Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Cowboys Draft 2012: The Big Board Version 3.0

Miguel Cabrera at third an experiment worth trying

For Miguel Cabrera, two gloves are better than one.

Let's just be honest with ourselves, and we don't need a single stat to back us up on this: The Tigers infield defense probably won't be pretty this season. For that matter, the outfield defense may not be beautiful, either. We're not going to see a lot of web gems on ESPN, and the ones we do will almost exclusively come from Austin Jackson.

I'm fine with that.

One reason for feeling that way is that I think -- as I've expressed -- people exaggerate when talking about sports. Shocking, I know. In a world of nuance, in sports, like in politics, people have a "bring it strong" mentality. If it's not the completely mindless shouting on ESPN (or CNN, or Fox, or wherever) -- as perfected by the completely pointless Stephen A. Smith and Skip Bayless -- then it's otherwise intelligent people with just as breathless proclamations, only with more numbers. We've had intelligent writers and people I respect tell us that bullpens don't matter and that the Tigers made all kinds of mistakes in signing Jose Valverde and Joaquin Benoit. Bullpens don't matter? I shudder to think what the Tigers would have looked like with Ryan Perry as the closer. But I guess you don't get to shout on ESPN or land a big-time gig by looking for shades of gray.

Can I blame them? I don't know. Maybe. There was a time when I would have been the one standing behind numbers and theories with certainty -- long time readers going back to my original Tigers blog can vouch for that. They've probably noticed the over-time transition that comes with experience -- watching as what we "know" doesn't always work out nearly as well as we'd like or ends up to be just plain wrong. I like to think I've learned from my mistake over time and have gained maturity and experience along the way.

Star-divide

This is what makes me such a fan of Lee Panas's sabermetric work. He wrote recently: "If you have read my blog before, you probably guessed what I think -- that the truth is in between the two extremes." Lee is the kind of guy who admits that there isn't one perfect defensive stat out there and looks at a range; that there isn't one perfect offense stat that sums it up, so he provides a couple that answer the specific question being asked. This is a terrific philosophy. It turns out, baseball is a lot like the weather. You can forecast all sorts of different models, but teasing out the one that comes closest to what actually occurs is as much an art as a science. And even then, you stand a good chance at being wrong.

So when I read opinions seemingly ranging from the Tigers infield defense will be the worst baseball has ever seen to the Tigers infield defense will be the worst baseball will ever see, I get a bit skeptical. Then I wonder if it even matters. Obviously, I cannot debate that the Tigers infield might resemble a softball team. You're not going to turn a pumpkin into a carriage here. Prince Fielder will still be below average at first base, whoever plays second isn't going to play particularly great, Jhonny Peralta has limitations in range as a shortstop, and Miguel Cabrera will doubtlessly remain below average at fielding third base.

So I think we can agree if an extra-innings game is decided by a ground-ball fielding competition when still tied after the 10th inning, the Tigers are almost certainly not going to pick up the extra point. Fortunately baseball, unlike another sport I enjoy, does not employ an All-Star Game skills competition to decide a winner of a tied game.

ESPN researcher Mark Simon, as cited by ESPN.com's Buster Olney today, writes that an infield of Fielder, Raburn, Peralta and Cabrera will be roughly 40 runs worse than average -- about 20 runs worse than Detroit's infield last year.

That's certainly not good -- especially if you're Rick Porcello.

You know what else isn't good? A combination of Brandon Inge and Don Kelly at third base. They combined for -26 batting runs last year. Or if you want to go in another direction, they were -0.5 offensive wins above replacement. Or if you prefer traditional stats, Kelly was the better batter of the two while hitting .245 with few walks and no power. Cabrera, meanwhile, came in at 71 batting runs or 7.8 oWAR. I don't need to do the math for you. That's a huge difference.

Balls will get by Cabrera, and he's going to make errors. But please put away the cartoonish view that Cabrera will stand at third base, let every ball go by, shrug his shoulders and smile like Alfred E. Newman. Let's realize Cabrera will make most plays and throw the ball to first base accurately most of the time -- where it should be noted, his first baseman is a damn good sight better than Carlos Guillen trying to field throws while literally standing in the base path like he did in 2008. In the end, what you lose in defense you're going to more than make up for in offense.

How big of a difference could this be? According to Panas' numbers, Detroit might have expected to get 7.5 WAR this year with Cabrera at first base and an Inge/Kelly platoon at third. Now with Fielder at first and Cabrera at third (below average defense factored in), Detroit might get 12 WAR from the corner infield positions. But I guess we don't need sabermetrics to tell us Cabrera is better than Inge and Kelly.

We'll see how a slimmed-down Cabrera looks at the hot corner when the full team reports for spring training in less than a month. So will his coaching staff. Then there will be more than 30 spring training games to get a feel for how the Cabrera-Fielder thing works out. If he's completely awful, can't make any plays and a total detriment to the team, he's probably not going to be playing there long. The Tigers will have to sort out a DH problem next year, but they've got 12 months to plan for that.

Me, I'm going to wait for actual baseball to be played before saying what Cabrera can't do. He's had a knack for proving the pundits wrong. In Detroit, it's in everyone's best interest that his experiment at third base works out.

Comment 146 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

My question is why does everyone insist Raburn stays at 2B?

With Cabby at 3B, Delmon moves to DH, and Raburn moves to the OF (where he’s probably average or better in the field). Santiago can handle 2B more than 50% of the time, and Worth/Kelly/Inge could fill in when he needs a rest.

by Matt Snyder on Jan 27, 2012 12:37 PM EST reply actions  

The important person does.

I can talk myself into Cabrera at third, but Young in LF, Raburn at 2B and better defenders/worse hitter at DH doesn’t make any sense to me.

More on how Cabrera at 3B, even if he’s bad, might work. Jay Jaffe at BP talking about how the move might work, using math.

by bdjeff42 on Jan 27, 2012 12:51 PM EST up reply actions  

read that article too

was a bit too saber-y to fit into the writing style I had but here’s the quote near the end that I liked:

One of the lessons of a two-part study I did last year is that at a team level, there’s little correlation with fielding ability, at least to the extent that we can measure it with one year of data, and winning—nowhere near the correlation that there is with offense and winning. There is literally no correlation—.00, folks—between corner infield FRAA and winning percentage.

by Kurt Mensching on Jan 27, 2012 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Moneyball

This is a very early SABR view: get the bats into the field, no matter what; defense be damned, runs created will > runs lost. Teams went probably too far that way and smart (or, maybe, poor) teams found value in defense. Bill James said one of his mistakes early was ignoring defensive contribution too much. Maybe the pendulum has swung the other direction? There is a spot in that discussion for the introduction of steroid testing.

Anyway, I think the point at which Cabrera offers less value at 3B because of his defense is lower than the point the team will keep him there. Or, he’d have to be more terrible at the hot corner than Jim Leyland can stomach before he doesn’t give more value than he would at 1B, using current WAR/RAA/whatever assumptions.

by bdjeff42 on Jan 27, 2012 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

My estimate for the "break even point" for Cabby at 3B is -27 runs.

