Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Phil Mickelson Outshines Tiger Woods

What are the best options for the No. 4 and 5 rotation spots?

As we know now, the combination of Justin Verlander, Rick Porcello and Max Scherzer as the Tigers' top three starters is fairly well understood.  So who does Jimmy Leyland trust to follow up in the two games behind this living, breathing 3 game winning streak?  MLB.com depth chart shows Bonderman and Galarraga as the 4 and 5 starters now. 

But the guy I'd like to see the Tigers try out in the rotation (other than Casey Crosby) is Phil Coke.  He was a starter in the minors, gained confidence as a reliever with the Yankees, and was really a very good reliable pitcher through their title run.  This change of scenery, plus the Tigers desperate need for a lefty starter, seems like a great fit for Coke, who is just entering his prime. 

Here is an excerpt that describes Coke from the Replacement Level Yankees Weblog's perspective:

Although his last appearance of the season was a disaster, Phil Coke was pretty good for most of 2009. As a lefty-reliever, his primary job is to get left-handed hitters out. That's something he's done 77.9% of the time in his major league career, which is the good news. The bad news is he's an extreme fly ball pitcher, and allowed 10 HRs in 60 innings. The major difference with Coke pitching to righties versus lefties is his BB rate. RHB have hit .202 against him and have slugged .367 against him in his career, good for an ISO(SLG - AVG) of .165. LHB have hit .197 with a .349 SLG, good for an ISO of .152. Coke's walked 16 of the 127 RHB he's faced, compared to 6 of the 163 LHB he's faced.

As an extreme fly ball pitcher, Coke is in a good park to call home at the CoPa.  Being in the AL Central, there are a number of top-notch left-handed hitters that the Tigers will face, so having a lefty killer facing them three times in each game he starts against them would give them the best chance to win.

If Coke could fill one of those two spots, then what of the other one?  Bonderman would need to find his old self.  Same goes for Dontrelle Willis, Nate Robertson, Armando Galarraga, etc.  Right now it seems the best option is indeed to let the chips fall where they may in spring training, just to see who is the most like they once were, and ride that horse until it falls. Then get on the next best one and keep going. 

Or, play the matchups with a 4-man set rotation and a 5th/6th starter used based on matchups.  I wonder whether the Red Sox would be willing to deal Dice-K for two of them?

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Bless You Boys writing staff.

Comment 60 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nice discussion starter

I cleaned it up with some editing, thinking of bumping it to the front page.

All your favorite Tigers blog are belong to me.
Bless You Boys.com -- MackAvenueTigers.com

by Kurt Mensching on Jan 10, 2010 7:38 PM EST reply actions  

interesting idea.

I haven’t read up much on coke, but I watched him with the yankees, and he looked okay. Enough so to even overcome the part of my brain that says all yankees must die.

The time for reckoning has come, and we already have the answer

by Vreeland2 on Jan 10, 2010 9:45 PM EST reply actions  

Personally...

I feel that it’s best for the Tigers to find that 4th starter and than play matchup with the 5th starter.

I see Bondo as the 4th starter.

My Music: Now on last.fm!!
My Blog: Inside A Head

by madpoopz on Jan 10, 2010 10:41 PM EST reply actions  

Same here

If Bondo is finally healthy (and I’ll believe it when I see it), then he’s got the fourth starter role locked up. That or closer, but most likely he’ll be a SP.

As for the fifth starter- I say we give a few pitchers a crack at it, in this order
Robertson
Galaraga
Miner
Figaro
Coke
Bonine
Willis

President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.

by David Tokarz on Jan 11, 2010 12:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Agree

Bonderman as #4, and someone from within the organizational scrap heap as #5

by trross1200 on Jan 11, 2010 10:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Sinistrophobia...

…DD’s fear of all things left handed (pitchers, batters, umpires, etc…)

http://www.indianchild.com/phobias.htm

by trross1200 on Jan 11, 2010 10:31 AM EST up reply actions  

I wonder about Bondo's velocity

I really love the guy, but unless he can hit 94ish consistently he can’t get anybody out and he won’t be able to hang on as the #4 no matter how dedicated the Tigs are to him in that spot.

by crwi on Jan 11, 2010 4:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

I’m hoping Bondo is healthy. Strange as it may sound, I actually am more confident of Robertson than anyone else in the sprap heap. When healthy (that’s the key), he’s a decent, reliable innings eater who at least gives you a chance to win. If the arm speed is there, Bondo is my other starter. If not, I want to see Miner or Coke. I wouldn’t let Galaraga near the mound.

