Austin Jackson, Alex Avila lead Tigers' over- and -underperformers at the plate
Monday I looked at what pitchers may be getting results a bit better or worse than you should expect them to get over the course of the season.
As with pitchers, what happens is that luck plays into results a lot more in the short term. Over the course of a season, good luck and bad luck average out a lot closer. In a month, anything can happen. So numbers can be really skewed.
Case in point: Austin Jackson.
Jackson's BABIP was .521 entering Monday's game. His line drive percentage was nearly 40 percent. If he were able to keep up those numbers, he'd have a historically great season. But it's quite unlikely, almost impossibly so.
Using his line drive%, ground ball% and fly ball% to normalize things a bit, his batted-ball type should translate to about a .352 BABIP. And if we take that a step further and adjust his stats -- entering play Tuesday -- with that his slashline becomes 249/.312/.377/
And remember: That isn't meant as a criticism on his first month. He had a productive one and did a lot of things right. But when trying to make a prediction about what to expect going forward you need to work to eliminate luck.
A few of the Tigers' hitters fall to one extreme or another, so we should expect some correction to occur.
The stats I went with are BABIP, xBABIP (as calculated using a spreadsheet from The Hardball Times) and career BABIP to help tease out the luck factor a bit. In the case of rookies, I went with their minor league career numbers. For the quick-summation stat, I went with wOBA. If you need a reminder about this stat, check out our Saber 101 on it.
Who's going to improve?
Underperformers so far
| Player | BABIP | xBABIP | Career BABIP | wOBA | Translated wOBA | Difference |
| Alex Avila | .192 | .361 | .336 | .250 | .346 | -.096 |
| Gerald Laird | .186 | .300 | .289 | .252 | .313 | -.061 |
| Adam Everett | .189 | .270 | .275 | .186 | .246 | -.060 |
| Magglio Ordonez | .291 | .308 | .318 | .384 | .391 | -.007 |
| Brandon Inge | .301 | .303 | .282 | .333 | .334 | -.001 |
It's amazing to see what a bad start the catchers both got off to. Of course, catcher is one position you seldom look at batting statistics too closely for. Their primary responsibility is handling the pitcher and throwing out runners. But even when you discount that you don't expect much the Detroiters still fell flat out of the gate. A closer inspections hows both had some struggles with luck and should start to see better results at the plate.
Adam Everett's numbers would not be very good no matter how you slice the pie; his numbers are even worse than they should be.
After Magglio Ordonez's hot start, it's kind of funny to picture him as a guy who could improve. But he's actually cooled off substantially -- and struggled with a sore abdomen.
And Inge is just thrown in because I was trying to include all the regulars in the lineup. As you can see, he's doing as could be expected.
[Note from Mike: The wOBA is using the generic weights and include stolen bases and caught stealing. The wOBA's here won't match the ones on Fangraphs because they are using weights specific to this particular season.]
Who's going to step back a bit?
Overperformers so far
| Players | BABIP |
xBABIP |
Career |
wOBA |
Translated wOBA |
Difference |
| Austin Jackson | 0.527 | 0.353 | 0.361 | .411 | .311 | .100 |
| Ryan Raburn | 0.380 | 0.291 | 0.331 | .353 | .302 | .051 |
| Ramon Santiago | 0.372 | 0.311 | 0.285 | .338 | .298 | .040 |
| Johnny Damon | 0.380 | 0.324 | 0.308 | .402 | .365 | .037 |
| Scott Sizemore | 0.327 | 0.310 | 0.339 | .323 | .296 | .027 |
| Miguel Cabrera | 0.353 | 0.314 | 0.346 | .426 | .408 | .018 |
As I type this, Austin Jackson had yet another hit that somehow fell in. This one went off the glove of an outfielder who just about got to it but didn't. Jackson's incredible run of luck must slow down at some point, but who is to say when. As you can see though, he is far above what should reasonably be expected.
Ryan Raburn, Ramon Santiago and Johnny Damon are all benefitting from BABIPs quite a bit above what could be expected given their career norms and the makeup of their hits. They should all cool off a bit, too. Scott Sizemore is closer to where he should be.
If there was one player in the above who I thought could defy expectations, it's Miguel Cabrera. Still, his incredible start might wilt slightly. Not much, but a bit.
Conclusion
Ideally, you have a nice mix of players performing better or worse than expectations so it kind of cancels each other out when the luck swings around. However, the Tigers seem to all be playing better than could be hoped in the long run. So that does concern me a bit. I won't be surprised if they hit a bit of a run-scoring slump, and you probably shouldn't be, either.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good work Kurt
The one name I was hoping to see getting a stretch of “bad luck” would be Maggs, but not seeing his name on here was a bit of a downer for me. With his BA plummetting in recent weeks, I was hoping to see him on the “bad luck” list.