I took a look at it in a blog post today: http://sabrtoothtigers.blogspot.com/2012/01/detroit-tigers-lineup-shuffling.html

I agree that I don’t think Leyland would allow a -27 run 3B to play very much, unfortunately.

sabrtoothtigers.blogspot.com

by Matt Snyder on Jan 27, 2012 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly

Using Cabrera at 3B AND Young in the OF should bring about an automatic firing of the manager.

sabrtoothtigers.blogspot.com

by Matt Snyder on Jan 27, 2012 1:23 PM EST up reply actions  

A firing out of a cannon.

"You, on the other hand, make Eeyore look like Rainbow Brite." -johnmoz

"I think of you more as the blue book style essay of sports journalism."-Kurt Mensching

by David Tokarz on Jan 27, 2012 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

JL on Mike & Mike this morning

said that’s exactly what he plans to do at the start. Miggy at 3B, Delmon in LF (with Boesch in RF and of course Prince at 1B). Justified it by saying it’s the traditional philosophy of power at all your corner positions.

by EalyEagle on Jan 27, 2012 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah! Rec'd for bravado.

Now you’re talkin!

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 27, 2012 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

This

Now you’re talking 2.0!

by Keith-Allen on Jan 27, 2012 3:29 PM EST up reply actions  

A groundball's best friend

The lack of correlation between corner infield FRAA and winning percentage is largely due to teams being able to balance the offense/defense tradeoff at those positions in combination with the lack of correlation between FRAA and fielding ability. If we look at some simple statistics, the Tigers allowed the second highest batting average in the AL on groundballs last year and the third highest average on bunts. Both of these averages were significantly higher than the corresponding numbers for the 2006 Yankees who earned Jaffe’s title of worst FRAA infield since 1951.

by GWilson on Jan 27, 2012 6:12 PM EST up reply actions  

No

Using DRS the Tigers worst 3 positions defensively (not counting pitcher where they were 2nd worst in MLB) were 2b, 3b, and rf where they ranked respectively 7th, 12th, and 10th in the AL in wOBA. Of course, the 2011 Opening Day lineup featured Rhymes, Inge, and Ordonez at those positions and the backup plans weren’t much better.

by GWilson on Jan 27, 2012 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure, blame it on RIO

Well, 3b is fixed offensively, big time
2b should be better, regardless of whether they use Raburn or Santiago
RF won’t have the struggling Magglio for half a season, offensively or defensively

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 27, 2012 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Defense may Championships...

The World Series winner was in the top 50% (16 MLB Teams) for fielding percentage in 10 of the last 11 years…

Let’s hope our challenges at 3B, 2B (Raburn), LF (Young / Raburn) and to some extent SS as Perralta compensates for 3B and 2B do not lead to a really bad overall defense.

Another point is the impact of extra outs and the unnecessary toll on the pitching staff…

by Boomer Dog on Jan 28, 2012 4:29 PM EST up reply actions  

If RR hits like he has in the last two months of the season the past two years

then I don’t see him sitting out many games, either against RHP’s or LHP’s.
Certainly against lefties, one would think that JL has him in LF.
I can’t see RR tearing it up and he sits vs RHP’s with Dirks/ Thomas/ Kelly in LF and Santiago at 2B.

The Miguel- Jhonny combo on the left side is not appealing. Miggy needs to guard the line to prevent doubles, and don’t worry about the singles going through the hole.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 27, 2012 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Raburn's Aug. & Sept.

JL still did not play Raburn like a Full Time Player in Aug. & Sept. The Tigers played a total of 54 games those two months. Raburn made an appearance in 36 of them (1 with 0 Plate Appearances, 3 with 1 PA, & 9 games with only 2 PA’s = 13 of his 36 games played he had 2 or less Plate Appearances). He started only 26 of those 54 games, and came in to finish games 10 times. 19 of those games he did not even get a hit & 25 of those games he did not have an RBI.

JL seems to know “when he’s hot, he’s hot & when he’s not, he’s not”.

Everyone knows I don’t like him but, we are stuck with him and I am fine with that. I still like this team as a whole right now very much. I don’t like JL either, but he seems to get the job done. I have a hard time Believing this but, they don’t get paid to agree with anything I say or think. They know more about the players than I can read in numbers on a web site or see on TV. And I’m pretty sure if DD makes any more moves I will be Okay with them. I hope!!!!

by TigersFan1957 on Jan 27, 2012 11:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that's a good point

And you can spell Raburn against tough righties with a guy like Andy Dirks or Clete Thomas, so that it works out to be a job sharing-style arrangement.

Of course, if I was conspiracy minded, I would argue that Raburn’s being penciled in at 2B because we’re going to make a move for left…

"You, on the other hand, make Eeyore look like Rainbow Brite." -johnmoz

"I think of you more as the blue book style essay of sports journalism."-Kurt Mensching

by David Tokarz on Jan 27, 2012 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

said to burly right-handed man: R-A-B-U-R-N

Every day each of us says the dumbest thing we are going to say that day.
qwantz.com

by JamesyRx on Jan 27, 2012 8:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I can't help but think

This may have something to do with the lineup comment you made wit Cespedes being located in LF.

… Regardless, I like it and agree.

by Let's do this! on Jan 27, 2012 10:24 PM EST up reply actions  

When Raburn is hitting, he hits righties and lefties

When RR is in a groove, ain’t no Andy Dirks, nor Clete Thomas, nor Don Kelly gonna even be in the conversation. I like all of them for the roles that they can play. I just hate to see them cast into roles that they’re not up to.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 27, 2012 11:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd rather see...

Cabrera @ 3rd, but he needs 2 hit the weightroom & take a few laps around Comerica, maybe run the steps, he seemed 2 soften up a bit the last couple years since the move 2 1st, but, would be beter than the dismal offense from that position. That bein said I’d rather see Santiago @ 2nd rather than Raburn, neither his offense & sertainly not his defense impresses me, Santiago would be more consistant I think, as far as gettin on base. Idk if Dave’s done, but I could another fielder comin in & movin Peralta 2 3rd & rotate Cabby & Fielder between 1st & DH, & then figure it out when we get vMart back.

by LTownDown on Jan 27, 2012 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

has he?

Well then he’s probly taking this seriously, that’s good, he’s a beast & he’s gonna be a big guy, but ya idk I haven’t seen pics of him lately. He’s just seemed kinda lathergic @ 1st, I think he’d be happier @ his OG position, he needs to be quicker, hopefully slimmin down’ll help with that.

by LTownDown on Jan 27, 2012 6:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree with this

Raburn is better that Young in the OF and why does Worth not get mentioned more. Keep him, release Inge and let Worth have some time at 3B, SS and 2B

by sabre paws on Jan 27, 2012 9:40 PM EST up reply actions  

"He's had a knack for proving the pundits wrong."

Hahahaha, love it!

I remember all the talk last season that he’s a worthless drunk who won’t do anything. I was laughed at when I drafted him #3 overall in my fantasy baseball league.

Miggy not only exceeded expectations, but he put up arguably his best offensive season.

If I have to bet one way or the other on this 3B issue, I’m betting Cabrera. Results talk. I can’t wait for baseball to start!

Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Fight!

by Brand New Hero on Jan 27, 2012 12:42 PM EST reply actions  

Full disclaimer:

I realize I’m exaggerating the “worthless drunk who won’t do anything” portion. Don’t lambaste me for it. :)

Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Fight!

by Brand New Hero on Jan 27, 2012 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I hate writers like Passan and Lynn "Hiya Fatty" Henning

You can be critical without being a dick, dude. Don’t you feel an obligation to at least be nice to other people?

"You, on the other hand, make Eeyore look like Rainbow Brite." -johnmoz

"I think of you more as the blue book style essay of sports journalism."-Kurt Mensching

by David Tokarz on Jan 27, 2012 12:59 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I hate Passan

With every fiber of my being.

And I still don’t hate him as much as he hates anything to do with the state of Michigan.

by MakeItTrizzle on Jan 27, 2012 3:14 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

I might not have taken him with the #3 pick

But not because of his off-field issues. I got Cabby in the second round.

"You, on the other hand, make Eeyore look like Rainbow Brite." -johnmoz

"I think of you more as the blue book style essay of sports journalism."-Kurt Mensching

by David Tokarz on Jan 27, 2012 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

MI or 3B are good choices

"You, on the other hand, make Eeyore look like Rainbow Brite." -johnmoz

"I think of you more as the blue book style essay of sports journalism."-Kurt Mensching

by David Tokarz on Jan 27, 2012 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow! That's impressive.

I lied, it was the #4 pick. But still, he finished as the #5 overall player last year. And no way was he falling to my second pick at #21.

Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Fight!

by Brand New Hero on Jan 27, 2012 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

David, what kind of league were you in that he lasted till the 2nd round?

was it an anti-Tiger league or just people who REALLY underestimated Miggy comin off the DUI?

I took him #3 overall in a couple leagues last year and was just happy to get him there. With the 3rd base eligibility coming this year I’d definitely take him #1 overall if I got the 1st pick… because I don’t think he makes it to 3 this year.

Did we really just sign Prince Fielder? Holllllllllly sh*t.

by tigers22 on Jan 27, 2012 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Heck yes. I'd take him #1 as well.

Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Drink, and Fight!

by Brand New Hero on Jan 27, 2012 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

The latter

A bunch of friends and the like. Plus it was a ten team league and I had (I think) pick six or seven. So it cycled around to me quickly.

"You, on the other hand, make Eeyore look like Rainbow Brite." -johnmoz

"I think of you more as the blue book style essay of sports journalism."-Kurt Mensching

by David Tokarz on Jan 27, 2012 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

A level-headed well thought out article.

Well played, sir, well played. I believe if everyone plays within themselves and makes effective decisions from their heads rather than from the dangly bits, then the defense should rate as a solid ‘’Good Enough". If anyone starts turning singles into triples with bonehead plays, well then they will have to sit in the DH timeout chair and think about what they’ve done.

by grath on Jan 27, 2012 1:00 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

nice line
they will have to sit in the DH timeout chair and think about what they’ve done.

by Kurt Mensching on Jan 27, 2012 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

A humble request

If someone has to sit on the DH Timeout Chair when the Tigers are on the field, they must be forced to wear a dunce-cap-style hat that says “Bad Defence” down the side of it.

by frisbeepilot on Jan 27, 2012 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Make the guy where an old Inge jersey

After he gets traded to the Astros

"i think it will be mostly feast the rest of the year,"

by Honeyman on Jan 27, 2012 6:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Neither am I.

Although, their “get an upper-deck ticket for all 80 home games except for Opening Day for $99” deal sure as hell gets me out to SkyDome.

by frisbeepilot on Jan 27, 2012 6:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Nor are we maple syrup guzzling surrender monkeys

THIS IS AMERIKUH.

"You, on the other hand, make Eeyore look like Rainbow Brite." -johnmoz

"I think of you more as the blue book style essay of sports journalism."-Kurt Mensching

by David Tokarz on Jan 27, 2012 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I was thinking about another backpack.

Kind of like the bullpen backpack, they could have a dugout backpack that the DH has to wear between at bats. The mental image of a pouty Cabrera sporting a pink My Little Pony backpack that is dwarfed by his 6’4’’ frame…it makes me chuckle.

by grath on Jan 27, 2012 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm more worried about Young playing left than Miggy at third

I’ve never seen a worse outfielder in the majors. From the way he gets himself into “position”, to his arm, it’s something out of my co-ed softball team (Rhonda plays left). The thought of a routine grounder to the left side pinballing around Comerica into a triple is not far-fetched.

Let Raburn and Kelly share left and give Ramon a chance to be our starting 2B once and for all. Let’s be relatively solid up the middle and lights-out bat-shit ox-strong at the corners

"i think it will be mostly feast the rest of the year,"

by Honeyman on Jan 27, 2012 1:09 PM EST reply actions  

I think Cabrera will be worse than Young...

But you’re right. He might not be.. Young lost about win and a half per year with his glove for the Twins.

Regardless, to have Fielder, Cabrera and Young on your team and still use the DH grab-bag Leyland mentioned yesterday would be negligent.

by bdjeff42 on Jan 27, 2012 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

"You, on the other hand, make Eeyore look like Rainbow Brite." -johnmoz

"I think of you more as the blue book style essay of sports journalism."-Kurt Mensching

by David Tokarz on Jan 27, 2012 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

The wall?

Urp.

"You, on the other hand, make Eeyore look like Rainbow Brite." -johnmoz

"I think of you more as the blue book style essay of sports journalism."-Kurt Mensching

by David Tokarz on Jan 27, 2012 7:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I like the weather analogy for sabermetrics.

Saying (for example) that wOBA is bullshit is akin to saying that dewpoint is bullshit. It’s a measurement derived from a set of data. You may not know what it is and you very well may not care, and you’re certainly free to disregard it. Just as if you’re interested in the chances of rain, you can go out and look at the sky, or you can also listen to the meteorological report on the local news.

by lesmanalim on Jan 27, 2012 1:09 PM EST reply actions  

How important is defense?

Half of the equation is scoring runs.
Half of the equation is run prevention.

Part of run prevention is defense.
Most of run prevention is pitching.

If 80% of run prevention is pitching, then 20% is fielding, or 10% overall.
Pitching in this case includes the catcher calling the game.
Defense includes holding runners, etc.

How important is defense at one position.
It’s most important at catcher, then SS, then CF, then 2B, then 3B/OF, or so we are told.

I’m not concerned about Cabrera at 3B. If he struggled defensively to the point where it hurt his hitting, I’d be real concerned. If it got to the point where he had to DH and put Delmon in LF, I’d be somewhat concerned. Let it ride and see what happens.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 27, 2012 1:28 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

I thought this was going to devolve into a Yogi Berra-ism

You know, “Baseball is 90% mental and the other half is physical,” or somesuch.

You make a good point, though. It’s hard to get mad at two guys at corner infield positions if they’re mashing the ball and getting on base like nobody’s business.

by frisbeepilot on Jan 27, 2012 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

This post nails it.