A lifelong Tigers fan

by ewild on Jan 11, 2010 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Willis

Dontrelle is a long shot, and he’s as good as released to me. But who knows? Wouldn’t it be amazing if he just figured it out again and returned to being a reliable 3.75 ERA pitcher? I would become a huge D-Train fan. Huge.

A lifelong Tigers fan

by ewild on Jan 11, 2010 5:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Dream on

President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.

by David Tokarz on Jan 12, 2010 2:24 AM EST up reply actions  

it's easy to speculate but difficult to really say

until spring training gets underway. we have no idea if Bondo and Nate have their stuff – though it looked like they will. I’d put Bondo in the #4 spot, and Nate #5 since he’s a lefty, which will come in handy. I keep forgetting Armando even exists since he sort of disappeared at the end of 09 there.

by allikazoo on Jan 11, 2010 11:06 AM EST reply actions  

Please not Robertson...

This is a guy we should have unloaded immediately after the 2006 World Series. I’m so sick of watching the Tigers try to nurse him back into the rotation. They should have twisted Brian Cashman’s arm a little and dumped that salary on the Yanks along with Granderson.

If Bondo’s got his velocity back, he’s a no-brainer at #4 but that’s a big “if.” Otherwise, we’re going to Lakeland with no idea.

by crwi on Jan 11, 2010 4:26 PM EST reply actions  

Otherwise, we’re going to Lakeland with no idea.

That pretty much sums up everything with the fourth and fifth spots, I’d say. We know nothing.

All your favorite Tigers blog are belong to me.
Bless You Boys.com -- MackAvenueTigers.com

by Kurt Mensching on Jan 11, 2010 4:28 PM EST up reply actions  

We've only tried to "nurse him back into the rotation" once,

and it was this year. He came back from having a mass removed from his elbow and threw almost 30 innings with a 3.77 ERA. Small sample size, yes (sorry, Kurt). But maybe the elbow was the cause of his embarrassing 2008 and beginning of 2009.

If Robertson can throw 180+ innings with around a 4.50 ERA, then his salary would be worth it.

by StringTheory on Jan 11, 2010 5:37 PM EST up reply actions  

you realize 30 innings is small enough we know it's a small sample size

and you’re just being redundant, right?

All your favorite Tigers blog are belong to me.
Bless You Boys.com -- MackAvenueTigers.com

by Kurt Mensching on Jan 11, 2010 5:45 PM EST up reply actions  

What more need be said?

He’s scrappy. And a total pro. Despite the small sample size. I’d love to see him in a Tiger uniform.

by crwi on Jan 11, 2010 6:51 PM EST up reply actions  

*hangs head in shame*

I think it’s the alliteration allure.

by StringTheory on Jan 11, 2010 7:10 PM EST up reply actions  

We're hellbent on making you regret telling us that.

:)

President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.

by David Tokarz on Jan 12, 2010 2:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Well...

If he comes out in Spring Training and looks good and earns a job, and then pitches well enough to keep it, fine. But when I look at his stats over time, it becomes very apparent to me that a healthy Nate Robertson is essentially a very (slightly below) average guy who pitched his nuts off for one season (2006).

With that said, of course you’re right that if he can fit into the five spot with the stats you mentioned, he’s worth the money. What are the odds that we really think that will happen?

by crwi on Jan 11, 2010 6:49 PM EST up reply actions  

It's going to be an interesting battle royale in Spring Training

I’d give Bonderman the inside track on one of the rotation spots. They’d be sort of nuts if they didn’t at least let Coke audition as a starter. The way I sees it, one spot will be either Bondo or ‘Mando (rhyme!) and the other will be from the Coke/Robertson/Willis lefty pu-pu platter. I don’t see them breaking camp with 5 righty starters. Unless they want Joe Mauer to hit .983 against them.

by ChrisDTX on Jan 12, 2010 12:19 PM EST reply actions  

Exactly what I was thinking

Mauer, Morneau and are just the tip of the lefthanded iceberg. It seems insane to allow the plethora of lefties in the AL Central to have somewhere on the order of 10-15 extra AB’s against a “legitimate” #5 right-handed starter every game. Just for reference, the Tigers’ #1 and #2 starters in 2009 (Verlander and Jackson) faced the 2nd and 6th-most left-handed batters in the league, respectively. With the 4-man core rotation of Verlander, Jackson, Porcello and Gallarraga (I didn’t know who to tap as our “fifth starter”), the Tigers faced 24% more left-handers than right-handers in 2009. If you include Robertson as the 5th starter (to be conservative), the rotation still faced 18% more lefties. Conversely, taking the Atlanta Braves as having a similarly-constructed pitching staff with 5 RHP starters, the starting rotation (Vazquez, Jurrjens, Lowe, Hanson, Kawakimi) faced 14% FEWER lefties than righties. Over a full season using equivalent number of batters faced, this could spell doom.

by TigerFanInCleveland on Jan 12, 2010 5:27 PM EST up reply actions  

The red sox have no interest in our garbage

These guys contracts suck, no team is going to touch them.

by Lions1788 on Jan 12, 2010 2:00 PM EST reply actions  

Oh Sheet...

