Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Are the Tigers Complacent, or Just Confident?

2011 was, by all accounts, a very good season for the Tigers. They won their division for the first time in a quarter century, by fifteen games, no less. They beat the Yankees and advanced to the American League Championship Series, taking that series to six games. I suppose that one could be forgiven for jumping to the conclusion that this team really doesn’t "need" to make a whole lot of adjustments heading into the 2012 season.

I beg to differ.

Yes, the Tigers have to be considered favorites to repeat as Central Division champions in 2012, but let’s make no mistake that this team has issues. They have serious issues that need to be addressed before the man says "play ball" on opening day.

For one thing, the Tigers are apparently happy to start the season with platoons at second and third base, and these platoons are made up of players that have no business starting at their respective positions on a contending major league ball club. I think that's totally inadequate, and moves need to be made.

At third base, Brandon Inge has worn out his welcome with most Tigers fans. After finally being demoted to Toledo last summer, he returned and played well, but he was limited to starting against left handed pitchers. His apparent platoon partner, Don Kelly, has been a utility player his entire major league career, with a career .240 average, and an OBP well under .300. Both players at this stage are defensively average, at best.

At second base, Ramon Santiago is very good defensively, and Ryan Raburn has shown he can hit -- at least once August rolls around. But Raburn would presumably be playing against left-handed pitchers, where Santiago is actually a decent hitter, and Ramon would start against righties, against whom he’s a pretty poor hitter. Defensively, Raburn is not an infielder, period. If he hits like he can, his bat needs to be in the lineup, but his glove needs to be in the outfield.

The 2011 Tiger lineup was among the league’s worst at getting on base in the top three spots in the batting order. The Tigers ranked 11th, 9th, and 13th in the league in OBP in the first, second, and third spots, respectively. That seems like an incredible waste, considering that they have one of the best RBI men in the game, in Miguel Cabrera, batting fourth.

Star-divide

What have the Tigers done to address those issues? Apparently nothing. The roster will not be without its changes for the 2012 season. Gone will be Magglio Ordonez, Carlos Guillen, Joel Zumaya, Brad Penny and Wilson Betemit. Octavio Dotel will take Al Alburquerque’s place in the bullpen, and Ryan Perry was traded for Collin Balester. Gerald Laird is back, taking a roster spot to give Alex Avila some much needed occasional rest. Will Rhymes was released, and Eric Patterson signed to a minor league contract. Ho hum -- nothing done.

Dombrowski told us that Kelly Johnson would be too expensive, so he didn’t bother to make an offer. The Jays’ lefty hitting second baseman has a career OBP of .343, while averaging 19 homers and 69 RBI over a six year career, and he plays solid defense as well. There were rumors of the Tigers being interested in Aramis Ramirez, Matt Garza, and Jimmy Rollins. Dombrowski denied all those glimmers of hope.

In fact, the Tigers didn’t even bother to offer arbitration to Wilson Betemit, who is the best hitting third baseman left on the market, at the Tigers’ position of greatest need. Betemit’s defense leaves much to be desired, but he hit an impressive .292 avg /.346 obp /.525 slg in 133 plate appearances for the Tigers after bumping Inge to his rightful place in Toledo. Betemit is not the ideal solution, since his glove appears to not fit him very well, but he is clearly better than what they have at his position, and he’d have cost very little.

It can be said that there isn’t much available on the free agent market at the positions where the Tigers have needs. That is partially true. Aramis Ramirez signed for $36 million over three years, and he’d have been a big help. The Tigers apparently inquired on Martin Prado of Atlanta, and San Diego’s Chase Headley. Whether they made credible offers for those players is something we don’t know.

On the pitching front, the Tigers have stood by while several starting pitchers have signed reasonable contracts with other clubs. I would include Hiroki Kuroda, Erik Bedard, Paul Maholm in that group. Roy Oswalt remains available, apparently for a very reasonable price. The Tigers should sign him, rather than relying on a bunch of unproven kids to carry the load during another pennant drive. Let the kids beat a major leaguer out to earn a job.

What is clear at this point is that the Tigers don’t feel a sense of urgency to upgrade their roster. They’re quite comfortable with where the team that they have to start the season. We can be glad that they don’t feel any urgency to trade a Jacob Turner or Nick Castellanos for the sake of making a move at this time. But I would make any other prospects available to address the needs that I’ve outlined above.

Moreover, the Tigers’ rivals in the AL Central haven’t done a whole lot to improve themselves, either. The second place Indians hope brought back Grady Sizemore at a discount and hope that he can remain healthy, and they will have a full season of Ubaldo Jiminez in their rotation. The Twins have added Jamey Carroll and hope that Joe Mauer and Justin Morneau will be healthy. They’ve also added Josh Willingham, but they have lost Jason Kubel, Michael Cuddyer, and Joe Nathan.

Chicago has taken a step back, losing Edwin Jackson and Mark Buehrle from their rotation, and Carlos Quentin from the lineup, and Sergio Santos from the bullpen. They’re rebuilding, and don’t look like much of a threat right now. The Royals are relying on an impressive crop of young talent, and they will score runs, but their rotation leaves a lot to be desired. Overall, there is nothing very intimidating from the competition.

Still, the Tigers were just 1.5 games ahead of Cleveland as late as August 18 last season. They went on a hot streak, beating their division rivals in head-to-head competition, settling the division race in the next two weeks. But that streak included Magglio hitting .400, a three way platoon of Betemit, Inge and Kelly all hitting .300 with OBPs above .350, and it included near perfection from Justin Verlander, Doug Fister, and Jose Valverde.

If that is what the Tigers need to do in order to repeat as division champions, I would not hold my breath. Ordonez and Betemit are gone, and they haven’t been replaced. They still have no legit lead off man, and they’re praying that Brennan Boesch can put together two first halves and be their No. 3 hitter.