One thing we may see with Miggy and Prince at the corners is a lot more teams trying to bunt for singles. I would rather see that than a lot of doubles and triples down the baselines, as long as the corners do not throw the ball away trying to make a play. I have not watched Fielder field (so to speak), but I cannot remember the last time I saw Miggy make a bad throw, either tossing the ball to a covering pitcher or snapping one to second, third or home. He is pretty accurate.
I am also not worried about Miguel diving for a ball. Like someone noted, the physical risks are if anything less at third than at first. Short and second are more dangerous, because of the greater chance of getting a knee blown out by an aggressive baserunner.
And even the big version of Miguel is surprisingly quick and agile. Slimmed down, I think he will field the position just fine.
Delmon, on the other hand…..
Just let Raburn and Dirks share LF and use Kelly, Inge and Worth to back up all four infield positions (or at least 2nd, Short and 3rd. Seems silly to use Delmon in the field at any time when the DH slot is available.

by knucklescarbone on Jan 27, 2012 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice article

Well done.

If your parents didn't have any children, chances are you won't either

by Singledigit on Jan 27, 2012 1:36 PM EST reply actions  

single, every time I think about our new infield, I think about your "outs" complaints

You know the one: You have to get 27 outs, and you only get 27 outs. I just hope Cabrera and Fielder can convert as many chances into outs as humanly possible.

"You spend a good piece of your life gripping a baseball, and in the end it was the other way around..." Jim Bouton

by JimWalewander on Jan 27, 2012 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks Kurt for being a voice of reason.

I feel like our corner defense will be fine, if a little below average. Miggy will make the plays he should and Fielder is a serviceable 1st baseman who knows the position and works/plays hard to improve. We’ll miss Inge only on the foul pop-ups going back to his right and the once in a while insane acrobatic plays he makes, I think we’ll appreciate the offensive uprgrade just a bit more, and I for one never want to see Cabrera dive headlong into the stands!
As far as Raburn is concerned(I’m a hater), it’s obvious to all of us(why not Jim?) that he CAN’T play 2nd and I wish he wasn’t even in the conversation. That being said, I can live with him in left as long as he brings his bat all year. For all the talk of signing a starting 2nd baseman, Ramon is/was as good as anyone actually available, and I think with this lineup we can live with him as a starter for the year, with Worth available for when he or Peralta need a blow. Up the middle defense is so important that we need to keep it as solid as possible, i.e; no Raburn.
I think as long as our most usual outfield lineup includes Boesch, AJax, and Raburn, the defense won’t be noticebly worse than years previous. I’m of the opinion that BB is a decent fielder and with a little work on his routes and jumps (a la Kaline helping Gibby way back when), he could be a plus defender.
Just my two cents as a looong-time Tiger fanatic, and someone who thinks he knows what he’s talking about;). Can’t wait to get the show on the road, and hopefully it all works the way it could and should, especially when we get Victor back for the playoffs(please). Go Tigers!

by jlamb13 on Jan 27, 2012 1:44 PM EST reply actions  

Thank you Kurt

Rosenberg wrote something yesterday in the Freep which I agreed with: this is the starting point, not the finish line.

Leyland is going to try this and see how this works. If it doesn’t he’s going to have all the ammo he needs to start shifting people into positions they are probably more suited for and will take less heat from those players because he at least tried to put them in the spot they wanted to be in initally.

The Tigers have a good enough team to spend the first 3 months of the season finding out what works best. As long as they have it worked out by September (and they will), this “experiment” is going to go just fine.

by Big Z in Orlando on Jan 27, 2012 2:01 PM EST reply actions  

delmon

i dont know if this post fits but reading the article and reading everyones posts 2 things i think are gonna happen.yes,cabby isnt the best defensively at 3rd but ill take it if it keeps inge pickin pine out his rear.and 2,i think delmon is gonna have a monster year,he finally got healthy at the end last year.id much rather have raburn out in left,he does have some speed.i think that the tigers need to buy out inge,hes not happy and we dont need him sulking around the clubnouse,leyland said he wasnt.hes just not being the team guy he needs to be,yeah,losing a job sucks! but,put your big boy pants on and say “hey,where or how can i help?”

by tigerfaninboston on Jan 27, 2012 2:50 PM EST reply actions  

I agree with you

on two big points: I, too, think Delmon is going to have a very good year. He’s going to get a lot of good pitches to hit and he impressed me down the stretch and in the postseason. I think he’s being grossly undervalued. Also, I really think we need to buy out, or release, Inge. Partly because I feel bad for the guy and would like him to have a more realistic chance of contributing on another club, and two because he just doesn’t really have much left to offer us. Presuming Miggy is the starting 3rd baseman, Don Kelly would likely be the 2nd stringer, leaving Inge with little-to-no playing time.

Chicks dig me, because I rarely wear underwear and when I do it's usually something unusual

by BrianCMU. on Jan 28, 2012 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Someone said that Delmon was looking fit and trim

I think it might have been a commentator on the MLB network.
It’s a classic case of a player being in his “contract year”. The Tigers made it clear that they were going to bring Delmon back, but also made it clear that they were only open to giving him a one year contract. Maybe that’s what his agent wanted anyway, but the challenge has been put to him.

The Tigers picked up Delmon, hoping to catch lightning in a bottle. Being at the LDS against the Yankees, lightning struck that night. That homer to right center field (don’t ever remember DY hitting another one out to right) buys him a lot of slack with me. That, and the hot streaks that he has gone on with Minnesota.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 28, 2012 1:23 PM EST up reply actions  

If Delmon is going to have an awesome contract year and then sit on it when he gets paid

I am perfectly fine with that, provided we don’t re-sign him after this season. Let him pull an Adrian Beltre (in ’04) and sign with someone else for a huge sum of money

by handsomerob1 on Jan 28, 2012 3:12 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

It's hard to see Delmon coming back if Victor returns as the DH

I guess they could put him in LF, but….

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 28, 2012 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with jlamb. Raburn does not belong anywhere in this equation, He is far and away the worst fielding 2nd baseman of any in this discussion and really not even comparable to Santiago at the plate. a little more power but too many strikeouts. 114 last year for a .294 strikeout pct.
It was noted that Pince led the majors in 1st base errors with 15. it was not mentioned that Cabrerra made 13 and even Puhols made 11. not a huge difference, roughly 1 error extra about every 80 games,
The last year that Cabrerra played third all year his field pct was .957. Last year Inge was at .961, Still not much difference.
I also think we are overating the need for speed at the leadoff spot with this lineup. We need the leadoff hitter on base. I am almost 60 but I could still score from 2nd when Miggy and Prince hit em out. We need Jackson in center because he is great there. He needs to bat ninth where his 181 strikouts dont rob us of 75- 90 runs

by d-fan on Jan 27, 2012 3:48 PM EST reply actions  

Speed is necessary!

Top of the order runners DO need speed…most of Cabrera’s hits are NOT HR’s.

Runners need to…

- Score from 2B on singles
- Score from 1st on doubles
- Help stay out of DPs
- Pressure on IF Defense (Pitcher/Catcher: Steals, Infield: Bunts/IF Hits/etc)
- Pressure on OF Defense – Tagging up/etc

But agree…Raburn should NOT ever play 2B and Young should not ever play LF!

by Boomer Dog on Jan 27, 2012 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm over 60

and I could score from first on a homer.
lol

by Greg Sleight on Jan 27, 2012 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Tigers may lead MLB in GiDPs

Slow runners may score from 1B on HRs and some times on Doubles but what about the majority of the time…

2011

MC 197 Hits: 30 HRs (15%), 48 2Bs (24%) and 119 1Bs (60%)

PF 170 Hits: 38 HRs (22%), 36 2Bs (22%) and 95 1Bs (56%)

DY 127 Hits: 12 HRs (9%), 21 2Bs (17%) and 93 1Bs (73%)

How many RBI opportunities will Cabrera have if AJ strike outs 180 times again?

