Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

Detroit Tigers Rumors: Aaron Harang, Derek Lowe, Carlos Beltran updates

The busy day at the blog may never end. Here are a few more rumor updates:

Jon Heyman reports -- confirmed by Fox Sports' Jon Paul Morosi -- the Tigers are interested in starting pitcher Aaron Harang of the San Diego Padres. The Indians, too, are said to be interested in the former Reds righthander.

In his first season with the Padres Harang sports a 3.19 ERA for the season -- 2.92 at spacious PetCo Park and 3.81 away from it. He has 6.19 strikeouts per nine innings, or a rate of 16.9%.

For the more predictive stats, his FIP is 3.65, or 3.92 if his home run rate is adjusted to league average. However, ZiPS projects a 4.42 ERA for the rest of the season. Before pitching in San Diego, Harang's ERA had not been below 4.21 in the previous three seasons. He missed a portion of the 2010 season due to back spasms.

Harang has been effective in his two starts since returning from the disabled list with a foot injury. He has not allowed a run in the 13 innings since the July 9 return against the Dodgers. In that game, he had a no-hitter through six innings before being replaced by the bullpen. On July 14, he shut down the Giants for seven innings.

Harang would be owed the remainder of his $3.5 million contract. Harang has a mutual option for $5 million for 2012 with a $500K buyout.

I'm not sure what the Padres would ask in return. In June, Heyman wrote the Padres may not give him up easily due to his bounceback year and team-friendly contract.

I kind of like this idea. There is always a risk in bringing a National League pitcher to the American League, but it seems like most of the names the Tigers are linked to pitch in the NL. But Harang might be a nice compromise that brings a good player -- not a great one -- at a decent price without compromising the future.

In any case, I have no doubt the Tigers will eventually find their starting pitcher.

Star-divide

Also we have an update on Derek Lowe. It sounds like the deal was down to cash. ESPN.com's Jerry Crasnick reported on Twitter the Tigers needed Atlanta to pick up about 75% of Lowe's remaining salary -- totaling about $21 million through 2012. That wouldn't fit well for the Braves, who appear to be trying to clear out Lowe's salary to make a move at Carlos Beltran.

Speaking of Beltran, Heyman reported Beltran would likely accept a trade to Detroit in order to play with a contender.

Comment 91 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Seems to me...

.. that a trade for Harang would be more for the sake of making a trade than to actually gain anything. If we’re going to give up any prospects, we need to go a bit bigger. I see a Washburn v2.0

by H2OPoloPunk on Jul 18, 2011 7:04 PM EDT reply actions  

I hear ya

I’ll pass on all three

Chicks dig me, because I rarely wear underwear and when I do it's usually something unusual

by BrianCMU. on Jul 18, 2011 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

This

It seems like rumors of Detroit targeting Harang, Lowe, and Guthrie are just deals for the sake of doing the trade.

Lock Jacob Turner up until 2012

by cabby4mvp on Jul 18, 2011 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Totally agreed.

I have said this very much to the effect of Guthrie and Lowe. Harang, even more so. Donwe seriously want to target a guy who looks like he’d be replaced by dontrelle willis? I say eff no.

Charlie Sheen Night at CoPa: everyone has their Tiger Blood and Coke is a free mixer.

by Siggzilla on Jul 18, 2011 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry--epic tense fail

A guy who LOOKED like he’d be replaced by Willis

Charlie Sheen Night at CoPa: everyone has their Tiger Blood and Coke is a free mixer.

by Siggzilla on Jul 18, 2011 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

No

It’s to replace the replacement level starter that will fill Coke’s old place in the rotation.

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 18, 2011 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

Furbush and/or below would likely be 0.0 WAR players for the rest of the season. Harang would be about 1.0 WAR. So if the Tigers were an 86 win team before a trade, they’d be an 87 win team after it.

DetroitJockCity.com

by Matt Snyder on Jul 18, 2011 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or to add another mid rotation level starter, even though one of them will be the fifth best starter

I can’t get rewarmed to Aaron Harang, just as I had a hard time rewarming up to Washburn.
Guthrie, I like. He’s better than his numbers this year and get him out of the east, he’s a No. 3 or so, IMO.
Lowe- could be a nice pick up. He’s not new to the AL and may transition well, especially with most AL hitters not having seen him a whole lot. Don’t want to tie up his full salary, though, and you can bet DD won’t do that either. Trade Inge and Raburn for Lowe, and I’d eat his whole contract. Won’t happen, though.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 18, 2011 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

my question now is

when does a deal take place? i agree with kurt, it’s not a question of if, but when and who. will it go right up to the 31st, or will it be soon? by the way, i might be in the minority, but i disagree with the thought the tigers would be better off with furbush or below as the 5th starter. guthrie, lowe, or harang are not exciting necessarliy, but they would be better. i believe much better, actually.

by atlantatiger on Jul 18, 2011 7:59 PM EDT reply actions  

Furbush and Below both have relief stuff

Below moreso (I think Furbush could eventually stick in a rotation as a #4 or #5). Either way, there’s also going to be a learning curve. Neither has the pedigree nor stuff to slide immediately into a role as an above-replacement level starter. So we’re supposed to risk it on one of them as opposed to giving up a minor piece (probably a relief prospect or a low-level, low upside player)?

