Two Tigers in position for postseason awards
With a little less than a month left in the season, and the talk of postseason awards picking up, I thought I'd look at the major races in the American League and throw it out there for discussion.
From where I stand, two Tigers have a chance to take home some hardware: Miguel Cabrera, as the MVP; and Austin Jackson as the Rookie of the Year. Honestly, if I expanded this to Gold Glove awards, I think nothing changes.
So with a month to go? How do I rank the contenders?
MVP:
1. Josh Hamilton, TEX
2. Robinson Cano, NYY
3. Miguel Cabrera, DET
The easy thing about guessing award winners is that you really don't have to look past the mainstream statistics, so it saves time. The bad thing is that you don't have to look past the mainstream stats, so the outcome of the awards is sometimes wildly debatable.
In this case, Josh Hamilton and Robinson Cano both get a checkmark in the "Team made the playoffs" category. (Can a player control who his teammates are? No. Except where he chooses to play in free agency. Nonetheless, people vote that way.) Cano gets a checkmark in the "East Coast media market" category. (Yes, it doesn't affect how many votes come out of the area. But when they're on TV and the top story more than most, it certainly helps.)
Hamilton leads in batting average with .361, which is 28 points above Cabrera and 43 above Cano. He's also got more home runs and more RBI than Cano. And he's got the backstory of struggling with drug and alcohol problems. The writers can defend this vote relatively well. Unless he's injured the entire month of September, he should be considered the major front runner.
What about Cabrera? Well, he's No. 2 in average, No. 1 in RBI and No. 2 in HR. He's No. 1 in OPS at this point. And he has totally had to carry the Tigers' offense for months. He would make a great choice, obviously. But he won't win.
Cy Young Award:
1. David Price, TB
2. CC Sabathia, NYY
3. Francisco Liriano, MIN
This race feels like it could go anywhere, but I feel pretty confident the top two guys I listed will be involved. Yes I know I did not type "Felix Hernandez." Remember, this isn't me writing who should win the award. (But check the bottom of the post for my shoulds). This is who I think will win the award. And Mr. Herandez is sadly lacking in the column sportswriters look at. "Does he know how to win?" 11-10 (as of this writing) record. So, no, Hernandez does not "know how to win." That's just the way it is.
Not that David Price is a bad choice, what with a 2.87 ERA and a fair shot to get to 20 wins. Plus he's got that plucky underdog Rays thing going for him, another good storyline! (Yes, anyone who followed baseball closely picked the Rays to go far, but that's beside the point.) If it's not Price, I think Sabathia has the next-best shot to win it. He will almost certainly lead the AL in wins, finish with an ERA near 3 and finish in the top 10 in strikeouts.
Guessing the third finalist is hard. Jon Lester? Lotta strikeouts. Lotta wins. Was treated for lymphoma. Jered Weaver? Not this year, doesn't have the hype and the Angels didn't do him any favors. Hernandez? As I already covered, I don't see it happening but maybe he'll get some smart votes. So I went with another playoff pitcher with nice stuff: Francisco Liriano. He too has solid ERA, a large number of strikeouts and a fair amount of wins.
I'll say this, the award this season will tell us more about the voters than about the candidates.
Rookie of the Year
1. Austin Jackson, DET
2. Neftali Feliz, TEX
3. Brennan Boesch, DET
This one is basically a two-man race at the top. I wasn't really sure what direction to go for the third-place finisher. Boesch is qualified for the batting title and has a nice line, but he isn't helped by the fact his past two months have been so bad. Wade Davis doesn't really have very beautiful stats at all, but he is a starting pitcher. Danny Valencia of the Twins has been up since early June. His OPS is nice, but his counting stats aren't all that beautiful. In the end it really doesn't matter who finishes third.
So it's Jackson or Feliz. The latter is a reliever for the Rangers who has 36 saves and just three blown. He's pitching for a playoff team. (Remind me again why there is always so much clamoring that a reliever get experience in the seventh inning for a season, then the eighth for a year or two?) He's got 59 strikeouts in 58 innings, a WHIP of less than 1 and an ERA of 3.26. So there's some gaudy stats, but the ERA isn't doing him any favors as a reliever.
Then we have Jackson. While Feliz has been in the game for 58 innings, Jackson has 1075 innings in the field under his belt. And they're pretty good innings. Slightly above-average by saber stats, way above average if you're just watching the game or talking to people like most of the voters. He's one of two AL batters qualified for the batting title, and he's got a .305 average as well as 22 stolen bases and 43 extra-base hits. (It totals a .774 OPS if the sportswriters are into that sorta thing).
Last season I spent a lot of time analyzing how writers tend to give out the award. I was able to narrow it down to Andrew Bailey winning, back when most people didn't even put him in the conversation. So I say with confidence I don't thnk Feliz will get it. I don't think relievers will win it back-to-back. I don't think his ERA is low enough. I don't think his strikeouts total will be high enough. And Jackson plays daily at an important defensive position while putting up pretty nice numbers. So I think Jackson wins. But if I'm wrong, Feliz is deserving.
Manager of the Year
Don't care!
Summation:
Best bets to win:
MVP: Josh Hamilton
Cy Young: David Price
Rookie of the Year: Austin Jackson
Manager of the Year: Don't care!
Should win:
MVP: Josh Hamilton
Cy Young: Francisco Liriano
Rookie of the Year: Austin Jackson
Manager of the Year: Ron Gardenhire
Why Hamilton? Speaking saberly, his wOBA is 16 points above Cabrera's and he plays a more difficult defensive position above average while doing it for a playoff team. I'm still rooting for Cabrera to win.