Yes, there is cause for optimism, but there is also cause for concern. The Tigers have needs, and they haven’t been addressed this off season. At least not yet.

Poll
What do you believe is the Tigers' most urgent need before the season begins?
Second Base
107 votes
Third Base
316 votes
Outfield
6 votes
Starting Pitching
53 votes
Bullpen
13 votes
Top of the Lineup- at any position
203 votes
There are no urgent needs
16 votes

714 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 55 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Top of the lineup

AJax needs to go to the bottom of the order. Can’t we find a serviceable leadoff hitter?

by Bret Boone's Farm on Jan 16, 2012 3:11 AM EST reply actions  

Agree

He would be a dynamite 9th hitter, especially if we had some speed in the lead off spot.

by Craig Unruh on Jan 16, 2012 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm comfortable with the current roster

Last season, Magglio Ordonez was replaced when we got Delmon Young. That trade immediately moved Magglio to a bench role. When Boesch got hurt, Magglio was resurrected from the bench. Boesch should be 100% by now.

Brad Penny went from being our 4th starter to our 5th starter when we got Doug Fister. We have a plethora of arms that could be our new 5th starter this season.

Just remember, during the regular season, we don’t play every game like it’s the World Series. The season is a huge grind and the 25 guys who you start with on Opening Day aren’t the same guys you finish the season with. There are no important games being played before June. It’s a touchy feely situation until late July, when you start setting up the roster for the stretch run and the play-offs.

Last thing I want to see is the Tigers peaking in April and May like they did in some of the previous years. I’ll take a strong 2nd half and post-season, at the expense of having a strong 1st half. Even if we acquired a starting 2b and 3B, we don’t know for sure that those players would stay healthy all season long. If we’re going to give up some valuable trading chips, we need to wait until July, when half of the season’s wear and tear is behind us. Going all in right now would be foolish. The smart to play is to be patient. Give what we have a chance to succeed or fail, then make changes as the season progresses.

by Keith-Allen on Jan 16, 2012 4:32 AM EST reply actions  

Good retrospective, but I feel confident that we've covered what ground there is to cover.

I’d just like to note that before BYB, I was perfectly content with not thinking about baseball for a couple months.

Can’t un-bite that apple.

/sigh

by lesmanalim on Jan 16, 2012 4:57 AM EST reply actions  

very good article

this was a very good article by tigerdog,it echoes a lot of my and most other tiger fans concerns..but,in my post the other day i agreed and still do with mr.allen and others,while a platoon at 2nd and 3rd isnt what WE want to see im inclined to let it play out and see where we stand at the 1/4 and 1/2 way points and let DD make adjustments.however,theres always a however! tigerdog is right about the obp out of the top 1/3,that does give me pause.i guess that whay mr.cespedes is supposed to fix,that is a signing id like to see,we need speed,thats a painful fact to see,do i think we need to spend “stupidly” to upgrade 1 position with speed ,no,we need a couple.i know people are going to ask well then who do you want the tigers to get? and i say,let dd do his job its a long season,its not how you start,but how you finish.

by tigerfaninboston on Jan 16, 2012 6:46 AM EST reply actions  

I reluctantly clicked 3B

…but my reluctance is not because I’m some sort of Brandon Inge fanboy or anything. Honestly, we’re nicely set in a lot of places — moreso than the average franchise, I’d wager to say — and we should be so lucky as to have to talk about these little patch-up jobs.

I’d be good if the roster stayed as it was. Invariably, something weird and/or unexpected will happen between mid-February and the start of April, and we’ll have some pretty big fish to fry around here.

by frisbeepilot on Jan 16, 2012 7:32 AM EST reply actions  

I voted for 3B

I don’t think anything will actually be done until July, when some of the pretenders decide to start selling. Right now, there aren’t many teams willing to let go of players at prices the Tigers like. Somebody like your boy Chase Headley might be a lot cheaper in July than he would be right now.

I think that the top of the lineup needs to be addressed, but I believe that we have decent enough guys on the roster and our manager doesn’t value OBP like you or I do. Jackson, Boesch, Avila, Cabrera would be an “adequate” 1-2-3-4 punch. Here are 2011 OBP’s of that lineup: .317, .341, .389, .448. Jackson’s .317 is far below what we would like from a leadoff hitter, but I bet that he bounces back a bit and approximates what he did his rookie season (.345). I think we’ll see Boesch increase to above .350, but Avila will probably regress a bit. Jackson and Boesch have speed at the top of the lineup as well. It’s not ideal, but it’s very passable. I don’t think for a minute that Leyland will do it, but if he’s not willing to move Young out of the 3 spot when he already has viable internal options, it shows me that he doesn’t see it as a priority. If we really valued OBP from the top of the lineup, we’d just sign Fukudome instead of Young, save ourselves some cash, and have a LF that gets on base an extra 6% of the time over Young.

I’m fine with the 2B platoon for now. If we grant your wish and send Raburn to the OF, it makes Santiago our regular at 2B. He’s not a starter on a loaded big league team, but I also think the margin for improvement is low. When you look at somebody like Orlando Hudson, how much does it actually improve the team to have Hudson in there instead of Santiago? The marginal difference, based on expectations, is actually pretty low – maybe .015 in average, .030 in OBP, and .040 in SLG. I don’t think it would be worth the compensation or prospects it would take to get somebody that’s “a little better” and there’s nothing “a lot better” out there.