VP of Membership, Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by JoelZumayaKegStand on May 4, 2010 10:25 AM EDT reply actions
I have never been one to equate BABIP directly with luck
but AJax has a BABIP so incredibly high, that there is no way this could possibly continue.
Nice job breaking things down for us, Kurt, and this is done the right way, by comparing to their career BABIP, rather than a league average as I’ve seen some others attempt to do previously. FWIW- the median BABIP for all “qualified” hitters in the AL falls around .300, give or take a few points. But of course there are hitters who have the ability to hit the ball where the defenders ain’t- to shoot the gap on the right side with the first baseman holding a runner on the bag, or the ability to go the opposite way, and some are better line drive hitters, which we know increases the chances of a base hit. All that can’t be discounted by measuring against a league average, or median.
I checked out the charts at Fangraphs to see how AJax and other Tigers rate vs other players in the league. By comparison, Evan Longoria has the second highest BABIP in the league at .409. AJax isn’t just leading the league in BABIP, he’s blowing the entire league away. The optimists among us would come back with hopes that Jackson’s K rate would also drop, (only two in his last six games), giving him more balls in play even as the percentage of hits drop in, so his average doesn’t take as steep of a decline. The kid is a work in progress, and I’m not prepared to conclude that we were all wrong being concerned about him leading off with the K/ BB rate that he had in the minors prior to this season, but the early results look very promising.
Maggs has a BABIP of .289 for the 2010 season. I’m not so sure that career averages are the ideal measuring stick for a player with so much experience. Maybe better to look at three year splits, or more recent numbers for comparison purposes. But what if Maggs has made a permanent adjustment in his approach to hitting recently? What if he’s given up trying to drive the ball so often, and he’s perfectly happy being Singlio, at least much of the time? We saw two completely different Magglios in 2009, neither of which resembles what we saw in 2006- 2008. If he has changed his entire approach, and he’s the type of talented hitter that might be able to pull that off, then we’re dealing with moving goal posts as far as a number to calibrate expectations to. I just know that I feel confident with him at the plate when a runner needs to be moved up or driven in.
some of those things I put in as general guideposts
the xBABIP is because BABIP isn’t pure luck. It adjusts for batted ball type to get a better estimate of what you’d expect. Career BABIP at least tells us if a guy is routinely below or above .300. It’s just a quick and dirty comparison.
Looking at how things changing the BABIP changed the wOBA was my final quick and dirty stat.
In any case a lot of this you can truly do without advanced statistics, but at least they are able to confirm or deny the theory on certain players.
by Kurt Mensching on May 4, 2010 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm not a doctor
but I can imagine that a sore abdomen messes with your swing some. I’ve noticed Maggs has been a little late on fastballs recently…
by ChrisDTX on May 4, 2010 11:08 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
AJax's trend
AJax’s month to month BABIP’s
2008
April – .330
May. – .333
June- .277
July – .400
Aug.- .439
Sept- .Did Not Play
2009
April – .511
May. – .468
June- .338
July – .304
Aug.- .337
Sept- .465
2010
April- .530
May – .538 (so far)
He’s going on his 7 month of having a .400+ BABIP.
6 months out of the last 9, he’s posted .400+ BABIP’s. For 2 of those months, he’s posted BABIP’s over .500. By the looks of it, he could very well sustain a .400 BABIP for over a full-season based on this trend. Ignoring this continuing trend wouldn’t be wise even if it is unprecedented.
Conclusions in either case just shouldn’t be made yet. It’s wrong to think that something can’t happen because it never happened before. I have a few of theories of how an extreme BABIP can be sustained if anyone would care to listen. I wrote my own xBABIP calculator which is more accurate than the one at Hardballtimes and it projects his BABIP to be .448. I’ll have to wait and see how this plays out.
I know there are haters of AJax at this forum. IMO, that’s just a lapse of short-sightedness and stubbornness from those people. Nothing wrong with being wrong, that’s the only way to learn.
really not appropriate to just call people "wrong."
yes you have a plethora of numbers that support your argument but the opposition has valid arguments as well. I really haven’t seen anybody say that AJAX will eventually fail. The speculation is that his numbers will eventually regress to a more sustainable figure. Is a BABIP of +.400 let alone +.500 really that sustainable at a major league level?
On another note, telling us what you project his BABIP to be because your calculator “is more accurate” is hardly a way to advance an argument.
My Music: Some Sorta Giant
My Blog: Strike Three Mechanics
I referred to my xBABIP calculator because Kurt used the Hardballtimes calculator and got what I'd call misleading results.
“Using his line drive%, ground ball% and fly ball% to normalize things a bit, his batted-ball type should translate to about a .352 BABIP. And if we take that a step further and adjust his stats — entering play Tuesday — with that his slashline becomes 249/.312/.377/.689 ops (hat-tip to Mike Rogers for calculating that). "

by 




















