Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Detroit Tigers Rumors: Erik Bedard worth the risk?

Seattle -- yes, this is Mariners Day at Bless You Boys in honor of their losing streak being 5 games longer than Detroit's worst in 2003 -- will send Erik Bedard to the mound on Friday for his first start since a knee injury in June. The Tigers, like several teams, will be watching to see how he does. He's intriguing in that he could be really good -- or he fall to injuries yet again. If he stays healthy, it's a giant boost to whatever team took the risk.

When healthy, the left-handed Bedard was quite effective this year, like he has been in much of his career. He had an ERA of 3.00 -- xFIP of 3.30 and SIERA of 3.23 -- in 15 starts. His strikeout numbers are nice at 8.50 K/9 (23.5% K/PA). His walks were fine at 2.60 BB/9 (7.2% of PA). However, ZiPS does project him to have an ERA in the upper-3s for the rest of the season. Obviously, that's still an upgrade.

However, Bedard is not without risks. He's been on the DL four times with the Mariners since 2008 and started no more than 15 games in 2008 and 2009. In both of those seasons, he didn't pitch past  July. He hit the DL with a torn labrum in his shoulder in 2009, and didn't pitch at all in 2010. So honesty, we're in pretty uncharted waters right now. The good news is that the upper half of the body seems to be fine. The bad news is that the lower half is now the issue.

Star-divide

Like Jarrod Washburn in 2009, Bedard's knee is causing problems. Unlike Washburn, the issue wasn't due to growing pain. Bedard hit the disabled list retroactive to June 28 with a sprained left knee. The issue with that is that the left leg is the push-off leg. So you've got to hope the knee is fully recovered and that Bedard does not suffer any pain in the final two months that could render him ineffective.

Bedard has not made any minor league rehab appearances since the injury. He did throw 40 pitches in a simulated game. Friday, he will be on a pitch count as well, Mariners manager Eric Wedge said.

Bedard is not expected to come at a real high price in terms of prospects, due to his injury history and free agency. I think the real risk is in opportunity cost. If you trade for him, you probably aren't going to be trading for a backup plan as well. If he does fall to injury, you'll have to look back at your internal solutions or attempt to make a waiver trade before the end of August.

Jeff Sullivan wrote at Baseball Nation:

Suddenly, then, Bedard starts to look like a real intriguing potential addition. An addition with obvious risk, yes, but an addition with game-changing talent. In Bedard, you could have a guy who gets hurt and misses the rest of the year, but you could also have a guy who pitches like an ace for the next two or three months. Bedard was already pitching like an ace for two months before his season was sidetracked by a minor injury, so who knows?

Is it worth it? I don't know. I don't think anyone will know before he's on the mound Friday and without a thorough review of his medicals. Since we're not privy to that part, we'll just have to wait and see.

Sullivan:

Are there any front offices out there who're game for such a high-risk/high-reward investment? I'm not sure, but we'll find out soon.

Well, if any will the Tigers would.

Comment 36 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I like the possibility, but not the probability that this is what we need

Would DD bet his job on a pitcher that has thrown as little as Bedard has over the past few seasons? I don’t think so. If at all possible, why would he not bet on something surer, even if it means dealing a better prospect away to get it. At a minimum, we need someone to fill the five slot for the balance of this season and win about every other game. They MUST be able to eat innings and get us past the weak middle relief corps in the bullpen.

I like Bedard, and I wanted DD to sign him this past winter, before he got Penny, and Bedard went back to Seattle on a minor league deal for just $ 1 million plus incentives ($ 6 million worth, possibly). He could be huge down the stretch, or he could be a total bust. I’d rather give him a shot than Harang or Vargas, but I’d also rather have a Fister, Guthrie, or Kuroda.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 26, 2011 2:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Fister and Furbush on the same staff

would be an epic mash of names.

Charlie Sheen Night at CoPa: everyone has their Tiger Blood and Coke is a free mixer.

by Siggzilla on Jul 26, 2011 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

hahaha

yesssss

Chicks dig me, because I rarely wear underwear and when I do it's usually something unusual

by BrianCMU. on Jul 26, 2011 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I remover the last injured player we got from the M's...

It did not end well.

Charlie Sheen Night at CoPa: everyone has their Tiger Blood and Coke is a free mixer.

by Siggzilla on Jul 26, 2011 2:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Bedard is too big of an injury risk.

