Detroit Tiger Cubs: Brennan Boesch
This is the first in an intended series on the 2010 Detroit Tigers rookies. Next up will be Austin Jackson.
The 2010 Tigers offense has been just that: highly offensive (Get it? It's a pun!). While Miguel Cabrera has been a beast all year, the rest of the lineup has either been inconsistent or just plain terrible. Austin Jackson is currently in an extended slump. Johnny Damon started off slowly, then heated up, and then cooled off again. Guillen has spent most of the season on the DL. Sizemore, Everett, Raburn, Avila, Laird, Inge, and Kelly have been all kinds of terrible. One of the non-offenders has been rookie Brennan Boesch. Already a fan favorite, he has also drawn skepticism from the prospect watchers and sabermetricians among us for his seeming inability to take a walk, his propensity for swinging at junk pitches, and his lack of a solid minor league track record (before 2009, that is). So far this year, he is hitting .338/.384/.626 with 7 HR and 29 RBI in 38 games. Simply put, Boesch has been the second best hitter in the Tigers lineup.
The question: Can he sustain this production?
The Minors
Boesch was taken in the third round (82nd overall) of the 2006 draft from the University of California, Berkeley. While he was considered a great talent, many scouts noted his stiff swing as a clear red flag. Debuting with the Oneonta Tigers in 2006, Boesch hit .291/.344/.435 in 70 games. At West Michigan (2007) and Lakeland (2008), Boesch failed to reach even a .700 OPS as a regular. The worst news, for someone drafted on the strength of his plus power potential, was that Boesch only managed double-digit home run numbers once in his first three seasons (he hit 10 at West Michigan in 513 AB). By the end of 2008, it seemed likely that Boesch would be nothing more than organizational filler.
In 2009, Boesch found his long-awaited power stroke, hitting 28 home runs in 527 AB (though some of this new-found power was probably due to Erie's homer-friendly park). Despite his prodigious power (.235 ISO), Boesch only mustered a paltry .318 OBP, due to a walk rate of less than 6%. In addition to a tiny walk rate, Boesch's strikeout rate increased at each level, from 14.4% at Oneonta to 24.1% at Erie. While the walk and strikeout rates make it hard to call 2009 a true breakout year, Boesch certainly took a step in the right direction.
On the strength of his 2009 season, Boesch resuscitated his status as a legitimate Tigers prospect. While he didn't make Baseball America's or John Sickels's lists, Fangraphs named him as the system's eighth best prospect and Kevin Goldstein rated him as the Tigers' fifteenth best prospect.
After a torrid start in AAA to begin the 2010 season (.379/.455/.621 in 15 games), Boesch was called on to fill the large power gap in the Tigers' offense.
The Majors
If you are a regular on this blog, or even a casual Tigers fan, you don't need me to tell you that Boesch has responded to his promotion in a big way. He has provided both the badly-needed lefty power bat and the badly-needed protection for Miguel Cabrera. How could someone with such an uninspiring minor league career burst onto the scene so dramatically and suddenly? And, more important, can he keep it up?
As noted above, one of the knocks on Boesch has always been his stiff swing, resulting in a swing so full of holes that you could (as David Tokarz would say) drive your Boesch Bus right through it. Despite these concerns, however, Boesch has managed to make contact at only a slightly below average rate (79.1% compared to MLB average of 81.1%). While he has been making contact at a passable rate, those critics who point to Boesch's propensity for swinging at junk pitches are justified: he has swung at 46.5% of pitches outside of the zone (compared to MLB average O-Swing % of 28%). To put that in further perspective, Vlad Guerrero's career O-Swing percentage is 38.9%.
Given Boesch's below average contact rates and above average O-Swing%, it would seem highly likely Boesch is racking up a huge number of strikeouts. Surprisingly, his strikeout rate (SO/AB) is only slightly worse than average (22.3% compared to MLB average of 20.4%). It would also seem likely that Boesch would not be drawing many walks. In this case, he is also below average, posting a walk rate (BB/PA) of just 6.6% (compared to MLB average of 9.0%).
Considering these pedestrian peripherals, it is hard to see how Boesch could be as successful as he has been, and it seems likely that he might simply be getting lucky. Indeed, this does turn out to be the case. He currently sports a BABIP of .392, though his expected BABIP (xBABIP) is only .297. That is a pretty hefty difference, and when his BABIP inevitably regresses, his lofty offensive numbers will regress with it. Since much of his value so far has been derived from a high batting average (.338) that has offset his low walk rate, it is hard to imagine him remaining this effective throughout the whole season.
As has been noted in his scouting reports, however, most of his value will be derived from his big power, which seems legitimate. He currently has a 14% HR/FB ratio, and while this could also be luck driven, it seems likely that he will continue to hit HR at an above average rate (though without any previous major league track record, this cannot be said conclusively).
