Should the Tigers pursue Zack Greinke?
On Thursday, we learned that the Tigers were not one of the teams Kansas City ace and former Cy Young Award winner Zack Greinke could block a trade to. This kicked off speculation by MLive.com's Steve Kornacki whether Detroit had enough trade chips in the farm system to make such a deal happen.
According to a source familiar with Kansas City’s approach, the club is looking for a blue-chip pitching prospect capable of joining its rotation by 2012 and help up the middle.
Detroit is a player because left-handed pitcher Andy Oliver definitely fits that bill, and right-hander Jacob Turner could be ready by 2012. The Tigers also have three solid middle-infield prospects in Will Rhymes, Scott Sizemore and Danny Worth.
I don't think it will happen. I'm not certain the Tigers are really ready to give up their top pitching prospects all over again, especially since this time in Turner they've got a prospect with fewer flaws than Andrew Miller, Eugolio de la Cruz and Humberto Sanchez had when they were moved.
I'll admit to you, I can dream with the best of them, and I would really enjoy seeing a rotation that included Justin Verlander, Max Scherzer, RIck Porcello and Zack Greinke in it. Some fans who only use traditional stats may be a bit turned off by Greinke. After all, he doesn't even have a winning record, right? But pitching wins is a team stat, and Greinke has the misfortune of being an ace pitcher on a bottom-dwelling organization. He's suffered from below-average fielding behind him yearly during his career. He makes up for that by being a strikeout machine, although that dipped from 25% of plate appearances to merely 20% in 2009. You really can't just look at the most recent year when evaluating baseball players. Greinke's FIP the past three years was 3.34, 2.33 and 3.56. But I can't believe I'm actually arguing Greinke is good. That should be obvious.
Turner and Oliver just hope to have his career. Turner has a much better shot at it. With potential plus pitches across the board, a ceiling of "ace" and the likelihood he'll be written into the top two lines of a team's rotation, he's really everything you want in a prospect and he'll be under club control for six seasons. If potential turns the actual, he's going to be the kind of player any organization would like to own. Oliver has more flaws, needs more polish and projects to the middle of a rotation at best. Still, there's value in that and he could provide a boost to the Tigers when he arrives as a fixture in the rotation.
Getting back to the point, it would be a lot of fun to have Greinke in a Tigers uniform but it's not going to happen.
What's your take on the possibility?
340 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'd pass
From what I’ve seen, Turner looks like the real deal. I think he’ll be as good or possibly better than Grienke in the not so distant future
Yes But Greinke Is A Proven Commodity
Turner may not be anything. Do It!!!
by BennieBladesFan on Dec 17, 2010 2:08 PM EST up reply actions
we shouldn't, but...
Most likely D&D’s gonna pass, just like he has on most of the high profile FAs, they really needed some more power. But, my gut says we’re goin n2 the spring like last year w/ sum BS wait & see guys, & we’all know how well that turned out 4 us last year. We need another solid pitcher & Grienke’s a good pitcher regardless of his W/L record, which I would say reflects more on KCs offense, or lack there of. it’s kinda like the Jackson situation a couple years ago, where he would pitch good enough to win, but not get the run support.
If the price is Turner, Wells and Worth….I’d do it….Turner looks very promising so it would be a tough pill to swallow but I think Grienke is worth the risk…
price would start with Turner AND Oliver
especially considering he’d be going to a division rival. too much to give up
than what do you do in the future
our farm system has very little depth. We need all theses prospects to help rebuild from the inside out. This is the problem. We keep trading away the future.
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
by Detroitchik on Dec 17, 2010 5:44 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
*not than ****then
then what do you do in the future
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
Our Staff is young
With Grenkie, Verlander, Scherzer, Porcello (who I don’t Like), & Gallaraga we have a young group that can be signed for a long time, barring any injuries. There are many different groups of players that could be combined for a trade, I say do it. Offer them their choice of one pitcher, Oliver, Turner, Gallaraga, or Porcello + their choice of two other players, Avila, Sizemore, Rhymes, Wells, Clete, Inge, or Boesch (or Turner, Oliver, & Werth no other choices).
If they don’t want that then pass.
We would have plenty of time to rebuild the system & plenty of young pitchers contracts (I’m not sure how long Scherzer, Greinke, Verlander, Porcello, Gallaraga are curently signed for) to extend & keep.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 17, 2010 8:35 PM EST up reply actions
But its a Money thing
If the Tigers trade for Grienke he will only be here two years then will opt for free agentcy and you will have to start paying Scherzer and Porcello more money down the road.DD has already said the Tigers have two 20 mill players thats it so some of these guy are going to leave or be traded we will have to continue adding young starters to the rotation.
Who Believes Everything DD Says?
After getting Grenki, I think he would sign an extension to stay with this team. We would have a great chance of contending into the post-season for many years to come. Our rotation would be younger than the Phillies & almost as great, not quite, but they could contend against each other very well (both teams that is).
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 17, 2010 9:19 PM EST up reply actions
Illitch can afford him.
Payroll is just under 105MM, some $ 30 million less than it was last year.
Greinke makes 13.5 MM- and he’s a steal at that price.
What they can’t afford is another third place finish if they don’t upgrade the leagues 4th worst rotation.
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
Yes, for now
You cannot commit $60MM+ to just three players for any amount of years unless you’re the Yankees or Red Sox. It will REALLY limit any plan for the future and you will lose some of your players that could turn into something, Scherzer and Porcello for example.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 12:33 AM EST up reply actions
Or the Phillies.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 8:53 PM EST up reply actions
Yup
Although I’m convinced they will greatly regret this signing soon.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 9:12 PM EST up reply actions
Especially if they can't dump Blanton and Ibanez.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 10:04 PM EST up reply actions
Danny Worth and Will Rhymes are not solid prospects.
Tigers don’t have the pieces to do this deal.
Forget prospects, they're players.
They’re part of the package if I were the KC GM. Are you listening DD and the KC GM? See my package if I were the KC GM. Kurt knows where to find me if you want me to negotiate a deal. Obviously Wilk, Bishop, Dirks, Rhymes, and Worth are part of the deal. As KC GM, I’d try for Cole Nelson, Jeff Rowland, Matt Little, Shawn Teufel, and Bryan Holaday too. I could build a team around them at LOW payroll.
by StephenGrosberg on Dec 18, 2010 5:38 PM EST up reply actions
I hope that DM thinks like you do
Deputy Editor, Bless You Boys
Free Scott Sizemore!
by David Tokarz on Dec 19, 2010 2:18 AM EST up reply actions
I personally think that Giving up Turner is too much
if they would take any combination of Oliver, Furbush, or Crosby along with Sizemore and Boesch or Wells I’d be more than happy to do it. I don’t think there is anyway they’d bite on that thought. I just am not really sold on Greinke being a true ace. He had a ridiculous season in 2009, but came back to earth a little last year. He’s been a headcase in the past, and didn’t really develop until late. a little bit too much of a gamble for me to give up Turner for.
sure why not
If there’s a GM that would trade a Cy Young caliber pitcher for Worth, Oliver, and Wells; its Dayton Moore
Blatant Twitter Promotion, rarely updated, occasionally funny
by rock n rye on Dec 17, 2010 10:23 AM EST via mobile reply actions
I would take any deal if they didn’t have to include Turner, even if it was 5 for 1 or something crazy like that!
by mdawson7 on Dec 17, 2010 10:46 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Dayton Moore Incompetence Tournament
Someone posted this to the Royals Fansite.
http://www.royalsreview.com/2010/12/12/1871693/dayton-moore-incompetence-tournament
Let’s hope DD is talking to him early and often.
That is outstanding
Very funny…the work of a true fan. Makes me wish that guy was on BYB.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
How About
I would give them Garalaga, Worth and possibly thomas for Greinke. To my recollection,
there are no top tier FA starting pitchers available for next years class of 2011. So, not paying these 3 players, and about $23 million coming off the books for Carols/Maggs we can also afford it. One more dependable starter would be awesome. I agree giving up Turner is too much.
Why would they give up an ace...
for a 4th starter and some pieces, especially to a divisional opponent?
Who mentioned Coke?
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 12:25 PM EST up reply actions
This isn't video game trade ball.
You have to give up things that are worthwhile to get something worthwhile.
Alex English was pretty coo'.