I like prospects a lot but even I think that’s boneheaded.

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 18, 2011 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know...

If anyone’s talked about this yet so far, but what about acquiring Leo Nunez from the Marlins? He can help take some of the load off of Benoit for the 8th inning, allowing him a chance to catch his breath from doing a lot of the heavy lifting. He’d also be able to fill in for Papa G on days that he needs off.

Nunez has a 3.35 ERA (3.31 FIP). He has a 6.5% HR/FB ratio. He strands about 3/4 of his base runners. He’s a flyball pitcher, but that would play well in the “Grand Comerica Canyon.” His K/9% isn’t as good as Valverde (7.35 vs. 10.53 career) but his BB/9% is about 1-2 points lower any given season and about 1 point lower for his career. Since being given the Marlins closing job in ‘09, he’s been very solid.

I realize trading for him would probably cost a Furbush/Oliver/Ruffin type, plus filler. It would also be a bit of a luxury at this point rather than a need, but a back 3 in the pen of Benoit/Nunez/Valverde would be very, very good. He’s making $3.5 million this season, and is arb eligible in ’11 and will become a free agent in ’12. I believe I saw somewhere recently that many peg Nunez at about 7-8 million after arbitration this year. If we were able to sign him long term, we could possibly get a bit of a discount, letting us save 1-2 million versus resigning Valverde.

To me, an addition of Nunez in the bullpen, a lower quality starter like Harang or Guthrie and maybe some kind of small 3B upgrade (Dare I say, Mark Reynolds?) could be what the Tigers need to push them over the top in this division. It allows them to have the potential of a solid 1-5 (assuming Max and Rick right themselves and Penny can stay consistent.) It further shores up the bullpen this year and could give us our closer next year. Reynolds might not be awe inspiring, but anything’s better than Inge at this point.

(Sorry about the quality of my post deteriorating as I go on. I always have a hard time keeping my ideas going strong.)

by TartanElk on Jul 18, 2011 8:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Furbush, Oliver and Ruffin are not at all the same caliber

Rather, they’re radically different.

Oliver has massive upside as a very good middle of the rotation starter (#3, borderline #2) if his control comes around, and he’s probably a B right now. Ruffin is a very promising relief pitcher that also probably ranks around a B, and Charlie Furbush might be passable in the rotation or the bullpen- he’s a C+ at best (I can explain those grades if need be).

Otherwise, it wouldn’t be a horrible idea if the price was right, but we’d probably get squeezed at the deadline.

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 18, 2011 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd trade any for Guthrie

They’re all still maybes. Guthrie IS a no 3 already.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 18, 2011 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Guthrie is more like a 4

and isn’t getting any younger. I would trade Furbush, not Oliver.

by Rob Rogacki on Jul 18, 2011 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oliver

He’s getting multiple chances and not doing anything with it. Not impressed at all. Take Guthrie and hope for the best.

by Tim 34 on Jul 18, 2011 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

"They're all still maybes" is lazy analysis

Seriously- Mike f’n Trout, the best prospect in the game, is still a “maybe” in the strictest sense of the term. Every player is a maybe before they have major league success, and even well after that. Hell, I’d argue that Brennan Boesch is a “maybe” too. Should we flip him for a mediocre player at the deadline too? What about Austin Jackson? After all, maybe his plate discipline doesn’t work itself out.

Are prospects risky? Hell yes. It’s certainly possible that Oliver never figures it out and bounces around from organization to organization before retiring in obscurity at 35. It’s also certainly possible that all he turns out to be is a relief pitcher. But it’s also certainly possible that he turns out to be a reliable, cost controlled #3 starter. That’s why you go to prospect people.

Oh, and what happened the last time that the Tigers traded for a midrotation starter well past his years of peak performance? You talk about it enough, I’m surprised you forget now. Can we say that all trades at the deadline are maybes too?

Seriously, this drives me insane. It’s called f*cking risk. You’re going to get it regardless of what you do. Calculate for it.

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 18, 2011 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

BTW

No offense intended to you, TD. I’ve been seeing way too much of this talk recently, and it’s driving me around the bend.

