Royally Squandered: Royals 3, Tigers 2
Apparently, the run sponge was wrung dry last night.
Following Detroit's lineup exploded for 10 home runs (and four homers), was it utterly predictable that the Tigers would come back this afternoon with a two-run effort against a pitcher they'd destroyed in two previous meetings this season? This is the sort of effort that makes people say things like, "Hey, don't use up all your runs! Save some for the next game!"
It's not that the Tigers didn't hit Kyle Davies, however. They knocked out nine hits against him in six innings. But an all-too-familiar problem reared its head yet again, as batters just couldn't get that big one with runners in scoring position. One of the most egregious squanderings took place in the fifth inning. Adam Everett scored the tying run on a wild pitch, but with Placido Polanco on second base, Marcus Thames struck out and Miguel Cabrera followed up with a grounder to shortstop.
But maybe the blown opportunity in the sixth was even worse because the Tigers beat themselves. Carlos Guillen hit a leadoff double, but was then thrown out trying to steal third. Whose call was that? Jim Leyland's? Guillen's? Regardless of who was responsible, it was a huge out, as Ryan Raburn hit a single that would've driven in a run.
The Tigers also had a runner on second with less than two outs in both the seventh and eighth innings, but continually failed to get a key hit. It was just that kind of afternoon for the home team, and as a result, the Royals stole one on their way out of town. After 17 straight days of baseball, maybe all the Tigers could see was tomorrow's off-day, casting seductive glances at them from afar. But it's always frustrating to lose a game that was there for the taking - several times.
Roar:
Failing to drive in those runners from scoring position was even more shameful, considering that it wasted a surprisingly fine performance from Armando Galarraga. After missing his last turn with flu and a sore throat, a newly lighter (15 pounds, by most accounts) Galarraga pitched five innings and struck out six batters. Giving up two runs should've been good enough to get himself a win.
Whimper:
Oh, Marcus Thames. You thrill so many with your power, but also frustrate us with your inconsistency. Thames went 0-for-5 with two strikeouts, leaving a team-high five runners on base. He also got a bad jump on a fly ball by Willie Bloomquist in the fifth inning, resulting in the ball going over his head for a double and bringing home the Royals' second run of the game.
And though Raburn has made some plays while filling in at third base, he provided a glaring reminder of how much the Tigers miss Brandon Inge when he's not out there. Raburn committed three errors, two of them in the tenth inning leading directly to the Royals' game-winning run. (Josh Anderson gets his revenge!)
Comment of the Day:
0-16 with RISP. epic fail
by mrsunshine
0 recs |
32 comments
|
Comments
DD, Bill Hall's agent is on line one.
I don’t condone him picking up the phone, but it is obvious that we can’t afford to not have the Notorious One manning the hot corner. You are right about Thames. I am not sure that I can remember any team that is as bad as this one (on a pretty consistent basis) at stranding base runners…….
"Without deviation from the norm, 'progress' is not possible."
by Zappatista on Aug 16, 2009 7:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ian
I think this title is perfect. There was so much squandering, I literally got nauseous. We blew several opportunities to win. But even so, I LOVE THESE GUYS!!! (still)
Welcome to Detroit>>Where the weak are killed and eaten.
by Detroitchik on Aug 16, 2009 7:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Also
knowing the White Sux lost, makes this easier for me, anyway.
Welcome to Detroit>>Where the weak are killed and eaten.
by Detroitchik on Aug 16, 2009 7:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
me too for sure
we’ll make it up tuesday, you’ll be there!
by allikazoo on Aug 16, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
YAY!! :o)
Me and Kid Rick. The M’s are going down, sister!
Welcome to Detroit>>Where the weak are killed and eaten.
by Detroitchik on Aug 16, 2009 7:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just hope he forgets he has a change up.
When he does he gets in trouble.
by 13194013 on Aug 16, 2009 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lucky Shirt....
Welcome to Detroit>>Where the weak are killed and eaten.
by Detroitchik on Aug 16, 2009 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
HA!
apparently. But which player and/or team? Hmm?
Welcome to Detroit>>Where the weak are killed and eaten.
by Detroitchik on Aug 17, 2009 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just FYI
When Avila homered last night, it was fanboy galore from me.
by Tagne13 on Aug 16, 2009 7:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
In the past two games I’ve gone to (one this year, one last year), the Tigers have hit four home runs and scored ten runs over all. Miguel Cabrera has hit three home runs in those games.