Even the video game GM
would turn that down…
by TonyOrlando78 on Dec 17, 2010 1:43 PM EST up reply actions
Even if Moore was drunk enough to consider that
I can guarantee that MLB HQ would shoot that down and immediately begin a collusion investigation.
Nay
He’ll cost far too much. I saw Washington offered Espinosa, Storen and Zimmerman (the pitcher), all very good, top prospects, and KC said they still hadn’t offered enough. Obviously KC is over-valuing Greinke, and I guess they have every right too, as moving him will bring them the pieces they hope to build their team around moving forward. I’d rather target a guy like Garza who will come will a less-severe price tag. At this point, I wouldn’t move Turner or Oliver, and just look to sign a Brad Penny or a Pavano
Rod Allen's humor consultant
I wouldn't take that offer either..
Washington didn’t offer much of anything. Zimmerman has blown out his arm, and Drew Storen is only a back end reliever. Not close to getting it done.
Would trade for Greinke
Would like to see Greinke in the old english D as long as we didn’t have to give up too much.I would give them Gallaraga,Coke and Furbish.They would be getting two MLB pitchers and future pitcher in Furbish.Would not trade Oliver or Turner.
We'd be ripping them off if they accepted that trade.
Any talks about Greinke would have to at least include Oliver.
Your proposal
is embarassing. It would start with Turner AND Oliver.
Only if KC accepted it.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 7:49 PM EST up reply actions
I just hope DD and co learned something from the Dontrelle Willis debacle
pitching is a mental game and no team should be “the farm” on pitchers with a history of anxiety and skittishness.
the trade wasn't bad because we got Cabrera too.
that deal may not have happened if we didn’t take Dontrelle. the problem came with the contract extension.
Man I’m getting tired of explaining this.
Stop explaining it.
Your blog is down, add it to your signature.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
Come on Greinke's a Top of the Rotation guy
Oliver, Worth and Sizemore would be worth the price. Turner is a chip too much, but even adding Galaraga would be worth the price
by BigSteve in ND on Dec 17, 2010 11:19 AM EST reply actions
You list one prospect
Oliver is the only guys with major value….the others are just “guys”
Would love Greinke, obviously.
But we might as well shut down Toledo and Erie if we give up what we would have to give up. No thanks.
by rcpratt on Dec 17, 2010 11:21 AM EST reply actions 3 recs
^^^ this
my sentiments exactly
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
We agree?
Thats been happening more and more lately…
Deputy Editor, Bless You Boys
Free Scott Sizemore!
by David Tokarz on Dec 19, 2010 2:21 AM EST up reply actions
That's it, couldn't put it any better.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 11:48 PM EST up reply actions
Turner or Oliver plus Sizemore might do it.
And I’d do that in a heartbeat.
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
Not within the division.
The price goes up to have to look at Zack on the mound the extra times each year.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 11:56 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
EXACTLY!
No way does Turner OR Oliver plus Sizemore do, and it wouldn’t do it if we were outside of the division. Greinke is an ace and will require a ton in exchange for him.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 12:34 AM EST up reply actions
Naaah
I’d rather see us not go for Greinke. IF we were to move Oliver and Turner to the same team, I’d much rather see Felix Hernandez.
by Let's do this! on Dec 17, 2010 11:25 AM EST reply actions
I'm really on the fence about giving up the pieces necessary for him
and I don’t think their asking price is going to come down enough for it to be worth it.
Director of the 2010 Free Casper Wells campaign
No Run Support
Garza would be the better choice
I would take Garza or Greinke but Garza would be the better choice.He will make a lot less than Grienke over the next couple of years and i assume he would cost less to trade for.I think the Tigers should think long and hard about giving up Oliver or Turner as we are going to have to have young arms joining the rotation to keep the costs in controll.It is going to be extreamly important with the high cost of free agents to add talent that is club controlled at a low cost.
I don’t mind giving up two high end prospects for a Cy Yyoung award winner…But, if the piece of the pie is not steep than Garza is a nice plan “B”..
With what we would have to give up to get Greinke and the dollar cost Garza is a better option
The Royals would probably want young starting pitching prospects for Grienke and the Rays need bullpen help.So we would be better off trading with the Rays it would be a better fit for the Tigers we wouldn’t have to give up Oliver or Turner.
Sizemore, Crosby+ 1 is as far as I would go.
by StephenGrosberg on Dec 17, 2010 11:34 AM EST reply actions
And they would laugh at that.
Not even if the +1 was your boy, Adam Wilk.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 7:55 PM EST up reply actions
I love Adam Wilk, but I'd part with Sizemore and Crosby.
If they laughed, I’d sweeten the pot of players others like, but I don’t. Schlereth/Weinhardt I rate higher than Ryan Perry.
by StephenGrosberg on Dec 18, 2010 5:50 PM EST up reply actions
Just curious because you are our mechanics guru,
is it a mechanical thing or do you just think he’s not that great?
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 10:41 PM EST up reply actions
Here’s a post I did on Perry a while back.
Mechanically he’s fine, I noted that he has a potential timing issue but I doubt it’s caused the amount of trouble he’s had.
He’s really someone I should take a look at again though because the video I used for that post was obviously dated, while also analyzing him through pitchf/x.
Thanks, poopz.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 19, 2010 9:16 PM EST up reply actions
No way can you put that offer out there and be serious.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 12:35 AM EST up reply actions
I'm serious with everything.
Put it out there and hear the reaction. Reactions produce grounds for further dealing.
by StephenGrosberg on Dec 18, 2010 5:52 PM EST up reply actions
You make a very good point with that
But unfortunately I think that offer is going to get you hung up on and negotiations immediately ending. I have no issues with originally low balling to get an idea of what the other team is for sure looking for and to get talks started, this offer will not get talks started.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 6:54 PM EST up reply actions
I said this in a fan post but I think dealing Jackson in a deal for greinke makes sense. From all his minor league numbers and even his stats this year I don’t think he can sustain success. I really think his value has peaked. Throw in Oliver galarraga and worth and I think a deal could be made
by craggt on Dec 17, 2010 11:35 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Not even close
Jackson’s value has not come close to peaking. He’s going to be an excellent lead off hitter for years to come.
by Let's do this! on Dec 17, 2010 1:07 PM EST up reply actions
And also . . .
. . . trading Jackson would be more thinkable (though still a bad idea) if we had another potential CF around, but we don’t.
Casper Wells, no?
Just playing devil’s advocate here. I don’t want to trade Jackson.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
Not a CF . . .
youmight as well suggest Raburn . . .
I believe you mean DH.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 11:18 PM EST up reply actions
I am certain iis bench
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
by Detroitchik on Dec 17, 2010 11:18 PM EST up reply actions
Just don't anyone suggest infield.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 11:50 PM EST up reply actions
haha
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 12:54 AM EST up reply actions
It's the eternal conundrum
Do you mortgage the future to win now, or do you build a bit slower and remain competitive for more than a season or two? I’d prefer to think of this organization as more like the Indians of December 1993 than the Marlins of December 2002.
That being said, I agree with you regarding the prospect of a Verlander, Greinke, Porcello, Scherzer rotation. It might not rank up there with the Phillies’ rotation, but it would be damned impressive!
Any fool can hit home runs...try hitting 312 triples!
by Ghost of Wahoo Sam on Dec 17, 2010 11:36 AM EST reply actions
Without Turner, yes
I don’t think KC would, or should, trade Greinke without getting a Turner-esque prospect. I’d be willing to give Oliver and just about anyone else they want for him though.
The thing to remember is this. He’s not “cheap” and will make about 13.5M per year for 2011 and 2012. After that, if he pitches well, he’ll hit the free agent market for 20M+ per year (or he’ll might give an extension “break” and sign something like a 5yr/85M extension). Either way, a trade for Greinke would cost us a ton of pospect value, a nice chunk of change for the next two years, and we probably wouldn’t have him in 2013 (since DD has said this organization can probably only support two 20M players).
That being said, our rotation would be outstanding for two years with JV, Greinke, Max, Porcello, and Coke/Galaragga. Even in 2013, if Greinke walks, hopefully Turner is still around and ready. I’d offer Oliver, Raburn, Sizemore/Rhymes, and whoever else they wanted, but it probably isn’t enough.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
Are Verlander and Greinke friends?