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by momotigers on Jan 16, 2012 8:16 AM EST reply actions   2 recs

Rec'd for all of this

There simply aren’t any moves to be made right now.

by Rob Rogacki on Jan 16, 2012 10:41 AM EST up reply actions  

The only way I'd take O Dog's contract is if it brings Headley's price tag to within reason

We really don’t know what some of the players that seem like an upgrade for the Tigers would cost, other than Betemit, who is really the only free agent option left at either 2B or 3B. I would bring back Betemit but only as a last resort. His defense is horrible, but there is enough of a difference offensively to more than compensate.

We also don’t know how much DD and JL really want to make a move. I still believe that JL is loyal to his players, to a fault, and I also believe that they still love Brandon Inge. I think that he had some personal issues to work through, that he’s worked on those issues, and they want to give him another chance. I do not believe that they are seriously intent on starting Don Kelly against RHP’s full time.

As far as the 2B platoon goes, Hudson would be getting about 70% of the starts at 2B, assuming a straight L/ R platoon.

Hudson vs RHP- .256 .356 .363 .719 (3 year splits, .271 .354 .375 .729)
Santiago vs LHP- .320 .352 .480 .832 (3 year splits .305 .351 .403 .754)

Raburn vs LHP- .274 .321 .486 .807 (3 year splits .282 .355 .547 .902)
Santiago vs RHP- .245 .301 .361 .662 (3 year splits .305 .351 .403 .754)

Headley vs LHP .352 .415 .476 .891 (3 year splits .257 .326 .361 .687)
Headley vs RHP .264 .359 .370 .729 (3 year splits .275 .352 .399 .751)
B Inge vs LHP 245 .339 .378 .717 (3 year splits .247 .345 .460 .805)
B Inge vs RHP (Too obscene to print)

Delmon vs LHP .301 .338 .421 .759- (decent, but not great)
Delmon vs RHP .256 .288 .382 .670 (not worth starting 70% of the time, IMO)

Santiago actually had a higher OPS at second base than Raburn did last year against LHP’s. Using Santiago in a platoon only against RHP’s makes no sense at all. Realistically, though, if Raburn is hitting, he hits lefties and righties and you have to get his bat into the lineup one way or another. He easily out hits Delmon and AJax.

If we make no additions to the roster, the question becomes whether Raburn in LF and Santiago at 2B is better than Delmon in LF and Raburn at 2B against LHP’s. This is a no brainer for me. I’d be looking to move Delmon for whatever we can get for him and put Raburn in the outfield. If Santiago needs a break, get someone else- Danny Worth, if you have to.

In the poll above, I voted for help at the top of the lineup. I figure that we can carry a dud or two in the lineup, but not in those spots in the lineup. If I had to pick a position, I’d go with third base, because the offense from our tandem at the hot corner is that putrid by comparison with league averages.

There is no basis to conclude that there are no moves to be made right now. You don’t know how badly DD wants to make a move, what he’s willing to give up, or what other GM’s are demanding. I doubt that Callaspo or Maicer could cost that much right now, because the Angels don’t need both of them, even on the bench. Even Betemit is far better than using Don Kelly at third base.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 16, 2012 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Correction

I posted the wrong 3 year splits for Ramon vs RHP’s

The correct numbers are .254 .317 .353 .670

Compare with Hudson’s .271 .354 .375 .729

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 16, 2012 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

If I were the Angels...I'd keep both Callaspo and Izturis

I’d probably start Callaspo at 3B and keep Izturis on the bench as a good UT to fill in for Callaspo, Kendrick, and Aybar. As a fan with my sights set on a ring, I’d rather have a reliable UT than a bunch of Tiger prospects.

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by momotigers on Jan 16, 2012 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

If they're serious about moving Trumbo to 3B most days, though.....

plus, they have Kendrys Morales and Pujols took his job.
They’ve extended Kendrick and come to terms with Callaspo for 3.1 mil.
I would think that Maicer is the odd man out, but they’re not going to give him away.
I’d deal any prospects other than Turner or Castellanos for him. Not sure DD would do that.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 16, 2012 8:27 PM EST up reply actions  

And I don't think you could get him

Unless you offered up one of those two. San Diego is negotiating from a position of strength. The Tigers need Maicer more than the Padre’s need to move him. So if they insist on one of those two do you still make the trade?

by wilsonm24 on Jan 17, 2012 9:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Except that Maicer is on the Angels

and he wouldn’t cost anything remotely close to Turner or Castellanos, and every GM in the game knows that. Maybe you’re thinking of Chase Headley? The Angels would want bullpen help, in the form of someone with major league experience. Perry might have been a fit. Maybe Pauley. They also need a catcher.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 17, 2012 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

I meant the Angels.. but the statement still holds truth.

So you think that the Angels would be willing to trade a potential starting 3B for a middle reliever? Would you be happy with that trade?

You are right though, he shouldn’t be worth Turner or Castellanos, but he is worth more than a middle reliever or a catching prospect that projects as a back-up defensive replacement. Especially since he is their infield depth at three positions, and he will probably get about 400 AB’s this year.

by wilsonm24 on Jan 17, 2012 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Since we haven't heard any rumors of the Angles looking to move either of those guys

I don’t know how you gather that they wouldn’t cost that much in a trade? They are both under contract for under 4 Mil this year (very affordable) and there is no reason for the Angles to trade them, unless they want to reduce their infield depth.

For Headly, the last reports from back in Mid December show that the Padre’s were asking for the moon in any trades. Is he worth trading for? Probably, but to me, asking for the moon means both Turner and Castellanos…or too much.

As for trading Delmon and moving Raburn to LF and starting Santiago full time at 2B (or platooning with Worth) I would be all for it. But we aren’t going to get much out of Delmon, as you pointed out a few times last season, Delmon’s value is crap right now, it is so low that he was going to be non-tendered by the Twins. If we could get a fringe prospect out of him then I would be content. Of course then you have to ask, what are we going to do about LF when Raburn starts out the first 2 months of the season flirting with the Mendoza line.

by wilsonm24 on Jan 17, 2012 8:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Moving Delmon is more a matter of reallocating resources

In other words, money. I wouldn’t be surprised if San Diego asked for either one of JT or NC, but no way both.

