WHY VERLANDER'S DEAL ISN'T AS RISKY
I'm sure that Tiger fans everywhere are excited about the signing of Justin Verlander to a five year, $ 80 million contract (reported by AP), but much of that excitement will be tempered by "but that's awful risky for the Tigers", thinking that JV could go the route of Bonderman, Robertson, or Willis, who received a combined $ 29 million last summer mainly for sitting on the DL. That trio will receive another $ 34.5 million in 2010, without very high expectations of being productive. But Verlander's deal is different, and not just because he has been more effective and has no history of arm trouble.....
The Tigers have some $ 67 million coming off the books after the 2010 season, assuming that Magglio Ordonez doesn't log at least 135 starts this summer. Those expiring contracts belong to Ordonez, Bonderman, Robertson, Willis, Brandon Inge, Gerald Laird, Bobby Seay, and Adam Everett. Probably not a player in the bunch that the Tigers are thinking that they MUST extend. Sure, those expiring contracts will leave many vacancies to be filled, but there is more dead weight in their numbers than real value, and Dave Dombrowski will have plenty of payroll flexibility and roster flexibility to mold and shape a new lineup for the Tigers. Carlos Guillen has another year, as he's signed through 2011.
Dombrowski is not likely to paint himself into the same corner that he found himself this season, with a total of some $ 72 million in "bad" contracts on the books. I'd consider a contract that no other team would take off your hands, even for nothing, to be a bad contract. So, even if Verlander goes down with an injury, heaven forbid, the team will have the flexibility to go another direction. Add the fact that the club continues to focus on starting pitching in the draft, and there are talented starters like Casey Crosby, Andy Oliver, and Jacob Turner on the way up, and the future of the Tiger rotation is looking solid. Likewise in the bullpen. There were many good bullpen arms on the farm even before the Granderson trade brought a few more. There will be lots of vacancies after this summer. But expect future Tiger lineups to be leaner, speedier, very athletic, and not signed to long term contracts all at the same time.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Bless You Boys writing staff.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Agreed
We can do a lot worse than locking up one of the top 10 starters in the league and also having one of the top 10 hitters in the league locked up through his prime. Our staff could look downright 90’s Atlanta Brave-like in a year or two.
by dtowntigers4life on Feb 4, 2010 3:42 AM EST reply actions
could in 2013
but there is no such thing as a pitching prospect, as they say.
no whammies, no whammies …
by Kurt Mensching on Feb 4, 2010 6:45 AM EST up reply actions
Anytime you give a player....
…..80 mil its a risk……I think JV will be fine but to say giving someone 80 million dollars is not a risk is ridiculous……Go JV GO TIgs……But this is stil a risk.
by BennieBladesFan on Feb 4, 2010 11:21 AM EST reply actions
Yeah it's a risk...
but the Tigers need a pitcher they can build around.
Never said it wasn't a risk
Bennie- I said that this deal is not AS risky as some of the other large contracts that DD has signed in the past. In other words, DD isn’t going to get himself backed into the same corner that he finds himself right now. Jason Beck points out that there are very few clubs that take on two $ 20 million salaried players at the same time, but the financial reality of the Tiger situation shows great payroll flexibility going forward. The Tigers could potentially have JV go down, and still be able to adjust, at least financially. That being said, I’m sure that DD has been in touch with his Lloyds of London agent about insuring this contract.
If you fill out the roster for 2011, I come up with about a $ 65 million payroll after all the free agents have departed, Verlander and the four relatively small arb eligibles are added in, and the rest is filled in from within. Of course, they’ll add to that number by adding some players via trade or free agency, but that kind of payroll flexibility makes the Verlander deal much less risky in terms of the impact that it has on DD’s ability to replace him, should he be unable to play.
Ok....
….I realize you said that im saying its just as risky as any iother contract…..just becasue they have some flexability doesnt mean its not risky is all I was saying…..I hear your points man.
by BennieBladesFan on Feb 4, 2010 11:56 AM EST up reply actions
Generally agree
As long as payroll stays at $65 million, we should be fine. Couple a strong farm system (I hope) with the new going rate for free agents (a lot of two win players out there for cheap) and there’s no reason why this team can’t be competitive for a very long time.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.





