I recall a story at the beginning of , was it two years ago(?) when they were talking in the oufiled before a game and Zack told Justin that he was throwing his four-seamer all the time. Verlander made the adjustment and has stuck with it ever since.
It just got me to thinking that Greinke might be more open to a trade to detroit than another location. Not that it is his decision to make however.
i dont know if theyre friends
But they certainly respect each other. They’ve both talked about how they get ideas from watching each other pitch. Being on the same team could make both of them better
by craggt on Dec 17, 2010 12:02 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Would Love It
But there’s no way they should give Turner. I just don’t think Oliver and company would be enough. We should at least try, but I don’t see it happening.
It is not mortgaging the future
When the Cy Young pitcher you are picking up is 27. I think we should definitely persue this. Giving up Oliver, 2 of Sizemore/Rhymes/Santiago/Worth and either Boesch/Wells could be the start and then throw in a couple A-ball types (like we did in the Cabrera deal) might be enough. From all I’ve read about him, Turner is the truth, but if Oliver is Andrew Miller part II, I say trade while is stock is somewhat high.
We'd have him for 2 years
Dombrowski alluded to the team only carrying 2 huge contracts (20M+) during this off-season. If Grienke pitches well for the next 2 years, he’ll be a 20M man in 2013 and we won’t be able to afford him (and Cabrera and Verlander) unless we start producing a lot of home-grown, cost-controlled players by then (and I highly doubt that we would be producing many home-grown players if we traded them all for Greinke!)
I’m not against making a push for Greinke. I’d love to see him in Detroit for 2011 and 2012, but we wouldn’t likely have him in 2013.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
Good pitching wins games; excellent pitching wins championships
At the risk of following the flavor of the minute, take a look at the SF Giants and what got them to the WS this year. They have 4 outstanding starters which makes up for any other flaws in their roster. The tigers have 2 outstanding starters in JV and Max, one solid #4 in KidRick, and then a bunch of questions. Regardless of how much hitting we get, we need at least a solid #3 or better to be added. Greinke fits the bill and Garza’s 2010 is nearly the same as Greinke’s (both have 1.25 WHIP, Garza has the better ERA, Garza gives up more HR and fewer K’s, but has the better VORP (30 vs. 20)).
I’d give up anyone and everyone not named Turner or Castellanos (outside a few on the current ML roster) for either Garza or Greinke. Trading prospects with future impact is worth getting a strong #2/3 to blend with the current roster for next year.
Rule of thumb
You almost always trade a prospect for a proven young MLB player as long as the contract there under isn’t a negative.Garza in this case would be a better deal than Grienke cost wise.If the Tigers did get Garza that would move Coke back to the pen.That would make the starters and the pen one of the best in the league.
Wrong
Coke would stay in the rotatation…Armando goes to the pen. Plus Grienke is quite a bit better than Garza..
I'd rather move Coke than Galaragga
Just because we need the lefty and I think Galaragga is decent as a #5.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
Go for it
Why not? Grienke is a perennial cy young candidate with little injury risk and he’s only 27. Turner’s ceiling is Grienke, and even though Tuner’s a stud I think we’ll all be happy if he wins a cy young. So why not? Sure Grienke’s older and obviously more expensive, but if we pull the trigger we’ll have a rotation of Verlander, Grienke, Scherzer, and Porcello for years to come with some of Oliver, Crosby and co. still in the system at worst. We’ll still have plenty of money to spend next offseason on a big bat, and winning now would do a whollle lot to bring FA’s to Detroit. So I say, lets do it, Turner, Crosby, Rhymes, and Gallaraga, and then we’ll see whose got the fearsome foursome.
Um,
Crosby can’t get traded and still be in the system.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
Um, read the post "SOME of Oliver, Crosby and co. still in the system."
The implication is that we will likely have to give up another pitching prospects not named Turner, and we will still have enough arms in the system to justify doing such.
I did, several times.
And each time you said to ship out Crosby in the last sentence, which is why I said what I did.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 11:53 PM EST up reply actions
We won't have enough arms in the system to justify squat
The big three are Turner. Oliver and Crosby.
Furbush is a #4 starter if everything breaks right (I’ve seen his stuff, not impressive). Adam Wilk is a pitchability guy who happens to chuck a baseball with his left hand at 88mph right at the strike zone every time. Maybe he’s Andy Sonnastine, but that’s his upside. Brayan Villareal looks pretty good, with his 95mph cheese and good out pitch, but there are a lot of scouts who think his stuff is overrated. After that, what? Chance Ruffin? A boatload of relief arms? Never mind that one of our big three (Crosby) can’t stay on the damn mound. And that the other two are criminally underrated (especially Oliver).
Deputy Editor, Bless You Boys
Free Scott Sizemore!
by David Tokarz on Dec 19, 2010 2:27 AM EST up reply actions
Don't . . .
Dombrowski has repeatedly said that the Tigers can’t afford more than 2 $20 million per year players, and that the supporting cast for Cabrera and Verlander has to be less expensive players—not cheap players, mind you, but no more $20 million guys. I’m not completely sure of Greinke’s contract situation, but we can’t be too many years away from Greinke commanding a $20 million+ contract in the free agent market. Threfore, we can’t afford to gut the farm to get him, because we won’t be able to afford to keep him.
2013. Greinke will be a free agent after 2012.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2010/12/tigers-interested-in-penny-other-starters.html
Wouldn’t mind Penny at all
Just saw that.
Marcum would’ve been a great addition. I’d take Penny.
ehhh, barf
No thanks to Penny….he’s get killed in the AL
That's a start.
Keep working on that, DD. Webb, Duchscherer, Penny, Capuano, and more haven’t signed yet. A couple of flyers and I will believe you had a plan “B” all the time!
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 9:14 PM EST up reply actions
That's correct
We need to bring in some plan B’s if we don’t make a trade for a starter.might add Durbin to that list.
I'm desperate for a plan "B",
and I know it won’t be a popular name, but just for competition I’d even take Bondo. He’s an extra year removed from the injuries and that might help. The more I hear DD saying how comfortable he is with the rotation, the more I believe he thinks it. I’ve also seen the name Andrew Miller, and I think that would be too funny.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 9:02 PM EST up reply actions
Andrew Miller signed with the Red Sox
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 9:11 PM EST up reply actions
That's right,
brain not always working.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 10:05 PM EST up reply actions
I hear ya
Many moments of that on here for myself.
by Let's do this! on Dec 19, 2010 12:29 AM EST up reply actions
Here's how to acquire Zach.
Sign a few former Braves. Say they are gritty leaders. Tell GMDM they can block prospects too.
Moore looses his mind with eagerness and trades Greinke for the withering corpse of Andruw Jones and the ghost of Steve Avery.
Alex English was pretty coo'.
by 13194013 on Dec 17, 2010 1:37 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
TRUST THE PROCESS!!!
Blatant Twitter Promotion, rarely updated, occasionally funny
by rock n rye on Dec 17, 2010 2:19 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I also misspelled lose.
Cripes, banner day in the crap spelling bee for me.
Alex English was pretty coo'.
That trade is not getting done without Mark Lemke
Just sayin’.
by theRPS on Dec 17, 2010 3:37 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Don't forget Sid Bream flying around the bases!
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 7:01 PM EST up reply actions
I would sit tight
Greinke sure is tempting, but i’d rather hang on to the youngsters. The main reason the Tigers have been so “average” the last few years is because the pipeline of impact prospects and farm system has been so poor and bare. Detroit needs to focus more on the future. I know most fans hate hearing that…
Greinke would be the future
If we could sign him to a long term contract. He’s 27. Did the Cabrera trade cost us dearly? No it was obviously worth it and that ‘emptied’ our farm system. Make a similar trade DD!
by craggt on Dec 17, 2010 3:11 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
But then you would have about $65 million tied up in 3 players . . .
. . . how would you afford to pay for a supporting cast?
And wouldn’t you rather have, say, 2 $10 million starters, as opposed to 1 $20 million and one league minimum?
Depends on who that league minimum starter is
Cliff Lee (just for the sake of argument, I’m well aware he’s already signed elsewhere) and Tommy Hanson is a hell of a lot better than Carl Pavano and Gil Meche.
You don’t have to sign someone immediately, but I think you could definitely put 60 mil in 3 players if someone like Jake Turner was looking for real (at AA or higher) and looking ready for the show. It’s not something to rule out, it just means you have to run your club like a small market one after you make those expensive signings (which isn’t a terrible thing if you’ve got a great GM).
by ozymandius1024 on Dec 18, 2010 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
Something like this would be well worth the prospects.