Bad idea; he already went down with an injury this season.

I have a grand idea: let's win a game.

by 13194013 on Jul 26, 2011 2:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Is it worth what?

I’d trade Brandon Inge for him if that’s what you’re asking.

Not clear what the M’s want, but if you can get a high end #2 pticher at a low cost, the ‘risk’ of the opportunity cost of a more reliable #4 type is worth it.

To me, he’s the prefect kind of acquisition. He has the upside to be a high end playoff starter. If he doesn’t work, you can still pitch guys like Below in the 5 spot. Not to the worst thing in the world.

by lankownia on Jul 26, 2011 2:47 PM EDT reply actions  

This

If the Tigers can’t get an Ublado or Shields (or possibly Kuroda), then they might as well take a chance on a guy like Bedard.

If he’s healthy, then the trade is a win. If he’s healthy half of the time, then it would pretty much be a push with a guy like Guthrie. That’s really your decision between Bedard and Guthrie/Harang: can Bedard make seven or more starts?

DetroitJockCity.com

by Matt Snyder on Jul 26, 2011 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bedard

might be better than a couple of those guys (Kuroda and Jiminez).

I’m a little more concerned with having a legit #2 pitcher in playoff series than having a slightly better #5 starter (wich is what Guthrie would provide IMO).

by lankownia on Jul 26, 2011 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

What's the price though?

Is it similar to the Washburn package, or is it Oliver +?

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 26, 2011 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not even close to Oliver for just Bedard.

Probably even less than Washburn, because Bedard is on the DL as of a week before the deadline.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 26, 2011 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

No – Let Below / Furbush or Oliver start – No need for an older injury prone pitcher

by Jim Bunn on Jul 26, 2011 2:58 PM EDT reply actions  

if you want those guys to start

then getting bedard isn’t going to be a problem. if he gets hurt, you’ve still got those guys. if he doesn’t get hurt he’s clearly better.

by Kurt Mensching on Jul 26, 2011 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bedard

Low end prospects like they used to get Betemit? Then yes. But no more than that.

by BengalsNme on Jul 26, 2011 2:59 PM EDT reply actions  

The problem is not cost in prospects, or in salary

the problem is opportunity cost if Bedard gets hurt, which he has been every season since forever.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 26, 2011 3:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Please explain

Are you saying we should just get CC Sabathia and Cliff Lee instead? If so, I am with you.

by Bret Boone's Farm on Jul 26, 2011 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

no, he's saying getting Bedard means we didn't get Guthrie.

Or some other mid-rotation starter who isn’t going to get hurt. We only have room to acquire one starter.

by lesmanalim on Jul 26, 2011 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes.

Because of the injury risk, if the guy we trade for gets injured, the purpose of trading for a needed player is defeated.

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 26, 2011 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

However

If the cost for those mid level guys is too high, and it always is a week before the trade deadline, and you don’t want to give up the cost then trading for Bedard for a few minor prospects is a very good move.

Even if you do trade for one of the mid level guys, the risks in acquiring Bedard are minor because you are trading for him as a luxury instead of a necessity. If he is healthy then you relegate one of your other starters to the pen and improve your middle relief corps and starting, and if he is hurt then you can bring the guy back out of the pen.

For the cost that Bedard is going to be, there is really no reason not to trade for him.

by wilsonm24 on Jul 27, 2011 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Do it in a heartbeat

He shouldn’t cost much of anything, so the prospects given up wouldn’t really affect our chances of nabbing a more solid frontline starter before the trade deadline. And we wouldn’t be saddled with any contract reverberations next year?

I’ll take a no risk/high reward proposition every time.

by Doug25 on Jul 26, 2011 3:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Oops wrong hole!

Fister Below Furbush
I’m not too keen on Guth or Harang….looks more like Penny type
Bed should come cheap and we also pull Harang as insurance.
Personally I rather go for broke and go after Garza, Shields, or Kershaw….(on the market for the right price) yeah they’ll cost Turner and more but… having that one two punch….we go from pretenders to contenders

by uwashere2 on Jul 26, 2011 3:51 PM EDT reply actions  

As good as it gets

Jackson CF,
Boesch LF,
Ordonez RF,
Cabrera 1B,
Martinez DH,
Peralta SS,
Guillen 2B,
Betemit 3B,
 Avila C,

Verlander P

I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by Tigerdog1 on Jul 26, 2011 4:01 PM EDT reply actions  

JV and Raburn-less

The Tiger lineup cannot look better.

