Rick Porcello opts for Arbitration
In a move that is just a mere formailty for Rick Porcello, yet likely to be one of the last of its kind in Major League baseball, the Tigers' starting pitcher has decided to exercise an escape clause on an option for the 2012 season that would have paid him $ 1.344 million for the season. Opting for arbitration, he stands to make closer to $ 4.25 million, based on comparable salaries of pitchers with similar experience and performance levels.
The Tigers drafted Porcello with the 27th pick in the 2007 draft out of Seton Hall Prep High School in New Jersey, and signed him to a major league contract that included a signing bonus of $3.58 million, plus salaries of $380k for 2007, and just over $1 million for each of the 2008, 2009 and 2010 seasons. The deal also included a club option for 2011 at $ 1.536 million, which the Tigers exercised without hesitation. Those salaries netted the Tigers starter almost $3 million above the major and minor league standard fare for those seasons.
Porcello's contract drew some interest at the time it was signed, not only because Porcello was the most highly rated high school pitcher in that year's draft. A key issue was that the Tigers went way over Commissioner Bud Selig's slot recommendation, which drew the ire of the Commissioner's Office. Selig was attempting to limit the amount of bonuses given to newly drafted players.
The fact that Porcello was given a major league contract guaranteed that the pitcher would be in line much sooner for the big dollars that players can get through arbitration after three years of major league service, and through free agency after six years of service in the major leagues. He also began burning up his "option years" right away, which put him on the fast track to the majors.
There won't be any more major league contracts given to amateur draft choices, as the new collective bargaining agreement between the players and owners expressly prohibits such contracts. We also won't be seeing the kind of bonuses or salaries given out that were given to Porcello, as clubs will now be subject to very strict penalties for paying players bonuses above the amounts that will be set for each club.
Although the Tigers exercised the 2012 option, the contract contained an escape clause that allowed Porcello to choose arbitration in the event that he was eligible at the time, which he is. Porcello has accrued two years plus 170 days on the major league roster, just shy of the three year mark, but enough to qualify as a "super two" player. The minimum requirement for arbitration this off season is two years and 146 days. In fact, Porcello has accrued the greatest amount of service time of any of the "super two" players that are eligible for arbitration in 2012.Being eligible for arbitration is, of course, good news for Porcello. But the good news for the Tigers is that their young pitcher will not accrue six years of service time until after the 2015 season, meaning that he will be under "club control" for four more seasons. Had he not been sent down to the minors twice briefly during his time with the Tigers, he would have been eligible for free agency a year sooner as I explained in this article.
Porcello joins Max Scherzer, Delmon Young, Phil Coke, and Don Kelly as arbitration eligible players this winter. Young is eligible for the third and final time, while this will be the first year of eligibility for the others. Kelly and former Tiger Ryan Perry were also eligible as "super two" players.
Players and clubs have until January 18 to exchange proposed salary figures with each other, and hearings will be tentatively scheduled for February. If the two sides do not agree on salary terms, a three member arbitration panel will choose one number or the other, and the player will be on a one-year contract for that amount. Tigers GM Dave Dombrowski has a perfect record of avoiding arbitration, as he has managed to reach an agreement with every player that has been eligible for arbitration during his tenure in Detroit.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
eh
few more million, but what can ya do
No longer the Founder, President and CEO of the Ryan Raburn Fan Club
How many yachts does Porcello need to ski behind?
He’s had one huge payday out of high school and what he is making now it not chicken feed. Time to produce RichKid Rick.
"But the point is, finger-pointing is just what sports fans do when something doesn't go right." -- Kurt Mensching
by RealityIsOptionable on Jan 6, 2012 7:19 PM EST reply actions
It's not Porcello's fault that MLB players make far more than everyone else.
Realistically, he’d be foolish not to opt for arbitration. Anyway, think of all the tax dollars we’ll get out of his raise.
The 99 percenter in me is screaming right now.
I'm going to come find you and offer to triple your salary without any other changes in your job
then criticize you when you decide to accept the offer.
Ok, not really, but this is essentially what we’re talking about here.
by Rob Rogacki on Jan 6, 2012 8:57 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Player salaries are kept artificially low until they get to arbitration
then, they start to get closer to fair market value.
Only when they hit free agency, after up to four years waiting to get on a roster, plus three more years when they can be optioned, plus six years of major league service time, then they get to market their services freely. To billionaires.
"King of Minutiae"
I know this
But criticizing Porcello for turning down the opportunity to make more money doesn’t make any sense.
I understand his position
And yes if I was Rick I’d do the same thing. I’m just not happy because the pie is only so big and in my opinion he has not lived up to exceptions. The money is the part of baseball I hate.
"But the point is, finger-pointing is just what sports fans do when something doesn't go right." -- Kurt Mensching
by RealityIsOptionable on Jan 6, 2012 10:00 PM EST up reply actions
I despise the money involved in modern day free agency.
IMO, the system has it backwards; in no sane universe should a 39-41 year old Albert Pujols make 26 million, while players in their prime make far less. The gap is assanine; to willingly overpay because someone is a free agent is just wrong in my opinion, especially when it is leveled out by not paying players in their prime for their 6 six years of major league service time. It just seems like such a ridiculous way to justify things.
Tired of generic music??? Exterminate All Rational Thought is here to help!
And yet . . .
. . . the money isn’t all that out of line when you look at rock stars and Hollywood actors.
by rea on Jan 7, 2012 9:01 AM EST up reply actions
No. Not totally.