I’d easily send them Turner, Perry, and any combination of Boesch, Worth, Sizemore, Rhymes they would want. Might even swap Oliver and Perry if it took it. We can only hope Turner turns into someone of Greinke’s caliber. However, I would only do this trade if he agreed to sign an extension. I mean, a starting rotation of Verlander, Greinke, Scherzer, Porcello, and Whoever would be nice, plus losing Perry wouldn’t be as bad, seeing we could slide Coke back to the pen…
by BeardedPlayoffJesus19 on Dec 17, 2010 3:31 PM EST reply actions
Trade
I would be willing to trade Boesch, Worth, Galaragga and one of our reliever prospects, but NOT Oliver or Turner. Maybe Ryan Perry and keeping Coke in the pen would be a best case scenario and a very good deal for KC as theere are still a couple good relievers on the market still that we could replace Perry with.
Pitching wins championships
I’d give up Oliver/Sizemore/Boesch/Villarreal for Greinke.
The problem is I’m guessing they would want both Oliver and Turner plus a handful of folks. I would guess that their kings ransom increases IF he is traded in the AL Central.
Tough call but who wouldn’t want Greinke?
Imagine: Verlander/Greinke/Scherzer/Coke/Porcello next season!
by JAYRC on Dec 17, 2010 5:50 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Just my opinion
Yes I would love too see Zach in Detroit. Now for what I would give up to get him would be Oliver, Perry, Sizemore, and either Boesch or Raburn ( not both)
I do not understand some of the logic around here
1. We need a pitcher, but we don’t want to settle for a #4 or #5 guy
2. Our pitching was terrible last year, so we really need a #1 or a #2
3. But we don’t want to pay for any free agents who are a #1 or #2 (i.e., Lee)
4. Which means we have to trade for a #1 or a #2
5. But we don’t want to trade any of our top prospects to get a #1 or #2
How do you expect to acquire a young, top flight starting pitcher without giving up dollars to a free agent or very good prospects to another team?
Stick Turner and Oliver on a plane with an OF prospect and an IF prospect and another scrub of their choice and make the damn trade.
The logic is that
we don’t NEED a #1 or #2, we have JV and Max. We DO NEED a pitcher or two later in the rotation to eat up innings and keep us in the game. We did not NEED Lee, and I would guess we would never have gotten him, I would bet he knew where he was going after the last pitch of the WS. We don’t want to trade our TWO top prospects for Grienke because we don’t need him, we would like him. We have very few real prospects in our system, guys that will be real major leaguers, studs. These two guys, Turner and Oliver, will probably be here in 2012. We then have an INCREDIBLE 1 – 5 rotation, relatively reasonably priced, for several years.
We need to sign a couple flyers and make somebody EARN the 4 & 5 spots in the rotation this year, but we don’t need to trade away our only real prospects that are close to ready for a player we don’t NEED.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 9:29 PM EST up reply actions
a couple flyers?
Good Luck Winning there.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 17, 2010 9:46 PM EST up reply actions
It's just as good of an idea
as giving away the future for a guy we don’t need.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 9:48 PM EST up reply actions
He is still young Only 27 Still has at least 10 years
He is young & could be part of our future. The guys you talk about Might Be Good, look at our past players, Porcello? not living up to expectations & probibally won’t, Miller,?, & others??
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 17, 2010 9:53 PM EST up reply actions
He won't get re-signed.
DD said we have our 2 $20m players.
Looking at the past, Porcello was rushed, Miller was rushed, Bondo was rushed. They weren’t ready but we stuck them in the majors anyway. They would have all benefitted form another year or two in the minors to get “polished”.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 9:59 PM EST up reply actions
So they wern't ready?
At the time they were not ready. Just because they are brought up early does not mean they stop maturing, in fact they should have improved faster, facing better hitters. They still never did mature, if they had they would have been great, they just were not as Great as everyone made them out to be.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 17, 2010 10:07 PM EST up reply actions
In the majors,
your job as a pitcher is to use the best stuff you have when called upon to win for the team. In the minors, results aren’t as important as development, and you work on control, developing pitches, improving pitches, etc…It’s why you get sent back down when things aren’t right (Max and Porcello last year?). Their development was stunted to an extent, and they didn’t live up to expectations.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 10:14 PM EST up reply actions
So someone else gets called up
Someone else gets a chance to prove themselves too. The player being sent down gets to pitch to lesser hitters & get a build up in confidence. If your Major Leage Coaches can’t figure out a pitchers problem, he should be fired. You send them down to bring up someone better.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 17, 2010 10:18 PM EST up reply actions
When do they work on that?
They need to face real batters in game situations to fix it. At the major league level, it doesn’t cut it to be “working on it”. That stuff is done in the minors.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 10:26 PM EST up reply actions
So Then
We send a pitcher down & bring up a starting pitcher who is not as good. Or do you send them down to pitch a game or two when the schedule works out to where you can aford to skip them in the rotation, so they can work on something. I think Gallaraga went down so they could bring up a reliefer last year.
Anyway you do not send a starter down & bring up someone you think or know is not going to give the team a better chance of winning, that is insane.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 17, 2010 11:18 PM EST up reply actions
You think when Max
went down that Figaro or Mando or whoever was called up were instantly the better pitchers than Max.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 11:22 PM EST up reply actions
Do You?
How long was he gone? How many Major League Starts did he miss? One or Two? Do I think they made the right move? Don’t know. As fast as he figured it out, this could have been worked on in a bull pen work out or two, pitch batting practice. They do practice don’t they? Just because the move was made does not mean it was the only move to make or the right move.
I just checked it out. Durring his time in the minors the Tigers had 3 off days. He missed 2 starts but had 2 in the minors. When he returned Willis disappeared from the rotation. I checked for the next 3 rotation starts & he was gone. Willis also came up from the minors when Max went down. Willis pitched on May 4th then his next start was the day after Max’s last start before the minors May 15, about the same amount of days Max was gone.
Seems the Tigers were playing tumbeling pitchers at the time with Gallaraga, Willis, Bonderman, & Max. Sorry Figaro had no starts in his time gone. Send someone down, bring them back & see how they would do.
That is what I call a Flyer Pitching Staff.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 18, 2010 12:11 AM EST up reply actions
At the time
The Tigers had 6 pitchers & they were trying to figure out who their starting 5 would be.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 18, 2010 12:20 AM EST up reply actions
Outside of Bondo,
none of those guys were having success before injuries and none have a proven track record of sustained success (Bondo was at least improving before the injuries) when healthy. That’s not a flyer staff, that’s a bad contract staff.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 12:33 AM EST up reply actions
Please Explain?
What Is A Flyer Staff or Flyer pitcher then?
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 18, 2010 12:35 AM EST up reply actions
To me,
a flyer is someone that has had proven success and is removed from that success by a year or two due to a major or constant nagging injuries.
The guys I mentioned along with guys like Bondo or Bedard or Harden (both already signed) would be in that category.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 12:39 AM EST up reply actions
So Then
I listed Willis who won 20 games & had success at one time, Gallaraga who has had success one year (his first year with Detroit) in the past & a perfect Game (off the books) as flyers but you don’t think so.
Thanks for the definition. I’m outa here for tonight. I have said all I need to say about my opinion for now. I won’t change my mind & I’m sure you won’t either.
Talk to you later in another post.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 18, 2010 12:49 AM EST up reply actions
If Greinke isn't extended, the Tigers would get 2 top draft picks as compensation
and there is the replacement for losing the prospects that get traded for him.
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
Minus 2 years of development for the prospects
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
Assuming we offer him arb.
I believe I have stated this before, hahahahaha.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 10:23 PM EST up reply actions
Based on past record,
NO!
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 10:26 PM EST up reply actions
Then
He would have to be bad enough that they did not want to keep him. Sorry, I just don’t see that happening.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 17, 2010 10:28 PM EST up reply actions
No, DD doesn't offer arb.
It’s not that he wouldn’t be good enough to keep, he doesn’t offer players arbitration, plain and simple.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 11:20 PM EST up reply actions
He offered arbitration to Lyon and Rodney
knowing that they’d decline. He’d offer arbitration if he was okay with the player accepting, which I think he’d do with Greinke.