Conclusion
It seems highly unlikely that Boesch will remain this productive throughout the course of his career, or even this season. Considering his relatively unimpressive minor league numbers, his luck-driven batting average, and his combination of high strikeout/low walk rates, I would be VERY surprised if he manages to be anything more than an average MLB hitter over a sustained amount of time. Ultimately, I expect him to be a similar hitter to Marcus Thames: lots of strikeouts, lots of home runs, and not enough walks. That said, Boesch has three things that Marcus completely lacks: a decent glove (UZR has him as a little below average), decent speed, and a left-handed bat. Even if his production declines, I still suspect that these three things will earn him plenty of chances to be an effective big league regular.
All stats taken from www.baseball-reference.com and www.fangraphs.com
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Bless You Boys writing staff.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Save them as a file and upload them.
I just click the outer part of the graph I make and then copy → past into paint. Save (I save mine as PNG’s) then I upload to BYB, but you can upload to any photo place like Imageshack.us or Photobucket or whatever.
So much Boesch talk here lately. I feel like I need to get started on a look at him like I’ve planned.
My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.
Now I write at Bless You Boys.
Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.
Very thorough, nice job.
Though I’m wondering if every hitter eventually rises or falls to the mean, shouldn’t they all have similar stats?
I’m kidding, of course, but my point is that every young player is unique, and every situation that they face is unique. If they are slumping, do they have the mental/physical faculties to overcome it? Can they adjust their approach in a given at bat or against a certain pitcher? Can they overcome personal issues, adjust to the grind of a 162 game schedule, learn from mistakes, and even improve when they reach the majors? All these questions can’t be quantified by stats. Skilled observers like Leyland and other grey hairs are paid big money to evaluate how the young player reacts to each unique situation to paint a more full picture of the player’s potential.
In the case of Boesch, like every young player I suppose, time will tell. Though I agree it’s likely he won’t be hitting .350 in September!
Baseball Geek
by StorminNormanCash on Jun 11, 2010 6:11 PM EDT reply actions
You're right that every young player is different.
Austin Jackson might be an interesting player to compare to Boesch. Both have similar weaknesses (strikeout too much, not enough walks), but they have very different strengths. Boesch is a pure power hitter and will only probably live or die by that power. Jackson, on the other hand, is a speedy guy with gap power and a good glove. It’s not as important for him to hit homers as it is for him to make better contact and be smart on the basepaths. I really hope that they’ll both be stars, but given their weaknesses, I suspect it won’t happen. I think they’ll both settle in as roughly average big leaguers, with Jackson having more value due to his position and plus defense. Both need to develop more plate discipline before they can reach their full potential.
Excellent post.
As awesome as the kid has been, it’s prudent to temper our expectations. That said, plate discipline is a skill that tends to improve as a player ages, so ultimately I could see Boesch drawing walks at a slightly below average rate, as opposed to the moribund rate he currently sports. Also, his O-Swing (is that like O-Face?) % could/should decrease as well over time.
What does the future hold? I don’t know. Best case scenario he’s the poor man’s Shawn Green. Worst case scenario he’s Ben Grieve.
Plate discipline only marginally improves over time.
Power’s most likely to improve but I doubt that Boesch is going to stop swinging at everything anytime soon.
My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.
Now I write at Bless You Boys.
Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.
Brennan Boesch
Brennan Boesch is a hitter, stop tying to analyze him with made up stats, and appreciate what he is doing.
Baseball is getting out of hand with SABR-metrics, and cute, ridiculous, made up, fancy sounding stats…batting average, RBI’s, slugging %, on base %, total bases,and runs scored worked for the likes of Ty Cobb, Tris Speaker, Babe Ruth, Joe DiMaggio, Al Kaline, and they’ll certainly work for Brennan Boesch.
by HonoluluBlueJohn1978 on Jun 14, 2010 11:35 AM EDT reply actions
Yes, and they work for those players because
They all had full careers. Brennan Boesch has had 164 PAs this season. They’ve been an amazing 164, but it’s still a crazy small sample. You can appreciate what he’s done thus far, but be realistic in knowing that there’s plenty of evidence to show that it won’t continue over the long haul (or even this season).
But if you think that Boesch is going to continue getting insanely lucky and putting up a babip that’s 80 points higher than Ted Williams career average, you’re going to be sorely disappointed.
by ozymandius1024 on Jun 14, 2010 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions
What?
I have no idea what those things mean…babip, etc…what I’m saying is just enjoy the efforts of a young man that has only played in 30+games.
Baseball stats are basic, and instead of enjoying watching a young man trying to make the big leagues, fans are trying to find fault with made up stats that have no other purpose.
Reggie Jackson struck out more times than anyone in baseball history, Cy Young lost more games than any pitcher in baseball history.
Baseball thrive on numbers, yes, it the one sport where fans can remember stats with ease…714 HR’s for Babe Ruth…755 for Aaron…511 wins for Cy Young…2297 RBI’s for Aaron, etc…but trying to figure out a kids stats after 30 some games, based on his past minor leagues, or looking into the future is simply silliness.