I woudln’t give up much for Delmon, but there aren’t a lot of options for outfielders left on the market. He comes on a one year deal, and might work in a situation where the Tigers take some salary back in the form of an infielder. I think that JL is infatuated with RBI stats, and he sees what Delmon did in MIN two years ago. Just speculating.

We can only speculate what clubs are asking for, and what the Tigers are willing to give up. I don’t think DD feels any particular sense of urgency, and JL doesn’t see a problem with some of the under performers that we have in the lineup. I think they’re willing to see how Inge and Raburn start out.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 17, 2012 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Delmon is probably going to be paid more than he is worth

He is still a lottery pick at this point. He could be very good or he could be very average and 6-8Mil for average doesn’t hold much value.

So not only would we have to take on a bad contract we would probably also have to fork over some money as well to off-set Delmon’s. Unless the Tigers take on a 3 or 4 years bad deal I would rather just suffer through one year of Delmon with a platoon at 3B or 2B. It isn’t worth having a Maggs/Robertson/Willis/Bonderman/“other contract we regularly crucify DD over” contract for the next 3 years just to get a minimal upgrade for this year at 3B.

by wilsonm24 on Jan 17, 2012 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I hate waiting til the deadline because it is such a crap shoot.

The deadline strategy means that Dombrowski must make a 2011 deal instead of a 2009 deal.

Waiting til August is a strategy that occasionally works, but deadline deals are never a sure thing. The Doug Fister trade does not erase the memory of Jarrod Washburn and Aubrey Huff trades. I know those did not cost much, but they were not the “final pieces” most of us felt they would be. I prefer a roster that does not need to plug major holes on July 31,

Also sometimes teams over pay at deadline time. Fister was great – no doubt about that, but the cost was very high. Two or three 2 or 3 of the guys Detroit sent to Seattle could still be playing for the Mariners after Fister is gone from Detroit. Don’t get me wrong, I’d make the trade in a heart beat all over again. My point is asking if the Tigers could have aquired Fister, or someone like him, BEFORE the 2011 season started. And would the cost have been as high?

I got my answer this weekend when the Yankees made their big deal. Brian Cashman could have waited until July and tried to use Montero to aquire Felix Hernandez, he’ll be the deadline guy everyone wants this year, but instead the Yankees traded a pretty good prospect to get better NOW. And this is where I disagree with Keith-Allen. I know the season is a grind. But the Yankees will be better come August because Michel Pineda and Hideki Kuroda will have been with the team since Florida. Waiting is a solid strategy when there is a chance a player can bounce back. But do you really believe the Tigers can win the World Series or the AL Championship for that matter, with a platoon at second and third? I don’t. Not after what New York and LA did over the winter.

The Tigers can and probably will win the Central Division. They won’t win the AL Championship with this roster because their probable opponents did not stand pat.. The Yabkees added Michael Pineda and HIdeki Kuroda. The Angels signed CJ Wilson and Albert Pujols. Texas will either sign Yu Darvish or Prince Fielder. What did the Tigers do – They re signed half of their second base platoon and then they gave fan favorite Gerald Laird a million bucks to sit on the bench for 120 games. Oh yeah, they also signed that guyt that is such a great releif pitcher he has played for 12 other teams. Finally they traded Ryan Perry for Ryan Perry. It’s been the lamest off season for the Tigers in several years

The Tigers will be a fun to watch from April through Septemeber. They will win alot of games. But unless they plug the holes that were there LAST spring, or unless Dombrowski pulls another Doyle Alexander / Doug Fister trade (this time with infielders) out of his hat, July 31, October will be a one and done in 2012, The Yankees and Angels got better. The Tigers did not……yet.

by Jim Bunn on Jan 16, 2012 8:45 AM EST reply actions  

2009 was a colossal failure, but terrible luck

Both acquisitions (Washburn and Huff) were about as bad as they could possibly be. It’s highly improbable that any deadline deal could ever be that bad, let alone two deadline deals at the same time. It’s also pretty improbable that a deadline deal would work out quite as well as Fister (or Alexander). Most deals probably end up a lot more like the Peralta deal where the player helps a little (and in 2009, we only needed that…a little)

I’m fine waiting until the deadline if it looks like the market will improve. However, the traditional trade deadline fodder won’t help us much. The FA class of 2013 isn’t very good at 3B or 2B, so there won’t be a bunch of pending free agents. Maybe Phillips is available, maybe Wright, but after that – there’s nothing much better than what we have today. We’ll be looking for the guys with more than a year left before free agency and they won’t be discounted too much.

Of course, we’ll have a much better idea which prospects we should be shopping by then. I think our farm will sort itself out a lot between April and July. Hopefully, guys like Avisail Garcia and Daniel Fields can add some results to their skills and be valuable chips. Turner could make himself the best SP prospect in baseball with a good first half. If Smyly stays at AA, he can probably keep his value. With good first halves, Olvier and Crosby become way more valuable. Maybe some of our 2011 draft class will add some value as well (doubtful). My point is that we don’t have too many prospects that can hurt their value by playing a few months.

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by momotigers on Jan 16, 2012 10:28 AM EST up reply actions  

*cracks knuckles*
I got my answer this weekend when the Yankees made their big deal. Brian Cashman could have waited until July and tried to use Montero to aquire Felix Hernandez, he’ll be the deadline guy everyone wants this year, but instead the Yankees traded a pretty good prospect to get better NOW.