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
Yeah, he did.
I would now consider this idea, but I don’t think we have enough to do it within the division. The Royals will want more from us because of where we play (AL Central).
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 12:04 AM EST up reply actions
Right
He just hasn’t had many instances where he should have offered arbitration. (But that’s partially because of his affinity for extending prior to the end of the contract.)
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
a couple flyers?
Might as well save the money & pitch the mud hens.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 17, 2010 9:54 PM EST up reply actions
That's hillarious,
considering you were the one that wanted all the mudhens in the lineup.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 10:07 PM EST up reply actions
Remember
With Improved Pitching Staff.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 17, 2010 10:09 PM EST up reply actions
No, with five Cy Youngs -
three or less runs allowed most nights.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 11:25 PM EST up reply actions
How Soon We Forget
The Twins had 80 games with 3 runs or less yet no Cy Young, Correct?
The Giants won 86 of their games allowing 3 runs or less yet no Cy Young, Correct?
How soon we forget & change words around for our liking’s…..
Although when Halladay trade rumors came up 2 years ago I said get him, then again last year I said get him. Someone else got him.
When Lee was offered 2 years ago I said get him, then at the end of the year again I said get him, then again this summer I said get him, then again this winter, but someone else got him,
When Oswalt requested a trade I said get him but again someone else got him.
We will have to wait & see if I was correct or not, all three are together on another team of course, someone thought the same as me. But I’m pretty sure 77Best Rookie Class Ever ? did not agree with me.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 18, 2010 10:54 PM EST up reply actions
And
They had a year of Major League under their belts except for Rhymes, Wells about a half year.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 17, 2010 10:10 PM EST up reply actions
Webb, Duchscherer, Penny, Capuano… all have at least a year or so under their belts, too.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 11:28 PM EST up reply actions
What does that mean?
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 12:19 AM EST up reply actions
The players I said would be in the batting order.
You mentioned I had mud hens in the batting order I posted in another blog. I said they had time under their belt now. You mentioned pitchers with time under their belt. Now we are compareing pitchers to batters.
Where do these pitchers stand up to say Greinke, Bonderman, Willis, or even Robertson or Miller, he was waived by Boston?
Verlander, Scherzer, Porcello, Gallaraga, & Coke all have more than a year under their belts too, so are these other pitchers better than any of them? Sure, they are cheaper than Greinke, but they are not even close to his calibur. None of them will help put us over the Starting Pitching Hump we are behind. We already have three # 4  pitchers.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 18, 2010 12:33 AM EST up reply actions
Yes, if healthy,
Brandon Webb is better than at least three of those guys. If Duchscherer can stay healthy for an entire season, he is better than three of those guys. If he comes back healthy, Capuano is at least as good as Coke or Mando. Penny looked good last year until he was hurt.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 12:44 AM EST up reply actions
Sounds familiar
Sounds like our wounded pitching staff of the last couple of years.
by TigersFan1957 on Dec 19, 2010 12:21 AM EST up reply actions
Agree 100 %
But would like Garza but don’t want to trade Oliver or Turner.
They wouldn't need to get either for him.
They just let their entire bullpen walk away, along with CC and Pena. Give ’em a couple of our cost-controlled-for-the-next-five-or-six-years-arms and BB or Wells and it may work.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 9:54 PM EST up reply actions
I don't think they need to replace Crawford externally
They have a kid named Desmond Jennings who is billed as a much better prospect than Wells or Boesch. I’m not sure if they have an internal plan for 1B (Streiby?). I know they need bullpen help. Even if your system is stacked, you can’t replace what they lost.
They will probably trade with someone that can give them a high quality 1B prospect and a couple of reliable, cheap, bullpen arms.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
Yes
I’ve read into Desmond Jennings and it sounds like he is the second coming of Carl Crawford, which is why they had no issues letting him walk.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 9:45 AM EST up reply actions
Maybe so
I guess we will just have to wait and see. But he hasn’t stolen fewer than 35 bases in a season where he has had 200+ PA. His career minor league averages are .299/.384/.441/.824 for AVG/OBP/SLG/OPS. He looks very solid.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions
Absolutely
Just explaining why the Rays are not going to want an outfielder as one of the top players. They look good in terms of outfielders.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 6:56 PM EST up reply actions
The Tigers desperately NEED to upgrade the rotation.
I’d trade any prospect that only hopes to grow up to be like Greinke one day, in exchange for the real deal.
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
Yes, the Tigers do.
We could do it without trading away all of our prospects, though. I want a perenial winner, not a window. Trading away everything in the pipe for one guy, that’s all of our eggs in one basket.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 10:04 PM EST up reply actions
"How do you expect to acquire a young, top flight starting pitcher without giving up dollars to a free agent or very good prospects to another team?"
Obviously, we need to stick Turner into the Way-Forward Machine and enjoy our 25 year old stud.
Why didn't we think of that before (smacks head)?
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 12:48 AM EST up reply actions
Depends on the asking price
If it’s Porcello and Turner, I’d pass. But either one of them, or Oliver, and maybe a Sizemore, I’d do it. I hate to trade young pitching talent, but let’s not forget that, if Greinke were to leave after two years, the Tigers would almost surely get two very high draft picks for him to replace the lost prospects, and they’d have a helluva rotation in the mean time.
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
Comp picks,
hahahahahaha!
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 7:02 PM EST up reply actions
Greinke fires his agent and asks for a trade
From JP Morosi at Fox Sports
Greinke fired his agent on Friday, the clearest indication yet of the ace right-hander’s desire to be sent to another club.
After Greinke switched representation from SFX Baseball to CAA, a high-ranking executive from another team told FOXSports.com, "He really wants out of K.C." Separate major-league sources confirmed that Greinke has unequivocally asked the Royals to be traded.
His new agent is Jeter’s agent. Gotta be a smart guy to swindle the Cash man out of $ 50 million for a shortstop that hits worse than Johnny Damon and waives balls through the infield.
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
he should hire Boras
he seems to be able to get whatever his clients want
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
Grienke is a head case and one year wonder
Pass.
good afternoon
He's Dontrelle Willis all over again
good afternoon
Except, of course, having his better season after his anxiety problems.
And not being even near a drop off like Willis. Clearly it is exactly the same!
Alex English was pretty coo'.
and the Cy Young and stuff
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
by Detroitchik on Dec 17, 2010 10:45 PM EST up reply actions
hahaha
you really believe that, don’t you?
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
by Detroitchik on Dec 17, 2010 10:46 PM EST up reply actions
Is it even possible that KC actually trades Greinke within the division or
does anyone know if Det is on his NTC?
JD’s like, "you want some fucking pitching? Here’s all the pitching you can stand. Now choke on it, bitches!"- RCCook
Well, that sig kills the family friendliness.
No, Detroit is not.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 17, 2010 11:40 PM EST up reply actions
Detroit is NOT on the NTC
I think there are only 10 teams that are NOT on the NTC and the Tigers are one of them. However, he has said he’ll waive the clause.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
MLBTR says DD is "comfortable" with the rotation.
And that makes me VERY uncomfortable.
HERE’S THE LINK to that horse $h!+ comment!
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
That makes me sick.
It looks like the Twins get swept again next year.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 12:00 AM EST up reply actions
I don't believe it
It’s code for “we’re looking around at our options right now.” He also mentions that they are completely “open-minded” to any changes to the rotation or bullpen. Not to mention they have been linked to Brad Penny and other veteran starters. I do not believe that for a minute, I still think he is hiding something.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 12:43 AM EST up reply actions
The whole "top four" stuff is a load of bunk.
Coke is a complete roll of the dice. One start in AAA ball, one three inning start in the majors, and they’re now counting on him more than Galarraga? B.S.
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
It completely is
Until the season starts and our rotation is what it currently is, I refuse to believe we are not looking for a pitcher. I don’t think it’s going to be a Matt Garza or Zack Greinke level pitcher, but I would not be shocked to see us get Penny and/or Gorzelanny or someone of that level.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 9:48 AM EST up reply actions
I was gonna say
Code for “bluffing” but close enough.
Deputy Editor, Bless You Boys
Free Scott Sizemore!
by David Tokarz on Dec 19, 2010 2:30 AM EST up reply actions
what's he supposed to say?