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 18, 2011 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course there is risk in prospects, that's exactly the point!

Oliver is maybe a No 3 starter. 2 is pushing it, and he certainly doesn’t carry that value on the market. What bugs me is people valuing prospects based on their “upside” as if it’s a sure thing. There is possibility and then there is probability. Some folks don’t want to make a trade for fear that some kid turns out to be John Smoltz.

For the record, I did not blame DD for taking a shot at Washburn. He gave up another prospect and a kid, and acquired the pitcher of the month who was having a great season in the middle of a pennant race. One more W from him and the Tigers are division champions. It just didn’t work out, but I was fine with that move.

In the case of Guthrie, I think he’s a No. 3 right now if he gets out of the AL east. I posted my reasons in another thread. We’d have him for two years counting this season, then he can be extended or he can walk and probably bring a sandwich round first pick- like maybe an Andy Oliver type. I doubt you get him for just Furbush.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 18, 2011 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

David never said that Oliver was the next Smoltz

I agree with him that Oliver’s upside > whatever Guthrie will bring to the table. The big difference here is not our viewpoint on Oliver’s potential, but rather our idea of what Guthrie will bring to the table. You have him pegged as a clear cut #3 outside of the AL East, I still see him as more of a #4 guy. I think Guthrie can be had for a lesser prospect than Oliver anyway, so there’s no reason why we shouldn’t be able to have both.

by Rob Rogacki on Jul 18, 2011 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I didn't say that he did, but others do so routinely

Guthrie’s three year splits show a 4.17 ERA, 1.266 WHIP, and 200 IP per season. 9.9 WAR from 2007 through this season. He’s not a K machine, and some (probably DD) don’t like that about him, but he is a fly ball pitcher with a weakness for the long ball.

 A No. 1 pitcher should be in the top 14 in the league. A Top 3 is in the top 42. Guthrie is easily in that group, and has been for years. DD doesn’t have to settle for a No 5 starter. I think it takes Oliver and another prospect to get him, or any other good starting pitcher that is drawing interest from multiple clubs.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 18, 2011 11:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dude, a 4.17 ERA is above league average this year

His FIP and xFIP this year are well above average. And he’s 32, so he’s only going to get worse. The Tigers would be stupid to acquire him this year, at least at the price that you’re proposing.

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 19, 2011 2:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Washburn was having one good half season

since signing a four year contract. His previous three years were lousy. The Angels refused to overpay him (as they typically do) and Seattle overpaid him (as they typically do). He was given up for dead but pulled out a solid half season before the Tigers got him. Guthrie has been plodding along steadily, very predictable but in a tough division, and he is definitely AL tested. Odds of Washburn crashing were pretty good. Odds of Guthrie improving are pretty good.

Lowe has been mediocre in the NL. Maybe he comes back and has a revival, but they’d have to work out big money issues and chances of success are lower than Guthrie’s IMO. Harang has been lousy and is having a good year in PETCO.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

You're telling me nothing I don't know.

I follow the M’s and was livid when the Tigers traded for washburn. Lowe, not to interested in. Harang, I just like the guy. Guthrie, eh, not sold on him.

I have a grand idea: let's win a game.

by 13194013 on Jul 19, 2011 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just so we're all clear

When David says “above average” in this case (with ERA, FIP, xFIP), he’s saying “worse than average”.

Guthrie’s xFIP has been better than average only once, and that was back in 2007.

DetroitJockCity.com

by Matt Snyder on Jul 19, 2011 8:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

League Average ERA- starting pitchers

2010- 4.27
2009- 4.63
2008- 4.50

Guthrie- 4.17 (three year splits, 2008- 2010)

2007- 4.63

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Go check FIP.

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 19, 2011 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Derp

Thanks for catching that.

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 19, 2011 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

This

my exact thoughts.

Charlie Sheen Night at CoPa: everyone has their Tiger Blood and Coke is a free mixer.

by Siggzilla on Jul 19, 2011 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think he is very average in terms of allowing runs

but get him out of the AL East,
he’s a fly ball pitcher with an achilles for homers, get him into spacious Comerica,
and he eats innings quite regularly. 200 IP consistently. The Tigers have a bullpen that is great when given a “save situation” but horrible otherwise.

I would rather have Ubaldo or Kuroda, obviously, but I’d much rather have Guthrie than Lowe or Harang.

I put the odds of Andy Oliver being major league average for more than two years at less than 50/ 50. Like his stuff, but whether he can ever put it together is a coin flip.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

He's been better vs. the East than Central

Career vs. Indians, Royals, Twins, White Sox: 156 IP, 4.62 ERA
Career vs. Yankees, Red Sox, Blue Jays, Rays: 405.2 IP, 4.39 ERA

I don’t think brining him to the Central will be a magical fix for anything.

