Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Rampage Jackson Talks UFC 144, Japan Glory Days & Joe Rogan

Don Kelly is Mr. Versatility

Just like last year, we'll be grading all the Tigers who contributed significant playing time over the course of the season, starting with the position players, then doing the rotation members, and finally finishing up with the bullpen and writing profiles for players without enough playing time to earn a grade. Each list will run in alphabetical order. These reviews will occasionally dip into sabermetrics so we can get a better idea why things happened, but I'll try to explain as we go through things. 

Don Kelly

Just the saying the name Don Kelly threatens to drive some folks -- and a Tigers blogger -- over the edge. 

Why? It might have to do with the fact Kelly bats .245 and has an on-base percentage beneath .300, yet is somehow the go-to player for manager Jim Leyland. 

And I'm sure Don Kelly is a nice guy. You want to root for him. It was really quite fun when he rewarded Leyland's trust during the postseason and became a real hero. 

It's just all those other times when Kelly does exactly what you expect of him that are the problem.

If there's one thing you can say about him, at least he can play defense pretty much wherever you need him to. Some of those positions he fields quite well. Other of them, well, others he can find a glove for. On top of it, he even pitched in relief with some success making an otherwise awful game kind of fun.

So in the end, I like Kelly. I just can't justify giving him any grade higher than 

C- 

Star-divide

At the plate:

Kelly didn't hit well. He didn't get on base. His career BABIP is pretty awful on a yearly basis, making you think Kelly is woefully unlucky or the BABIP and xBABIP (.302 this year) thing just isn't going work well with him.

But can we find any positives? Of course. Kelly actually cut his strikeout rate from 16.7% to 11.4% this year. His walk rate improved from 3.2% to 5.0%. He also got his line drive rate up to 22%.

Of course, those are always reasons to be a bit afraid for 2012, because he didn't have a lot to show for it and you have to worry about some of those numbers stepping toward his career norms. 

In the field:

Kelly played third base more this year than any year in the past. In fact, it was the position he spent the most time at this season. Of course, it's hard to put too much weight on any of his advanced defensive numbers because the sample size just isn't large enough any any single position. 

Still, if you want to credit him for being quite a bit above average in 2011, you have to acknowledge he took a step backward at several positions this year so his overall defensive numbers are down.

Just looking at the Fan Fielding voting, Kelly was seen as being pretty average across the board, with most numbers in the 50-55 range for an aggregate of 51. That is down from the 57 last year.

As far as my eye test goes, I don't believe that Kelly really looked all that different this year. But i guess if the fans and advanced metrics both see a step back, there's probably reason to believe one occurred.

 In 2012:

It's hard to see too much changing in 2012. Kelly will continue to not hit that well. He will continue to field a bit above average. If Detroit can't find any good third basemen to acquire from elsewhere, he'll probably split time with Brandon Inge.  At least he batted a .250 with a .698 OPS against right-handers if he does end up in a platoon situation. Not great, but he does have a fair amount of power batting against righties. 

Poll
Don Kelly deserves a grade of __
A
51 votes
B
321 votes
C
268 votes
D
46 votes
E
6 votes

692 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 36 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

C, because it's hard to give Donnie a D

what do you classify him as, other than a super utility guy? In that role, he could even get a B, but as an overall position player, he’s not above average. C. And welcome back next year, Donnie, just hope it’s not in a starting role.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Nov 3, 2011 10:07 PM EDT reply actions  

That's right, it's just hard to give him a D

He really actually deserves a D. If we define a C as average (let’s say median for the sake of argument), we’d have to say that half the position players are worse than Kelly. That’s not possible, is it? Even on a crappy team, like the, oh…say….Twins, I bet Kelly doesn’t start.

If we took all the MLB position players, kicked them off their current teams, and re-drafted them, little league style, with 30 team captains, drafting 13 position players each, Kelly wouldn’t go above #200. He’s below average.

I gave him a C also :)

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by momotigers on Nov 3, 2011 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I struggled with this

whether to grade him relative to his role, or to players at large (if there is a certain way we are supposed to analyze them I missed the memo, sorry) I went with role, but as a player in general i agree he is probably a D

by rif23 on Nov 3, 2011 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

in the end, I gave him the same grade I gave andy dirks

both maybe deserve D’s ultimately but then I’d have to bump Inge down.

by Kurt Mensching on Nov 3, 2011 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

well said

he is a below average player, but what can you expect out of a utility player. Donnie performed every role they asked him to and did so admirably. You aren’t going to build a team around Kelly, but there aren’t many players making league minimum at age 31 that you would build a team around (I don’t actually think there are any). Half a win out of a league minimum utility player is good enough for a B in my book.

by rif23 on Nov 3, 2011 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wanted to give him a B, and I could still justify it...

Given he’s the only active player in the MLB to play every single position. But alas, I went with a C. He’s an average utility guy.

