Six spring training stories: second basemen, outfielders, pitchers and more
Sure, the trendy thing would have been to give you five stories to watch as spring training gets underway in Lakeland. But we're better than that around here, right? So we're going to give you 20% more: six spring training stories to follow. What a bargain! So what have we got on tap today?
- The battle at second base among Will Rhymes, Scott Sizemore and Danny Worth.
- The backup roles in the outfield, which will see Brennan Boesch, Clete Thomas and Casper Wells battling for position
- The roles of the lefties in the bullpen and which ones will make the club
- How Phil Coke will adjust to being a starting pitcher
- What health concerns will come up?
- What new wrinkles for the club do Jim Leyland and Dave Dombrowski have in mind?
Six weeks from now, we'll know about these six topics and more.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The Two Most Important Stories of the Six
Good summary of the state of things heading into ST. In reading your comments, it strikes me that two of the six are really the most important.
The battle at second may be interesting, but probably will not make much difference in Tiger wins and losses. There are enough competent candidates to ensure that. Same goes for who will be the fourth outfielder.
Phil Coke’s success as a starter will determine if and when a minor leaguer gets his shot. If needed, either Furbush, Oliver or even Turner will probably perform well enough.
The two big issues seem to be: 1) Do we have the lefties we need in the pen and, 2) health. Health is beyond DD’s control. But he could do something about adding a lefty to the pen. If there is a DD deal during ST this will be it.
Zumaya's health is a huge story
We can talk about Thomas and Schlereth and Coke and the state of the bullpen all we want, but I personally think the health (or lack thereof) of Joel Zumaya looms HUGE over this bullpen. If he’s healthy, there’s your eighth inning right there — none of this futzing-around with patching things together using a conglomeration of 3 or 4 different guys in huge-pressure situations. Zoomer in the 8th frees up Leyland to use the other guys earlier, in more specific spots where they’re more likely to succeed.
Just my $0.02, of course.
Benoit is our 8th inning guy
They didn’t pay that cat 5.5M a year to pitch before the 8th inning. Zumaya would be a heck of a 7th inning guy, but I also hope that Perry can provide a solid 7th most of the time if needed.
Ideally, we have Zumaya, Perry, Benoit and Valverde to cover the 7-9 innings…since we’ll be ahead by the 7th most of the time, it’s good to have 4 late inning guys!
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
Not to get too far ahead of ourselves...
but I think they paid Benoit $5.5 million for 2012 and 2013 with the belief that he’ll be a serious contender for the closer’s role.
That would presume that The Big Potato would be allowed to walk at the end of this season (and maybe the Tigers can capture an additional draft pick in the process).
"All aboard! There is plenty of room."
Brennan Boesch Bandwagon Conductor
Question
Valverde has a club option for 2012…can we decline option, offer arby, and get a comp. pick?
Either way, if Valverde is good in 2011, I don’t see them declining the option at 7 or 7.5M. If we had a bunch of relievers knocking on the door, than maybe…but I don’t see a bunch of guys in the minors that would be able to step up in 2012 if we let the Potato roll.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
Yes, as long as he declines the arbitration offer
If he’s a type A free agent, the Tigers would receive two draft picks- one between the first and second rounds, plus either the first or second round pick from the team that signs him
If he’s a type B free agent, the Tigers would receive one draft pick- between the first and second rounds
The 2012 option is for $ 12 million
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
Thanks!
And Yikes, I thought the 3rd year option was more in line with the rest of the contract. I’m almost hoping he pitches well enough to be a type A and we decline the team option and offer arb. If he takes the arb, I can’t imagine it would be much more than 12M.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
right on
I love having Zumaya, Perry, Benoit, and Papa Grande out in the back end of the pen. IF Zoom can be healthy, having 4 solid arms out there to cover 3 innings will be a great advantage for us.
"The White Sox...they suck. And we're going to show the Twins they suck too." - Phil Coke
//Will Dave Dombrowski make any deals by the end of spring training?//
I have a hard time seeing them signing a guy before the end of Spring Training. But never say never.
Or do you mean trades? Hmmm.
by ivantopumpyouup on Feb 14, 2011 7:33 AM EST reply actions
I love Spring Training!