“we’re not happy with the rotation, we think galarraga stinks”? He’s the boss. He has to make his players know he believes in them, plus he needs to look content with his team to opposing GMs, even if he’s continuing to try to improve.
by Kurt Mensching on Dec 18, 2010 10:26 AM EST up reply actions
He was in a no win situation.
If he says we’re not happy, good luck in getting fair value in a trade. If he MEANS he’s happy, good luck in winning the division.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 10:41 AM EST up reply actions
It like a game of poker
You have to wear your dark sunglasses and don’t show your hand.
KC is going to mess up
The have to much value on Greinke right now. Legit offers are probably coming in and they say it’s not enough. Good luck trading him in the middle of the year. No team gets a fair value trading in the middle of the season.
Anyway, I’d trade for him right now. Rather have made a move then sit back and hope the future pans out. It may not work but there is no guarantee on Turner or Oliver either.
Greinke to Philadelphia
. . . for Blanton, Ibanez and a B prospect. That’s my prediction . . . That’s the kind of deals the KC GM makes.
Holy crap
If that’s right, I would die… That rotation would be nuts.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 9:48 AM EST up reply actions
We Need a Pitcher But Greinke is NOT the Guy
Grienke will be expensive to obtain and to keep. He is a great pitcher but he will only help get us to the playoffs. His anxiety disorder would be a complete disaster during the intense pressure of the playoffs. We need 3 top-flight pitchers to win a championship. You had better believe that is what Mr. I wants before he gets too much older. We should pursue a top-flight pitcher that is a better value and that thrives on pressure. I propose Wandy Rodgriguez or Matt Garza.
You do NOT need 3 top-flight pitchers
Yankees had C.C. Sabathia as their only top flight pitcher when they won it a couple of years back (no way do I consider Burnett or Pettite a top flight pitcher). The 2008 Phillies did it with, if you consider them top flight, Hamels and Moyer as their top two. 2006 Cardinals did it with Carpenter and a bunch of bums.
Also. I would not consider Rodriguez top flight, yet. He’s had three good years and three decent/bad years. I would consider him a middle of the rotation player not a top-flight pitcher.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 9:55 AM EST up reply actions
"His anxiety disorder would be a complete disaster during the intense pressure of the playoffs"
Huge difference between Greinke and Willis. Willis had his big season, then struggled, then went on the DL with an anxiety disorder. Greinke struggled, went on the DL with an anxiety disorder, then had multiple big seasons and won the Cy Young. He seems to have learned how to cope, in other words.
How about Wandy Rodriguez instead?
I bet Wandy would come waaaaaay cheaper than Greinke (which means we might still need to put Oliver on the table, but not Turner. He also might be had for Wilk/Furbush/Villareal instead with the right players added in). Wandy would be a solid #3 this season, would cost about 7M, and he’s left handed (for those where it matters).
Wandy is a free agent after 2011. We could offer arb and let him walk. He’d be at least a type B, probably a type A. Then, we still have Turner, maybe Oliver, and a couple of other strong SP prospects in the system to vie for a 2012 spot.
The more I type, the more I like the idea.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
I wouldn't mind this
Mainly because he’d be cheaper. He’d be a pretty good No. 3 and seems to take care of business.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 9:56 AM EST up reply actions
Plus the ownership in Houston is dumb
And meddlesome. They approach Al Davis levels of meddling.
Deputy Editor, Bless You Boys
Free Scott Sizemore!
by David Tokarz on Dec 19, 2010 2:31 AM EST up reply actions
oliver...fine...Turner...no
I think I would pursue this if Andy Oliver was the key to the trade. His first stint in the major leagues was not too impressive (I know you can’t base what his career could be on that); however, Jacob Turner looked really, really impressive when I saw him pitch in Spring Training last year. If we can somehow keep Jacob Turner, I’d much rather pursue Greinke that way.
We have JV and we have Max, we have few prospects worth a whole lot in the minors to anyone not named Grosberg, and we do not have an unlimited budget. Right now, I guess I see Grienke as more of a luxury than a need. We need another starter (preferably two), but we are not in need of an ace, we have one in JV. When I said to try a couple of flyers, I meant to at least resemble a plan “B”. We all know the rotation needs upgraded, even DD probably gets it. If we are going to trade to upgrade, and given what’s out there in FA we would have to, we can’t, as rc said, shut down Toledo and Erie to do so. There are other teams out there that are looking to dump real starting pitchers because they are getting too expensive, too. It would take less in prospects because they are salary dumps. We’ve been reading about them for a while. Guys like Blanton, Shields, Wandy Rodriguez, Nolasco and probably more we don’t know. Guys that it would take a combo of a couple of guys we have in the minors to get that are cost controlled for a while. Our minors have mid-level prospects all over, which is usually what it takes to get salary dump guys. We need a couple of guys that will go deep into games to keep us from overusing the pen. We shouldn’t blow the wad on one guy.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 10:13 AM EST reply actions
Well stated.
No need to blow the future for Greinke (or anyone else). Wandy Rodriguez or Matt Garza as a #3 and Porcello as a #4 feels pretty good to me. Picking up a Shields or Nolasco in addition would make us formidable (and Coke can stay in the pen). We will need to be able to beat not only the Twins but the Red Sox as well. No use aiming for anything less than a World Series appearance.
by PawPawMaxwell on Dec 18, 2010 11:03 AM EST up reply actions
Solution trade Grosberg to KC so he can be GM
by swish330 on Dec 18, 2010 11:06 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Philly
maybe we get their whole rotation for Adam Wilk, Furbush, and Dirks!
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 11:13 AM EST up reply actions
I'd certainly be able to get a GREAT TRADE for KC.
I’d ask for Turner, Wilk, Dirks, Rhymes, Bishop, Nelson, Teufel, Little, Jeff Rowland, and Holaday, The Tigers would turn down Turner, and I’d counter with Schlereth/Weinhardt. At that point I’d have an idea of DD’s thinking and come up with a deal. Kurt, JAYRC, and Tigerdog1 know where to find me. I work for free, but appreciate a “thanks” once in awhile.
by StephenGrosberg on Dec 18, 2010 5:22 PM EST up reply actions
But he'd never do it without getting Wilk!
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 12:07 PM EST up reply actions
Name these pitchers
Career FIP: 4.17
2010 FIP: 4.42
Career K/9: 7.10
2010 K/9: 6.60
Team’s 2007-2010 Defensive Ranking by UZR: Third
He’s not bad, but is he a guy who you’d give up a top ten prospect for. Who is he? How would you expect him to do in Detroit?
Career FIP: 4.54
2010 FIP: 3.92
Career K/9: 6.53
2010 K/9 7.86:
Defensive ranking of his teams: 25th
He’s not going to cost you a top 10 prospect, and he’s gotten better each of his last two seasons. Is he really a guy you just cross off your list automatically?
by Kurt Mensching on Dec 18, 2010 11:29 AM EST reply actions
I have no idea,
but I’m sure I would never suspect who they actually are.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 12:06 PM EST up reply actions
First guy is Garza
But can’t figure out the second guy. 25th by UZR? 2010 or 2007-2010?? Anyway, with regard to Garza, I think he would be a good #3 guy in Detroit. Our defense is not nearly as good as the Rays, but decent.
My guy is Wandy Rodriguez. I think he would fill our need for a lefty well. If Coke doesn’t make it, we would still have a solid lefty starter.
by PawPawMaxwell on Dec 18, 2010 1:26 PM EST up reply actions
Yep
Garza is really overrated both by the media and by some of the commentors here. His peripherals aren’t really that good, and he’s a Super-Two and probably going to be making around 5 million next year so he’s not going to be Max Scherzer cheap.
Second Guy is Tom Gorzelanny (it messed me up, because I looked up the UZR thing, and I counted that it was the Marlins that were 25th in that period. Oh well.). I completely agree, and I think I’ve said so before.
I can’t wait until someone comes in and tells me how hard Matt Garza owns despite the evidence that he wouldn’t be the best guy to trade for.
by ozymandius1024 on Dec 18, 2010 1:32 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
If not for cost in prospects would take Graza over Gorzelanny everday
What we need is a rock solid starter everyday some one who has pitched against the Red Soxs and Yankees and not someone who is pitching in the weak National League.I’ll take my chances any day with Garza as 77 has stated above we already have Verlander and Scherzer he would be the #3 starter and would not cost us that much per year.And he would bridge the gap till Turner and Oliver are ready.