How about GiDPs…

MC 572 ABs – 180 Groundouts (31%) and 24 GiDPs

PF 569 ABs – 179 Groundouts (31%) and 17 GiDPs

Why extend innings (wear/tear on the pitching staff) with unneccessary outs by conceding to a poor defensive line-up and lack of speed on the bases for additional slugging…why not address the issue with a better defender / speed at 3B or SS or 2B.

by Boomer Dog on Jan 28, 2012 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Because fast guys don't hit for much power

We have 7 lineup spots that could feasibly hit 20+ home runs this season. Fielder and Cabrera will likely hit 30+ each. Boesch could hit anything from 10-30, if not more. Delmon, Avila, and Peralta could all reach 20 or more (though the likelihood of all three doing it in a season is pretty slim). Even Raburn and Santiago could feasibly combine for 20+ at 2B (they combined to hit 19 last season in about 700 combined plate appearances).

My point is this: there are going to be double plays next season. We need to accept that now. The assumption that the Tigers’ coaching staff and front office is making is that the power coming from the majority of the lineup will more than offset the risk of grounding into double plays.

by handsomerob1 on Jan 28, 2012 4:21 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Double plays are more about opportunity

The top teams in OBP are usually the top teams in DP’s.

BOS: 1st in OBP and 5th in DP’s
NYY: 2nd in OBP and 3rd in DP’s
STL: 3rd in OBP and 1st in DP’s
DET: 4th in OBP and 4th in DP’s
TEX: 5th in OBP and 6th in DP’s

Which of these teams won the World Series?

by Keith-Allen on Jan 28, 2012 7:11 PM EST up reply actions  

If Cabby doesn't

work out at 3rd. How about LF?
Not many really good fielders for LF on the tigers anyway.

by Greg Sleight on Jan 27, 2012 4:14 PM EST reply actions  

I was thinking about this too.

A couple of years ago, due to some sort of weird injury, the Twins put Joe Mauer in right field for a game. He’d never played RF in the majors, or minors, or high school, or Little League. And he did just fine.

Would it really be that terrible to put Miggy out in left field? He seems like a guy who could figure something like that out. Hell, he’s figured out how to put an ungodly hurt on a baseball more often than pretty much anyone else in the game, and apparently that’s about the most difficult thing to do in all of sports. It might be worth a shot.

by frisbeepilot on Jan 27, 2012 4:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Tigers Corner Defense Will Be Horrible & Hurt Team's Chance to Win Games

I don’t think it’s a matter of the “experiment” being “worth trying.” The Tigers have to have Cabrera’s bat in the lineup, and with Martinez likely coming back in 2013 as the DH, Cabrera has to get playing time.

The fact that this post has even been written—and commented on plenty—reflects what an obvious problem potentially horrendous defense is for the team. Talking about it more to make oneself feel better is silly, though unsurprising.

I do agree that left field (or anywhere) may be a better place for him. Why? Cabrera has only played full-time at third for two seasons in his career—and made 40 errors during those two seasons (certainly the worst in baseball during that time). And the last time he played there regularly was 2008—or probably 20 pounds ago.

Does anyone think he will be as good as he was then, when he was clearly not good?

Cabrera at one corner and Fielder at the other will give the team the worst, most immobile, and error-prone corner defense in baseball—by a good margin—and perhaps the worst in many years. Fielder led all 1B in errors last year.

(It’s true that Pujols made 11 errors, and by his standards it was a very bad year defensively—an aging player who was showing it all year. So you’d expect Fielder, in a couple years, to be even worse than he is now, with balls trickling off his glove, etc. For him, 15 errors was also a bad year—but he’s made 14 and 17 before, too. Thank god for the DH. Prince may be sitting at DH by the time he’s 30.)

You can number-crunch all you want about how teams simply have to score more runs than the opposition. Clearly true—but no teams win it all with good offense and poor defense. The Cardinals would have not sniffed the postseason had they not replaced Ryan Theriot (playing out of position, and poorly) with Rafael Furcal, just as one example. The defense righted itself at the essential time.

I think Detroit fans can remember how badly the team’s defense was when the Cardinals beat them in the World Series in 2006: an embarrassment, though largely the fault of skittish pitchers who Leyland didn’t think ever had to learn how to throw a guy out at third or first. Next year’s version, instead of perhaps being shockingly bad in the field, will be expected to be bad. That’s the way the owners seem to want it.

One saving grace is that no other team in the division has really improved itself—and certainly not enough to challenge the Tigers very seriously. It’s their division to win, or lose, doing it their way.

by Mark Twain_STL on Jan 27, 2012 8:44 PM EST reply actions  

Welcome to BYB Brandon Inge

Next time you see Don Kelly can you ask him to drop in and say hello? We love him here and think he’s a Wizard. Thanks.

by Keith-Allen on Jan 27, 2012 9:39 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Ehh

I’m not worried about that. You can’t permanently DH either Cabrera or Fielder yet — despite their terrible defense. Especially next year when Martinez comes back. And as far as I’m concerned the amount of runs that they will create will GREATLY out number the amount of runs they’ll give up making it better to feel good about.

by Let's do this! on Jan 27, 2012 10:29 PM EST up reply actions  

No, really

Look at the numbers. An extra 10 errors or missed plays at the corners will not make much difference over the season. Post-season, there might be one game that a missed play at one of the corners makes a difference in a game.
On the other hand, having the ability to have, this year, Miggy, Delmon (at DH), and the Prince in the same lineup will win a boat-load of regular season games, and more than one in the post-season.

by knucklescarbone on Jan 27, 2012 10:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, it's going to hurt

But it’ll be offset by replacing Brandon Inge’s bat with MIGUEL CABRERA’S.

We’ll be ok.

"You, on the other hand, make Eeyore look like Rainbow Brite." -johnmoz

"I think of you more as the blue book style essay of sports journalism."-Kurt Mensching

by David Tokarz on Jan 30, 2012 11:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Kaline said he would work with Young during the off season.

I remember another time he said that about a player. A few years back there was a guy with a great bat, pretty useless glove and “the worst arm in the majors”. His name was Gibson or something….

by Ty Cobb from the grave says.. on Jan 27, 2012 8:49 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Is it really an "experiment"

If it’s already been tried and tested?

I know it’s it’s not a double-blind gold standard test, but are we really make that huge of a leap of faith?