DetroitJockCity.com

by Matt Snyder on Jul 19, 2011 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

and the Tigers..... been pretty good!

Not looking for a magical fix, Matt. Just trying to get a guy that has a good shot at being at least as good as he has been. You don’t have that with a guy coming over from the NL. I’d still bet the under on numbers moving from AL East to AL Central. I think most people would.

And all this being said, I’d be as inclined to give Andy another shot tomorrow as much as Furbush, Wilk, Below, etc. AO is the one with the real upside here, and the ONE of that group, IMO that has a legit shot at sticking in the rotation. I think the last call up messed with his head.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why?
He can help take some of the load off of Benoit for the 8th inning

Why is this important? The team needs long/middle relief. Benoit should be fine handling the 8th in conjunction with a few appearances from Al Al when needed.

Personally, I wouldn’t give up a Furbush/Oliver/Ruffin player to sign a guy who is going to be replacement level at a position that isn’t a current need (Valverde).

by Big Z in Orlando on Jul 19, 2011 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Like I said

It would be more of a luxury at this point than anything. Certainly not a necessity. My thinking was that it would be taking on a little bit extra this year to save us a little bit of money next year to allow us to go out and add a better bat to the lineup or maybe another reliever.

My line of thinking was along the lines of:

AlAl/Nunez/Benoit divvying up the 7th and 8th innings depending on rest, then getting it to Valverde for the 9th. Potentially, you could shift one of Nunez or Benoit and have them work the 7th and then 8th depending on how it’s split.

Max, Porcello and Penny are all good for about 5-6 IP each start. In fact, Scherzer has only pitched less than 5 innings twice this season. Adding Nunez would allow us to drop Purcey off the roster and add someone like Furbush or Below (if he is indeed projected to be a reliever most likely) who could both work out of long relief as well as middle relief.

I could be taking too simplistic of a view of this, as I know it’s not so easy to just take everyone out of their usual role and have them adjust, but I feel like it’d be a feasible option.

by TartanElk on Jul 19, 2011 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Shoot

I’m forgetting about Coke. Maybe just shove in Coke for AlAl, but I’m not sure how well that’d work.

by TartanElk on Jul 19, 2011 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I understand

About the difference in caliber between them all. I’m not very good with prospects by any means, but I’m trying to get better with that. I was just going for the point that it would take one of the bigger names in our farm to get him.

by TartanElk on Jul 18, 2011 8:34 PM EDT reply actions  

It's fine- the reply button outwits the best of us sometimes.

Yeah, it’d probably take a mid-level top 10 guy, and a player like Bruce Rondon (good but not stellar) wouldn’t do it. Plus, the Marlins will have leverage (this being the trade deadline and all).

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 18, 2011 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

There is one possible advantage.

The Marlins are supposedly trying to absolutely, 100% offload him. They don’t want to pay him the money he would earn in arbitration. The thought is that if they don’t unload him at the deadline, then they most likely would during the off-season. So, while the Marlins would have the upper hand in terms of demand, they’re also likely to be dealing from a place of some desperation.

by TartanElk on Jul 18, 2011 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lets just trade for Beltran and Aramis Ramirez

and hope hitting beats pitching!

1) CF beltran
2) LF Boesch
3) DH Martinez
4) 1B Cabrera
5) 3B Ramirez
6) SSPeralta
7) C Avila
8) RF Ordonez
9) 2B Guillen

by noleshane on Jul 18, 2011 8:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Rhymes and Nunez apparently pulled from their games tonight

no apparent injuries in either case reported. Could be something’s up. Or not.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 18, 2011 9:16 PM EDT reply actions  

I've heard speculation Jackson to Dl

Since every position is already backed up you might as well bring up Rhymes for a little while.

You know I'm right about this.

by HighOPS on Jul 18, 2011 9:46 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Trade Talk

Hopefully DD has something up his sleeve because some of this trade talk is horrible.

by Tim 34 on Jul 18, 2011 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

All of these guys elicit a response of "Meh".

However, that’s better than our current 5th starter, which is “$%^$”.

by rook34 on Jul 18, 2011 9:43 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Haha

Best way I’ve heard it put all day.

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 18, 2011 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm new to Sabermetrics...

What is Meh? Minimal Excitement Happening?

I think Brad Penny leads the Tigers with a 0 Meh. Not to hot, not too cold.