"i think it will be mostly feast the rest of the year,"

by Honeyman on Jul 26, 2011 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Now THATS a lineup

"Goaltending is a normal job, sure. How would you like it in your job if every time you made a small mistake, a red light went on over your desk and 15,000 people stood up and yelled at you."
-Jacques Plante

by DetroitSports on Jul 26, 2011 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

What's his contract situation?

Not that it matters too much, but what kind of money and years are we looking at? I know he signed a big contract not too long ago.

by jehu22 on Jul 26, 2011 4:32 PM EDT reply actions  

The Tigers only have 4 wins from one of their rotation slots.

I’d rather stabilize that spot and maybe pick up another 3 or 4 wins from it than risk having to go back to the current situation. So, I’d probably not go after Bedard except to list as an option negotiating with other teams.

Blockbusters are OK with me, too.

You know I'm right about this.

by HighOPS on Jul 26, 2011 5:24 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd take Bedard

if it meant we’d drop Purcey. I’d convert Bedard to a RP and keep looking for a 5th starter. That would also give us some rotation depth.

by Keith-Allen on Jul 26, 2011 5:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Huh?

Take a highly-valuable starting pitcher (assuming health) and turn him into a situational reliever? Does not compute.

by Bret Boone's Farm on Jul 26, 2011 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

We'd be better off doing the opposite

Acquire Bedard, and then get somebody like Guthrie or Harang and convert them into long relief.

"Aside from the stuff I haven’t been diagnosed for yet, I don’t have a problem."- Phil Coke

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jul 26, 2011 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I though about that too

and figured no one would like that idea. I guess I’m wrong.

Bedard has been on DL for the past month, missed all of last season, missed half of the 2008-2009 season’s, and missed September in 2007. It just seemed like to me he’d be better off suited in a relief role and as a spot starter. Try to save his arm for when the games matter most, the final few weeks of the season, and the play-offs.

by Keith-Allen on Jul 26, 2011 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, thanks

I’ll pass

Chicks dig me, because I rarely wear underwear and when I do it's usually something unusual

by BrianCMU. on Jul 26, 2011 10:54 PM EDT reply actions  

He's looking more like a Tiger...

After the Tigers chances fading with other pitchers on the market, it looks like Bedard or Wandy Rodriguez might be a Tiger. The Tigers don’t want to pay the price for Jimenez and Kuroda won’t come to Detroit. Shields would be better to pick up in the off season. As of the trades made Wednesday and the amping up by other teams for players, Detroit is slipping a bit behind. This is because they are waiting for Bedard’s tryout on Friday and to allow the Astros to dangle and force them to drop Rodriguez’s price at the trade deadline. One of those two lefties will be a Tiger on Aug. 1

by Al Kaline on Jul 28, 2011 12:39 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Wake-forest-logo_small
Is Austin Jackson a top-five center fielder?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Is Prince Fielder earning his keep?
Small
Reading the Detroit News comments section on Tigers stories
Small
All-Time Tigers Team
Small
A Sunday with Dan and Jim
Small
2012 Detroit Tigers Draft Question
Amrita_rao_small
Elvis Andrus and Jurickson Profar
Img_1374_small
Scary moment for ex-Tiger Will Rhymes
Small
Austin Jackson: A mid-May appreciation
Tigers_logo_small
Advice on tickets, pre-game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Quick Rules

Do:

  • Treat others like you'd like to be treated.
  • Stick to the topic being discussed.
  • Make arguments based on facts, not emotion.
Don't:
  • Confuse BYB with talk radio, your blog or your social networking web site of choice. We're a baseball community.
  • Feed the trolls.

Commenting Code of Conduct


Managing Editor

Dsc0178-l_small Kurt Mensching

Deputy Editors

Meatcomputer-1_small BigAl

Sparky_anderson_wall_small Rob Rogacki

5532934019_b5fa57ae98_small allikazoo

Contributors

Good_to_great_leadership_image1-262x300_1__small Tigerdog1

Suss_small Matt Sussman

6m2bts_small Melissa Heyboer

Moderators

Be050826_small NCDee

Sifl_and_olly_small 13194013