Yeah, and he got the lesser pitcher in the deal. Unless Pineda ups his ground ball rate from 36.3%, there are a lot of would-be fly balls at Safeco that will leave the yard at Yankee Stadium. His ERA was 1.50 higher on the road vs. at home last season. Home BABIP? .222. Road BABIP? .289. I wouldn’t be surprised to see him struggle quite a bit next season in New York.

But do you really believe the Tigers can win the World Series or the AL Championship for that matter, with a platoon at second and third? I don’t. Not after what New York and LA did over the winter.

Yeah, and I guess we should have given Boston the AL championship last January as well? Just because they made big moves doesn’t mean anything. If anything on Albert Pujols goes “pop,” the Angels are the same team that finished 10 games behind the Rangers last season. The Yankees have had the highest payroll in baseball for FOR-EV-VER, and remember how their season ended last year?

What did the Tigers do – They re signed half of their second base platoon and then they gave fan favorite Gerald Laird a million bucks to sit on the bench for 120 games.

That guy sitting on his ass for 120 games is meant to keep the other catcher (you know, the MVP-caliber one) healthy enough to not go 2-for-30 (or whatever his numbers actually were) in the postseason again. Think of it as a $1 million insurance policy on Avila’s knees.

Oh yeah, they also signed that guyt that is such a great releif pitcher he has played for 12 other teams.

He also won the World Series last season, so there’s that.

It’s been the lamest off season for the Tigers in several years

No, lame offseasons are the long ones that start in August when the team is 15 games out of first place. I’ll take a shorter offseason with no big moves over a long one with a blockbuster move or two any time.

by Rob Rogacki on Jan 16, 2012 10:54 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

+100

for the last 2 lines

by rif23 on Jan 16, 2012 11:01 AM EST up reply actions  

nice, NICE post

Mon-o-day, I sure you are right about the recent Wankees dealings. I really, REALLY don’t like the Yanks (having spent my teenage years about 30 miles out side of the Bronx (in Jersey)). Also, good point about Boston. Have to admit – before the season started last year, I was thinking Boston was the team to beat. I do, however, have to believe that Crawford will rebound this year. Too much talent not to, in my (not so) humble opinion.

by timot on Jan 16, 2012 12:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with the jist of the argument (the front office needs to make some improvements)

however I don’t feel much pressure to do it before Opening Day.
The Tigers need 2nd and 3rd basemen and a deeper Bullpen. I would focus on the BP (but I’m not a GM so what do I know?).
Overall, I like this team as it stands. I also have confidence that Dombrowski knows what he can and cannot do to improve it. If he can then he will. I hope he doesn’t sell the Farm just to get a big name player to start the season with. Injuries happen. Trades happen. Baseball happens. Right now Detroit looks capable of winning the AL Central. That has to be the first goal. As the season goes on (and those injuries and trades are taken into account) DD can make adjustments to improve the situation. (Think Fister). That’s his MO and I don’t see it changing. I trust him.

BTW: I am surprised at the % of poll takers who picked 3rd base. The pendulum has really swung away from Inge! Raburn at 2nd scares me more than Inge though.

Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it.

by murrajo on Jan 16, 2012 9:18 AM EST reply actions  

Ramon

Excellent writing, as usual T-Dog. As you know, I am a little higher on Ramon than you are. Ramon has never been given a chance by the Tigers to be the everyday pivot man, at least since his rookie year. They have given that chance to guys like Scott Sizemore and Will Rhymes. Why not give a good soldier like Ramon at least a chance to be the regular second baseman? I agree with you about Raburn: they should take his infielders glove away from him.

"Detroit Tiger season ticket holder"

by The Skipper on Jan 16, 2012 9:52 AM EST reply actions  

I'll do my best Rogo impersonation here

Ramon Santiago has 2087 plate appearances at the MLB level with a slash line of .249/.316/.342. Cuss, cuss, swear…burn kittens for fun…Rhymes is a runt…I hate Don Kelly.

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by momotigers on Jan 16, 2012 10:37 AM EST up reply actions  

I voted 3B

I was tempted to go with top of the order, but I think the “top of the order” problem is being overstated. Improvement is always a good idea, but we didn’t exactly have a bad lineup, Our top of the order problem is more a result of odd lineup construction than a poor collection of offensive players. The Top of the order may have not done a good job getting on-base, but the middle and bottom did a really good job of it. The Tigers 2011 lineup is case in point that lineup construction makes very little difference in the number of runs scored. Overall the tigers ranked #4 in baseball in OBP, Slugging, and Runs scored. The lineup did about what you would expect it to do, the odd construction doesn’t seem to have had much effect.

In describing the front office I don’t know if I would call them complacent, or confident. I would add another C and refer to DD and co. as “Calculated.” As described above, the Tigers have been linked to several players who would also provide a significant boost to the top of the lineup, but we really have no idea about how serious discussions ever got, or what kind of offer the Tigers made. I think it is instructive that players that are “available” and fans have lusted after, like Chase Headly , Matt Garza, and Nick Punto, haven’t just been missed by the Tigers, they haven’t moved at all. The front office knows what they have, a decent, if unspectacular product, they know they can improve, but aren’t winning to do so at any cost. The Tiger’s window doesn’t close after 2012, or 13 and I am whole heatedly in-favor of calculated decisions that improve our ability to compete in the long term, even if they don’t maximize our world series potential on a yearly basis.

by rif23 on Jan 16, 2012 10:27 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