JV is a + 94 Meh, Brad Thomas was a -88 Meh. Neither very good….

sarcastic jinxing ass

by The Eric on Jul 18, 2011 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Actually, it stands for MLive Effect Headaches

The more MEH, the more MLive commenters say things like “Fire Dumbrowski and Leyland” and claim that Brandon Inge is way better than the statistics indicate.

by Rob Rogacki on Jul 18, 2011 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Trade

DD knows he and Leylands jobs depend on not only making the playoffs but advancing. He also knows he doesn’t have the starters too pull that off. After Verlander and Sherzer lets face it, it is a crap shoot. But in a 7 game series they could get away with a 4 man rotation. So adding Penny into the mix still leave them with Porcello. I believe DD will be looking for that veteran pitcher who won’t cost the farm to get but who could push them into the playoffs. So that leaves 2 or 3 players he can use to get that. Oliver and Perry have shown they aren’t in the future plans. Furbush and Veleral could also be gone. As far as position players both Rhymes and even Raburn could be dealt. None of these guys will get you a #2 starter. It could get them that veteran starter and maybe even a better hitting 3rd baseman. There is nobody out there I would give Turner up for.

by LarryLive on Jul 18, 2011 10:47 PM EDT reply actions  

it's a little early to give up on Oliver and Perry

Perry has struggled this year but was solid for a young player the last couple years. Oliver has all of 31 big league innings of experience.

by Mark in Chicago on Jul 18, 2011 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's not giving up

It’s a matter of trading a prospect with upside for a major leaguer with a track record that includes some good success and some limitations as well. The current team needs a major leaguer now, while DD still has a job to lose.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 18, 2011 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree with that sentiment

I would trade Oliver and/or Perry if the deal was right (and no, Oliver for Guthrie is not an attractive deal).

by Mark in Chicago on Jul 18, 2011 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then your options will be very limited

ANY decent major league pitcher will take good prospects to get. That’s just the going rate at the trade deadline, because the demand always exceeds the supply of good starting pitchers. Add that the SP is reasonably priced, with a year of “club control” still remaining, and the price is even higher.

Change some of those factors, such as the SP has a big fat contract that he’s not worth for next season, and the price tag comes down. Get the seller to pay a chunk of that contract, and it goes back up again. But you won’t get a pitcher that can really help the Tigers if you’re not willing to give up a prospect with the upside of a No. 3 starter.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

What we really need is to pull another Luke French out of our butts.

A guy who suddenly, inexplicably looks like he has some upside for some reason, even though he really doesn’t, to help facilitate a deal.

by Trysdor on Jul 19, 2011 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

You mean like a John Smo......

never mind!

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Paging Charlie Furbush

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 19, 2011 2:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Pretty much....

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

I Wish More People In Here Understood This

You must give up value to get value. And value is in the eyes of the beholder.

Would I trade Harvey Kuenn for Rocky Colavito? In a heartbeat.

Would I trade Steve Demeter for Norm Cash? In a heartbeat.

Would I trade Elliott Maddox, Denny McLain, Norm McRae and Don Wert for Joe Coleman, Ed Brinkman, Jim Hannan and Aurelio Rodriguez? Oh Yea!

Would I trade John Smoltz for Doyle Alexander? Yup! at that time!

Would I trade Oliver for the right player? Yup!

Would I trade anyone (on the team or in the minors) for the right person? If I thought it would help the team, yes I would, none bared.

by TigersFan1957 on Jul 19, 2011 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

I’m a firm believer in making Jacob Turner untouchable. However, if he were able to be used to obtain someone like Ubaldo Jimenez, or another player of his caliber, I would definitely do it. I’ll take the known quantity, even if it’s a bit inconsistent, of someone of that caliber, over the prospect any day. There’s a chance you make the wrong choice, but that’s the chance you have to take.

I’m also a firm believer in not gutting your system for one player, but I have to admit, Ubaldo would be a pretty tempting piece to do it over. He has a ridiculously team-friendly contract. There’s also no doubt getting out of Coors and moving to Comerica would significantly help his numbers. I just keep flipping every couple of hours on whether I would want that done if we have the chance.

by TartanElk on Jul 19, 2011 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Smoltz Deal

The Tigers aquired Doyle Alexander for Smoltz on August 12, 1987.

The Tigers finished in first place.

Doyle Alexander’s record for the Tigers that season was 9 Win & 0 Losses an ERA of 1.53 in 11 Games. Not to bad.

Smoltz in 88 was 2 & 7, 89 was 12 & 11, 90 was 14 & 11, 91 was 14 & 13, 92 was 15 & 12, 93 was 15 & 11. These numbers are not all that great. Playing for the Tigers who knows what his record would be in the AL.

by TigersFan1957 on Jul 19, 2011 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

And

Smoltz was in A ball at the time, not having an impressive season, and he would have had no Leo Mazzone or Bobby Cox to tutor him with Detroit, plus the Tigers window of opportunity was closing.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Guthrie

Dave Cameron had a take on Guthrie on a pretty short list of SP’s as a trade chip at the beginning of June. You could pretty much eliminate the others on that list for the Tigers for one reason or another.

