Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Assuming he would play here, I still like the idea of Roy Oswalt on a one-year deal. Especially if reports of his asking price being $8 million are true.

4 months ago Dsc0178-l_tiny Kurt Mensching 67 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Dombrowski should be all over Kuroda and Oswalt.

I’d much, much rather get either of these guys on a short term deal than to trade Turner for Garza! Olney says the price for Oswalt is now around $ 8 mil and Kuroda is $ 10- 11 mil? Either one is a steal! DD should be on it, big time.

On Edwin, I’m not so sure. His second half of 2009 was putrid with the Tigers. I dreaded every start of his after the break- and he was a legit All Star in the first half of that season. We don’t have Dave Duncan around to keep him on track. Boras wanted $ 75 Mil for five years initially, but even if he’s down to $ 45/ 4 years, I’d pass. Let him go to the Yankees at that price.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 13, 2012 2:17 PM EST reply actions  

Couldn't agree more

Especially Oswalt at or near $8MM for one season. This seems to line up exceptionally well for the Tigers and Oswalt. He gets to build value with a team that can score runs and plays in a park that is neutral(no launching pad, is COPA.) A one-year deal allows the Tigers best prospects to hash out whatever issues they have in Toledo.

AND, say Turner is having a monster season in Toledo and gets called up? You’ve got Oswalt in the ’pen for the last couple of months and playoffs.

Oswalt gets a chance at a goodly number of wins due to the Tigers offense, stadium, and team. Helooing to rebuild his value. The Tigers get a season changer on a short deal who could help them in multiple ways.

It’s tough to see a down-side.

Justin can now let the fungus grow back on his shower shoes.

by Singledigit on Jan 13, 2012 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

You don't throw Roy Oswalt in the 'pen

If Oswalt is healthy in 2012, he’ll produce. His track record is too strong to think anything otherwise. If we sign Oswalt, Turner will be in AAA until he’s traded or 2013, whichever comes first. I’m totally fine with that. I suspect that if he’s not thrust into Detroit, Turner will have a very solid, but not eye-popping season in Toledo. That’s still great as one of the youngest kids in the league.

The big downside to Oswalt seems to be his health concerns, which fits perfectly with the Tigers. We have 3 or 4 guys in the high minors that could use a little more seasoning before a promotion and Oswalt would allow that if he’s healthy at the start of the season. If the back is a concern after a couple months of pitching, I bet we have somebody in the minors what would deserve a shot.

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by momotigers on Jan 13, 2012 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Oswalt wouldn't be in the pen

But the odds of at least one of the five starters having a significant injury are pretty strong. Just the way things work. The Tigers have been fortunate the past couple years, but go back not so long, and we’ve got Maroth, Bonderman, Rogers, Willis (thankfully) and even durable Nate missing time with injuries. Oswalt would be worth it for the depth alone.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 13, 2012 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

You're also overlooking Oswalt's experience

He could be a valuable asset simply for being a mentor for some of the younger pitchers on the staff.

by Rob Rogacki on Jan 13, 2012 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Not sure if someone on a one year deal

is looking to be the leader of the pitching staff. I don’t doubt that he would be a good teammate, but we better not expect him to fix Porcello, Schlereth or Coke. That said, hiring him on his pitching alone for 8 mil is a steal and I really hope DD pushes hard on that.

by jbeshay on Jan 13, 2012 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

It's not about being the leader of a pitching staff

It’s about Oswalt possibly offering subtle tips to a younger player like Porcello or Scherzer that could make a big difference in their results. We saw this with Avila and Laird the last time he was here. Avila’s defense went from meh to Gold Glove caliber seemingly overnight. Word is Martinez also gave Avila a couple tips at the plate early last season, and we saw what happened with that too.

by Rob Rogacki on Jan 14, 2012 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree

You sign Oswalt or Kuroda in lieu of acquiring someone like Garza. If you can’t sign either of them, then maybe you consider trading for a starter.

by TartanElk on Jan 13, 2012 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I absolutely agree.

