Attack of the Metrodome: Twins 6, Tigers 2
It's like a horror movie. You know the monstrous killer is in the room. Probably hiding behind the door. Don't go in, you're thinking (or yelling) to the nubile victim-to-be.
But of course, she goes in. Because if she didn't, you wouldn't have a movie. She goes in, walks past the door, and Ahhh! The killer is behind the door! Exactly where you knew he was!
No, no, no! Don't turn around! But it doesn't matter anyway, because the killer is behind you! You're dead, you're dead, you're dead!
And sure enough, the axe goes right into the head.
That's what playing in the Metrodome is like for the Detroit Tigers. You know the 'dome is going to play a role in one of these games. A chopper that ricochets too high off the artificial turf. Maybe a grounder that gets through the infield just a little too fast on that surface. Or - just like the killer behind the door - the fly ball that gets lost against that white teflon roof.
Losing a fly ball in the whiteout of that roof makes outfielders look silly. Suddenly, major leaguers look like your buddy on the softball team, holding out his arms with uncertainty, stepping in place like a fly stuck in flypaper. And there's fear. Where is that ball? Where will it land? Will it hit me in the head?
Today, that was Don Kelly. Kelly was a defensive replacement in left field, taking over for Carlos Guillen in the eighth inning. In virtually every other ballpark on this planet, when Orlando Cabrera pops up a 98 m.p.h. inside fastball off his fists, it will eventually land harmlessly in the glove of the outfielder. And almost every time, Kelly probably catches that ball easily. But not in the Metrodome.
Kelly couldn't find Cabrera's fly ball and it dropped to the turf. That put runners on second and third with one out, completely endangering the Tigers' 2-1 lead that Justin Verlander had worked so hard to protect.
Joe Mauer was intentionally walked to set up a potential double play. But Jason Kubel blooped an opposite-field single into short left. Unfortunately, Kelly misplayed that ball too, letting the ball bounce high and then bobbling it before he was able to make a throw. Two runs scored, and the Tigers' lead was gone.
(The ballgame was officially gone, when Brandon Lyon took over for Verlander and grooved a high fastball that Michael Cuddyer decked into deep left-center field for a three-run homer.)
What was Jim Leyland thinking, putting Kelly out there in virtually unfamiliar territory? Well, that wasn't the first time Kelly had played in the Metrodome. As Jason Beck pointed out on Twitter, Kelly started two games for the Tigers in Minneapolis back in July. But if you want to know why an inexperienced player was put in such a position with a pivotal game on the line... well, that's probably a question worth asking.
Sure enough, the axe goes right into the head.
Whimper:
Of course, the Tigers should've scored more than two runs. And they squandered plenty of scoring chances, getting a runner to third four times. But the best chance was probably in the fifth, when Gerald Laird grounded into a double play with runners on second and third.
(We can't be too hard on Laird, however, since he shut down the Twins' running game, gunning down both Denard Span and Carlos Gomez at second base.)
But then there's also this:
Comment of the Day:
by StringTheory
59 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
IMO
It’s like Leyland “wants” to lose. Why, why, why do you even put Kelly in the game???? I thought he was going to stick with the guys that put us in first place!!!! That has to be the worst move of the year. We had this game. Until Kelly literally “lost” it for us. I just don’t get it.
Tammy
Here's my question:
When did Kelly take away Raburn’s job of “late inning defensive replacement in left field?”
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Sep 19, 2009 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Does Raburn have much experience in LF at the Metrodome?
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by David Tokarz on Sep 19, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions
No idea
I wasn’t really advocating putting Raburn there instead of Kelly. I was just noting that Raburn has gone virually AWOL the last few days (with the exception of starting last night).
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Sep 19, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Still think he would have been a better choice
But it would be an interesting question.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by David Tokarz on Sep 19, 2009 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I just think it is too big of a game to put in a rookie
Put anyone else out there, but not a Kelly
Tammy
yeah
that’s the thing with Leyland, so inconsistent. One day he’s telling us play the guys who got you there, don’t put rookies in over their heads. next, he’s putting kelly in a place where hes’ going to fail.
by Kurt Mensching on Sep 19, 2009 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Jim played the percentages...
and got burned. I actually have more of a problem with him leaving JV than the Kelly move.
This is a qualitative observation vs. a quantitative one...
…but Bobby Seay has been awful at the Metrodome this year and if you’re not gonna trust Kelly in that situation, then you can’t trust Ni either. And it’s not like Kubel hit a rope off Verlander. It was a pop-up that found turf.
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Sep 19, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions
I think that's sarcasm, Kurt. I'll explain.