As PawPaw stated, I think the battles at 2B and OF#4 are interesting, but won’t have a huge affect on the ending record of the team. However, they probably do have a pretty big effect on 2012 and how our organization views players going forward. I think guys among Wells, Boesch, Thomas, Worth, Sizemore, and Rhymes become instant trade chips if they are not in the plans this season. All of them are old enough that it’s time to fish or cut bait.
With most of our important decisions made, I won’t be dissecting the performances of the 25-man guys as much this season, I’m really looking forward to seeing some of the other 40-man guys and non-rosters…I’m amped for Turner, Oliver, and Furbush starts. Some of the “toolsy” positional guys will be fun to watch as well…and oh yeah, Adam Wilk.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
Nice article and breakdown
I think that 2B is pretty much Sizemores to lose, but they aren’t going to just hand it to him like they did last year. I know Rhymes played well last year, but he was playing well above his skill level. Rhymes K rate was the lowest in Detroit than it has been at any other time in his professional career, his ISO was also the highest it has ever been, his UZR (small sample size I know!) wasn’t that great, it was better than Sizemores but people talk about his defense as being so great when it is really just average. I think Rhymes has a position with this team in the future but I don’t think it is as a starter.
I think we are looking at Boesch and Thomas as the back-up outfielders. The left-handed bats coming off the bench is too nice to pass up, especially with all our starting outfielders being righties. Plus, they both bring a different thing to the plate, Boesch has the pop to be big contributor and Thomas is decent with the stick but is a decent defensive upgrade at both corners and won’t hurt us in center.
Not terribly concerned with the lefthander in the bullpen. Personally, I think LOOGY’s are overrated. I know they serve a purpose, but I think that anyone in the pen should be able to come in and get one guy out regardless of if they are right or left handed.
Phil Coke is the one that I will be watching most closely. Honestly though, I don’t have terribly high expectations out of him. I see him as more of a 5th starter (even though he is starting in the 4th slot) so if he gives us 5-6 semi-decent innings then I will be happy with it. By semi-decent I mean, no more than 4 or 5 runs 75% of the time he pitches.
With Zoom, I hope with the addition of Benoit, the continued growth of Perrry, and the Potato closing things out I don’t think we need to rely on Zoom too much. I can see him being a 7/8th inning guy but only being used to keep Benoit and Perry from pitching 2 or 3 days in a row. I hope that the reduced innings will allow us to keep him for an entire year.
Guillen…well is Guillen. I hope that we have him for the rest of the year after he returns, he brings so much to the team with his bat. I think he showed that he is adequate at second, similar UZR to rhymes in the same amount of plays… For this year I would rather have Guillen as much as possible, I think as an all around player he is the best option at 2B.
The rest of the team? Injuries happen to every team, it is all dependent on how the replacements play. It is bad enough we dissect the logical arguments to everything Tigers…lets not dissect the things that are completely and totally unpredictable.
The biggest questions to me are....
1. The three big IF’s (partially covered in the article above, but…)
a. Will Rick Porcello rebound from a poor sophomore season and regain his form showed in 2009?
b. Will Brad Penny stay healthy?
c. Will Phil Coke make the transition back to starting pitching?
d. If all three of the above don’t work out, will Andy Oliver be able to step up, command his pitches well enough to hold a starting job in the major leagues?
2. Will Magglio remain healthy? If not, the Tigers are screwed for a No. 3 hitter.
3. Second base, as indicated above, together with the NO. 2 slot. Expect a drop in Avg and OBP from AJax due to a natural regression in his BABIP, but taking a big hit in OBP in both the 1 and 2 slots would be a big blow to run production for Maggs and Cabrera. I have little doubt that someone steps up and claims this job. Unlike the rotation there is depth here.
4. The LOOGY’s in the bullpen. They didn’t bother to replace Phil Coke. Dan Schlereth is still pretty raw with about six solid appearances under his belt and Brad Thomas is, well, just not very good, especially against righties. And if they don’t cut it, will JL nix the pavlovian moves to get lefty match ups by taking out perfectly effective righties?
5. Now we get to that outfield backup discussion. I’m not all that concerned about Raburn, either at the plate or in the field. He’ll be as good as Cuddyer and much better than Juan Pierre.
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
#2 above
I agree that losing Maggs would hurt, but not nearly as bad as last year. I’m hoping that Raburn could be a decent option at #3 if Maggs can’t play.
