Pitchers as MVPs?
In today's News, Tony Paul — a BBWAA writer — made the case for Justin Verlander to be voted the AL MVP this year. He also outlined the BBWAA's apparent distaste, in recent years, for pitchers (especially starters) to be voted MVP.
"The Cy Young is for pitchers and the MVP is for position players," goes the conventional wisdom. "Pitchers only pitch once every five days, but position-players are out there every game." But, consider...
- Any one hitter is one-ninth of a batting order (11%).
- Any starting pitcher is one-fifth of a rotation these days (20%).
Now, I realize there are bullpens, DHs, pinch-hitters, days off, injuries, and a host of other statistical categories I've ignored here (pitchers hitting in interleague games, position-players taking the mound, suspensions for throwing at hitters' heads, etc.). I've also completely ignored fielding, and I've assumed that the BBWAA is a fair assessor of talent; these might be big stretches. This is meant to be a crude, quick-and-dirty assessment, which it is.
I took the last three years' worth of MVP and Cy Young voting data, and considered the top five in each category in each year. (No pitcher, starter or reliever, was in the top-5 in the MVP voting from 2008 onward.) Then, I calculated what percentage of their team's plate appearances (for the MVP) or innings pitched (for the Cy) was attributable to each. All the stats are from baseball-reference, because they're fantastic.
For the MVP candidates:
2010 MVP
| Name | PA | Team PA | % of Team PA |
| Hamilton, TEX | 571 | 6298 | 9.07% |
| Cabrera, DET | 648 | 6312 | 10.27% |
| Cano, NYY | 696 | 6379 | 10.91% |
| Bautista, TOR | 683 | 6071 | 11.25% |
| Konerko, CHW | 631 | 6118 | 10.31% |
| Avg | 10.36% |
2009 MVP
| Name | PA | Team PA | % of Team PA |
| Mauer, MIN | 606 | 6346 | 9.55% |
| Teixeira, NYY | 609 | 6447 | 9.45% |
| Jeter, NYY | 716 | 6447 | 11.11% |
| Cabrera, DET | 685 | 6233 | 10.99% |
| Morales, LAA | 622 | 6305 | 9.87% |
| Avg | 10.19% |
2008 MVP
| Name | PA | Team PA | % of Team PA |
| Pedroia, BOS | 726 | 6402 | 11.34% |
| Morneau, MIN | 712 | 6330 | 11.25% |
| Youkilis, BOS | 621 | 6402 | 9.70% |
| Mauer, MIN | 633 | 6330 | 10.00% |
| Quentin, CHW | 569 | 6231 | 9.13% |
| Avg | 10.28% |
Now for the Cy Young candidates:
2010 Cy Young
| Name | IP | Team IP | % of Team IP |
| Hernandez, SEA | 249.7 | 1438 | 17.36% |
| Price, TBR | 208.7 | 1453.7 | 14.36% |
| Sabathia, NYY | 237.7 | 1442.3 | 16.48% |
| Lester, BOS | 208 | 1456.7 | 14.28% |
| Weaver, LAA | 224.3 | 1449.3 | 15.48% |
| Avg | 15.59% |
2009 Cy Young
| Name | IP | Team IP | % of Team IP |
| Greinke, KCR | 229.3 | 1426 | 16.08% |
| Hernandez, SEA | 238.7 | 1452.7 | 16.43% |
| Verlander, DET | 240 | 1447 | 16.59% |
| Sabathia, NYY | 230 | 1450 | 15.86% |
| Halladay, TOR | 239 | 1451 | 16.47% |
| Avg | 16.29% |
2008 Cy Young (all pitchers)
| Name | IP | Team IP | % of Team IP |
| Lee, CLE | 223.3 | 1437 | 15.54% |
| Halladay, TOR | 246 | 1446.7 | 17.00% |
| Rodriguez, LAA | 68.3 | 1451.3 | 4.71% |
| Matsuzaka, BOS | 167.7 | 1446.3 | 11.60% |
| Rivera, NYY | 70.7 | 1441.7 | 4.90% |
| Avg | 10.75% |
2008 Cy Young (just the starters)
| Name | IP | Team IP | % of Team IP |
| Lee, CLE | 223.3 | 1437 | 15.54% |
| Halladay, TOR | 246 | 1446.7 | 17.00% |
| Matsuzaka, BOS | 167.7 | 1446.3 | 11.60% |
| Mussina, NYY | 200.3 | 1441.7 | 13.89% |
| Santana, LAA | 219 | 1451.3 | 15.09% |
| Avg | 14.62% |
I did 2008 twice because I didn't really feel like getting into the whole "is a closer worth more than a starter" sort of argument, talking about leverage factors, all that jazz... someone else can, if they like. (For this analysis, I'll ignore the relievers; but, for the record, I think they can be MVP candidates, too.) The point is that the numbers turned out a bit surprising, which is why I'm doing all this.
| Average % of a team's plate appearances by top-5 MVP vote-getters: | 10.28% |
| Average % of a team's innings pitched by top-5 Cy Young vote-getters: | 15.50% |
Is an inning pitched equivalent to a plate appearance? How important is a "stopper" in a rotation? Do voters over-value RBI and wins in these awards? I'm not sure. The moral of the story is that the whole "every fifth day" argument is bunk. Dear BBWAA voters, don't be afraid to vote for a pitcher as an MVP.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Bless You Boys writing staff.
3 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This reframes the argument in a way hadn't thought about.
Thanks for doing the work.
You know I'm right about this.
by HighOPS on Aug 19, 2011 7:52 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Neat article...good stats
I don’t believe and don’t feel that Verlander will/should win the MVP. That would rob the best position player of any honor. It doesn’t mean that I don’t think that Justin Verlander is the most valuable player, because I strongly feel that he is. The guy has just about guaranteed our team 20% of our wins. And in a weak division, we only need the other 4 guys to pitch at a 35% rate combined to get to .550. (We’ve had trouble doing that, by the way).
Anyhow, I think it would be great to see an award just for hitters. That way, Verlander could win the Cy, the best hitter could win the position player award, and the better of the two could win the MVP.
The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981
Also, there are three plate appearances per inning
A pitcher that averages 4.00 plate appearances (that’s a 1.00 WHIP) per inning, say 240 innings in a season, will have 960 plate appearances logged in a season.
I don't care what the Chinese say, 2011 is the Year of the Tiger!

by 


