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Aug 16, 2009 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is, to say, in EACH game they hit 4 home runs and scored 10 overall
Leave it to me to describe it in the most confusing way possible
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Aug 16, 2009 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
fireworks were as good as always
Saw that game, Clete’s walk-off homer against B-more, Porcello’s gem against Minnesota back in May, and ’Mando lose to Boston…but Pedroia was playing so it was a win for me.
by Tagne13 on Aug 16, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wish I could go to more than one game a year...
I DID go to two games in ‘07, but I suppose one was to make up for not going to a game in ’06. The Tigers are 3-1 all-time in games I attend, but I have yet to go to a game in which the Tigers starting pitcher does NOT give up a home run. I have seen Andrew Miller give up a solo home run to Josh Fields and a grand slam to Juan Uribe, Verlander give up a two-run shot to BJ Upton (ironically, Edwin Jackson was the opposing pitcher in that game), Galarraga give up a solo shot to Frank Thomas, and now I’ve seen Edwin Jackson give up two home runs.
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Aug 16, 2009 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's with the Pedroia love?
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Aug 17, 2009 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
17 straight days of baseball takes its toll
I’ll enjoy the day off.
by NCDee on Aug 16, 2009 8:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
got a buddy on another message board that basically said:
leyland should have pulled raburn in the 8th for Inge and that he wants to see raburn demoted by tomorrow night. seems kinda ridiculous…
I Like Pie
by mrsunshine on Aug 16, 2009 8:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How quickly Thursday’s game is rendered meaningless.
by Ian Casselberry on Aug 16, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i pointed that out to him too
waiting to hear if he has a response
I Like Pie
by mrsunshine on Aug 16, 2009 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's just silly
Raburn contributes a lot.
Welcome to Detroit>>Where the weak are killed and eaten.
by Detroitchik on Aug 16, 2009 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he's half right.
Raburn’s been clutch. But when you have a player on the bench who saves runs on a routine basis like Inge, you play him in a game that you need. Winning today would have been huge, especially with the Royals heading to play the Sox for three and King Felix coming to see us on Tuesday.
Inge should have been in the game unless he was completely unable to play. I know Leyland was trying to give him three days off, but that doesn’t make the move an excusable one in my opinion.
by rook34 on Aug 16, 2009 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay...
Has anyone else read the preview for Tuesday’s game? They are just making stuff up:
Porcello lost to the Mariners when he allowed five runs over 5 1/3 innings on July 21 in Detroit.
Um, actually, the Tigers won that game (though admittedly, it was not exactly a brilliant pitching performance). C’mon, Jason Beck, you’re better than that.
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Aug 16, 2009 10:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
talk about not checking your facts
I Like Pie
by mrsunshine on Aug 17, 2009 1:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
looking at it
he used the stats from the white sox loss. I think if you write so much mistakes like that slip in. No excuse, but they do.
by Kurt Mensching on Aug 17, 2009 1:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good news though
BP’s Postseason Odds have the Tigers with a 51% chance of making the playoffs.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Aug 17, 2009 1:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think that's an absolutely perfect rating
it’s pretty much 50/50 whether the Tigers will squander first place, or the White Sox will allow us to keep it, or if this team will step up in the last six weeks of the year and earn the division title. After all, it’s not like 2006 where we can let another team vulture the division, and still advance to the playoffs via the wild card route.
The extra one percent, I’m interpreting as coming from the 2.5 game lead the Tigers currently enjoy, no matter how hard they’ve tried to allow Chicago to catch up. Obviously, BP’s formulae are far more involved, but if you’d asked me to pick a number, as far as the Tigers chances of playing into October, that may well have been the exact number I would have chosen.
And I’m curious to hear what the rest of you, just as fans, or as statheads, might have come up with. I think we all feel that it’s pretty much even money at this point, with a possible lean towards the Tigers, and I don’t think any of us are certain this team will play on past the end of the regular season. So, how confident are you, if you had to put a number on it?
Official BYB Juju Consultant...now accepting rally creature applications!
by ahtrap on Aug 17, 2009 2:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As an aside
not knowing what PECOTA or ELO are, clicking on a couple of the links from the page DDB links to, the pecota percentage is 48.4, while the ELO adjusted chances are over 57 percent.
Official BYB Juju Consultant...now accepting rally creature applications!
by ahtrap on Aug 17, 2009 3:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
PECOTA
PECOTA scores are the Baseball Prospectus projected scores for players. Fascinating system.
ELO is, apparently, what they use for chess scores, just modified for baseball. Go figure.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Aug 17, 2009 8:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BTW,
There’s no formula involved. BP just plays the season thousands of times, Monte Carlo style, to see who wins.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Aug 17, 2009 8:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