Why Liriano? Because the W-L record is an awful way to give an award out. He's having a solid season in ERA and strikeouts, and when you look deeper you see that he is completely dominating even if he does only have 13 wins. He has more strikeouts per nine innings than Felix Hernandez. His FIP (2.37) and xFIP (3.05) are both the best in the AL.
Why Jackson? He plays above-average defense at difficult defensive position, plays there near daily, gets on base and has strong baserunning skills.
Why Gardenhire? I suspect it would annoy Twins fans.
Your turn
Who's on your list for "will win" or "should win"?
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"What about Cabrera? Well, he's No. 1 in average, No. 2 in RBI and No. 2 in average."
I’m pretty sure that should read “He’s No. 1 in RBI, No. 2 in average, and No. 2 in home runs.” Hamilton’s No. 1 in average and Bautista is No. 1 in homers.
Adrian Beltre and Jose Bautista should probably be in the MVP discussion.
I don’t think Bautista should win, but Beltre has a pretty solid case, even if he falls a little short on the traditional counting stats.
If Cliff Lee can right the ship in the last month of the season, then he should also be in the discussion for Cy Young. It’s a shame that his time with the Rangers has been so bad. There’s something about Lee that makes me want to root for him.
Seems like a pretty weak rookie class in the AL this year. The NL, on the other hand, is insane! Jason Heyward, Stephen Strasburg, Jaime Garcia, and Buster Posey are all excellent candidates and have probably been better than any AL rookie this year. I think Posey should win it, especially to rub it in Brian “Posey’s not ready for the majors” Sabean’s face.
Minor quibble
I see AJax as having a very real shot at a gold glove. Span, Gutierrez, and Borbon haven’t hit enough, Hamilton plays LF primarily, and Torii seems to have lost some luster. I think it ends up as a coin flip between Jackson and Rios.
I don't really think anybody has noticed his fielding except us.
However, if Galarraga had gotten his perfect game I bet it would be more of a discussion…
Bucholz
I think Clay Bucholz will warrant some Cy Young talk—he has quietly been good this year. If King Felix pitched for any other team, he’d win the award. Voters won’t ignore the fact that CC has eight more wins than him—all tho, King Felix is posting better stats in ERA, WHIP, K/9, K’s, and CG’s.
Not enough innings though
I’d agree that he deserves to be in the conversation, however.
Deputy Editor, Bless You Boys
Free Scott Sizemore!
by David Tokarz on Sep 9, 2010 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions
The MVP award is not for "best player" (or Cabrera should win), but is for player "most valuable to his team"
Voters usually run the “but for” test, and try to gauge where a team would have finished without the player’s contribution. Good ol Ernie Banks was the poster boy for being the best player in the NL many years on the Cubbies, while other players walked away with the MVP. The award was even more limiting when only one team from each league made the post season.
Miggy also leads the world in OPS and in WAR value.
Hamilton only leads Cabrera in batting average.
Cano leads in pinstripes. Where is the BBWAA based again?
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
actually josh hamilton has the highest WAR in baseball
Cabrera beats him in win probability added, as they are first and second in that stat.
by Kurt Mensching on Sep 8, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions
where would be without Miguel?
I don’t even want think about it. That’s value!
Rooting for Tiger stripes, not pinstripes
by JerseyTigerFan on Sep 8, 2010 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Unfortunately
I don’t think the idiot national sports writers will ignore the Tigers missing the playoffs even though they’ve played better than most predicted and have been decimated by injuries. I’d be shocked if either Jackson or Cabrera wins.
It’s the same kind of crap with the gold glove awards. Laird for all his flaws was hands down the best defensive catcher in the AL last year but Mauer got the award. Why? Because he won a batting title. And because he’s a media darling. What’s the point of even having an award for best defense when half the idiots in the voting pool give it to the guy with the highest batting stats or the most hype?
In both cases the voters are looking at things that should not matter in handing out awards. I can accept that Hamilton might beat Cabrera in a fair vote, but there is no way Jackson should lose to a guy who won’t crack 70 innings on the season. But he will because Feliz will still be playing at least a week and a half into October.
I don't think that matters for rookie of the year, honestly
last year is a good example: Bailey pitched for the last-place A’s. In fact, the past few years in both leagues where a team finished didn’t predict it nearly as much as the season the players had.
by Kurt Mensching on Sep 8, 2010 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions
I have to agree with Kurt
I think the ROY is the only award that is only measured by “this guy had a great year”. All the rest are too influenced by the post season, IMO.
Hater of fair weather fans
agreed
In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 8, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Sportswriters are like umpires
They make judgement calls based on their opinion of a situation. No matter who they pick there is another side convinced that it was the wrong choice
Blatant Twitter Promotion
by rock n rye on Sep 8, 2010 4:06 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Post Season doesn't matter. All the awards are voted on before the playoffs begin.
But in the case of the MVP, most voters understand the definition of what the award is for, to mean that the player contributes to the success of the team, not just the best player.
Rookie of the Year simply goes to the best player that qualifies as a rookie.
Cy Young goes to the best pitcher in each league. In the past, pitcher wins have been considered the primary factor, but that’s changing.
Manager of the Year is given to the best manager.
Only the MVP really should be impacted by the team’s record.
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!

by 


