We don’t need another one on the pile. I have no faith that Sheets will throw a full season. That’s like expecting Pavano to throw almost 200 innings. (note sarcasm)

by momotigers on Jan 13, 2010 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd take a hundred innings from Ben Sheets

Hell, make him the closer.

President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.

by David Tokarz on Jan 13, 2010 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

At the very least

I could make several “3 Sheets to the wind” jokes in the game threads…

by ChrisDTX on Jan 14, 2010 10:24 AM EST up reply actions  

High risk.....

Ungodly reward if it pays off….Three words: MAKE THIS HAPPEN

by baum on Jan 14, 2010 8:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Interesting discussion

what this make me want to know is whether Leyland and DD will let Coke come to spring training and compete for a starters job? Ever since the trade I feel like I have heard him mentioned as a bullpen guy, but with 2 spots wide open in the rotation I think it would be smart to give him a chance.

I can't believe I ate the whole thing!

by tigerfaninChicago on Jan 14, 2010 10:02 AM EST reply actions  

Question

If Coke becomes a serviceable 4th or 5th starter, does your opinion of the Granderson/E-Jack trade improve, stay the same, or become worse?

by ChrisDTX on Jan 14, 2010 2:29 PM EST reply actions  

mine improves

starter is more valuable than a reliever, and the Tigers need a serviceable left handed starter, so it would fill a need.

All your favorite Tigers blog are belong to me.
Bless You Boys.com -- MackAvenueTigers.com

by Kurt Mensching on Jan 14, 2010 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Improve

although my opinion while ultimately be determined by the career of Austin Jackson. If Jackson gives similiar results (esspecially on the defensive side) compared to what we would expect from Grandy and Coke is productive either as a starter or reliever the trade will be a win. I suppose though if Coke is a quality starter I could lower my expectations some on Jackson and still be okay with the trade.

I can't believe I ate the whole thing!

by tigerfaninChicago on Jan 14, 2010 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Most certainly.

President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.

by David Tokarz on Jan 14, 2010 11:23 PM EST up reply actions  

my opinion improves greatly...

but I really don’t think DD made the trade expecting Coke to contend for the spot anyways other wise he would’ve said so. Would’ve lessened the sting of trading Granderson a bit right there and than.

My Music: Now on last.fm!!
My Blog: Inside A Head

by madpoopz on Jan 15, 2010 12:21 AM EST up reply actions  

he did say

that he expected Coke to compete for a starting spot

by rif23 on Jan 15, 2010 1:10 PM EST up reply actions  

oh.

I retract my statement and some of the sting from the trade.

My Music: Now on last.fm!!
My Blog: Inside A Head

by madpoopz on Jan 16, 2010 12:05 AM EST up reply actions  

personally..

I feel Bondo will win the 4 spot, but I hope Armando gets it.

I just really like Mando.

My Music: Now on last.fm!!
My Blog: Inside A Head

by madpoopz on Jan 14, 2010 10:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Coke as a starter would be a refreshing twist to the Granderson trade

With all the relievers we have now stockpiled, including a bunch of lefties, makes you wonder if Dombrowski had eyes on making Coke a starter in the beginning. Would certainly balance the trade of Granderson if Coke turns into a reliable #4 or #5 starter… for possibly several years to come. I just don’t see the offense getting generated out of A. Jackson. Way too many K’s in the minors, with a lucky, empty BA. I hope I’m wrong.

by longbomb on Jan 15, 2010 7:56 AM EST reply actions  

Galarraga and Bondo

These two should be given the first shots at 4 and 5. Hopefully Armando has recovered from his sickness-plagued season.

