the Tigers lost this game, however.  The lineup once again showed how inconsistent it could be, failing to mount any sort of real scoring threat against Carl Pavano after driving in two runs in the second inning. 

I realize the initial impulse is to say, "How could they look that bad against Carl Pavano?"  But this wasn't quite another case of the Tigers making a mediocre pitcher look good.  Well, maybe it was.  Pavano came into the game pitching well, having allowed three earned runs in each of his past three starts.  If anything, he provided an excellent example of how a pitcher can succeed throwing strikes.  Pavano hit the strike zone with 72 of his 101 pitches.  (Maybe Tigers coaches should make Galarraga watch tape of Pavano's performance.) 

And maybe Pavano is just a bad match-up for Detroit.  In two starts against the Tigers this season (both at Comerica Park), he's given up four runs in 15.1 innings with nine strikeouts.  And most importantly, no walks.

Whimper:

Marcus Thames has been playing well lately, so it's probably unfair to single him out for this.  But in the ninth inning, after Kerry Wood walked Placido Polanco on four straight pitches and fell behind Miguel Cabrera 2-1 before serving up a two-run homer, Thames comes to the plate and... swings at the first pitch. 

In Thames's defense, it was an 88 m.p.h. slider that was right down the middle, and he just missed getting a good swing on it (and he knew it right away, judging from his reaction).  But it really didn't seem like the smartest at-bat in that situation.

Comment of the Night:

"Jason" Galarraga is pitching like he doesn’t want the ball to get cooties from getting too close to the plate.

by Baroque

Comment 3 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good post

Pavano was outstanding! Though, I still believe we should/could have won this game. During the interview I was looking at Leland’s eyes and I swear his right eye is brown and the left is green or hazel. Well, that’s my contribution and 2 cents worth. Gotta work today, so I’ll set the DVR and HOPE1

"It's designed to break your heart. The game begins in the spring, when everything is new again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops, and leaves you to face the fall alone". A. Bartlett Giamatti

by densogirl on Jul 12, 2009 10:33 AM EDT reply actions  

wait how did galarraga get the loss...

didn’t watch the game at all, but according to the box scores I’ve seen he pitched into the 7th and gave up 4 runs? So whoever gave up the 5th run in the 8th should be the losing pitcher right?

<—confused

by psiu_glen on Jul 12, 2009 10:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Galarraga was already on the hook for the loss when he left in the 7th

And the Tigers never tied the game or took the lead to take that decision out of his hands.

So though that fifth run Ni gave up turned out to be the difference in the final score, the lead never changed hands.

by Ian Casselberry on Jul 13, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Wake-forest-logo_small
Is Austin Jackson a top-five center fielder?

Recent FanPosts

Gibby_small
How you should feel about liking Quintin Berry
Small
Is Prince Fielder earning his keep?
Small
Reading the Detroit News comments section on Tigers stories
Small
All-Time Tigers Team
Small
A Sunday with Dan and Jim
Small
2012 Detroit Tigers Draft Question
Amrita_rao_small
Elvis Andrus and Jurickson Profar
Img_1374_small
Scary moment for ex-Tiger Will Rhymes
Small
Austin Jackson: A mid-May appreciation

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Quick Rules

Do:

  • Treat others like you'd like to be treated.
  • Stick to the topic being discussed.
  • Make arguments based on facts, not emotion.
Don't:
  • Confuse BYB with talk radio, your blog or your social networking web site of choice. We're a baseball community.
  • Feed the trolls.

Commenting Code of Conduct


Managing Editor

Dsc0178-l_small Kurt Mensching

Deputy Editors

Meatcomputer-1_small BigAl

Sparky_anderson_wall_small Rob Rogacki

5532934019_b5fa57ae98_small allikazoo

Contributors

Good_to_great_leadership_image1-262x300_1__small Tigerdog1

Suss_small Matt Sussman

6m2bts_small Melissa Heyboer

Moderators

Be050826_small NCDee

Sifl_and_olly_small 13194013