I voted 3rd base as well

Yes, the tigers are a good team. But, with the way things stand right now, they are going to the playoffs to be one and done. We’re lucky that Boston, NY, Tampa, Texas, AA get to fight it out for two playoff spots or do we expand this year? I cant remember. And look at AA’s pitching staff by adding Wilson. We cant just build for the division, we have to build for the whole thing. If we could get at least one solid mediocre infielder at 2nd or 3rd that would be a plus. The lineup we May be able to patch. Whats wrong with BB hitting 2nd, Young hitting 3rd, and I’d keep Cabby and vMART 4 and 5. If it isn’t broke don’t fix it. AJ strikes out way too much and is not good at the little things that make a lead off man. Bunt, put the ball in play, walks. Maybe Danny Worth can rescue us in one of the infield spots but he’s still pretty young and his bat is suspect. Although I’d take him over Inge.
But, still, the bottom line for most of it is, pitching, pitching, pitching. We are good there, I just dont know if were good enough.

by blueleo1 on Jan 16, 2012 11:05 AM EST reply actions  

Lead-off

I went with lead-off hitter but really I see that and either second or third as the same potential upgrade. The platoons are frustrating but so it having no one on base in front of two of the best hitters in the league in Cabrera and Martinez. The fact that Cabby still had over 100 RBIs this year with such a weak top of the order just shows how useless that stat is. He’s have knocked in 150 if Jackson got on base more often.

by Sutelc on Jan 16, 2012 11:07 AM EST reply actions  

RBIs

id like to point out the fact we had TWO 100 rbi guys,v-mart & cabby.i also think peralta was valuble in the rbi department with over 80 or close to it,add to that a healthy boesch and who knows? so i agree a healthier obp by jacson who knows what we could do for run production.so i guess,let the cespedes as the cure talk start,however i dont agree,not for 8 yrs 60 million or even close to that.lets see if jackson has improved,but,i agree hes not a leadoff guy (yet).

by tigerfaninboston on Jan 16, 2012 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

RBI are more of a factor of who's in front of you

as opposed to being a so-called “RBI guy”. If you’re a good hitter, and people get on base in front of you, you’ll bat ‘em in. That’s just how it goes.

by frisbeepilot on Jan 16, 2012 6:30 PM EST up reply actions  

There are good hitters that lack RBI skills

Some of them are the speedy types that lack power. Jamey Carroll, Ichiro Suzuki, Brett Gardner, Emilio Bonifacio, Michael Bourn, Dexter Fowler, Juan Pierre, and Austin Jackson, to name a few.

Then there are a contact hitters, like Placido Polanco, Martín Prado, Freddy Sanchez, that are good at moving runners up a base or two, but they are not good for clearing bases.

by Keith-Allen on Jan 16, 2012 8:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Do the Tigers still have moves to make?

Yes. Of course. But they have to be the right moves, and they don’t have a need to be in a hurry.

As you said, they ran away with the Central last year. Cleveland hasn’t improved. Chicago and Minnesota have gotten even worse. KC is still a year or two away from contending. And the Tigers have basically the same team as 2011, except they’ve added bullpen depth and finally have a backup catcher to spell Avila. Plus they have a full year of Doug Fister this time.

So, I feel there’s no rush to fill 2B and 3B with a guy they really don’t want. They’re fine as they are until they begin approaching the July 31st trade deadline. At that point, if they still aren’t adding players, I’ll join everyone in rosterbation panic mode. Until then, I feel confident that Dave Dombrowski is being patient and knows what he’s doing.

by Rogo on Jan 16, 2012 11:10 AM EST reply actions  

I think they're both confident and complacent

Which by all means is fine with that lineup, but the Rangers went out and signed Adrian Beltre and traded for Mike Napoli just to lose in the World Series again. You can as confident as you want — you should never be complacent in sports.

With that said, I think the Tigers are putting all their eggs in the Yoenis Cespedes basket. That’s fine but you better make sure you give him an offer he simply can’t refuse or else you’re in big trouble.

I also have no idea what their thinking (as well as everyone else) when it comes to second base and a lead off hitter. Prado, Izturis, we’ve heard the names and just had them all become nothing. We HAVE to make a move. The Twins are still a threat. We can’t expect Dunn to post another horrendous year. We can’t expect the Indians to just roll over in the second half again. The Royals are going to be a surprising threat. We need to make a move before it’s too late.

by Let's do this! on Jan 16, 2012 11:56 AM EST reply actions  

It's already too late, or too early

Unless you’re looking to trade our few prospects to the few teams that are selling right now, we sort of need to upgrade through the market. And it became too late when Aramis Ramirez signed a contract that we certainly should have matched, if not exceeded. There isn’t much at 2B that presents a significant upgrade over what we have – there never really was.

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by momotigers on Jan 16, 2012 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Very true

But I don’t even care if we make a giant move. There are a couple of second baseman that could be had at the right price, that could also potentially be a solution as a lead off hitter without necessarily breaking the bank for them. Eric Farris of Milwaukee and Oscar Tejada of the Red Sox are a couple that have their ways blocked, but could be good leadoff hitters and play 2B. I’m sure they wont require Turner to bring over and are ready, or are extremely close to being so, for the big leagues.

by Let's do this! on Jan 16, 2012 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I think they're being realistic

In 2009 and updated in 2010 I wrote a story highlighting all of Dombrowski’s screwups and how they put the Tigers in a bad position without a lot of flexibility. Now, Detroit is atop the division, has a clear path to the playoffs, and is looking at a market that doesn’t have a lot of realistic, affordable answers to their problems.

I’m glad they’re not freaking out. I think it shows they’ve learned from past mistakes and want to compete in the long haul and take what comes to them.

I mean just look at last year. No one would have been excited about the prospect of trading for Doug Fister. Yet he turned out to be an affordable acquisition midseason and fans can’t stop singing his praises now.