FANGRAPHS LINK

My targets of those mentioned recently would be:

Jiminez
Kuroda
Guthrie
Lowe

I can’t rewarm up to Harang, though I wouldn’t blame DD for giving it a shot if that’s all he could get for a reasonable price. I just don’t have a good feeling that he’d translate to the AL very well.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 12:27 AM EDT reply actions  

Actually

Jiminez > Kuroda > Guthrie > Lowe > Chen = Harang = Coke > Oliver = Furbush = Below.

Strictly based on how I think they may help the Tigers this year, not for trade purposes.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Jacob Turner and Oliver are the main pieces for Jiminez

coming to Detroit you HAVE to do it 100 times out of 100. It’s not a hard question. That would lock your starting three up for the next three years. It isn’t even a question in my book….

by BeardedPlayoffJesus19 on Jul 19, 2011 1:14 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

No. You don't have to do it.

I wouldn’t trade Turner for Jiminez when the Tigers can probably get a mid rotation guy for less. Turner is the one prospect I listen to offers for but only accept one that truly is a full win.

I have a grand idea: let's win a game.

by 13194013 on Jul 19, 2011 2:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

If you wouldn't trade Turner for Jimenez, who would you trade him for?

Jimenez is a proven #2 starter who is on a dirt-ass cheap contract for the next few years. It doesn’t get much better than that.

by Rob Rogacki on Jul 19, 2011 8:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

The only thing I'd be concerned about is the dip in velocity for Jimenez

If that all checked out, I’d trade Turner and Oliver (and whatever else) for him in a heartbeat.

Unfortunately, I don’t think that would be enough to make a deal (the Yankees could easily blow that package away with the prospects they’re packing).

by ozymandius1024 on Jul 19, 2011 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Could be an AL proven # 1 starter

with no DL issues and having a good season!

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

This

You’ve got a guy who would have won a NL Cy Young last year if not for A) having half his starts at Coors Field and B) Roy Halladay. The Tigers have developed a grand total of ONE Cy Young-winning pitcher in their farm system in history. 1 2

So, unless you think that Jacob Turner is the next Denny McLain (or Justin Verlander), you have to give serious consideration to trading him for Jimenez. At some point, you can’t become so enthralled with potential that you let it outweigh actual proven value.

1 – Hal Newhouser would have been a Cy Young winner if they’d had the award then, admittedly.
2 – You could argue that John Smoltz was a Cy Young winner who came out of the Detroit farm system, but just about everybody agrees that Atlanta did a lot of work on him.

by johnmoz on Jul 19, 2011 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oooh

The SBNation system does footnoting. This will not end well.

by johnmoz on Jul 19, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

How do you do that?

That’s freaking awesome.

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 19, 2011 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

New Toys!

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's

Open bracket, number, close bracket. Discovered by accident.

by johnmoz on Jul 19, 2011 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Tigers, historically, are not a franchise that has developed fantastic pitching.

Position players, on the other hand, the Tigers have some of the greatest in their ranks.

I have a grand idea: let's win a game.

by 13194013 on Jul 19, 2011 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would not trade Turner

or Castellanos, barring a blockbuster acquisition.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

The next Smoltz? Nah

Aquiring Doyle Alexander and watching him run off 9 wins was one of the most exciting two months, as a Tiger Fan, that I remember. I would do it in a heart beat again. Sure we got beat by the Twins in the first round, but August and September sure were a blast that year.

Jurjens trade is a different story. All we got for him was one year of Edgar Renteria and one of the worst seasons in a long time. I did not like that trade the day DD made it. But interestingly it wasn’t Jurjens future that I worried about. It was the second piece in the trade, a guy that we had read alot about, outfielder Gorky’s Hernandez, that I thought we would regret trading.

Instead Hernandez was traded to Pittsburgh in the Nate McClouth deal and is languishing in Triple A at Indianapolis.

Shows you what I know about prospects!
 
Trade the kids if it brings a third basemen (Ramirez) or a solid starting pitcher, preferably Lefty.

by Jim Bunn on Jul 19, 2011 8:17 AM EDT reply actions  

What is LIKELY to get done

1. The players most likely to be traded by sellers (non contenders) are those with expiring contracts after this season that should not be offered arbitration after this season. In such cases, the selling club has nothing to gain by keeping the player, and will be off the hook for his salary if they can dump them. Example: Beltran

2. Next most likely are those players on non contenders that are about to get expensive as they head to arbitration this winter. Their departure is inevitable, although the club is a bit less motivated to move them because they could as easily trade them in the winter, when there are more buyers. They only deal them if the pennant fever overcomes and pressures a buyer into giving up a more lucrative package. Example: Guthrie

3. Other clubs may be still contending, but have a need and have depth at a premium position. They won’t deal within the division but will be looking for a very nice return. There could also be a salary issue where the club is looking to move up a younger prospect, and the player being sold has zero to one years remaining. Examples: Edwin Jackson, Lowe.

