Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bracketology 2012: Duke Finally Steps Up To The No. 1 Line

What to do with Brennan Boesch

I made this into a fanpost instead of a front page story- it seemed wrong to promote my own major league stuff to the front page when I'm the minor league editor. -Tokarz

I'm sure everyone's going to burn me at the stake if I keep running my mouth about trading Brennan Boesch. I still think trading him is a great way to capitalize on perceived value. Trading a player at his peak is a great way to maximize return. The only problem is that I'm not exactly sure we could get a major return for Boesch. We're certainly not getting a top prospect- not even KC's Dayton Moore is stupid enough to do that. We might get a reclamation project, somebody like Edwin Jackson that can contribute for a season or so. But after thinking carefully, I think there's a better solution.

It's called platooning .

Star-divide

The biggest knock against Brennan Boesch (other than the holey swing and lack of plate discipline) is that he's a platoon bat. Boesch's minor league record shows he hits right-handers a whole lot better than he hits left-handers. His 2009 splits at Erie prove this- Boesch shows a roughly 40 point difference in OBP and a 163(!!!) point difference in slugging when he's facing righties as compared to lefties. He is what he is-a big guy with power and some contact ability when facing righties. It would be wonderful if the Tigers had a guy that did the same thing, but with lefties. Luckily, we do. His name is Casper Wells.

It's unfair to call Casper Wells a purely platoon bat, though- Wells' splits aren't as bad as Boesch's. He hits for 40 more points of OBP (all made up of batting average) and only 100(!!!) more points of slugging when facing lefties, and his line of .250/.364/.466 against righties isn't shabby. But he's very similar to Boesch: holey swing with lots of power (though Wells has great plate discipline and could probably start against a few less talented right-handers). The great part is that they're both defensively decent- Boesch is average-to-above in an OF corner with a solid arm, while Wells handles center field very well and would be a plus right or left fielder.

Overall, what can we expect from Casper-Boesch? I could see them taking 750 plate appearances in left field. Lets say Boesch gets 500 and Wells gets 250 (he'd probably be a late-inning defensive replacement for Boesch occasionally since his defense is better). Using their 2009 numbers from Erie as well as scouting stuff as a baseline, let's play with statistics (note: math is probably complete trash- treat with a grain of salt). Fangraphs had Boesch hitting .280/.330/.440 in a platoon role. I think that line's a bit off- I'd go more around .270/.320/.500ish. Lets also go ahead and say that Wells hits about .280/.360/.500 in his plate appearances against lefties and late in ballgames. That comes out to about .273/.333/.500 as a final line for Casper-Boesch. How does that stack up against other players? Lets take a look at some free agents in 2011 and compare them to Casper-Boesch. I'll use 2009 lines for convenience (since that's the last full season of data we have).

Casper-Boesch: .273/.333/.500

Jayson Werth: .268/.373/.506

Carl Crawford: .305/.362/.452

Adam Dunn: .267/.398/.529

Look, I'm not going to pretend that Casper-Boesch is better than Werth/Crawford/Dunn, or even Manny Ramirez (also a FA this season). But if these guys perform only slightly better- say a couple more hits drop in and they hit .280/.340/.500, they're comparable in value to Jayson Werth. If I told you you could get a player slightly less valuable than Jayson Werth and it would only cost you two roster spots at the minimum, would you turn me down?

There's also plenty of room for roster flexibility. Lets assume 13 position players (a likely situation). That means 9 starters and a 4 man bench. I imagine the team would look something like this:

C: Avila, backup catcher TBNL

IF: Cabrera, Sizemore, Santiago, Guillen (who DH's), Worth, Raburn (our new 3B)

OF: Jackson, Ordonez, Boesch, Wells (who also plays defensive replacement and starts against weak righties to spell Jackson and Ordonez), Kelly

The last spot would really be between Thomas, Worth and Don Kelly (or free agents). Heck, you could sign a FA to man 3B or SS and still have utility on the roster by using Ryan Raburn as a supersub. Your lineup would then be this:

CF Jackson

DH Guillen

RF Ordonez

1B Cabrera

LF Casper-Boesch

3B Raburn

2B Sizemore

C Avila

SS Santiago

Ladies and gentlemen, that looks like a major league lineup. Play Worth and Kelly at 2B/3B when Porcello starts for defense if you want, but our 7-8-9 hole of suck gets plugged with tons of upside- and we don't spend a dollar more than we need to.