The Tigers need to keep their eyes open and grab the lower-profile players who really fit their needs when those opportunities arise.

by Kurt Mensching on Jan 16, 2012 12:04 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

on Fister

Kurt – how much of a regression do you see out of Fister this year? Do you see him notching 15 wins? That would be fine. I have to say – I really hated the trade when it went down. Thought we gave up WAY too much. But boy, outside of Doyle Alexander, that trade was one for the ages as far as our side goes.

by timot on Jan 16, 2012 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think we gave up all that much at all

Was not impressed with a single player they included. Sure some MLB quality players but no MLB difference makers that I saw.

I don’t deal in wins. Wins are a product of your batters showing up behind you at the right time.

Fister looked like a No. 3 pitcher going into the trade. He’s got good peripherals, he doesn’t beat himself, his fastball was inching faster. He had a good rate of quality starts in Seattle that trailed only Verlander, and he continued that success in Detroit. I could see him continuing in the mid-3s for ERA.

by Kurt Mensching on Jan 16, 2012 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Absolutely

I’d be fine with a guy that most people haven’t heard of — Eric Farris of Milwaukee and Oscar Tejada of the Red Sox were a couple of names I gave in another comment. I’d be fine with getting an Izturis/Aybar/Callaspo that’s going to get on base so our brutes can hit them in. I don’t necessarily want an All-Star year in and year out, I want a guy that is going to do what we need him to do.

by Let's do this! on Jan 16, 2012 7:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I hate agreeing with Kurt

Because it appears one is just agreeing with the top site dude and makes one look like a tosser.

But I couldn’t agree more with what he just wrote. I’m glad the Tigers aren’t freaking out as well. Besides, DDs performance the last two years deserve some benefit of the doubt.

Justin can now let the fungus grow back on his shower shoes.

by Singledigit on Jan 16, 2012 12:44 PM EST reply actions  

Tosser

The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981

by momotigers on Jan 16, 2012 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Top Of The Order Because...

…it automatically means an upgrade at 2b, 3b, or OF.

One fact to consider: this does not need to be addressed until end of July; the Tigers should win the ALCentral going away. Their final pieces need to be in place for the post-season; therefore, by the trade deadline.

Please don’t give up on “Turner/Castellantos/Smyly” in a trade!

Right now, the strength of our minor leagues is Catching (because our MLB catcher is so young and sooo good!) and SLP. Trade away those guys (not named Smyly!) — but not until June or July, and only as needed.

by DoctorDaveT on Jan 16, 2012 1:39 PM EST reply actions  

If we follow this...
Please don’t give up on "Turner/Castellantos/Smyly" in a trade!

We don’t get anything that would be considered an “upgrade” in return.

by Rob Rogacki on Jan 16, 2012 5:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I wouldn't say they'll win the Central "going away'

The Indians, Royals and White Sox may have something to say about that. And just because, we probably shouldn’t forget about the pesky Twins. The Indians are going to sign someone to get better — whether it’s Kotchman or Pena — and the Royals have a very young and talented team. White Sox are rebuilding, but there is no way we can expect another awful performance from Dunn.

If the Rays can win with less than those teams, then I refuse to believe we are going to run away with the division.

by Let's do this! on Jan 16, 2012 8:30 PM EST up reply actions  

top of the order

I think it’s definitely top of the order which probably, as previously said means an upgrade at an upgradable position like 2b or 3b as well. What this teams lack is contact and baserunners for Miggy and Victor. There is really no answer on this roster to put a formidable 1-2-3 in front of the those guys. Ajax, Boesch, Young doesn’t get me excited. There is defintley potential there but I’d prefer a .300 guy with speed. I think if things stay this way you have to move Miggy up to the three hole.

TEA Baseball Experience

by TEABaseballTour on Jan 16, 2012 2:41 PM EST reply actions  

Probably won't happen

Of the 22 players to steal 25+ bags, 10 of them hit .275 or better. Of those ten, only two really make sense for the Tigers — Erick Aybar and Emilio Bonifacio. Bonifacio’s .372 BABIP (which was nearly 40 points higher than his previous high) suggests that’s going to dip — similar as Jackson, but probably not quite as dramatic. He’s also played in 50 games and had a K% lower than 20% once. Not a big fan of his — don’t really want him.

Aybar is really intriguing to me, but he plays predominately SS where Peralta is sitting comfortably. In his 328 career innings at 2B he has been good, but that’s a terribly small sample size. His stats were right along with career norm though and he displayed more power, but I don’t see the Angels really giving him up too easily.

So I don’t really think that’s going to happen too easily, but we don’t necessarily need someone to steal a lot of bases. Speed would be good, but we also need someone who isn’t going to make bad choices on the basepaths. I’d be fine with a guy that will steal only 5-10 bags, especially seeing how that’s not really the Tigers game, that will get on-base at a rate of .350 or so and will not make stupid mistakes while running.

by Let's do this! on Jan 16, 2012 7:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd tend to lean towards just confident

At this point I’d really like to see 1 of 3 moves happen: sign Cespedes, sign Oswalt, or find a way to upgrade 3B.

I know sitting back and becoming complacent can get you in trouble, but I don’t think that’s what is happening here. Going into this season, I think it really is the Tigers as the clear cut favorite in the division and then everyone else. Not to say we can just assume we’ll win the Central again.. but with our current pieces, we should be able to compete until the deadline and then acquire a piece or two.

Raburn-Santiago '12

by tigers22 on Jan 16, 2012 3:03 PM EST reply actions  

Why don't we wee more prospect for prospect trades?

If tI were DD I would be looking in the minor leagues for

by BayesLaw on Jan 16, 2012 4:44 PM EST reply actions  

Dammit...let's try this again.

