Miguel Cabrera says he was not an alcoholic
Miguel Cabrera spoke to the media Monday about his alcohol problem, but first he wanted to comment a bit on how it has been covered (as quoted by Steve Kornacki, MLive):
‘You guys write in the paper alcoholic, that's not right," Cabrera said. "I don't know how to explain, but it's not an alcohol problem. It's what you guys call it; it's what you guys say."
Cabrera, you surely remember, had a .26 blood alcohol content the morning of Game 161 against the White Sox after a night out drinking. By all information we've received, Cabrera has done the right things since that morning. He has since apologized multiple times to his teammates and to the Tigers fans. He has also sought out treatment and has not had any alcohol.
"I know it was wrong what I did," he said. "But I can't hide that, you know? It's there, so I have to be a man and say the truth, and say I made a mistake and I'll work in the season to be better. It's part of life to be a man and don't try to hide something if it's broken. I have to prove how good I can be, inside and outside."
Good enough for me. Time will tell how the rest turns out.
Other stories about Cabrera from Lynn Henning, John Lowe.
Keep reading for one person's take on the Red Sox adding Casey Fien via waivers.
Casey Fien was taken by the Boston Red Sox on waivers Monday. Should you be concerned?
Matt Wallace of Take 75 North isn't.
Now, it might make you a little nervous to know a very smart and well run club like the Red Sox were the team to take Fien. I say, "Meh". He's a right-handed reliever with good control and command. Perhaps they think his skill set is well suited to Fenway Park and an outfield that should be able to run down a lot of fly balls now that they've added Mike Cameron.
And you know what? I agree with Wallace's take, really. There's a lot of names on the 40-man roster I wouldn't want to see removed either. Of course, everyone can point to Dontrelle Willis as being disposable. But the Tigers have proven again and again they have a reason for keeping him, and they don't feel the need to explain to fans what that reason is. Whether it's hope he can yet turn it around or insurance, they're not talking.
So I'm fine with the decision.
A few more stories to check out:
- SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: Cleveland Indians, Least Likely To Win World Series
- The MLB has decided to ban some maple bats in the minor leagues. The maple bats seem to explode a lot easier than other woods, so this is a first step. Another interesting step: any major leaguer whose bats broke more than 10 times has to consult with a panel of experts to see if there's a reason why.
- Our own Mike Rogers was in the media at KMOV MizzouSpot blog for his work on translating college statistics.
- Freep: Don Kelly discusses being a super-sub. Kelly brought eight gloves to camp. He's happy to play the role of jack-of-all-trades, he says.
- Beck: Austin Jackson is happy for the chance to prove himself. Jackson also discussed a lot of the changes he's made to fix the problems in his swing and (hopefully) cut down on strikeouts.
- Can the Tigers change who they are? Leyland hopes so. His new slogan, according to Beck? Protect the plate.
And finally:
The first game thread of the season will open around noon. You can't exactly follow this game pitch-by-pitch. But it's the first game, so there's a game thread. Depending on how it goes, I might do one for every game, or maybe just the televised ones. We'll see. Enjoy!
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
hoping for the best
I’m by no means an alcoholic but I guarantee I had a BAC of .26 at least a couple times in my life during college. It happens.
The media loves blowing things out of proportion, but I think the worst of this episode is past us and Miguel will have this entire season to prove to people he has his head in the right place.
Here’s hoping the Tigers hit dominate the college boys today in their first game of the 2010!
Agreed
I don’t think the issue was alcohol as much as it was lack of responsibility.
He could have been stone sober, but being out till 6 am the night before a big game is still a bad idea. Was the alcohol a contributing factor? Sure, but that doesn’t make him an alcoholic.
At the same time, he may have been on the road to alcoholism and realized it before it was too late. So I’m glad to see him make the decision to focus on what’s important (providing for his family) and put that behind him.
Miguel
is one of my favorites and he did display extreme lack of good judgment, on more than one occasion last season. There was an incident earlier in the season at the same bar. Miguel has been playing in the majors since he was a kid.
Maturity has probably been an issue for him, mostly, in my opinion. He’s probably rarely been told “no” for any reason. So he started to think he could do as he pleased. Anyway, I hope all that’s happened over the last several months, just before the season ended and in the off season have helped him to grow up. Overall I think he’s a good guy and I wish him the best personally and professionally. I think we have a future hall of famer on our hands. I hope we keep him through his entire career, or at least the bulk of it.
Welcome to Detroit, NO sissies allowed
Did anyone else see BBTN?
John Kruk’s “bold prediction” was that Miggy would hit .400 this year. Yes, Kruk is a freaking idiot.
fwiw
He also picked the Pirates as a sleeper team last year or the year before that.
by rock n rye on Mar 2, 2010 11:56 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
It came out, via John Kruk and on Deadspin, that he picked the Pirates because ESPN forces their analysts at times to pick different teams, so he was pissed off he couldn’t pick the Cards/Cubs (which ever one was better, I can’t remember at this time) so he went with the worst team in the division as a big F.U. to ESPN for making him do that.
My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.
Now I write at Bless You Boys.
Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.
he did show a lacl of judgement....
…..but it does not mean he is alcoholic and I think we all owe him the benefit of the doubt now…..i mean hey weve all had a drink or two at lucnch or before we went to work right?
by BennieBladesFan on Mar 2, 2010 10:53 AM EST reply actions
No, not all of us use alcohol
It’s my choice not to use any alcohol. I understand that every drink permanently kills brain cells. We must be able to get along without some brain cells, but I would rather keep as many of them as I can. Your decision. Your choice.
Gary M. Piekarek
I don't drink...
I have before but not anymore. In todays society it’s most definitely harder not to drink than it is too drink. With all the advertisments that get shoved in our faces by the major distributors it’s hard not to see why so many not only start drinking but tend to overuse alcohol as a substance. Just think about the word “drinking” in itself. Alcohol has become so engrained in our culture that a simple word is now synonymous with alcoholic beverage, not with merely quenching ones thirst.
But to get back on topic, everyone has there reasons for whatever they do. For all we know this was Miguels first mistake with alcohol. It could also be the exclamation point on a long list of mistakes. We can assume all we want but conclusions are few. All we ever do is watch Miguel on the baseball field. Never do we watch him at home or with his friends. Assuming immaturity, alcoholism, or any other problem with his personal life is pointless.
My Music: Some Sorta Giant
My Blog: Strike Three Mechanics
big difference between a glass of wine and .26 BAC
and Miguel had already been warned by the team after an incident in August. I’m not looking to rehash everything and say Cabrera is a bad guy here. But I think making excuses isn’t the right thing to do either.
He had a problem. He’s dealing with it. Good enough for me.
To deny there’s a problem, though, is just wrong.
by Kurt Mensching on Mar 2, 2010 2:30 PM EST up reply actions
Say What?
I don’t know if Cabrera is an alcoholic or not
However, I do know that there is no such thing as a “was an alcoholic”
Alcoholism is a genetic disease. This has been proven.
So a person is either and alcoholic or they are not.
If they are, they are for life,
whether they are sober or drinking.
There is no such thing as “was an alcoholic”

by 



