Look, I'm not going to pretend that the numbers I used were perfect. They're anything but. It's possible that Casper-Boesch slugs .550 (making this look so much better) or that one of them falls apart (turning this into a pile of suck). But if 2011 really is a retooling year (as it looks given the state of the free agent market), why shouldn't we try this? It saves money and provides a great defensive and offensive left fielder at minimum cost (an extra roster spot featuring a player good enough both offensively and defensively to serve as a great fourth outfielder). So what do you think? Better idea than trading Boesch?  Should I be banned from BYB for suggesting such an outrageous idea?

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Bless You Boys writing staff.

Comment 55 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Are you forgetting about Johnny Damon?

 The Tigers just need to keep on doing the opposite of what you think. It’s been working excellent so far. Just kidding. Keep the ideas coming.

Seriously , I think Casper Wells needs to play everyday, just as Avila does. So I don’t care much for the platoon idea with Boesch as of right now. Boesch is everything that we hoped Aubrey Huff would be last year when we acquired him. Too bad we didn’t go with Boesch as a call-up last year instead, he was just as RED HOT back then also. I hope Wells gets called up in September, but for now he’ll just clog up the outfield, especially once Guillen comes back.

@2B- I’d like to see how the Guillen experiment works out. I expect it to fail, but it doesn’t hurt to try.

@SS- I’m with you. I’d like to see Everett gone. He’s no longer an elite defender like he use to be. His hitting skills have completely diminished also. Santiago is worlds better and should be playing SS everyday.

@3b- Inge isn’t far away from being completely obscure also. I’m not crazy about Raburn being his replacement. I think we really need to get someone from outside the organization to play 3B. I’d take a flier on Mike Lowell.

 Lowell had hip surgery in September of 2008, but before that he played excellent defense. He hit .290 with a .811 OPS last season. This season he’s played just 4 games at 3B and hasn’t made any errors. He’s a former Marlin/Dombrowski guy, so I’m kind of surprised that the wheels aren’t already in motion to acquire him.

I just wish we would of grabbed Felipe Lopez when we had the chance. He would of solved one of our problems.

by linuxit on May 23, 2010 8:32 AM EDT reply actions  

The idea is to do it next year when we have space

President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.

Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on May 23, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

could you please explain to me

these “holes” in Boesch’s swing?

if his swing has problems, why is the entire organization bent on NOT messing with it?

Director of the 2010 Free Casper Wells campaign
No Run Support

by allikazoo on May 23, 2010 12:00 PM EDT reply actions  

He has trouble with the inside pitch...

…Its just the way his swing is…I dont think they want to mess with it but it could become a problem as more teams see him.

by BennieBladesFan on May 23, 2010 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bennie's right

He has problems with the inside fastball, he’s got a long stroke and his swing is “a stiff mechanical uppercut” according to BA. It allows him to get lots of power on the ball, so you don’t want to screw with it much, but his contact ability is low.

President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.

Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on May 23, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

BA may say that

but it sure doesn’t look stiff and mechanical to me in person & on tv.