I would have rather had Oswalt on a one-yeal deal than Garza for prospects back when the talk was that Oswalt was looking for considerably more money. Between Oswalt and Kuroda, this just seems like a perfect situation for Detroit.

by Grant E. on Jan 13, 2012 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Go for broke! Sign 'em all!

I’m bored. But a 7 man rotation would be interesting!

"You spend a good piece of your life gripping a baseball, and in the end it was the other way around..." Jim Bouton

by JimWalewander on Jan 13, 2012 2:39 PM EST reply actions  

Does that mean less Verlander and Fister?

I vote no!

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by momotigers on Jan 13, 2012 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

No, just more piggyback starts!

Sorry. Still bored.

"You spend a good piece of your life gripping a baseball, and in the end it was the other way around..." Jim Bouton

by JimWalewander on Jan 13, 2012 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

On reflection, though

is this another cagey Boras move? Drop the “reserve”, get more bidders?

"You spend a good piece of your life gripping a baseball, and in the end it was the other way around..." Jim Bouton

by JimWalewander on Jan 13, 2012 2:41 PM EST reply actions  

Sound good

Stop the Yanks of getting one of remaining free agents that are MLB pitchers. That way they are force to go with Garcia and Colon or close to it.

by Barry2 on Jan 13, 2012 3:02 PM EST reply actions  

I like Oswalt a lot

He could definitely help us win some games.

I also want to see some of the young arms get an opportunity.

DD can do no wrong here. He’s got a winning hand no matter how he plays it.

by Keith-Allen on Jan 13, 2012 4:57 PM EST reply actions  

He can do wrong if he fails to get another starting pitcher

or a bona fide 2B
or a bona fide 3B
or a couple hitters for the top of the lineup.
All of the above are just plain wrong.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 13, 2012 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I think items 1 and 2 are proving difficult

And if you can’t do item 3 by piggybacking it with items 1 or 2, you’re displacing somebody in order to put a better top-of-the-lineup bat in there.

Yes, I used piggyback on purpose.

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by momotigers on Jan 13, 2012 6:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Delmon is probably the only guy whose job should be in question

Assuming you can’t find a top-of-the-order bat among the 2B or 3B ranks, the only guy I’d displace for the sake of adding a better #1 or #2 hitter is Delmon Young. The other 6 guys (Avila, Cabrera, Peralta, Boesch, Jackson, and Martinez) are probably best-suited somewhere else in the lineup but shouldn’t lose a job because their bats play better elsewhere.

So, we’ve exhausted ourselves talking about 2B and 3B options that might be good fits at the top of the lineup. There might be people out there like M. Izturis (who the Angels shouldn’t trade, IMO) or Chase Headly (and I think the Pads are reluctant to sell yet) but a deal hasn’t happened yet and DD might prefer to sit on his prospects for now.

So, turn your attention to OF and look for somebody that could replace DY, act as a good 1 or 2 hitter, and let Boesch hit 3. There’s actually a logical candidate on the market for what I believe will be a very affordable contract – Kosuke Fukudome. He’s shown a good OBP for his entire career and enough of everything else to warrant a job. He’s no wizard in the OF, but his defense is certainly better than Young’s and his 3-yr UZR in RF is about league average. There are certainly other options available on the trade market as well.

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by momotigers on Jan 14, 2012 8:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Do you realize that one of our strengths is versatility?

I like how Leyland uses the entire roster and shuffles the line-up. Some of our players might not be good everyday players, but they are worthwhile when used in a platoon. I’ll also take these platoons over some of the full-time players in the majors. The numbers were actually pretty good with the platoons during the 2nd half of last season, so I’ll give them another chance. In the process, we’ll save a ton of cash, and have the flexibility to make some mid-season acquisitions if we need to.
This team has many great strengths, the most important is that we got bona fide super studs in Verlander and Cabrera. We’re the only team to have a pitcher that has won an MVP, Cy Young, and ROY. That World Series Title is next, and it’s inevitable that we win it in 2012.

by Keith-Allen on Jan 13, 2012 7:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I admire your optimism

but I’m not sure I’d go as far as “inevitable” hope you’re right. Still want a 3rd baseman.

by atlantatiger on Jan 13, 2012 7:48 PM EST up reply actions  

at 1 year, 8M

I’m allll for Oswalt. I think that’s a much better idea than possibly giving up Turner + others for Garza

Raburn-Santiago '12

by tigers22 on Jan 13, 2012 5:44 PM EST reply actions  

Oh Crap.