Consider this, our other options aren’t that much better, at least for the next couple f years.

by H2OPoloPunk on Jan 28, 2012 2:25 AM EST reply actions  

Cabby

Guys and gals lets not forget what position Cabby played in Fla. when we signed him. He was a 3rd baseman who played well enough there for us to pay him BIG free agent money. Yes he was signed for his bat but he must have been at least an average 3rd baseman. Also lets not forget that Inge wasn’t exactly Brooks Robinson at 3rd. If the team has Avila, Peralta, Santiago, and Jackson up the middle their defense will be ok. The outfield with Jackson, Boesch, and whoever in LF won’t be horrible. Would like too see a trade for a decent hitting and fielding LF but probably not going to happen. If they do anything more I would think it would be with the pitching staff aka 5th starter. I don’t see any major trades until maybe the trade deadline if the team is in contention. Oh, and there is always the Cespedes thing still hanging out there!

by LarryLive on Jan 28, 2012 10:53 AM EST reply actions  

If I'm the other AL Central teams

I’m putting out the fastest line-up I can find and bunting the living daylights out of Cabrera and Fielder until they can show they can put three outs up before letting a run score.

Fan of the Detroit Tigers, Lions and Red Wings.

by Elfuego51 on Jan 28, 2012 11:22 AM EST reply actions  

That would be great for us.

It’s usually the pitcher and catcher that field the bunts. So more than half of those plays will be super easy outs. Even against a Little League defense, you won’t score many runs if you can’t hit the ball past the infield grass.

If I was the opposition, I’d try hit the ball hard and hope to find a hole. Our 5.5 hole will be like the Grand Canyon.

by Keith-Allen on Jan 28, 2012 12:37 PM EST up reply actions  

If I'm the other AL Central teams

I’d be shitting my pants right about now.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 28, 2012 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Bunting is a lost art*

Not that many guys can pull it off anymore to where it would actually be dangerous

*by “art,” I mean art in terms of fingerpainting or watercolors.

by handsomerob1 on Jan 28, 2012 3:13 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Hope Inge is traded before he poisons the dugout...

I’m a big Inge fan, but he hasn’t handled sitting before and I doubt he will now. Find him a new home before spring please. Also please let that grass grow till the ball can’t be found.

"Always 1984"

by Hack Johnson on Jan 28, 2012 2:02 PM EST reply actions  

Anybody can be moved...

If Inge cannot handle the limited starts v LHPs and late inning defensive replacement role to the point where he is a distraction to the team he needs to either be traded or released.

Given his ego and the team’s penchant for “taking care of him” he may agree to a trade and the possibility of playing elsewhere if the Tigers make it palatable for the other team.

by Boomer Dog on Jan 28, 2012 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Inge is a 10 and 5 player

He has veto power over trades. As Knuckles says above me, between his 10-5 status, contract and lack of production, Inge is all but untradeable.

I'm owner/editor of The Wayne Fontes Experience a deputy editor at Bless You Boys, host the Bless You Boys Podcast and co-host The Knee Jerks podcast.

by BigAl on Jan 28, 2012 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

And that is basically what Dombrowski is saying.

That and the Tigers are still optimistic he can contribute in a positive way.
http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120127&content_id=26489548&vkey=news_det&c_id=det
In some respects it would be best if Brandon asked to be traded, although the Tigers would undoubtedly have to eat part of his salary to move him. At best they could hope to get a third-tier prospect in exchange, but moving him would get him out of the dugout if he is truly unhappy with his role, and would probably open up a slot for Danny Worth on the roster (which I would like to see).

by knucklescarbone on Jan 28, 2012 3:13 PM EST up reply actions  

-40 ...is generous

If raburn is the primary second baseman, I say -60 feels about right for that infield…its gonna be historically brutal… #cantwaittowatchthetrainwreck

by Wolverine119 on Jan 28, 2012 6:07 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Release Inge - Give him a chance to hook up elsewhere

I’ve always been a Brandon Inge fan. Just thought he was a good player most of his career and I appreciated that he chose to live in Michigan year round plus all the charity stuff made him special.

But we all know he ain’t comin back after 12 so maybe it is time to cut ole’ number 15 before he becomes either a problem in the club house or a fall back player if Cabrera makes 14 errors like he did when he first got to Detroit. It would be an expensive buy out at 5 million but they have eaten more before. He cannot be back up catcher as we now have Laird and I doubt that he could adjust to second or short at this stage of his career.

I suppose he could be a back up outfielder and an emergency ONLY 3rd baseman but his bat does not justify an outfield position and if he is on the team JL will not be able to resist that late inning subbing for Miggy and I don;t think we can afford to take him out late inning too often.

Say good bye to Brandon until it is time to bring him back as a broadcaster, coach, or manager.

by Michigan Jim on Jan 28, 2012 9:21 PM EST reply actions  

Inge

Back to posting about 4 letter words again…ok.

I wouldn’t be in any rush to unload Brandon. As horrific as his hitting was last year, it was still very close statistically to what Laird hit the last time he was in Detroit, and Laird can’t play third, or outfield, or…Laird’s not even that great a catcher. As far as Inge v Kelly is concerned, both are ok defenders anywhere, both below average hitters (Kelly isn’t going to learn to walk this season), but for Inge, the greater cost is sunk – why toss the money away? I’ve never seen Inge play 2B, but I’m betting he’s better there than Raburn. Give him a try in the spring, and if it works, play him against lefties. As has been suggested here, on those days put Raburn in left, DH Delmon.

Ok, these are all lemonade from lemons arguments, but simply discarding a guy, paying a guy millions to do nothing when you’re well below average with several other players – well, it seems a bit silly to me.

by Bigpaw on Jan 29, 2012 8:32 AM EST reply actions  

Laird is actually a pretty good defensive catcher

which is partially why he was signed (familiarity with the pitching staff also probably played a big role). You can afford to have some drop off at the plate with a good defensive catcher (which further emphasizes how important Avila was to this team last year), but typically 3rd base has been a position where you expect some solid offensive production. We haven’t really had that luxury in Detroit much, sadly.

by handsomerob1 on Jan 29, 2012 8:56 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Laird

Had they signed Fielder early, I doubt they’d have signed Laird. I suspect they’d have tried hard to bring up a rookie as backup catcher, then used Inge as fallback. As a backup catcher, Laird adds no more than Inge would to the lineup.

by Bigpaw on Jan 29, 2012 9:38 AM EST up reply actions  

with a $130m roster

I think having an experienced backup who is familiar with his pitchers who only costs $1 million is a pretty good decision.

by Kurt Mensching on Jan 29, 2012 10:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Laird and Inge both do much better vs LHP's

So if you’re going to give Miggy a break from 3B or Avila a break behind the plate, that would be the time to do it. If it coincides with Kid Rick starting that day, so much the better. Somehow, though, I doubt that any pitcher would get too excited about Laird and Inge being in the lineup on his start days.

"King of Minutiae"

by Tigerdog1 on Jan 29, 2012 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Hmmmm

Adding a $1M backup catcher when you already have a $6M backup catcher is questionable, at best

by Bigpaw on Jan 29, 2012 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Inge isn't a backup catcher

Don Kelly was the emergency catcher last season for a reason.

by handsomerob1 on Jan 29, 2012 2:54 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Inge's knees

Are not those of a catcher, even an emergency backup catcher.