Yes, but there is a huge difference in prospects and cash
So I don’t know what your point is.
I really don’t know if Detroit could get a deal done without giving up Oliver or Turner with Tampa anyway. People say they need bullpen help, but they’ve shown (and I’ve already said this before) that they won’t spend premium prices to get bullpen help.
Trading Matt Garza for relievers and the Tigers minors scraps wouldn’t happen, I don’t think. That’d be trading one of their premium trade pieces (because of perception) a return that’s not optimal.
by ozymandius1024 on Dec 18, 2010 1:58 PM EST up reply actions
Help me out here.
Why would the Rays want one starter prospect in Oliver (no way they could get a Turner type for Garza) when their rotation is set for several years? To trade? Why not just get the cost controlled guys in the bullpen they need form the team that has drafted the best ones in recent years? I’m not offering scraps. Perry could be pretty good in the near future. Simons should have gotten a shot last year instead of Stink’s boy. That’s not really scraps, it’s prospects. Perry has closer stuff and is team controlled for 4 or five years yet.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 2:07 PM EST up reply actions
Ryan Perry isn't very impressive at all
If he had closer stuff, Detroit wouldn’t have to sign Jose Valverde and Joaquin Benoit. You’d think with the electric stuff Perry is supposed to have he’d have a K-rate higher than 7 per 9. Yeah, it was only his second season in the big leagues, but college relievers are supposed to be guys that you can get right to the majors and have them produce. Ryan hasn’t done that, and I’m always nervous whenever that guy is in the game.
Simons isn’t even on the 40 man, and I would think if someone were that enamored with him that he would’ve been taken in the Rule V draft.
It’s like Andy MacPhail said: “Our feeling is the right-handed relief market is probably the most fungible market there is in baseball”. I completely agree with that (unless you’re talking about the high end guys like Mariano Rivera or Joakim Soria), and I think that most GMs in MLB feel the same way. So to say that the centerpiece of a Matt Garza deal (who has a pretty big perceived value, like I said before) would be a couple of relievers who aren’t big difference makers and someone like Ryan Strieby just seems really insulting.
They may need some relievers for their bullpen for next season, but I don’t think they’re going sell off one of their biggest trade pieces for something that’ll only fix a need for next season in lieu of something that would help them in the East for many years in the future.
by ozymandius1024 on Dec 18, 2010 2:35 PM EST up reply actions
Most teams would want Perry
The Rays are builing again for the future they would love to have a guy like Perry who’d be cost controlled and we have other pieces that im sure they would be interested in.And we would not have to give up Oliver or Turner like 77 said.And just because you think we don’t have anybody to trade thats not true.Im sure if you ask the Rays scouts they could come up with a list.
If they don't want to trade for what they need, why are they shopping him?
It’s insulting to propose a trade to a team that is very cost conscious that fills up their bullpen that they just let walk with some low-cost players? And OK, maybe not Simons (by the way, a lot of people around here don’t get him not being on the 40 man), how about Schlereth or maybe even Coke?
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 2:51 PM EST up reply actions
Then they trade Garza and get relievers as throw ins
Not the centerpiece of the deal. I just think if you’re trading one of your better trade chips that you’d want to get the best return possible, and not just to fill a need in your bullpen. I don’t think any of the current Tigers young relievers are close to being a sure thing (think Huston Street, Daniel Bard, or Andrew Bailey). For that reason, I would think they’d rather get a position player or a SP to fill the inevitable void in the future when James Shields gets his ass traded (when his value isn’t in the toilet).
They’re probably shopping him because he’s a Super-Two and going to be getting a decent raise on his already decent salary (for a young guy, anyway), and his peripherals don’t look nearly as good as the stats he’s putting up on the field (like Kurt said). They want to get Jeremy Hellickson into the rotation, and the only alternative to get that done would be to trade James Shields. Trading James Shields doesn’t make a whole lot of sense for them at this juncture because his value isn’t the highest on account of the godawful season he just had (not talking about his sweet peripherals though).
by ozymandius1024 on Dec 18, 2010 11:54 PM EST up reply actions
they've already said they don't plan to trade Garza or any starter
by Kurt Mensching on Dec 19, 2010 12:30 AM EST up reply actions
Does that mean that we can stop talking about them?
I’m aware that I’m not helping on the front though.
by ozymandius1024 on Dec 19, 2010 12:50 AM EST up reply actions
Then I will stop talking about them.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 19, 2010 3:20 AM EST up reply actions
Thats what they said I dont believe them
I think the Ray will trade Garza or Shields or both before the season starts.First reason they will have 2 first round picks in this summers draft and i think 8 supplemental pick.That is going to cost them something like 7 to 8 million dollars to sign those picks.They will need to move some salary.Second reason the are deep in starting pitchers but will need some bullpen help, a first basemen and possibly anouther outfielder or infielder.Third reason they have six starter and its only a five man rotation someone has to go.
It's like Friedman said
Teams rarely make it through the season with all 5 starters intact, and he doesn’t mind having depth. Obviously that could just be posturing, but you really can’t have too much quality pitching (especially in that division).
by ozymandius1024 on Dec 19, 2010 12:53 PM EST up reply actions
I went with the Pirates 07-09 UZR
the Cubs 2010 was like 20th so it wasn’t a big jump up.
by Kurt Mensching on Dec 18, 2010 5:42 PM EST up reply actions
I kinda want to hug you right now
Speaking as somebody who had Garza on two fantasy teams this year, he’s a good innings eater but not really much more.
Deputy Editor, Bless You Boys
Free Scott Sizemore!
by David Tokarz on Dec 19, 2010 2:33 AM EST up reply actions
Fight the urge, fight the urge!
I just thought Garza was being overrated by folks.
I had him in my keeper league for his first two seasons up too. All hype, little help to my team!
by Kurt Mensching on Dec 19, 2010 10:56 AM EST up reply actions
galarga and tunner and boesch and rayburnand two young minior leauge bullpen arms might get it done and hear why galarga it a majoir leauge starter and boesch is young pwer hitear a need for kc and rayburn cant play all 3 out spots and the in feild and tunner is going to be the next great power pitcher and he will be your player for alest the next 4years and also need bullpen help an d the tighers have a histery of drafting powear arms witch you need ral bad on your team.
Woo Dude
Use spell check please
by PawPawMaxwell on Dec 18, 2010 1:31 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I wonder though....
Some times it takes guys a few years to find themself or blossom into the player they are…..which is why I’d be VERY hesitant on trading anyone to an inner division rival…these guys could haunt us for years if they become the players their projected to be…were all hoping (as Tiger fans) whoever we send to the Royals becomes a flop…be honest…if you knew in advance a guy like a Cody Ross would blossom like he has…. would you trade him to a rival in the Central Divison?
The question should be changed to..
If Greinke could be had for Turner or Oliver..Which one do you move???
Oliver. Turner stays! he is under team control for 6 years You don’t trade that precious commodity away!
So is Oliver.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 2:09 PM EST up reply actions
Ditto
If the Royals bite on Oliver, give him to them. Turner (and I know I am on the fringe with this one) and Crosby are the guys I would not let go at this time.
by PawPawMaxwell on Dec 18, 2010 1:54 PM EST up reply actions
that's a no duh question
oliver 100 out of 100 times.
by Kurt Mensching on Dec 18, 2010 5:53 PM EST up reply actions
Greinke a Tiger
If the Royals would take Andy Oliver and Danny Worth I am all for it. But I don’t think the Royals are that stupid They would want Turner and I would definitely say “NO!” to that. I have heard that they are attempting to rectify their mistake and reacquire Jurrgens. Any truth to that one?
Crosby
How many years in a row has he been hurt? I don’t think he will ever make it
Your right but they should add someone else
His trade value right now is real low because of being hurt.I would keep him because if he can stay healthy he could be #1 starter in a couple years and those are hard to come by and i think he’s a lefty.
He is a lefty, and that package would not come close to getting Grienke.
If it would, I’d do it in a minute, then, once everything is signed, give their GM a saliva test.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 3:07 PM EST up reply actions
Detroit really missed out on that 8 WAR over 7 seasons
I know he had a nice playoffs, but Cody Ross isn’t really worth regretting.
by ozymandius1024 on Dec 18, 2010 11:58 PM EST up reply actions
and you need to bash the 3 other teams that had him since the Tigers
Blatant Twitter Promotion, rarely updated, occasionally funny
Zack will most likely end up in a Rangers uni, if he's moved at all.