Dude’s arm had to be falling off. I’d take my chances with a fresh guy at that point. JV battled to get through 7 without his electric stuff. At some point, you have to trust the pen, even with the ace out there.
Yeah
Even use Ni if you want a lefty.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by David Tokarz on Sep 19, 2009 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions
We need to rediscover the 2007 Metrodome mojo
The Tigers went 8-1 in Minneapolis that year. Hell, even last year they managed to win 4 games there.
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
Yikes
The Royals have had THREE players leave their game with injuries. We can’t have that!
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
I'm not necessarily worried about Dusty Hughes
But DeJesus is one of their better players and Olivo’s one of their power guys. I wonder what happened (all Gameday says is “injured foot/ankle” and “injured chest,” respectively.
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Sep 19, 2009 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions
And with the way we're playing we NEED the Royals to stay clutch
They do have Robinson Tejeda starting for them tomorrow. We’ll see if he’s legit.
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Sep 19, 2009 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions
I may or may not have half-choked on the water I was drinking
when I read “And sure enough, the axe goes right into the head.” Hilarious.
Henning had a rare, entertaining line as well:
The Twins Torment continued in ways that were purely sadistic at the torture rack otherwise known as the Metrodome.
Also. There was a question of whether or not anyone has won their division with a negative run differential. In 2007, Arizona won the division with 90 wins by a half game with -20. It’s reassuring, if nothing else. But that was the Mets’ infamous year as well.
Bringing up the Mets really isn’t helping, is it? Here, try what I’m doing and listen to this.
I don't know why that became an issue for discussion
if the tigers keep up the negative run differential, they’re going to lose the division. it’s that simple.
by Kurt Mensching on Sep 19, 2009 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't know.
They could continue winning close games, and losing embarrassingly a few times, yet still win the division. Unless you’re being sarcastic and referring to run differentials of individual games — then, woops.
by StringTheory on Sep 19, 2009 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with Kurt
I said it last week against the BlueJays and Royals. If you can’t score runs you can’t win. If you can’t beat these teams, you won’t beat the teams that matter.
Tammy
by VegasTigers on Sep 19, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions
All other analysis, well founded as it may be, is irrelevant other than...
we are not scoring runs in any fashion. Not hitting homers. Not bringing guys in. Not scoring on passed balls or errors. We cannot score. At all.
And we are apparently gripping so hard that it’s going to take a flukey game or a truly horrendous starting pitching performance to get us out of it. You can’t say we aren’t hitting. We had 11 hits today. We aren’t hitting with guys on. At all.
It’d be nice if we didn’t draw (or create) any more career-making pitching performances for awhile.
reminds me of Alfred Hitchcock
I heard an interview, a few years ago, with one of the men who worked on “The Birds” with Hitchcock. He was describing one of the last scenes, where the blond actress (Tippi Hedron?) goes into the attic alone and is almost pecked to death.
He said that Hitchcock looked at him for a few moments (after the interviewee was describing the scene), and said “so, let me understand this. It’s after the attack, all is quiet, everyone else is asleep, and she hears a noise upstairs and goes up to the attic alone to investigate. Is the woman daft or what?”
In movies, there are those destined to get the proverbial or actual axe to the head. :(
"For myself I am an optimist - it does not seem to be much use being anything else." -- Winston S. Churchill
Since I brought it up during our conversation about players in dreams a couple weeks ago...
Just for fun, I’ve been working on writing an actual story of the mafia taxi driver horror movie.
However, I now wonder if I should have the monster attack people in the Metrodome instead of in a shopping mall.
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Sep 19, 2009 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Can't someone sabotage the Metrodome overnight?
So that the damn building has no power or water or something essential to its function (but without anyone getting hurt, of course), so that they’d have to postpone tomorrow’s game and only make it up “if there are playoff implications?” Or better yet, force the Twins to move to a “neutral site” for the rest of the season, like Miller Park?
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Sep 19, 2009 10:13 PM EDT reply actions
I don't get angry unless I feel like they're not giving an effort. But why would they NOT be giving an effort now?
When things are down, I prefer to investigate. I try to dig into why things unfolded the way they did. It’s all well and good to say “they didn’t hit,” but I’m not satisfied until I find a reason why. It could be a mechanical description. It could be a psychological description. Likewise, I want to know why pop-ups off the bats of Twins always fall in while pop-ups off the bats of Tigers are always caught.
When things are down, most people get mad. I get cerebral.
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Sep 19, 2009 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I get horribly depressed.
My wife is not pleased with me.