I can’t for the life of me figure out who we went into 2010 with as our #5 hitter. It seems that VMart could also bat #3 on this team and it would look a lot like we did at the start of 2010…decent #3, great #4, and whatever at #5.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
didn't we have "whatever" at No. 5 last year?
Guillen was penciled in as the No. 5 hitter in 2010, as well as being the left fielder. Then, they got Damon and the LF/ DH thing was up in the air. The opening day lineup had (are you ready for this?) Inge hitting sixth, Laird seventh, Sizemore eighth and Everett ninth. Don Kelly was brought in as a defensive replacement for Damon in LF, while Santiago was used as a pinch hitter. Um, I think the team is improved!
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
When you look at that lineup, you have to agree.
We were in 1st place for a while without a legit #5 hitter. Guillen never hit well enough in 2010 to adequately protect Cabrera. We all know that Boesch was good protection, but only for about 30% of the season.
I try to think back to my expectations last season and I have trouble remembering why I was hopeful of that team (I guess because I’m a hopeless romantic when it comes to baseball.) We didn’t have protection for Cabrera and 1/3 of our lineup was known to be offensive waste. We also had two spots (Guillen and Sizemore) with the potential to produce next to nothing offensively in addition to their poor defense….and we were in 1st with that team. I’ve just adjusted my 2011 prediction to 119 wins.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
Good Analysis
Pitching/Health are going to be the biggest obstacles. On paper we have a decent starting 5. But, our starters have to get out of the gate a lot better then they did last year including JV. Last season first half, when the starter were lousy the bullpen was good, when the starters were good then the bullpen was lousy. The pitching needs to come together as one. Outfield, I forsee Thomas/Wells making opening day roster. Kelly will not make the team. We have to good of influx of extra outfielders and infielders to keep Kellys weak bat. As far as the infield goes it will be Seizemore starting at 2nd and Ryhmes backup (besides Santiago) until CG gets back then Rhymes gets sent down.
As I’ve mentioned before, we must play better on the road. Our home/road record was upside down dramatically last year. We need to play closer to 500 on the road. With pitching and health we have a chance to do that. I like our 4 & 5 starters better this year then last. Some of the things the tigs should emphasize in spring training this year is, stealing bases, hit and run, and more importantly, getting the runner home from 3rd with less then two out. Glad spring training is here.
I think Kelly is a much "surer" thing than anyone on the bench except Santiago
Kelly is a good 25th man. Your 25th man doesn’t need to be a masher at the plate (Kelly logged 238 AB’s last year and would have been closer to 200 if not for the Cabrera injury at the end of the year). Your 25th man needs to be a solid defender when needed in the field and he needs to be versatile. On the Tigers, it helps that he’s a lefty. And he should be someone that isn’t wasting away on the end of the bench (Wells, Sizemore, or Boesch still probably have too much upside to consider for this role.) It’s also nice to have a player that can shut up and accept the role. Kelly meets my criteria beautifully.
Granderson was my Tiger, then Sizemore, then Willis. Since they're all gone, I'm taking Raburn and hoping the pattern holds.
I, for one, would welcome Clete's return
assuming he’s had time to come up with some new walk-up music.
Direct spiritual descendant of Katie Casey
by NCDee on Feb 14, 2011 11:45 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Clete may be the best pure "defensive replacement" of the bunch
But he had totally lost his swing by the end of the 2009 season. I don’t think that batting in the 3 spot helped him at all. He comes up, is hitting with a nice short stroke, hits a few dingers, and develops this long, looping swing. He goes back down, works with Bull Durham, gets it right, comes up, tears the cover off the ball, and goes back to the big looper. I was looking forward to him becoming more consistent last year, then he went on the DL. He has a nice mix of skills, including a cannon for an arm, if he’s just make contact enough. He’s definitely in the mix for a job.
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
Wells unless Boesch get hot, like Thomas though, division too close for Coke to mess up
Kelly sounds like he is the fourth outfielder and is good defensively and bats left handed. This kind of removes Thomas from the equation. If Boesch gets hot you have to bring him north. I think Wells has the inside track because he can plays all three outfield positions and he gives the Tigers the additional right-handed bat against lefties which allows Maggs DH while Victor catches. I think also Boesch will benefit more from AAA than Wells.