If there are no proven veterans available to upgrade the infield, why not see what it takes to acquire a major league ready prospect? I don’t remember too many trades involving two prominent prospects, but I would certainly be willing to trade Castellanos plus one or two for a similar ceiling 2B or 3B that is close to a shot in the show.

You don’t have the proven track record of a veteran, but you don’t have the cost either. Since we are close to maxing out the budget on a yearly basis as is, I don’t see why this doesn’t seem to be a viable strategy.

A lower ceiling prospect this blocked should be relatively easy to obtain I would think…but this is mostly conjecture, admittedly.

by BayesLaw on Jan 16, 2012 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd like more moves like this, to be sure.

Turner and Castellanos to the Cards for Shelby Miller and Matt Carpenter?

"You, on the other hand, make Eeyore look like Rainbow Brite." -johnmoz

"I think of you more as the blue book style essay of sports journalism."-Kurt Mensching

Contributor, Bless You Boys

by David Tokarz on Jan 16, 2012 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

We got 8 1/2 months until the playoffs begin, that's plenty of time

I think any team can go into a downward spiral this season. It only takes bad luck and some regression to turn a franchise upside down. We saw that happen up close to the greatest offensive team ever put together, that being the 2008 Tigers.

Here’s my rundown of the top contenders-

Boston got new management, but the team hasn’t gotten any better. I think Bobby Valentine will self destruct and make the team worse. Catcher, LF, RF, SS, and 3B have been problematic. They are stuck with Carl Crawford and his .255 AVG, .289 OBP. .695 OPS in LF. That’s completely inadequate and unacceptable for a $140 Million player. I’d much rather have Don Kelly in LF, than be stuck with Crawford’s contract. Kevin Youkilis, the walking wounded at 3B, is still their 3Bman when he’s 100% healthy, which is like never. They got Salty behind the dish. That’s like having Gerald Laird full-time. In RF, they might have an ugly experiment of some sort going on. At SS, they are still stuck with Marco Scutaro, who was useless until June last year. Are they expecting Nick Punto to save this team? Their starting rotation is still a mess. That team needs to make a huge trade, but they done nothing but add a few bullpen arms.

The Yankees might be the most volatile team of the bunch. Their closer is 42 years old. Jeter is 38. AROD is 36 and has a serious knee problem. Teixeira, Granderson, and Swisher are all over 30 and may be due for some serious decline. They traded their young superstud prospect Montero for a pitcher that will likely have reoccurring elbow problems. Now they have no DH and a not very good catcher. Their pitching staff might be good, but the Yanks are famous for bringing out the worst in their pitchers. Only players I like on that team going forward are Cano, Brett Gardner, and David Robertson. Too bad they can’t figure out how to use Gardner correctly. He should be leading off and playing CF. Instead he’s in LF and batting 9th. That’s just stupid.

Tampa Bay. They got pitching and defense, not much else. They’ll be competitive, but a team like the Tigers or Rangers will steam roll right over them again.

The Angels look OK on paper too. Their starting pitching is about as good as ours, but like ours it lacks a 5th starter, which is no big deal. They finally added a big bat, Pujols, who can match up with Miguel Cabrera. They still don’t have a good Catcher, like we do. Vernon Wells. WTF is he still doing on this team? He’s the gold standard for negligence and he’ll be making $21 Million a year for the next 3 years. Can they squeeze another year out of Tori Hunter ? He’s making $18 Million this year, so they’ll need to try. They got some nice complementary players in Kendrick, Aybar, Callapso, Izturis, and Bourjus, I’ll give them that, but I don’t think they have enough RBI guys. I think Pujols will get pitched around, and somebody behind him will need to step up. Maybe Kendry Morales or Mark Trumbo could be that guy. They got a top prospect in Mike Trout also. A lot of questions with how this group of players work as a team. Even with Pujols, Verlander can mow through this line-up with no problem.

The Rangers look very good on paper again. Keeping everyone healthy will be the main issue here. Elvis Andrus will be the only everyday player under 30 years old going once June rolls around. If they add Prince Fielder, they’ll be even tougher. Looking forward to seeing how Darvish does, if they can sign him. They need him to be an ace starter if they are to beat the Tigers again. This is the team to beat for the Tigers. The Tigers will be right there with them after they shore up their weakness at 3B before the play-offs begin.

by Keith-Allen on Jan 16, 2012 5:47 PM EST reply actions  

See?

There are plenty of worse-off teams than us. Relax!

by frisbeepilot on Jan 16, 2012 6:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Wake-forest-logo_small
Is Austin Jackson a top-five center fielder?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Is Prince Fielder earning his keep?
Small
Reading the Detroit News comments section on Tigers stories
Small
All-Time Tigers Team
Small
A Sunday with Dan and Jim
Small
2012 Detroit Tigers Draft Question
Amrita_rao_small
Elvis Andrus and Jurickson Profar
Img_1374_small
Scary moment for ex-Tiger Will Rhymes
Small
Austin Jackson: A mid-May appreciation
Tigers_logo_small
Advice on tickets, pre-game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Quick Rules

Do:

  • Treat others like you'd like to be treated.
  • Stick to the topic being discussed.
  • Make arguments based on facts, not emotion.
Don't:
  • Confuse BYB with talk radio, your blog or your social networking web site of choice. We're a baseball community.
  • Feed the trolls.

Commenting Code of Conduct


Managing Editor

Dsc0178-l_small Kurt Mensching

Deputy Editors

Meatcomputer-1_small BigAl

Sparky_anderson_wall_small Rob Rogacki

5532934019_b5fa57ae98_small allikazoo

Contributors

Good_to_great_leadership_image1-262x300_1__small Tigerdog1

Suss_small Matt Sussman

6m2bts_small Melissa Heyboer

Moderators

Be050826_small NCDee

Sifl_and_olly_small 13194013