by geewy0202 on Jan 15, 2010 4:05 PM EST reply actions  

The pecking order

- Bonderman has a spot with his name on it. He will have to screw up bad to lose it.
- Robertson is next in line, followed by Willis. They haven’t earned it, but they have payola that hasn’t been justified since they signed big fat extensions, so they get dibs.
- If those two bomb out, Galarraga is probably next in line. I give him as much shot of pitching well as I do Bondo, and better than Nate or Willis, but he has an option left and he throws with the right arm, which is the wrong arm at the moment.
- Things go better with Coke- in the rotation- but things go pretty well with Coke in the bullpen also. He led the Yanks in games pitched and had a stellar 1.06 WHIP. Gotta watch out for the long ball, but he should be on the team, either way. I fancy Coke for a late inning job. I trust him more than I trust Zumaya or Perry at the moment.
- Bringing up the rear, we have Bonine, Figaro, and Luis Marte (who isn’t even on the roster, but is as good as Figaro)

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 19, 2010 10:34 PM EST reply actions  

Robertson and Willis

I think that Leyland and Dumbrowski have shown us in the past (with Sheffield and Willis in particular) that they aren’t going to let someone’s salary determine whether they get playing time or not.

I honestly think that the guy that’s thowing the best in Spring Training will get the shot unless:
1. Said “guy” is a player with minor league options and there is another guy throwing well or
2. Said “guy” is Coke and bullpen looks thin without him

by momotigers on Jan 20, 2010 12:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I think the tigers should use Bonderman,Coke,Galarraga,Robertson, and Willis has 5th and 6th starters ( roating) and use them in bullpen to keep fresh. Has soon as someone proves themselves(other than Coke) trade them for Draft pick / minor leauge players. Gotta remember we need to rebuild farm team with hitters or gonna be in same boat for next couple years. But if they wont do that go with your future Coke and Galarraga.

by lil chris on Jan 20, 2010 12:51 PM EST reply actions  

What if...

I’m wondering what would happen if we switched to a four-man rotation. We have an abundance of back-end starters as it is, trading a few and keeping one to double LRP with Miner for occasional spot starts wouldn’t be so bad.

I think it’s entirely possible, it just requires proper conditioning and the willpower to do it.

by metatron5369 on Jan 20, 2010 9:58 PM EST reply actions  

My guess is that it’s do-able, but something that could have ramifications as you’re then spreading those, what, 150 IP over the 4 arms? That’s basically 38 extra innings for each guy in the rotation.

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on Jan 20, 2010 10:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Well

It’s been done before. Like I said, conditioning would be required. Let the bullpen take over more often behind Porcello and Scherzer.

by metatron5369 on Jan 21, 2010 6:49 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Condition would be required but I don’t think that’s conditioning that can happen in one off season.

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on Jan 21, 2010 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Neither do I

It’s just an idea I wish baseball would take another look at. Nolan Ryan’s strategy in Arlington will pay off, mark my words.

by metatron5369 on Jan 21, 2010 6:50 PM EST up reply actions  

It’ll take a long time. Pitchers are conditioned to throw the amount that they’ve thrown from young in their careers (19-ish).

I will say that there are misnomers about innings pitched today compared to 40 years ago. The Dodgers pitchers in their great staff averaged around the same number of pitches as pitchers do today. The difference is that hitters work the count much more than they did so while 100 pitches back then could get you through 8 innings, now that gets you through 6.

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on Jan 22, 2010 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Detroit-tigers-logo_small
Winter Ball Wrap-Up: Dominican Republic

Recent FanPosts

Tigers1978_800x600_small
2012: The Year Of The Tigers
Small
How Can I Hate the Signing of Prince Fielder?
Copy_of_tiger_camp_015_small
Succeeding Jim Leyland
Nate_small
What would it take to get Cabrera?
Carlos_small
Tigers Fan 2012 Hopes & Fears
2kv_small
Is Dlugach back???
100_1952_small
Cecil Fielder criticizes Prince Fielder before awards ceremony
Dsc0178-l_small
BYB writing opportunity available!
Small
.304 Average for Austin Jackson?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Quick Rules

Do:

  • Treat others like you'd like to be treated.
  • Stick to the topic being discussed.
  • Make arguments based on facts, not emotion.
Don't:
  • Confuse BYB with talk radio, your blog or your social networking web site of choice. We're a baseball community.
  • Feed the trolls.

Commenting Code of Conduct


Managing Editor

Dsc0178-l_small Kurt Mensching

Deputy Editors

Meatcomputer-1_small BigAl

Sparky_anderson_wall_small handsomerob1

5532934019_b5fa57ae98_small allikazoo

Contributors

Hpim0067_small Tigerdog1

6m2bts_small Melissa Heyboer

Moderators

Be050826_small NCDee

Sifl_and_olly_small 13194013