4. Non contenders are under less pressure to act by the deadline unless there is a salary that they really would like to dump. Even then, they may have a player that could clear waivers or be picked up on waivers, such as an Aubrey Huff in 09. In these cases, the seller can sell now or sell later, the only advantage being that they save some money the rest of this year. They’re trying to take advantage of the desperation of the buyer(s). If there is more than one club interested (which is always the case with even a decent SP) they can command a higher package in return. Example: Harang, Heath Bell, Nunez

TIGERS: The Tigers need starting pitching. That much is obvious. They’re also in “win now” mode. I think the Sizemore deal makes that evident, if it wasn’t already clear. If DD’s job is really on the line here, as it appears to be, then he is certainly not beyond selling the farm at the expense of the future to save his own arse. A good SP will cost a good prospect. In that regard, DD is at a severe disadvantage. Prospects have to be viewed on a national scale, not a club scale. The Tigers have two blue chippers in Turner and Castellanos. I would not deal them, barring a blockbuster, but DD might.

Down the list, there are the “near major league ready” prospects. Oliver was once in this category and probably still is, depending on the scout’s view. He’s worth more than a supplemental first round pick, maybe about as much as a No. 1 pick. So, if you can get a rental that will bring a comp pick with him, his rental value makes the deal worthwhile, IMO. If it’s a rental that has no comp pick, you get two months for potentially six years of club control of a pitcher with No. 3 projection, No. 2 upside in a stretch. Add another year of an average SP, with compensation at the end of 2012, and the deal looks much more attractive.

But if all you get is an average pitcher, that guarantees nothing by itself. The Tigers have lacked a No. 2, a no. 3 and a No. 5 all year, by my reasoning. Max and Rick have not stepped up. Get a Kuroda and we need one of them to still step up. Get a Guthrie and we need one of them to step up big time. Get a Ubaldo and we can muddle along with them still being inconsistent but they still need to give us quality starts most games.

The Tigers cast their lot last winter. When DD (stupidly) declared “we’re happy with our top four” and that included Phil Coke, I was all over his case, along with many others on here and around Tigerdom. When he added Penny, that helped, but pretending that Coke was a sure thing, with Oliver being the only real plan B, was a gamble. DD lost that gamble, and now he is back to what he always wants to avoid. Paying for a starting pitcher when the price tag is highest.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 11:41 AM EDT reply actions  

BALANCE

The trouble that I have had with this trade as well as most of the others is that they do not balance out the starting rotation. What I mean by this is with any of these trades ( minus the Rodriguez ) would leave there starting fivers as all righthanded. Against teams such as New York , Boston, or even the Twins and the White Sox they will need at least one pitcher that throws from the left side. Failing to land at least one lefthander there pick up would have to be either a number one or two starter so to find success against teams that can put up a strong lefthanded batting order
 So if there was a possible trade to be made I would hope that the Detroit Tigers would consider a trade with the Oakland A’S. Such a trade would have to offer value for value but I feel it could be made which would be fair..
 If I was the General Manager for Detroit I would trade for Gonzolez, Coco Crisp,and Bailey for Porcello,Dirk,or Jackson, plus Oliveros,Furbush,Rayburn,Worth,Gaynor or Pounds and last Garcia from the Lakeland Flying Tigers. Yes the last three players have never played in the majors but they are decent prospects with potential.
 The next two moves I would make during the off season would be first to locate another left hander free agent or trade who is under 30 years of age plus …………….. I would go out and try to sign who ever is the pitching coach from the Oakland A’S.and allow him to coach without looking over his shoulder. He should have the control of the pitching such as Duncin has in St. Louis.
I say this because if you look over the A’S pitching staff over the past five to ten years with there present rotation they have continued to produce quilty pitchers and the one key hear has been there pitching coach once there pitchers have made it to the big leauge.Or if they brought over a pitcher from another team they have usually done well.

by Joseph Ciappara on Jul 19, 2011 12:50 PM EDT reply actions  

This is probably an awful idea

I hear that the Cubs are looking to unload salary to pursue free agents in the offseason, so a trade idea popped into my head while reading this site and i wanted to see if it was just me being stupid.

Tigers trade:
Oliver - Schlereth — Wade Gaynor — Rondon — Iorg

Tigers get
Ramirez - Zambrano —even money to cover the rest of Ramirez’s contract for the rest of the year

I think it means we give up 2 ‘B’ prospects and 2 ’C’s for 2 ‘B+’ players with ‘A+’ contracts.