Director of the 2010 Free Casper Wells campaign
No Run Support

by allikazoo on May 23, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

The only quibble I have with this

Is that he has that really weird, awkward half-swing that he uses to foul off the inside, belt-high-ish pitches. He could literally go an entire season without putting that pitch in play, but he has developed what looks like a great strategy to not get beat by it. I’ve also been impressed with his two-strike approach at the plate (seems to come up a lot). I’m actually starting to come around on him. I was convinced he was just total flash-in-the-pan, but I’m starting to see him as a genuinely MLB-caliber bat. Maybe a poor man’s Pablo Sandoval?

by theRPS on May 23, 2010 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sandoval is a great contact hitter

Boesch is a great power hitter. Big difference. Maybe Adam Dunn without the walks- which is a really poor comparison.

President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.

Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on May 23, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

So Wily Mo Pena?

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on May 23, 2010 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I get on the bandwagon

And you remind me why I shouldn’t be on it in the first place…

President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.

Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on May 24, 2010 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's harsh

Though Wily Mo was entertaining for a minute. Dude could hit the ball a mile.

by ChrisDTX on May 25, 2010 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is this a regular thing?

Or was he just unable to hit it on Sunday? His upper-cut makes me think it’d be a regular thing but I’ve never noticed it before.

by handsomerob1 on May 25, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hadn't noticed before

But there is the possibility that opposing pitchers had not explored this area of the zone against him previously. Will be something to watch going forward. Maybe “the book” is out!

by ChrisDTX on May 25, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Boesch for Oswalt...

…is a posibility…I like Boesch but to get a guy like Oswalt you have to give up players…Maybe Wells and keep Boesch…Its tough but I think if we can get an Oswalt in a package for Boesch and players or Wells and players you have to make the deal.

by BennieBladesFan on May 23, 2010 12:56 PM EDT reply actions  

No more NL pitchers please

I am sure there are some good NL pitchers that make it in the AL, but max, peavy, vazquez, etc all scare me. So I vote no to oswalt

by redwingxviii on May 23, 2010 8:42 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I think the numbers look awfully optimistic to me.

I know they’d be facing ideal situations for their talents, but I don’t see them putting up a combined OPS north of .830. Average LFer in 2009 hit .780, so you’re basically saying they’d be some 50 points in OPS better than average? I’m not buying that. Personally, I’d rather have Casper playing more than Boesch which negates the whole ‘platoon’ anyways, because of Casper’s better defense.

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on May 23, 2010 5:28 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't know

I could see them slugging .500 in the bigs- the problem is the OBP. I think it’s feasible that they get to .330 combined.

President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.

Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on May 23, 2010 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

350 total bases is a lot.

Only one team got 350+ total bases from their LF tandem. Next most was 322. No team had a RF tandem with 350+ TB. Best was 322 from LAD RFers. I think .500 SLG is wayyyy optimistic. Mark me down for .450.

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on May 23, 2010 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bahhhhhhh.

They wouldn’t need 350 TB if they got 700 PA’s, so my post isn’t entirely accurate. I’ll try to figure out some sort of line.

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on May 23, 2010 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Boesch-Wells using the .273/.333/.500 slash line in the post:

Let’s say that they get 3 sac bunts and 6 sac flies like the AL average in 2009.

For simplicities sake, lets say:

+ they don’t get on base due to HBP’s, so all the non-hits that they get on base by are all BB’s.
+ 3 SH, 6 SF’s.

This is what I get, doing some back-calculating to figure out the underlying numbers beyond that triple-slash line with the caveats above:

649 AB, 177 H, 42 BB, 325 total bases. Like i illustrated above, 325 total bases is A LOT. No MLB team got that from their RFers and only two teams had 320+ total bases from their LFers.

I think something more like .273/.333/.450 is much more likely, but I think that’s even optimistic.

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on May 23, 2010 8:30 PM EDT reply actions  

That's fair I suppose

This is why you run the numbers.

President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.

Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on May 23, 2010 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't take it as gospel, though.

My math might be wrong. It’s hard as hell to back-calculate that, haha. I was operating under the 700 PA rule of thumb I follow per position.