I try not to ask why, because then it gets into logic, and as you describe above, there’s not much logic in day-to-day baseball.
I'm kinda screwed when it comes to asking why
I have a background in science AND in writing/filmmaking, so I have a double dose of that urge.
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Sep 19, 2009 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm angry because nothing seems to be going our way...
except G$ throwing out baserunners.
My Music: Some Sorta Giant
he is damn good
too bad he will not get a gold glove, as Rod pointed out today
by Detroitchik on Sep 19, 2009 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Let's keep a level head
It was a bad day and tomorrow may be just as bad. However, the Twins are as bad (or worse) on the road as the TIgers and they have a 10 game road trip coming up. If Detroit is in the lead or tied for the lead at the end of this road trip (7 more games) they will win the division.
Update on KC injuries (according to the Royals' website)
Dusty Hughes left with “nerve soreness” in his elbow.
David DeJesus left with a sore right ankle.
Miguel Olivo left with a “stomach disorder.”
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Sep 19, 2009 10:35 PM EDT reply actions
Update on KC injuries (according to the Royals' website)
Dusty Hughes left with “nerve soreness” in his elbow.
David DeJesus left with a sore right ankle.
Miguel Olivo left with a “stomach disorder.”
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Sep 19, 2009 10:35 PM EDT reply actions
Oops
Don’t know how that appeared twice.
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Sep 19, 2009 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions
For those who pay attention to such things...
our playoff odds skidded to 62.6 percent today. I would guess they will be right at 50% if we fall tomorrow.
Rookies do not belong in late innings when we have
minimal leads. This was a very crucial game. Jim Leyland is an idiot. We have to win tomorrow.
So Porcello can't start an important game?
Like in the playoffs?
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by David Tokarz on Sep 19, 2009 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions
he's not really a rookie now
I think she means people who have less experience. Say … Kelly.
by Kurt Mensching on Sep 20, 2009 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Dunno
I’d trust a player like Avila or Ni. But I don’t think Kelly has the ability.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by David Tokarz on Sep 20, 2009 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions
wasn't kelly on the pittsburgh pirates before the tigers?
he’s not exactly a rookie, though he played about as many games for them in the majors as he has for us.
I see the Sox won BIG today
however, it’s not them I am concerned about, the twins are nipping at our heels like Chihuahuas. It’s frustrating and I am truly disgusted by this whole series.
Here's another thing to consider:
Pavano was gone by the time I got home, so I did not see anything the Tigers did against him for myself. All I have to go on are the assessments of Dan & Jim on the radio, and their observation seemed to be that none of the 11 hits were hit very well. All of them seemed to be either bloops or ground balls that found holes (or infield singles). Perhaps that is how you strand nine? The odds of getting five bloop hits in a row are almost impossible (though the Twins certainly find a way to do it).
And also, I should probably know this, but is Scott Baker the type of guy you can create havoc on the bases against? You know, steal bases, bunt for hits, hit-and-run, etc? Our boys need to get energized. Right now they look like they’re running on fumes. Perhaps we should investigate their in-season conditioning and training regiment?
http://tigersamateuranalysis.blogspot.com
by SabreRoseTiger on Sep 20, 2009 12:33 AM EDT reply actions
blah
I left the house right when this game ended and forced myself to not think about it most of the evening, which was probably a good thing. getting emotional over baseball feels even more ridiculous when I have no friends that understand it.
am I reaching the acceptance stage of this supposed grief process? heh.
I’m tired of trying to figure out why things happened or how. this loss was triggered by the lost ball but it was JV who gave up the hit, and we also couldn’t score any of our runners. same shit, different day. I hope we can hold on and get into the playoffs but my hopes are fading and it makes me pretty sad. I guess I’d rather this fall apart now than at the very end of the month.
I'm taking a break
no reason to waste time on this for now with a whole world out there
by zumayafn on Sep 20, 2009 9:32 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Identity crisis
Who am I? Tonight I find myself in the position of rooting for a team who heart I want to put a stake into. That would be the Sox. I can barely stand to look at A.J. Pier-whatever-ski, but I hope he hits like a Hall of Famer the next 3 days. If the Twins, who need a good dose of a garlic necklace themselves, lose 5 more games, I think I can be sitting back, tipping a few and watching the Tigs in the post-season. Speaking of steaks (as in ribeyes, as in RBIs, thank you Rod Allen), that was a huge RBI for Maggs. Could this be the beginning of a streak of steaks for the guy who looks like my son-in-law? I hope so.

by 






