They are getting Michael Pineda also.

by Keith-Allen on Jan 13, 2012 8:32 PM EST up reply actions  

That was a great deal for the Yanks

Seattle is outta their freakin’ mind….

"Goaltending is a normal job, sure. How would you like it in your job if every time you made a small mistake, a red light went on over your desk and 15,000 people stood up and yelled at you."
-Jacques Plante

by DetroitSports on Jan 13, 2012 9:45 PM EST up reply actions  

The Yanks done good, but they did take on some risk

Pineda had a rough 2nd half of last season. He has had arm problems in the past and missed most of the 2009 season due to elbow strain. His endurance and health may become issues.

Montero’s value is behind the plate, but the Yankees were going to let him waste away at DH. So trading him wasn’t a difficult decision. After shopping him for 2 years, at least they got something good in return for him.

by Keith-Allen on Jan 14, 2012 1:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Let's not forget

Pineida serves it up to LHB and that stadium is a band box for lefties. Not a bad trade, but taking a fly ball pitcher out of safeco and moving him to the bronxbandbox may devastate him.

Tired of generic music??? Exterminate All Rational Thought is here to help!

by Siggzilla on Jan 14, 2012 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe

But max they gave up was a good-hitting DH, so they didn’t really have much to lose

"Goaltending is a normal job, sure. How would you like it in your job if every time you made a small mistake, a red light went on over your desk and 15,000 people stood up and yelled at you."
-Jacques Plante

by DetroitSports on Jan 14, 2012 11:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Montero is technically a catcher

But with the concerns about his defense, I’ll give you DH. I wonder if they would try to move him to 1st if Smoak doesn’t pan out?

by Rob Rogacki on Jan 14, 2012 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Definitely

It’s do or die time for Smoak.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 14, 2012 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

That said,

If Montero is going to play 1B, this would be a really bad trade for Seattle. The real value in Montero is if he can stick as a catcher. Huge jump in value at that position.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 14, 2012 12:02 PM EST up reply actions  

That's up to Montero's defense behind the plate

First basemen can be had, but good hitting catchers are rare.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 14, 2012 6:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Olney was spot on estimating $10-11M

Hope that means $8M for Oswalt is about right, too.

by lesmanalim on Jan 13, 2012 8:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Or that means that the price of Oswalt goes up...

since there are less impact pitchers on the market.

"All aboard! There is plenty of room."
Brennan Boesch Bandwagon Conductor

by trross1200 on Jan 13, 2012 9:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Supply and Demand

Price will depend on the other teams left who are bidding…but teams may panic and jump quickly now.

by Boomer Dog on Jan 13, 2012 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Two HUGE moves by the Yankees

And DD fiddles while Comerica burns. Sigh!

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 14, 2012 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

While I am really bored

I don’t think starting pitching is the issue. It definitely was for the Yanks, but their bullpen was scary. It wasn’t that long ago that we were sweating out the last 3 innings in that 5 game series. We have the opposite issue (but Oswalt for 8mil is just too good to pass up). This is a tough year for 3B/2B and that is what i see as the biggest glaring holes. If the yanks signed or traded for a top player in either of those positions then I would have been fuming for sure.

by jbeshay on Jan 14, 2012 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

C'mon T-Dog

DD returns a team intact except for the “addition-by-subtraction” moves of losing Maggs and Guillen. A tea, if you remember, that own 95 games and walked away with the Division title.

Meanwhile, the team has a credible back up catcher(remember, you’re a big believer in “defense first” for a back up catcher), Dotel has replaced Perry, and no matter who bats in the 3 it’s hard to believe they’ll be worse than the black hole that Maggs was there in the first half.

Comerica is hardly burning.