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on May 24, 2010 1:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

nothing wrong with selling high, however

Only if it was in fact to go after a replacement like Carl Crawford or Jayson Werth.
Simply dealing him to deal him would be a waste though. Like him or not he is crushing the ball. Taking him out of the lineup without a solid replacement would suck.

by JAYRC on May 24, 2010 12:36 AM EDT reply actions  

Taking him out when he sucks eliminates value though.

To trade him you need to trade him at peak value. Plus his spot in the lineup is guillens spot right now. Add in the return of raburn and I think selling high is a very plausible option.

by madpoopz on May 24, 2010 1:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

True... but

Another way to look at it is
Wow, with Guillen at 2B and Boesch in LF now we actually have 7 players that can hit the ball (8 when Santiago is at SS).
Another plus being the posibility of five left handed batters in a line up.
I see where you are coming from though. It is a well thought out plan.
I’m just taking it all in and curious to see how this unfolds.

by JAYRC on May 24, 2010 2:04 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I don't think we see all the roster turnover you've suggested

The Boesch-Wells platoon may be put on hold for another year if the Tigers re-sign Johnny Damon, which would be a good move at this point IMO. He’s solidified the #2 spot in the lineup and he’s already thrown a runner out at home, giving us more D than I thought he would.

Also, Brandon Inge will get a contract offer from the Tigers this offseason. I just can’t see this organization letting a player like him walk. I would be ok with that also, mostly because the thought of Raburn as our everyday third baseman terrifies me.

by handsomerob1 on May 24, 2010 8:57 AM EDT reply actions  

+1

With this year’s poor free agent market, I expect Inge to get re-signed, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see Johnny back for another 1-2 years, especially if the Guillen Experiment pans out well.

A lifelong Tigers fan

by ewild on May 24, 2010 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Damon

I am enjoying Damon waaaay more than I thought I would. He’s a great #2 and I’d love to see him back next year. However, I think the organization might choose to save the 10M it will take and use his LF spot for Boesch, Wells, Ramirez, Raburn, or whatever other in-house option we can pursue. Spend 10M at SS.

by momotigers on May 24, 2010 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

That $10 million is up to Mr. Illitch

and I wouldn’t mind if they used it to bring back Damon. Remember that the $10 million spent on Damon doesn’t exactly mean $10 million less for somewhere else. Illitch can spend as much coin as he wants. Plus, I’d rather “overpay” for Damon than for a SS along the lines of Yuniesky Betancourt.

by handsomerob1 on May 24, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think some people are just over-valuing Boesch

I won’t assume that we could get something decent in return if we traded him. He only has 4 HR’s in his 93 MLB AB’s, with a .357 OBP. That’s nothing to brag about. He’s not even close to being in the Mike Jacobs territory when it comes to hot starts. Wily Mo Pena is a an OK example for Boesch (hat tip to Mike Rogers). If we’re lucky, Boesch will turn out to be like a Geoff Jenkins though. It’s too early to tell what direction he’ll be headed.

I do remember back when Wily Mo Pena got off to his red hot start, Cincinnati didn’t have enough room in their outfield to play him everyday (Kearns, Griffey, Dunn), so they shopped him around. They couldn’t find any takers for him though because they were asking for too much in return, so they were stuck with him. Most GM’s won’t buy high on hot rookies that they wouldn’t want otherwise. Boesch won’t sell high because of his defense and OBP. These days those are the two things that most GM’s look for.

by linuxit on May 24, 2010 10:57 AM EDT reply actions  

Peak Value.....trade Ordonez, Caberra or JV instead

Young players are alot more fun to watch, especially in september when out of playoff hunt.

by Gates Brown on May 24, 2010 7:27 PM EDT reply actions  

The difference between Boesch and Ordonez/Cabrera/Verlander

Three will retain value. One will not.

President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.

Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on May 24, 2010 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Boesch or Ordonez?

While Boesch’s hot start won’t be maintained, Ordonez is getting older by the day (though to appease Detroitchik, he’s apparently found a fountain of youth this year). His value won’t stay at the level it is for much longer.

by handsomerob1 on May 25, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, let's also factor in that 2009 had a myriad of off field troubles for Magglio.