"Virtually all tactical ploys—the sacrifice bunt, the stolen base, the hit-and-run—operate on average to reduce run scoring." -- Eric Walker

by johnmoz on Jan 29, 2012 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

If Inge were truly an option at catcher

he probably would not have been DFA’d last year, and Omir Santos would not have been brought up. It would have solved a lot of problems if Inge could still catch, but he can’t. Sorry for piling on.

by knucklescarbone on Jan 29, 2012 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Inge

Don Kelly caught all of 6 innings last year. Kelly could catch, but didn’t; same is true of Inge. Santos did not replace Inge. Santos was brought up as insurance for Martinez. Inge was still seen as a starting third baseman. Betemit replaced Inge.

Until they got Fielder, Inge was seen as the third baseman for 2012. You don’t take your third baseman out of his position and make him a backup catcher, unless you have a replacement. That’s my point. Peralta could probably catch, if need be. Lots of folks here have suggested 2B for Peralta. He won’t move until he’s replaced; neither would Inge. He was sent down last year to get his swing back, to start at third. If they had given up on him, he could have become backup catcher when Betemit arrived.

The suggestion is that Inge’s knees are more rickety than Jorge Posada’s, who actually caught last year. I think that’s ridiculous.

by Bigpaw on Jan 29, 2012 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Inge hasn't caught since 2008

And we suggest that Inge’s knees are more rickety than Posada’s because he’s had surgery on both of them to repair patellar tendonitis, which is Latin for “rickety ass knees.” There is no situation in which Inge spends time behind the plate in 2012. I’ll be surprised if he even goes out to warm up someone between innings while Avila is getting his gear on.

by handsomerob1 on Jan 29, 2012 7:43 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Inge started 144 games at third in 2010, after patellar surgery

Shoot man, think a little. Inge was a regular, started in a difficult defensive position for two years SINCE surgery, but his knees can’t handle warming up a pitcher? Just because you heard “rickety knees” as justification for not using Inge as backup catcher doesn’t mean it’s true. Inge has been a favorite of Leyland’s and doesn’t see himself as a sub in any position. Period. Leyland was willing to support that. For the past two years, Leyland saw Inge as a starter at third, and Inge could tell him, “A starter at third shouldn’t be a backup catcher.” Now, Leyland has an option. Inge will have to find another position. He could catch. He objects to catching. That’s ok, they have Laird. If they didn’t have Laird, today, Inge would be looking at 40 starts at catcher, 20 at third. Nope. Instead, they spent “smart” money on Laird, and Inge is looking for a trade, which he won’t get.

by Bigpaw on Jan 29, 2012 9:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Trust me, I'm thinking

Inge’s knees were shot to the point of needing surgery (seriously, you have some BAD patellar tendonitis if you need surgery) because of all the years spent in a catcher’s crouch. Believe it or not, having your knees fully bent for long periods of time isn’t exactly good for you. Surgery isn’t a cure-all either. Whether he wanted to or not (and clearly he wanted to), he wasn’t going to last much longer as a catcher.

If they didn’t have Laird, today, Inge would be looking at 40 starts at catcher, 20 at third.

No, he wouldn’t. Period. The Tigers don’t see Inge as a catcher just as much as Inge (or his knees) doesn’t see himself as a catcher. If they didn’t have Laird now, they would still be looking to sign a backup catcher on the cheap. Inge will still get the 60 games you are suggesting this season, but most (if not all) will still be at 3B.

And yes, Inge played 144 games at 3B in 2010, but that doesn’t mean he should have. Complete rehab from knee surgery starts at around 6 months, depending on the invasiveness of the procedure. Patellar surgery isn’t as rough as something like an ACL repair, so a guy coming back in 4-5 months isn’t unheard of. Inge’s April power numbers that season support that claim. However, the season-long workload took its toll, and his numbers declined afterward.

by handsomerob1 on Jan 29, 2012 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

You are missing the point.

Santos was brought up as the backup catcher because Victor was not physically up to the task, EVEN THOUGH Inge was also available. Why?
Because Inge was also not physically able to fill the role as backup catcher.
Criticizing Tiger management for bringing in a backup catcher (i.e. one who can actually play the position) so Avila does not have to catch 162 games (“Adding a $1M backup catcher when you already have a $6M backup catcher is questionable, at best”) is, well, “questionable at best.”
I hereby retract my apology for piling on.

by knucklescarbone on Jan 29, 2012 11:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe you guys can help me out

Cite for me the quote from Inge or his physician that says he can’t catch because of his knees. Find the quote from Leyland that says Inge won’t catch because he’s physically incapable. It’s one thing for you folks to surmise this stuff, but another altogether to actually know. Show me a quote from any of those three and I’ll shut up.

Knuckles, thanks, but I already answered your question. I think the Tigers were ready to part ways with Inge, but rather than making him a backup catcher, they let him try to regain something in the minors. This really follows a pattern in Tiger management. Polanco, for example, could have stuck around as a utility guy – he didn’t, he’s a starter. Why did Laird leave? Because he didn’t want to be a backup,
that’s why, and management wouldn’t ask him to do it.

For Leyland, there’s a huge chasm between starting and subbing. You see it with Santiago. Ramon could start 120 games this year, but Leyland will still consider him a sub. You see it with Raburn. Ryan is just not going to be handed a position. On the other side, you see Austin Jackson as purely a starter. He could platoon, but doesn’t. Neither did Granderson.

Inge is the longest tenured Tiger. I suspect they’d have welcomed Inge coming forward and saying he’d caddy for Avila. He didn’t, and I’m suggesting they’d rather cut him loose, or trade him, than make him a back bencher. Knees are a nice excuse, but that’s all they are.

by Bigpaw on Jan 30, 2012 6:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Cite for me the quote from Inge or his physician that says he can’t catch because of his knees. Find the quote from Leyland that says Inge won’t catch because he’s physically incapable. It’s one thing for you folks to surmise this stuff, but another altogether to actually know. Show me a quote from any of those three and I’ll shut up.

I never said that Inge “can’t” catch because of his knees. I have no idea what the dynamic is like between Inge, Leyland, and the rest of the Tigers’ brass in why they think that he’s not a catcher anymore, but it’s pretty clear that they don’t see him as a catcher anymore.

And why are you so certain that Inge would be the backup catcher? Laird is a better defender behind the plate and both are pretty bad at hitting, so $1M seems like a solid investment to me.

by handsomerob1 on Jan 30, 2012 8:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Inge

I know I’m beating this to death, but my original point was that I doubt Laird would have been signed if (1) Fielder were signed first, and (2) Inge agreed to catch. Why spend a million on a guy who left you a year ago if you have somebody on board who needs a role and is willing to catch? Was there ever an official announcement that Inge couldn’t catch? If there was, I haven’t seen it. Folks know that Inge was ruled out as a backup catcher – most assume it’s because of his knees; I assume it’s because he was seen as a starter elsewhere.

Other than possibly LOOGY, backup catcher is the least significant position on the roster. I was glad last year when the Tigers had a situation where both catchers would be on the field. I’d prefer if Inge could catch and they didn’t need to waste a roster spot on Laird.