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
throw in Mark Wohlers and DD could probably get Soria
Blatant Twitter Promotion, rarely updated, occasionally funny
Beltre to Angels
Zack to Texas
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
good thing you're not a bettor indeed!
by Kurt Mensching on Dec 18, 2010 7:30 PM EST up reply actions
haha
i’m sticking with it, though.
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
I think both will end up with the Angels
I’m sure the Angels would have no issues offering up Kazmir or Pineiro, Napoli, Brandon Wood, their choice of an outfielder not named Torii Hunter and a bullpen guy (assuming they also get Soriano) mainly because it will not hurt them very much. It may be overboard but it’s probably about the asking price Kansas would be asking for.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 7:50 PM EST up reply actions
I don't care where Beltre goes,
as long as it’s not here.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 8:11 PM EST up reply actions
Looks like we were both a little off..
by Let's do this! on Dec 19, 2010 9:30 AM EST up reply actions
That's usually how this stuff goes
It’s tough to predict trade destinations when no-trade lists are in play (with Washington in this case), and it’s an ace pitcher.
by ozymandius1024 on Dec 19, 2010 11:39 AM EST up reply actions
The Tigers have the pieces.
What about a Rick Porcello, Andy Oliver, Ryan Streiby package? Maybe a Nunez or Ciriaco included?
Ehh
I’d be a little hesitant to trade away Porcello also. I, personally, really like him and would rather see him stay.
by Let's do this! on Dec 18, 2010 9:13 PM EST up reply actions
To give up both Porcello AND Oliver,
we may as well send Turner, too. It’s not like we’ll need him if we are giving away the rest of the staff.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 10:09 PM EST up reply actions
.
Its just so hard to predict these things. Who knows where Greinke will go if he doesnt resign with the team that acquires him. Hes coming up on FA in a couple years, so it would be hard to give up all of these prospects for a guy that doesnt really know what he is going to do, he just wants out of KC. It would be a huge disappointment to give all of them up and watch him leave to Pittsburgh or somewhere absurd.
If Greinke was acquired and pitched well here then the Tigers would find a way to extend him But I would NOT want them them to do it as soon as they got him ala D Train or Robertson! Once bitten twice shy baby!
I wouldn't want them to, either,
but I would be more accepting of it. Willis was on his way down for a long time, and Nate was never good enough to get that extension, but Grienke is an ace, and if he was willing to extend now, he may actually be cheaper.
I was for the Alexander trade when it happened, and I'd do 'er again!
by 77bestrookieclassever on Dec 18, 2010 10:15 PM EST up reply actions
DD says he may look at some more middle relief
says he’s pretty satisfied with the starting rotation and the team overall….
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
by Detroitchik on Dec 18, 2010 11:36 PM EST up reply actions
He did
But says he’s "comfortable" with the pitchers he has now, and expects to remain "open-minded" about potential changes or additions to the staff. Doesn’t sound like he’s just going to sit on his hands and then do cartwheels when Phil Coke is the team’s 4th starter (though reading into that it doesn’t sound like there’s an impact guy incoming either).
One of these days I’m going to learn to not read into anything that David Dombrowski says and just see what the team looks like at the beginning of March.
by ozymandius1024 on Dec 19, 2010 12:09 AM EST up reply actions
there are rumors floating around the internet
Greinke is headed to the Brewers
but for now, that’s all they are, rumors
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
well, I'm 1/6
the only one I’ve gotten right is Maggs coming home. If Beltre goes to the Angels, I’ll be surprised; because I’ve been wrong about all the big moves this off season. In my defense so has every reporter out there too.
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
I am pretty much right there with you
I got Martinez coming here correct and Maggs coming back. Everyone else, waaaaaaaaay off..
It’s been a rather strange offseason if I do say so myself.
by Let's do this! on Dec 19, 2010 9:37 AM EST up reply actions
oh! I forgot about Vmart
I’m actually 2/7 then. Haha. Still pathetic.
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
hell no
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
by Detroitchik on Dec 19, 2010 10:08 AM EST up reply actions
I'd be happier in the dugout making the lineup card
but Jimmy wouldn’t.
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
by Detroitchik on Dec 19, 2010 10:12 AM EST up reply actions
oh, you have no idea.
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
by Detroitchik on Dec 19, 2010 10:23 AM EST up reply actions
don't wanna be a bat girl
tyvm
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
by Detroitchik on Dec 19, 2010 11:26 AM EST up reply actions
Remember, Maggs can only bat once in the order.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
give me a lineup card
a pencil and a real 3rd base coach
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
by Detroitchik on Dec 19, 2010 11:27 AM EST up reply actions
This sounds like great news to me.
We weren’t getting him, so please send him to a NL team. Plus it’s an NL team that the Twins have to play :)
Even though he doesn’t seem to bother them.
by rcpratt on Dec 19, 2010 9:48 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't think the Tiger had any interest in Grienke
But DD did say he was trying to get Marcum before the Brewers got him so hopefully he’ll come up with something.
The Brewers
gave up quite a bit to get him
Alcides Escobar
Jake Odorizzi
Lorenzo Cain
Jeremy Jeffress
Somewhat
It’s my understanding that Jeffress is quite the… druggie? He’s been suspended twice already for testing positive for marijuana, once more and he’s gone for life. I really like Escobar. He’s very solid both defensively and offensively and will be a pretty big upgrade over Betancourt. I don’t know much about Cain and Odorizzi.
I would have honestly thought they would get more for him.
by Let's do this! on Dec 19, 2010 10:20 AM EST up reply actions
If you're a fan.
We all know that 90% of the players there now will be traded..
by Let's do this! on Dec 19, 2010 10:16 AM EST up reply actions
i would say the Pirates are the lions of baseball
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
by Detroitchik on Dec 19, 2010 10:57 AM EST up reply actions
I remember George Brett and the 84 Tigers
And just like in 84 the tigers need to add a inning eating pitcher like Walt Terrell to the rotation.
no
Because Dayton Moore will sign the 2013 version of Jeff Francoeur and Gil Meche to block all the prospects from playing the majors
Blatant Twitter Promotion, rarely updated, occasionally funny
signing Francoeur
was just a stop-gap before the kids are ready, I don’t think you can really judge Moore as a GM until this round of talent gets into the bigs.
I think you can
Even if you have an amazing farm system like the Rays or Rangers, you have to have a GM that can make shrewd trades and signings with their remaining resources. Dayton Moore has never shown that he can be that guy.
All those prospects will need to stay healthy and hit their ceilings for the Royals to go as insane in the future as people think they will, because they certainly won’t be getting any help otherwise.
by ozymandius1024 on Dec 19, 2010 11:49 AM EST up reply actions
Moore's consistently made bad acquisitions on the ML level.
You can judge Moore based on the fact he has usually made bad moves.
Alex English was pretty coo'.
+1
Deputy Editor, Bless You Boys
Free Scott Sizemore!
by David Tokarz on Dec 19, 2010 5:19 PM EST up reply actions
I never worry about the Royals
remember all those can’t miss hitting prospects? They missed!
at some point, they’ll have everything click and be ok. but i’d put my money on the Indians turning it around first.
by Kurt Mensching on Dec 19, 2010 10:58 AM EST up reply actions
as long as they continue to finish behind us every season
its okay.
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign
by Detroitchik on Dec 19, 2010 11:03 AM EST up reply actions
It isn’t just about having a few “can’t miss” prospects, they will surely have a few guys that miss, but the sheer number top tier guys in their system almost ensures that they end up with a few that turn into very solid players, if not stars.
this is like the lions situation
pick against them every year and 9 times out of 10 you’ll be right.
someone else will try to tell me every year “this is the year, you don’t know what you’re talking about” and 1 time they’ll be right and they’re going to tell me about when they are.
Now you, I think you know what you’re talking about a lot more than your average Lions fans. So it won’t be so bad.
by Kurt Mensching on Dec 19, 2010 11:22 AM EST up reply actions
you guys realize
there’s a new thread talking about this move, right?
President & Founder of the "Bring back the Big Tilde in 2k11" Campaign

by 