President of the Tony Scheffler Fan Club

by ZWC11 on Nov 3, 2011 10:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Had to go B for his postseason heriocs

His versatility made him beyond invaluable to this team. No person in the bigs I’d rather have for a 25th man. He has his purpose and he serves it well.

God ain't got no use for a 180 lb bag of sugar.

by Siggzilla on Nov 3, 2011 10:16 PM EDT reply actions  

C

Rogo might whine, but he did his job.

"You, on the other hand, make Eeyore look like Rainbow Brite." -johnmoz

"I think of you more as the blue book style essay of sports journalism."-Kurt Mensching

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Nov 3, 2011 10:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Goin with a B

Just as I see Coke as being the most overrated player on the Tigers, I see Kelly as being the most underrated. I would not be surprised if next year he is the player you receive unexpected production from. Watching his at bats, especially late this year, and they were excellent quality at bats. His swing is seamless, and it generates unexpected power.

by jumpsuit on Nov 3, 2011 10:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Don Kelly:

Adequacy Wizard

"I'm a simple man. I like pretty, dark-haired women and breakfast food" - Ron Swanson
twitter

by rock n rye on Nov 3, 2011 11:26 PM EDT reply actions  

C

I like his defense no matter where he played. His offense picked up at the end & helped the Tigers. As much as I dislike him, he supprised me enough for the C.

And I gave Inge an E and I liked him.

Who’da guessed that? Not Me.

by TigersFan1957 on Nov 4, 2011 12:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Don Kelly is a W, for Wizard.

Don’t be hating!

I have a grand idea: let's win a game.

by 13194013 on Nov 4, 2011 1:57 AM EDT reply actions  

D

He’s a below average player, but he’s gets a passing grade due to his versatility and solid Defense.
Do I want him starting? No, not at all.
Would it be hard to replace him? No, not at all.

Do I want him on the team as a 25th man? Yes. He’s one on my favorite players. He’s kind of like Rudi. I think he makes the players around him happy because he’s such a hard worker with great attitude. He’s like the teams little brother, that we want to protect under our wings, and want to make all things better for him.

by Keith-Allen on Nov 4, 2011 2:58 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Good summary

I agree completely.

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by momotigers on Nov 4, 2011 7:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

My sentiments, exactly

Except I gave him a C because I like him too much to give the guy a D.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Nov 4, 2011 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

I gave him a B

It just seems there were a lot of game threads when his Wizard SKillz were mentioned. I think the guy did the best he could in whatever role Leyland put him in, and in that respect he was an above average 25th man.

"Some guy told me I should walk with the Lord. I'd rather walk with the bases loaded" Ken Singleton

by NCDee on Nov 4, 2011 8:42 AM EDT reply actions  

I gave him a B, too

Relative to his role on the team, I think a B is a perfectly fine mark. I only looked at how well he performed as a 25th man and utilityman. I can understand not wanting to grade him so highly because of the relation to other players, but I’ve been grading these guys on a sliding scale.

by onepartloss on Nov 4, 2011 9:01 AM EDT reply actions  

D

I’d have considered giving him a C but I felt the need to counterbalance the people who gave him a B which in spite of the reasons given I think it way too generous. He was not above average, even as a utility player. There are a lot of bench guys on other teams who could’ve done exactly what Don did. Nearly every NL team has at least one guy this versatile and so do several AL teams. Even as a bench player he was average at best, regardless of how many positions he played. Sure, he was great in the postseason, but I’m ignoring the post season in my voting. Otherwise I’d have to give Kelly an A, JV a B, and Avila an E.

by Sutelc on Nov 4, 2011 10:03 AM EDT reply actions  

I might have to steal this line for our facebook commenters
Sure, he was great in the postseason, but I’m ignoring the post season in my voting. Otherwise I’d have to give Kelly an A, JV a B, and Avila an E.

by Kurt Mensching on Nov 4, 2011 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not factoring in the post season is pretty silly as well

you’re telling me if you were grading the Cardinal players, you would ignore the post season David Freese had?

by jumpsuit on Nov 4, 2011 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

yep!

if I’m on the edge it might push me to one side or the other, but that’s it.

The season is 162 games. The postseason is a handful. Which is more likely to tell you about the true nature of a player? Anything can happen in 10 games, whether they’re in April or October.

The fact the Cardinals are the World Series champs and the Phillies, far superior in every way, are not really says a lot more about the randomness of a small number of games than it does about the individual teams.

by Kurt Mensching on Nov 4, 2011 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

And

The postseason doesn’t factor into voting for the various awards given out every year so that’s another reason not to look at it here. I thought the point of these polls was to evaluate the player’s contribution to our team en route to October.

by Sutelc on Nov 4, 2011 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

but

I still have to disagree. Sure, the post season is a small sample of games but fair or not they define your season just as much as the regular season. And players whether they step up their game or fall flat are branded by those games just as much as they are from the previous 162. With baseball being such a mental game, being able to produce under the weight of knowing the entire season is on the line, says alot about a player. And from any of the Tigers, Kelly was one of the most relaxed, focused hitters in their lineup when it mattered most.

by jumpsuit on Nov 4, 2011 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with Kurt...but I had to grade on a HUGE curve to do so

I gave Kelly a C because he did everything which was asked of him…which was too much at times. I’m fine with the 25th man being someone who can play solid defense all over the field. But the more Kelly plays, the more he’s exposed for what he is, a no-hit, good field utility man.