Justin can now let the fungus grow back on his shower shoes.

by Singledigit on Jan 14, 2012 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

great teams stay great by continuing to push

i know the yankees have oprah money but this is what teams do when they want to compete for championships every year. they don’t necessarily wait for montero to be great. prospects are great, but in the right deal anyone should be fair game. i think this is why we hear dombrowski is at least willing to listen on guys like turner, because standing pat rarely does the trick. look at the rangers this off season as well. one pitch from a championship and they still go out and get darvish, nathan, etc., and wouldn’t be shocked if they get fielder. i hope dave stays aggressive, whatever happens. not stupid or reckless, but definitely not afraid to be aggressive.

by atlantatiger on Jan 13, 2012 9:14 PM EST reply actions  

Amen brother.

It’s hard to know if DD is just waiting for the right deal or is satisfied with what he’s rolling out there. I like to think it’s the former, but when there upgrades available and nothing yet has happened.

I’ve can’t remember such consolidation of talent this widespread. There are 6-8 teams that could be downright scary.

by BayesLaw on Jan 13, 2012 9:43 PM EST up reply actions  

If Texas gets Fielder and Darvish..

Then I think we need to see if Tim Tebow will start franchising his prayer group. We’ll start a BYB chapter….the name is already apropos.

Between the Angels’ pitching, the Ranger’s offense, and the friggin’ embarrassment of talent in Boston and New York….whoever wins the A.L. this year will deserve it.

by BayesLaw on Jan 13, 2012 9:58 PM EST up reply actions  

And we will deserve it

We all saw what happened with Boston last season. Just because the Angels and Rangers are loading up this offseason doesn’t guarantee them a playoff spot, let alone a championship.

by Rob Rogacki on Jan 14, 2012 3:01 AM EST up reply actions  

You're missing my point Rob.

Of course loading up doesn’t guarantee anything. But you have to agree there are multiple teams that look like they could be elite, at least on paper. I don’t remember the consolidation of talent being so widespread in a while.

I actually think Detroit has the best chance of anyone to get into the playoffs. Once there, you will have to beat two really good teams to come out…that’s all I’m saying.

by BayesLaw on Jan 14, 2012 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

I’m starting to think our biggest competition this year is KC and Cleveland.

"Goaltending is a normal job, sure. How would you like it in your job if every time you made a small mistake, a red light went on over your desk and 15,000 people stood up and yelled at you."
-Jacques Plante

by DetroitSports on Jan 14, 2012 11:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Not necessarily true

the whole point of mlb playoffs is it really could go either way because it’s such a small amount of games relative to the season.

As an example, I’m sure if you told the Rangers last year that they would have to beat the Rays, Tigers, and Cardinals to win the World Series and could miss the Red Sox, Yankees, and Phillies, they would have assumed it’s locked up.

My point is you don’t know who you will face in the playoffs, nothing is a given.

by nicolas08 on Jan 14, 2012 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Homefield Advantage in Playoffs

Why not try to have the best league record for homefield advantage…

by Boomer Dog on Jan 14, 2012 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Philadelphia and New York did that

And what a great World Series they played last year.

by Rob Rogacki on Jan 14, 2012 5:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Homefield is an Advantage!

Two teams from one year is an awfully small sample size…

The Home team has won 55% of all playoff series since the last format change in 1998 and the top seed made the WS 33% of the time (better than the expected 1 in 4 and now more odds)

And maybe this is selfish – but I would like the Tigers to play at home one extra game per series (if needed) for the emotional and financial impact it would have on the fans, city (bars/restaraunts/vendors), team, ownership.

by Boomer Dog on Jan 14, 2012 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Kuroda is a Yankee

I liked him but I also like E-Jax and Oswalt, but I would rather have Turner or Garza

"I will play tomorrow unless I am dead when I wake up" - Victor Martinez

by vifinn on Jan 13, 2012 9:26 PM EST reply actions  

I'm much rather have Oswalt for a year and Turner for 6 than Garza for 2

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by momotigers on Jan 14, 2012 8:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Goal is NOT the AL Central...