Enjoy watching the Tigers, the young kids, Boesch, Jackson, Worth, ans stop analyzing them until they’ve played significant time…162 games would be good…and then take a look at their stats…their baseball stats, and not some made up fooey.
by HonoluluBlueJohn1978 on Jun 14, 2010 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions
All stats, including such basics as batting average and RBI, were "made up" by someone.
And if they “have no other purpose,” then why have smart GMs like Billy Beane and Theo Epstein adopted them to such a large extent? I don’t care if you don’t like the new stats, but to call them “some made up fooey” just because you don’t understand them is just plain silly. Many of the new stats are better mathematical models than the old stats, regardless of whether or not you actually want to use them.
As to your claim that “looking into the future is simply silliness,” consider Austin Jackson. He began the year on an absolute tear. Many of us, while appreciative of his excellent performance, looked at his numbers and recognized that they were probably not sustainable. He was striking out too much, not walking enough, and getting very lucky on the balls he put in play. 30 games may not be a large sample size, but there are still some conclusions that can be drawn, especially when you take minor league numbers into account. It is very rare for a player to perform better at the major league level than he did at the minor league level. Some have done it (Hanley Ramirez, for example), but that is the exception to the rule.
Where I really take issue with your post, however, is your claim that analysis and enjoyment are mutually exclusive. I live in North Carolina, with no MLB team within a four hour drive. I can’t watch the Tigers on TV, and I can only get to one or two games per year. The way I stay connected with the Tigers is by following their stat lines, reading boxscores, and doing analysis. I find it enjoyable, and I know that there are many other readers of this blog who find it enjoyable as well. If you don’t enjoy it, that’s fine. But the fact that baseball lends itself so well to this kind of number-jockeying is one of the reasons that I love it so much.
And Jack Z
And Brian Cashman (I swear he’s reading BP). And Andrew Friedman. And Neal Huntington. And Mark Shapiro. And Jon Daniels. And Jed Hoyer.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys
by David Tokarz on Jun 14, 2010 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Now is where I make fun of Jack Z
I think we may have had our blinders on in regards to his roster construction skills.
by ChrisDTX on Jun 14, 2010 11:47 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Fleecing Amaro for Cliff Lee
Is still pretty hilarious. Overall he’s still made many more good moves than bad, so I’m going to withhold judgement on him for another year or so.
by ozymandius1024 on Jun 14, 2010 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah
The Mariners should never have tried to contend. But some of their moves I loved (getting Lee for mediocrity, swapping a useless pitcher in Carlos Silva for Milton Bradley even though it backfired).
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys
by David Tokarz on Jun 15, 2010 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions
Boesch's baseball career didn't start when he put on the Detroit uniform
he’s got a whole lifetime of stats and scouting reports saying he’s not going to continue being this good. You can attack saber stats if you like — hell it was about a decade ago people would have said "who needs on base %, slugging % and total bases? — but they have risen because they are scientific method sound, peer tested and have proven to be predictive. You don’t have to accept it, that’s just the way it works.
by Kurt Mensching on Jun 14, 2010 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions
What exactly do you mean
When you say that his swing has holes? Can you analyze a bit on that? It may be easy for you guys but for someone who has not seen him a lot, this is not easily understood.
He's got an uppercut swing
It means that he’s trying to load his swing with a lot of power and thus opens himself up to a lot of swings and misses- he’ll hit for power, but his contact skills are poor because of it. That’s not a problem if you’re Adam Dunn or Jack Cust and you have a good eye (as a sidenote, I don’t know if Dunn or Cust have uppercut swings) but when you sacrifice power for contact and you swing at everything….
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys
by David Tokarz on Jun 14, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Let me first say that I absolutely love your prospect profiles and MLM recaps
I can’t wait for more of these. That being said…
Does Brennan have the same swing issue with Clete Thomas? They said that Thomas needed to “shorten his swing” to be an everyday player in the majors.
Also assuming that Miguel is the best pure hitter in the team, what’s the main difference between his swing and Brennan’s/Austin’s (your impression anyway) and what can they do to be more like him?
From what I understand
And it’s not much- there’s a difference between an uppercut and a long swing. An uppercut is where you try to load your swing for power and sacrifice a ton of contact. A long swing means it takes longer to get the bat through the strike zone, meaning that you have to decide on pitches earlier and meaning you have more holes that pitchers can get baseballs through. At least that’s how I understand it.
Bear in mind, I’m not a swing person nor am I a scout (but I’m working on scouting fundamentals). But that’s how I’ve always thought of it.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys
by David Tokarz on Jun 15, 2010 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I've got a scouting report on his swing from someone who I trust as a swing-guy...
Just have to write the article. My plan is to look at PITCHf/x to see what he does and doesn’t handle well thus far. But it’s ambitious to write considering my lack of database skills.
My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.
Now I write at Bless You Boys.
Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by 





