There should be five outfielders, including Kelly, IMO
Do the math. With no third catcher taking up a spot on the bench, there are four bench openings. Figure two infielders and two outfielders are likely.
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
I thought I did the Math right
I think Rhymes and Sanitago get the infield positions unless Sizemore get hot in Spring Training and I do believe he still has option left. Sizemore will develop fatser by playing everyday at AAA until Guillen get hurt again assuming Guillen will be ready but April. This leaves Kelly and Wells for the other two positions unless Boesch or Thomas gets super hot.
Okay- I read your comments differently
My bad. But I think that Clete still has a shot if Kelly’s on the team, as do Boesch and Wells. With three righties starting in the OF, I don’t think Jimbo would hesitate to take a couple lefties for the bench. I also think he likes Clete quite a bit.
Of course Santiago gets the other reserve infield spot. If Sizemore hits, I think he starts at 2B, but if not, I think Worth is the backup with Rhymes starting. Like Boesch, I think they’ll want Sizemore hitting every day. Could be a 50/ 50 platoon with Sizemore and Rhymes, I guess, but any less than that, and Sizemore is sitting most of the time. I can’t see that.
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
I like Thomas too but I think it is a # games
I agree I like to see Boesch and Sizemore play as much as they can to ready to be call-up when hot. I pointing towards Wells because how well does Thomas or Kelly left handers when Maggs is the DH and Victor is catching? I guess Boesch hits lefties good but he not a good defensive replacement in comparsion to Wells and Thomas during the late innings. I don’t consider Wells a start or star potential so being the fifth outfielder fits his bill. Where Boesch and Sizemore have the potential of a everyday player.
It occurs to me in this discussion
that if the bats on the pine are Kelly, Santiago, and the loser of the 2B race, don’t we need some sort of a good bat to pinch hit? Not that JL would pinch hit for most of his starters anyway, but you never know how things line up on a given day. I would not dismiss Casper as a starter just yet, but it would seem from what we saw early last year that Boesch does have the bigger upside, and Wells is a much better “defensive replacement” type. And then, on days when Al’s kid is not in the lineup and V Mart is catching, maybe Maggs is the DH and our OF bench guy is in the starting lineup. That could be any of the three- Wells, Boesch, or Thomas. But in the end, I agree that we want Sizemore and Boesch hitting every day, and I think SS has a shot at starting, while BB will have to wait while RR gets his shot with that fat new contract.
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
Can I offer a suggestion for #7?
I think I’m more interested this year than in years past to see how some of the more advanced minor league pitchers do… like Oliver, Furbush, Turner, Below, and Villarreal.
I fall asleep at night thinking about a 2012 staff that includes Verlander, Scherzer, Porcello, Turner, and Oliver.
"All aboard! There is plenty of room."
Brennan Boesch Bandwagon Conductor
I apologize in advance if I missed this somewhere...
but have we heard anyone use the “he’s in the best shape of his career” description yet for any of the Tiger pitchers or catchers that are in camp?
"All aboard! There is plenty of room."
Brennan Boesch Bandwagon Conductor
Not yet, but you can bet it's coming!
Maybe the script is already written. lol!
If you survived 2003, you can get through this!
If you think about it, we're pretty lucky
I like this years team. We have some infielders/outfielders and some pitchers fighting for spots. The cool thing is, in most cases we potentially have a backup plan if things dont pan out except maybe catcher. Lets face it, a few of these kids are going to be on the team this year. And any of the 3 outfielders/infielders could have a break out year and there wont be a question the rest of this season or next to see who is ready. I hate to say it, but right now I think the Chisox are the best team in our division based on paper. We may have a slight edge in the bullpen, and poissibly starting pitching. With that said, health, luck and performances to ones potential may be the factor down the stretch.
For us to win the division we have to do it day in and day out without any hicups. Especially when we play our own division. We cant let Cleveland & K.C. kick our tails again this year, and we better play better against the two teams within our planet.
But, as JL says, no team is perfect. Havent we had the division lead or very close to the division lead the last 3 yrs at All Star Break, and we didnt show up the 2nd half? We cant wait for 2012 to correct that problem.

by 






