Kelly deserves a D, because he was a black hole offensively for 6 months. His playoff performance was an aberration. He’ll never be that good again.

I'm owner/editor of The Wayne Fontes Experience a deputy editor at Bless You Boys, host the Bless You Boys Podcast and co-host The Knee Jerks podcast.

by BigAl on Nov 4, 2011 10:23 AM EDT reply actions  

But he has sneaky power

I swear that he gets a few dingers because pitchers don’t respect his hitting. But whatever, he filled the role.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Nov 4, 2011 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

I graded him a B

But my grade was as the last guy on the bench, and compared to what i saw of everyone else’s 25th guy. By that criteria, i thought he was better than most. I gave A-Jax a B too, but I don’t see them as equally talented. Does that make any sense?

by MotorCityCat on Nov 4, 2011 12:35 PM EDT reply actions  

C

Would still like to see JL throw him and the fans a bone, and allow Don to play all 9 positions in one game. Don would be forever a trivia question, and it’d match his career. He’s made a nitch for himself, at a late date, and deserves to be remembered. At least in trivia.

Maybe next year?

Justin can now let the fungus grow back on his shower shoes.

by Singledigit on Nov 4, 2011 1:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Not really Leyland's style

Gimmicks don’t play well with JL.

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by momotigers on Nov 4, 2011 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don Kelly - Utility Wizard

Can Hit, Pitch AND Field! What he did for the Tigers this year is worthy of giving him a B, he did everything he was asked to of

Fan of the Detroit Tigers ~ Detroit Lions ~ Detroit Red Wings! - No Town Better to be a fan of!
Fantasy: PoD Bench League (PackMules (2-6)) / WIIM Mursak League (Wingedmule (20-20-5))
Restoring the Roar - The 2011 Detroit Lions!

by MuleRules on Nov 4, 2011 3:33 PM EDT reply actions  

C

Because C+ wasn’t available. The guy is a utility player. He showed a little pop, a little bit of clutch, and a lot of versatility in the field. Every team could use a Don Kelly on the bench.

Sorry, Rogo.

by H2OPoloPunk on Nov 4, 2011 4:36 PM EDT reply actions  

He is a C

which is ok for a bench role player. As long as that is all he is that’s fine. More than that and we’re in trouble….I guess we’ll see.

Country Strong

by Rusty Kuntz on Nov 4, 2011 5:20 PM EDT reply actions  

If you buy into UZR at all...

He’s been a lot better than “a bit above average”, especially when he’s in the outfield.

by thepartybird on Nov 4, 2011 11:03 PM EDT reply actions  

the sample size is too small to use reliably for any of the advanced metrics

and we’re still not sure how reliable any of them are. Even for players playing full seasons at a defensive position you need to look across multiple seasons to have a good impression. That’s why I try to scatter shot several defensive stats alongside the fan impressions.

I don’t dispute he’s above average in the outfield. it’s just hard to say how much.

by Kurt Mensching on Nov 5, 2011 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hpim0067_small
Tigerdog's Spring Training Poetry
Detroit-tigers-logo_small
Winter Ball Wrap-Up: Venezuela
Detroit-tigers-logo_small
Winter Ball Wrap-Up: Dominican Republic

Recent FanPosts

Small
Old Gloves and Memories
Small
Why Cabrera needs time at 3B...
Small
Are You Interested in Fantasy Baseball?
Dsc01480_small
Questions about Pitchers and Catchers reporting
Sparky_anderson_wall_small
What Are Your Favorite Things About Being a Tigers Fan?
Tigers1978_800x600_small
2012: The Year Of The Tigers
Small
How Can I Hate the Signing of Prince Fielder?
Copy_of_tiger_camp_015_small
Succeeding Jim Leyland

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Quick Rules

Do:

  • Treat others like you'd like to be treated.
  • Stick to the topic being discussed.
  • Make arguments based on facts, not emotion.
Don't:
  • Confuse BYB with talk radio, your blog or your social networking web site of choice. We're a baseball community.
  • Feed the trolls.

Commenting Code of Conduct


Managing Editor

Dsc0178-l_small Kurt Mensching

Deputy Editors

Meatcomputer-1_small BigAl

Sparky_anderson_wall_small handsomerob1

5532934019_b5fa57ae98_small allikazoo

Contributors

Hpim0067_small Tigerdog1

6m2bts_small Melissa Heyboer

Moderators

Be050826_small NCDee

Sifl_and_olly_small 13194013