Not So Smooth, After All: Tigers 10, Angels 7
So for those of you that may not have stayed up to watch the Tigers and Angels (like, um, some people I know), what would surprise you more:
- The Tigers ringing up a 10-0 lead on the Angels? Or...
- The Tigers almost blowing a 10-0 lead on a night when Justin Verlander was pitching?
(A possible third choice: Detroit sports fans not being able to get a free Arby's sandwich today, because the Tigers didn't hit three homers during a game in which they scored 10 runs.)
The Tigers broke out of whatever malaise plagued them in Oakland, as they pounded Jered Weaver (and Jose Arredondo after him) for a combined nine runs and 11 hits. The two biggest blows were a two-run homer from Miguel Cabrera in the fifth and a three-run shot by Carlos Guillen in the sixth. Detroit exploded for seven runs in that sixth inning, and after the smoke cleared, a clear path to victory was surely expected.
But after cruising through five shutout innings, Verlander must have stiffened up or zoned out while the Tigers staged that run parade. Whatever sharpness he had was gone. Verlander allowed six hits from there - four of them with two outs - resulting in four Angels runs, and turning a cakewalk into a minefield.
Those mines started blowing up in the eighth, as the Angels teed off on Brandon Lyon, who had been as close to lights-out as anyone in Detroit's bullpen. Over his past 15 appearances, Lyon hadn't allowed a run. Yet after notching two outs in the inning, he became uncharacteristically hittable. The Angels knocked five straight hits, highlighted by a three-run homer by Bobby Abreu. Suddenly, a 10-run lead had been cut to three with the Tigers only four outs away from finishing the game.
However, Fernando Rodney was able to stop the rally short, pitching one of his most impressive ninth innings of the season for his 27th save. His change-up, in particular, was lethal, prompting some foolish-looking strikeout swings from Kendry Morales and Maicer Izturis.
Isn't it strange how a Tigers team that struggles so often to score runs on most nights (including this one, for four innings) can end up on the winning side of a slugfest? And it's happened a few times this season.
Roar:
Cabrera's homer was part of a 3-for-5, five-RBI night. During what's now a nine-game hitting streak, BigMig is 20-for-41 (.488) with three homers and 13 RBIs. Is he repeating the late-season surge he made last year?
Whimper:
We don't want to pick on Lyon, since he's been so good lately. So how about we circle Aubrey Huff's 0-for-5 night. Okay, he's had a week to adjust to being a Tiger. But right now, he's the anti-Cabrera, batting 2-for-20 with one RBI.
Comment of the Night:
It's the west coast
Strangeness abounds, especially at the Big A
Thanks to Kurt for setting up a second overflow thread, long after I passed out. He had my back last night!
And if you want to check out plenty of photos from the scene in Anaheim, allikazoo has set up a FanPost with several images - including a great shot of Brandon Inge's new arm ink - along with a link to her Flickr site.
0 recs |
27 comments
|
Comments
I admit it.
I did turn it off at the end of the fifth. This morning when I heard the score I had three reactions (in order)
1. Yay! we won
2. OMG we scored ten runs?
3. Seven runs for LA? What the hell happened to Verlander?
And then the first place I checked when I fired up the computer was here, and read through the game threads. You guys are Aces.
Concur with Dee
My reactions were exactly the same – I turned it off after the 5th inning was over and expected to wake up to either a 3-0 Tigers win or a 4-3 Angels win (given our luck lately).
As the great Ron Burgundy once said “That got out of hand quickly. I mean, that really escalated fast.”
by VATigersFan on Aug 25, 2009 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions
did Miguel throw a trident?
http://www.fromthecopa.blogspot.com
by rock n rye on Aug 25, 2009 11:31 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I think they've been meaning to talk to him about that
He should find himself a safehouse or a relative close by and lay low for a while, because he’s probably wanted for murder.
by kendra.michelle on Aug 25, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Magic Number 35 Sox have to Win 22 and lose 15 if we play .500
The numbers are getting close to mountainous for the Whitesoxs and Twins. If the Tigers go 19 and 19 in the remaining games, the Soxs will have to win 22 of 37 something they have failed to do all season. the Twins will have to win 23 of 37 something that is impossible for them right now with the pitching staff that they have available. The Tigers will play the Angels in a series where they will be the underdog in the first round of the playoffs, but they will win with better pitching. They will then play the Yankees after they win an epic battle with the Redsoxs that leaves two or three Yankees hurt because of Terry Francona’s beaning policy. Tigers and Cardinals rematch in the World Series with better results this time. Just watch, Cabrera is heating up and Huff will get his bat going soon.
hate to nitpick
But the sox-yanks can only meet in the ALCS. Wild card teams can’t face a team from the same divison in the ALDS
http://www.fromthecopa.blogspot.com
by rock n rye on Aug 25, 2009 11:30 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Hmm made me realize...
That means we get the yankees (assuming they get the top seed) if we make the playoffs (assuming we get the 3rd seed) if the BoSox or Rays win the WC. Then again, I don’t know if I’d rather face the Yankees or the Angels, it probably doesn’t really matter.
here’s what happens:
If the Red Sox make the playoffs, Tigers vs. Yankees
If the Rangers make the playoffs, Tigers vs. Angels
by Kurt Mensching on Aug 25, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions
and if the Rays make the playoffs… they probably beat Detroit a few times too many :(
I’d rather see the Yankees myself. I prefer the Bronx cathedral in October for a cool playoff atmosphere. But as long as Detroit makes it at all, I will not complain (much).
by Kurt Mensching on Aug 25, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks your right
Tigers V. Yankees
I still like the Tigers three headed monster in the playoffs. Washburn will return to his earlier form.
by Marcmargolis on Aug 25, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions

A great little site to track all sorts of stuff we only pretend we can quantify: CoolStandings.com
None-the-less I do enjoy seeing the number grow!
by Kurt Mensching on Aug 25, 2009 11:54 AM EDT reply actions
"Strom" Trooper? :)
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a great battle." -- Philo of Alexandria
(Currently, and sadly, on a self-imposed team-specific puck sabbatical.)
Still very cool.
Maybe the Troopers are related to Strom Thurmond?
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a great battle." -- Philo of Alexandria
(Currently, and sadly, on a self-imposed team-specific puck sabbatical.)
yeah
that’s why they merged at about the point the AL Central really started to stink compared to the other divisions.
by Kurt Mensching on Aug 25, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh thanks!
From afar that page resembles real work.
And was it wrong of me to snicker when I looked at the White Sox chart?

ain't no valley low enough
they better keep losing
by Kurt Mensching on Aug 25, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Geez
Things just started falling apart after I turned off the TV and went to bed, didn’t they? Actually, I was well aware of what was going on because I was trying to fall asleep with the game on the radio (I don’t have cable in my bedroom). That didn’t work so good, mostly because everything was going to hell. Once Rodney was summoned, I decided I REALLY needed to go to sleep and turned the radio off. That still didn’t work, because then I found myself lying in bed with my heart racing, wondering what was going on. I DID eventually fall asleep without peeking at the score on my computer, but somehow I had the feeling that they won.
It’s a good thing I’m not superstitious. But hey, if you can’t outpitch, outslug!
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
I feel asleep up 3-0
Woke back up 10-7, not realizing how close we could have been to losing, and figured “Rodney’s got it”. Glad he’s got my back.
I was also pleasantly surprised to see Laird and Verlander get into an argument. It’s about time they got heated, because I remember 2006 when Leyland got angry, the team started winning. I hope the same is true about this team.

by 

