And there was an obvious effect on his on-field performance. I believe Magglio will be good enough to earn his spot this year and the slide starts next year.

Dontrelle Willis apologist.

by 13194013 on May 25, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying he won't be good the next couple years

but his value will diminish, unlike DT’s original point that his value will be retained, as he gets older.

by handsomerob1 on May 25, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

It'd be nice to deal him too

But he’s far too expensive for us to get anything of real value.

President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.

Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on May 25, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

He really hasn't found the fountain of youth.

He’s replicating his 2008 season pretty much identically without anything that screams REGRESSION, save for the walk rate. He’s got league average power. He’s in my post coming up in an hour, so it’ll explain more.

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on May 25, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

you an I differ on this one David

Cabera, untradable last winter, ordonez untradable last july, Verlander with todays contract with 2008 numbers would be untradeable. Boesch OPS over 1000, if he did 800 he would be a plus player, and an inexpensive one for next 5 years so other positions can be filled. He had 28hrs last yr, and a batting ave that rose. I disagree that he is at peak value, he is a late bloomer. Presently, the announcers are not finding the supposed holes in his swing….270, 30hrs, 800ops my prediction yearly carreer stats.

Also trading one of the big stars would bring a young star 3rd basemen or shortsop. The minor league prospects at these positions now struggleing. Strieby could replace Cabera…… Wells and Ramerez ready to replace Ordonez or Damon. Would love it if they unloaded Damon and Ordonez while they have value, the core needs to hit prime together for a world series win, in a small market. I don’t think it would be fun to be a Yankee Fan following them to world series while they spend double most every other team. Plus Pizza would be $8 instead of $5.55 and my kids would get less for dinner.

BTW, toledo is hitting Steven Strousburg hard, 7 hits 4 innings, and lots of hard hit balls for outs. I count at least 9 mud hens that deserve to be major leaguers this year.

Enjoy everyone’s posts, Thanks Guys

by Gates Brown on May 24, 2010 8:34 PM EDT reply actions  

free agent value

some trade rumor site has inge and laird, just barely making type B free agent and Damon A…bet DD would hesitate on Damon, like he did Polonco….so I’m pulling for inge and laird to be better and Damon a little more average, as tigers win.

by Gates Brown on May 24, 2010 8:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Team chemistry

This isn’t fantasy baseball. I agree in principle to sell high, but when you have a spark like that that’s done nothing but (a) mash, and (b) catalyze the team offense, you can’t let that go in an early season deal. Deadline deals are often to find a spark like the one that he’s already given the Tigers. He’s earned his, and no matter what happens from here on out its gravy. The Tigers will not deal him. They might dig into AA or AAA to deal someone though, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see strong talent go, but Boesch is a cat with different stripes to this squad. He stays.

2010 is Year 4707 in the Chinese Calendar - The Year Of The Tiger

by TigerFanInCleveland on May 25, 2010 7:20 AM EDT reply actions  

Chemistry is awesome, Totally agree

Guess my thoughts were more about the offseason than now, and we have a new thread for that. Even Oppie is a great guy, and by all accounts a good leader. Was thinking about the time Gibson, Parrish, Morris, Trammel and Whittacker, all came on the scene together, maybe 1978, and hit prime together in 1984. DD has talked about the current group hitting prime together, mostly under team control bvefore free agency, supported by JV and Cabera as locked up stars, and I’m excited.

by Gates Brown on May 25, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying i'm pro or con on the idea

but I think the team chemistry card is a bit over played and probably not a big concern to the Tigers, given their past dealings.

by Kurt Mensching on May 25, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

The sports equivalent to the chicken or the egg.

Did the team winning cause team chemistry or did the team chemistry cause the winning?

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on May 25, 2010 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ask the 2002 Giants that question.