This is highly unlikely, naturally, because it requires Ilitch to take on salary that probably puts the Tigers over budget, and it would mean we probably can’t pick up valverde’s option or pursue free agents.

It would, however, solidify our lineup this year and anchor 3rd base until the coming of Francisco Martinez and give us a serviceable lefty number four (I assume that’s what he’ll end up as in the AL) for the next year and a half.

by Doug25 on Jul 19, 2011 1:20 PM EDT reply actions  

HTML Fail...

didn’t mean to strike through those names

by Doug25 on Jul 19, 2011 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd make this deal

I remember Zambrano from his days as a Lansing Lugnut – The man could pitch back then and despite the anger management issues I believe he still can. Change of scenery to contender could make him Doyle Alexanderish. I’ve always liked Aramis Ramirez but he has that total no trade contract which he doesn’t seem to want to waive.

by Jim Bunn on Jul 19, 2011 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Eew

Ramirez and Zambrano would be contract dumps, and I don’t want the Tigers taking on that much salary.

And since bloody when is Andy Oliver on the same level as the rest of that junk?

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 19, 2011 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kuroda

might be a pipe dream, but if- and it’s a big IF- he would waive his NTC, he probably wants to be compensated. If that simply means extending him another year or two, that’s even better, He is reasonably priced at $ 8 mil per year, with a $ 4 mil deferred bonus. Adding years, IMO, not only isn’t a problem, but would be essential to make it worthwhile to give up any good prospects. It all goes back to the big IF with Kuroda, and then there’s the WTF- as in WTF would McCourt want, because it clearly has nothing to do with the good of the Dodgers.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 19, 2011 1:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Bruce Chen anyone?

In 13 Seasons Chen has played for the Braves, Phillies, Mets, Expos, Reds, Astros, Red SOx, Orioles and the last three with the Royals. Obviously more than one GM thinks this guy can pitch. He is 5 and 3 with a 3.56 ERA in 11 starts and remember he pitches for KC. He has started 11 games and has 40 K and 23 BB while pitching and average of 6 innings including 1 complete game.

I know both DD and DM do not like trading intra division but since Chen is a Free Agent to be and KC is stock piling kids why not offer them couple of our once promising B prospects. Take two of the following Four. Robbie Weinhart, Ryan Striebly, Clete Thomas and Cale Iorg. I realize this is probably rosterbating but all four of these guys were once “future stars” according to the hype. I suspect neither of these guys will play in Detroit again and KC might be a destination where they could get some playing time

I suspect that only Thomas may have a future in Detroit. Why not get somethin. Chen HAS to be at least as valuble to the Tigers as some of the names they are talking about.

Plus it would be fun to have one of the few EX Expos

Whadda Ya All Think?

by Jim Bunn on Jul 19, 2011 2:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Damn I gotta preview before posting

should have taken out line I suspect…..

Sorry gang

by Jim Bunn on Jul 19, 2011 2:26 PM EDT reply actions  

The curse of Jerrod Washburn

Oh’ do I long for the days when every pitcher to whom the Tigers were linked was not immediately blogified as “the next Jerrod Washburn” regardless of whether they present any actual comparison.

by rif23 on Jul 19, 2011 3:17 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Wake-forest-logo_small
Is Austin Jackson a top-five center fielder?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Is Prince Fielder earning his keep?
Small
Reading the Detroit News comments section on Tigers stories
Small
All-Time Tigers Team
Small
A Sunday with Dan and Jim
Small
2012 Detroit Tigers Draft Question
Amrita_rao_small
Elvis Andrus and Jurickson Profar
Img_1374_small
Scary moment for ex-Tiger Will Rhymes
Small
Austin Jackson: A mid-May appreciation
Tigers_logo_small
Advice on tickets, pre-game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Quick Rules

Do:

  • Treat others like you'd like to be treated.
  • Stick to the topic being discussed.
  • Make arguments based on facts, not emotion.
Don't:
  • Confuse BYB with talk radio, your blog or your social networking web site of choice. We're a baseball community.
  • Feed the trolls.

Commenting Code of Conduct


Managing Editor

Dsc0178-l_small Kurt Mensching

Deputy Editors

Meatcomputer-1_small BigAl

Sparky_anderson_wall_small Rob Rogacki

5532934019_b5fa57ae98_small allikazoo

Contributors

Good_to_great_leadership_image1-262x300_1__small Tigerdog1

Suss_small Matt Sussman

6m2bts_small Melissa Heyboer

Moderators

Be050826_small NCDee

Sifl_and_olly_small 13194013