Totally agree…great 3-5 year window for Tigers – DD is waiting for the Cespedes decision and may wait til trade deadline to see what shakes out. Current configuration likely does not compete for WS. Like to see better team defense/speed (not D.Young), top of the order OBP (2B/3B), SP and one more arm for pen.

by Boomer Dog on Jan 13, 2012 9:30 PM EST reply actions  

The goal is always the AL Central.

I’d say that by now it should be apparent that the postseason is almost a total crapshoot. If you’re good enough to get there, chances are high that you’re good enough to win it all.

by stormhit on Jan 14, 2012 1:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Not really.

Considering how weak the AL Central was last year, a .500 record would have made the playoffs. The Blue Jays could have won our division last year.

"trout jefferson is using multiple numbers and no swears. I barely recognize you man." - Kurt Mensching

by Trout Jefferson on Jan 14, 2012 10:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Especially with the new wild card rule

the goal has to be winning the division, that wild card game is going to be a huge advantage for division winners.

by rif23 on Jan 14, 2012 10:29 AM EST up reply actions  

All goals start with the playoffs

Fter that it’s a crap shoot and hope your team is hot.

Winning the AL central guarantees a playoff spot so therefor, should always be the immediate goal.

Tired of generic music??? Exterminate All Rational Thought is here to help!

by Siggzilla on Jan 14, 2012 10:56 AM EST up reply actions  

All in

I get the argument that the goal should be to win the division but that’s thinking too small right now. Unless we have injuries we pretty much just have to show up to win the Central this year. Cleveland isn’t quite there yet, Kansas City doesn’t have enough pitching, the White Sox are starting over, the Twins lost a bunch of guys and I’ll eat my hat if Morneau and Mauer contribute the way they did in 2006-2009.

Our biggest concern should be being able to keep up with teams like New York and Texas and both of them are looking to be better on opening day then they were at the end of last year while we’ve made no real significant improvements besides giving Avila a little more rest and tightening up the bullpen. I will not be satisfied with just another division title. We need the pieces to play in October, not just April-September.

by Sutelc on Jan 14, 2012 11:14 AM EST reply actions  

Winning the division is not "thinking too small"

You basically have to win your division to get into the playoffs. Winning the division takes a balanced roster over a 162 game span. Winning the World Series takes a couple of hot bats and a lights out starting pitcher to win 11 games in a month. Getting to the playoffs is 90% of the battle in the MLB. A lot of luck goes into what happens from then on.

by Rob Rogacki on Jan 14, 2012 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Doug Fister > Pineda

Certainly from the perspective of trade value, and maybe as a pitcher overall.

by nicolas08 on Jan 14, 2012 12:40 PM EST reply actions  

Agreed.

And foster didn’t cost a single A prospect.

DD stole fister

Tired of generic music??? Exterminate All Rational Thought is here to help!

by Siggzilla on Jan 14, 2012 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Wake-forest-logo_small
Is Austin Jackson a top-five center fielder?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Is Prince Fielder earning his keep?
Small
Reading the Detroit News comments section on Tigers stories
Small
All-Time Tigers Team
Small
A Sunday with Dan and Jim
Small
2012 Detroit Tigers Draft Question
Amrita_rao_small
Elvis Andrus and Jurickson Profar
Img_1374_small
Scary moment for ex-Tiger Will Rhymes
Small
Austin Jackson: A mid-May appreciation
Tigers_logo_small
Advice on tickets, pre-game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Quick Rules

Do:

  • Treat others like you'd like to be treated.
  • Stick to the topic being discussed.
  • Make arguments based on facts, not emotion.
Don't:
  • Confuse BYB with talk radio, your blog or your social networking web site of choice. We're a baseball community.
  • Feed the trolls.

Commenting Code of Conduct


Managing Editor

Dsc0178-l_small Kurt Mensching

Deputy Editors

Meatcomputer-1_small BigAl

Sparky_anderson_wall_small Rob Rogacki

5532934019_b5fa57ae98_small allikazoo

Contributors

Good_to_great_leadership_image1-262x300_1__small Tigerdog1

Suss_small Matt Sussman

6m2bts_small Melissa Heyboer

Moderators

Be050826_small NCDee

Sifl_and_olly_small 13194013