There was hardly a hint of team chemistry there, but they were NL champs anyway. Hard to say that chemistry “causes” winning, but it is certainly valued by teams more than clubhouse cancer.

2010 is Year 4707 in the Chinese Calendar - The Year Of The Tiger

by TigerFanInCleveland on May 25, 2010 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

But why does Milton Bradley continually get work, then?

He’s painted as a club house cancer (though ask any of the M’s players and they’ll 100% disagree).

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on May 25, 2010 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

The only rule of absolutes

is that there is absolutely no such thing as an absolute rule. Bradley is a great example to the contrary. Good thing as sabermetricians we can enjoy the nuances of probability, error and deviation from the norm.

2010 is Year 4707 in the Chinese Calendar - The Year Of The Tiger

by TigerFanInCleveland on May 25, 2010 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think teams can win without chemistry....

provided that everybody on the team is so selfish they’re unselfish in a sick and demented way. Like the Yankee’s.

by madpoopz on May 26, 2010 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

it's hard to be unselfish in baseball

it’s not like it’s basketball or hockey or something where you pass the thing around.

You have a batter. You have a pitcher. 1 on 1 game between two people who want to be successful. Ball in play, I guess the fielder could try to make every play by himself and the third baseman and shortstop could collide or something. But we’re getting pretty far away from the main idea at that point.

by Kurt Mensching on May 26, 2010 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm having trouble finding a way to explain my point a bit more clearly.

but I guess the parameter’s of team chemistry are what I’m driving at in a way. Is team chemistry just a shared desire to win by men of competitive nature or is it just some guys who enjoy eachother? Is it a coexistence of the two or can team chemistry exist with either or? Basically can teammates hate each and still win or do they need some semblance of a friendship?

Really it’s all psychological, basically taking into account humanities need for social interaction, but it’s relevance to something of a competitive nature is an interesting one at that.

by madpoopz on May 27, 2010 1:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think it's about selfishness

I think the value of “team chemistry” is that players are in the right state of mind to play their best game. Just like how most players tend to perform better when they are on a homestand and in a regular, comfortable routine: they are mentally in a better place to deal with adversity if the game is going poorly. If a player is already in a bad place mentally, things can spiral downwards in a hurry.

I don’t think “chemistry” is a big factor in teams winning, but there are definitely times when it can help a team pull out of a losing streak, or recover from a heartbreaking loss. Look at this year’s Nationals team. Probably the best clubhouse atmosphere in baseball, and the attitude has helped a cellar dweller pull itself to mediocrity.

A lifelong Tigers fan

by ewild on May 28, 2010 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Detroit-tigers-logo_small
Winter Ball Wrap-Up: Dominican Republic

Recent FanPosts

Tigers1978_800x600_small
2012: The Year Of The Tigers
Small
How Can I Hate the Signing of Prince Fielder?
Copy_of_tiger_camp_015_small
Succeeding Jim Leyland
Nate_small
What would it take to get Cabrera?
Carlos_small
Tigers Fan 2012 Hopes & Fears
2kv_small
Is Dlugach back???
100_1952_small
Cecil Fielder criticizes Prince Fielder before awards ceremony
Dsc0178-l_small
BYB writing opportunity available!
Small
.304 Average for Austin Jackson?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Quick Rules

Do:

  • Treat others like you'd like to be treated.
  • Stick to the topic being discussed.
  • Make arguments based on facts, not emotion.
Don't:
  • Confuse BYB with talk radio, your blog or your social networking web site of choice. We're a baseball community.
  • Feed the trolls.

Commenting Code of Conduct


Managing Editor

Dsc0178-l_small Kurt Mensching

Deputy Editors

Meatcomputer-1_small BigAl

Sparky_anderson_wall_small handsomerob1

5532934019_b5fa57ae98_small allikazoo

Contributors

Hpim0067_small Tigerdog1

6m2bts_small Melissa Heyboer

Moderators

Be050826_small NCDee

Sifl_and_olly_small 13194013