I’m not certain of anything with regard to professional baseball. For all I know, Inge will be released next week.

by Bigpaw on Jan 30, 2012 8:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Inge was emergency catcher over Kelly at one point last season

Chris Iott, 8/22/2011:

Brandon Inge took some playing time at third base from utility man Don Kelly when he returned to the Detroit Tigers from Triple-A Toledo over the weekend. Inge also displaced Kelly as the team’s emergency catcher. “He’d be the No. 1 guy,” Tigers manager Jim Leyland said of Inge. With Victor Martinez unavailable to catch due to a knee injury, the Tigers would have to go to a position player if an injury were to force starter Alex Avila from a game. That player would be Inge, if he were available to do so. “He’s not going to start a game catching,” Leyland said of Inge. “But that gives us more flexibility and less worries.”

http://www.mlive.com/tigers/index.ssf/2011/08/tigers_brandon_inge_replaces_d.html

"Virtually all tactical ploys—the sacrifice bunt, the stolen base, the hit-and-run—operate on average to reduce run scoring." -- Eric Walker

by johnmoz on Jan 30, 2012 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Inge

Thanks. That dispels the thought that Inge was “physically unable” to step in as catcher.

I’ve suggested that, with Inge lacking a well-defined role for 2012, assuming Cabrera successfully transitions to third, Inge could have been a fallback position at catcher. It seems moot now, with Laird on board. It might not have worked anyway.

I don’t know about you folks, but I’d have Brandon Inge and his $6M+ sunk cost bringing a catcher’s mitt, as well as infielder’s and outfielder’s gloves to spring training.

by Bigpaw on Jan 30, 2012 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

The difference between an emergency backup and

a regular backup seems to be where we differ.
" the Tigers would have to go to a position player if an injury were to force starter Alex Avila from a game."
Laird was signed, not to ride the pine all season with his mitt on his head but with the idea that he will catch, maybe, 20-30 games or more, to keep Alex from wearing out over the season. That was the plan for Victor when he was signed. Laird was signed before Victor’s injury, because it was clear the Tigers needed a regular backup catcher who could actually play and that they would not be able to rely on Victor as a regular backup catcher going forward. Inge was never considered for that role, and whether it was because of his knees, or because he was unwilling, or because the Tigers were too considerate to insist on it, or because the Tigers figured a guy who has actually been playing catcher on a regular basis over the last few years would be better suited for the role, I suppose we will never know for certain. Frankly, it is likely a combination of all of the above.

by knucklescarbone on Jan 30, 2012 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

In retrospect

to nitpick, one might suggest that getting Laird, then signing Fielder, with apparent disregard that you have a $6M time bomb named Inge already on the roster, is exorbitant, but that’s, as I say, nitpicking. You build your roster, and you work around sunk cost. They did it with many, many excessive contracts in the recent past – they can do it now with Inge. I’m thrilled that they have Fielder, I’m hoping that Cabrera can go back to third base, and it would be nice to find a productive spot for Inge – if not backup catcher, then elsewhere.

As I mentioned earlier, I was happy last season when the Tigers didn’t have a traditional backup catcher who expected to play only 30-40 games a year. I think the future of the game is teams carrying utility players, such as Inge and Kelly, who can also be the backup catcher. Going to a “position player” instead of a backup catcher to replace the regular catcher should be the norm. I know it’s “only” a million dollars, and it’s “only” the 25th roster spot, but I abhor the waste of money on a guy like Laird if the cash can be spent more efficiently.

by Bigpaw on Jan 30, 2012 6:41 PM EST up reply actions  

The Tigers have a year to experiment and still be really good.

Trying Miggy at 3B is what they have to do. I think he will be fine. Cabrera has devoped into a fine 1B with a srong and accurate arm. He’s says 3B is his natural position so it’s not like it’s a huge challenge. Just get our pitchers to finish on the left side of field always. The thought od RaBum being a starter anywheres makes me sick. He isn’t much better defensively than DYoung if you watched all the games last year. I’d prefer him to be the backup 2B. The Tigers have options this year. If DYoung hurts us then we can have Dirks out there. I think Dirks deserves a chance..more than Ra BUM. Maggs ins’t doing anything right now. Maybe he’ll sign for a year and man RF which he still does fine and is a professional hitter if healthy. Besides he is a fan favorite. I surely would rather see Dirks or Maggs in than RaBum. The fans shouldn’t have to tolerate Ra BuM and his NOT hitting for the first 3 months ever again because then we wonder who’s butt he is kissing. They have a year to experiment becuase when VMart comes back he is going to play. Adding VMart and we won the division by 15 games. He was their MVP offensively. Miggy is a great player and always produces..that’s a given and we are very lucky to have him. I love DYoung and his intensity at plate on EVERY pitch. Why not try Inge at middle infield spots so he can be a quality backup, maybe even win 2B job if he hits somewhere OVER the Mendoza line. One thing I like about Ramon is that he is a SURE fielder and NEVER complains unlike Inge who let’s not forget is still makig 5.5 mil this year. Go Tigers..hope that Miggy works out and can’t wait for 2013 with the awesome VMart back.

by harley5571 on Jan 29, 2012 11:43 AM EST reply actions  

What about the possibility of Cabrera getting hurt?

There is an increased risk of injury with Cabrera playing 3B.

He is not in the same shape as his previous attempt and is very competitive.

Youkilis hurt himself playing out of position at 3B.

Maybe Trumbo will prove adequate at 3B for Angels and free up an INF by the break.

by Boomer Dog on Jan 29, 2012 1:13 PM EST reply actions  

Realizing this thread is about dead,

here is something I do not believe has been pointed out.
Last half of last year the starting third baseman most games was
Wilson Betemit. He was there only for his bat, and was NOT good defensively. I seem to recall him making a throwing error the first time he touched the ball as a Tiger (threw the ball into the ground about halfway to first).
There is a very good chance that Miggy will be less error-prone than Betemit, even if he has slightly less range.

by knucklescarbone on Jan 29, 2012 5:05 PM EST reply actions  


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hpim0067_small
Tigerdog's Spring Training Poetry
Detroit-tigers-logo_small
Winter Ball Wrap-Up: Venezuela
Detroit-tigers-logo_small
Winter Ball Wrap-Up: Dominican Republic

Recent FanPosts

Small
Old Gloves and Memories
Small
Why Cabrera needs time at 3B...
Small
Are You Interested in Fantasy Baseball?
Dsc01480_small
Questions about Pitchers and Catchers reporting
Sparky_anderson_wall_small
What Are Your Favorite Things About Being a Tigers Fan?
Tigers1978_800x600_small
2012: The Year Of The Tigers
Small
How Can I Hate the Signing of Prince Fielder?
Copy_of_tiger_camp_015_small
Succeeding Jim Leyland

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Quick Rules

Do:

  • Treat others like you'd like to be treated.
  • Stick to the topic being discussed.
  • Make arguments based on facts, not emotion.
Don't:
  • Confuse BYB with talk radio, your blog or your social networking web site of choice. We're a baseball community.
  • Feed the trolls.

Commenting Code of Conduct


Managing Editor

Dsc0178-l_small Kurt Mensching

Deputy Editors

Meatcomputer-1_small BigAl

Sparky_anderson_wall_small handsomerob1

5532934019_b5fa57ae98_small allikazoo

Contributors

Hpim0067_small Tigerdog1

6m2bts_small Melissa Heyboer

Moderators

Be050826_small NCDee

Sifl_and_olly_small 13194013