But they are all far more useless(to me atleast) and I find you average actor or musicians talents to be far more trivial when compared to an average athlete.
Im not saying the ‘money’ part of the game needs fixed. I just feel it needs to be reallocated and divided more for what a player does and is doing vs what a player has done.
Tired of generic music??? Exterminate All Rational Thought is here to help!
It's structured that way in the interest of keeping players "under club control"
at least for the first six years of their careers. If MLB had more evenly distributed revenues between the clubs, they could set the players free on the open market sooner in their careers. But the majority of baseball revenues are kept locally, so the bigger markets have a massive advantage, unlike the NFL, for example, where all 32 clubs share all the major media revenue equally.
"King of Minutiae"
I'm aware
And I do agree that it does allow small market teams with limited payrolls to compete. Regardless, I’m still staunchly against it and feel that profit sharing with payouts depending on percentage of cap money spent and a total restructuring of the free agency process would be better for the game than current structure. Most owners would agree, while most players would disagree. Just my opinion.
Tired of generic music??? Exterminate All Rational Thought is here to help!
We should lock Porcello up before he gets too expensive
Maybe we can lowball him now while his stock is down, like for 5 years / $30 Million. That’s the same deal that Jon Lester and Clay Buchholz got from Boston when they became arbitration eligible. We could use some team friendly deals like that.
Only if there's a serious home town discount
Rick has four years left under club control, so the club doesn’t have much incentive yet to guarantee his future seasons and eat all the risk of injury or non performance. It would be very Tribe- like to extend Porcello now.
Max is a year closer to free agency, so he’d be a bit more likely to sign a multi year extension, but I think they’re more likely to wait him out as well and do a deal when he’s two years away from free agency.
"King of Minutiae"
They could wait until next year, but the price goes up every year we wait
Verlander got 5 years / $80 Million after his 4th season. Bonderman got 4 years / $38 million after his 4th season. We could probably get Porcello now for about 5 years / $30 million. That would save us at least $10 million by getting it done now. Rick’s price could easily double if he has a break-out year.
It’s a slippery slope. It would be nice to have it guaranteed that Porcello’s here until he’s at least 27 years old. Scherzer is already 27 years old. I have doubts that he’ll still be playing baseball in 5 years. I’m not sure I’d want to extend him more than 2 seasons at a time.
I believe that only 3 pitchers in MLB are under age 28 that had > 30 IP the last five seasons
Cain, Edwin, and King Felix. Kid Rick is headed in that direction with a couple more solid years. Odds are against five straight healthy seasons.
The first question would be the degree of confidence the club has in his pitching ability. I think that I like Kid Rick’s future better than most- I’m cool with savvy pitchers that have excellent command and I think he’s that guy pretty soon. 5/ $ 30MM is low if he stays healthy and effective, but he’d be set for life. Heck, he’s already set for life.
I felt that the Tigers didn’t get enough discount in the Bonderman deal at the time. I thought that they gave him about what a guy of his performance level would get for two years of arby plus two years of free agency. If they thought he was heading for Verlander territory, then they’d have saved a bundle on the back end of the deal. Of all DD’s “bad” contracts, I think that the Bondo deal was probably the most excusable at the time it was signed. Dontrelle’s was the least, IMO.
"King of Minutiae"
Please god no extension for Max
That would be stupid..insane..and leylandlike… Shertzer is a max effort guy that uses the reverse w throwing motion..ya want some comp. Pitchers…see: Mark Prior..Adam Wainwright..& one Jermey Bonderman… Max should be traded as soon as Turner or Smyly are ready..this time nxt year @ the latest.. Learn from your mistakes Dave!! On the pos. Side Porcello & Turners’ throwing motions are mouthwatering!!!
by Wolverine119 on Jan 7, 2012 8:36 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I find the business side of baseball so stinking boring
Of course, it is important. Very important.
And I’m thankful folks like T-Dog are around to explain it, and do it in such a way even I can understand it.
But I find the rules, nuance, and road map of MLB contracts and such to be like a sharp stick in the eyeball.
Justin can now let the fungus grow back on his shower shoes.
Yep ...
me too. Isn’t it time for the season to begin yet?
39 more days till pitchers and catcher report!
It will be only 38 in about 40 more minutes
Tired of generic music??? Exterminate All Rational Thought is here to help!
Diamond Demo
Good article. Thanks for explaining this. There was an interesting interview and diamond demo with Rick on Hot Stove yesterday. If you missed it you can pick up the two videos under
mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?topic_id=7417714
Pressure starting to mount on Rick
At 4m is good for a #4/5 starter and he pitch a little better than his ERA has shown. If he doesn’t mature he could price himself out of the market in a few years. He needs to make a step forward this year.
We'll there's always a market, but maybe he'll end up taking a salary cut in FA unless he improves
He’s a guy that could easily end up with Garza-like arbitration values in a couple of years. I think what we’ve seen is that those salaries take a lot of teams out of the trade mix. Despite a decent season last year, Porcello’s trade value has dropped due to that extra year of experience which moves his salary up and slides him one year closer to FA.
Ultimately, if he develops more and some of our minor league guys come through, I see him being traded at the deadline if the Tigers have a bad year in the next 3 seasons.
The other sports are just sports. Baseball is a love. ~Bryant Gumbel, 1981
He done what he could with the limited pitch count , limited innings, and poor defense.
His value and quality will be much more apparent when he’s allowed to get another inning in per game and doesn’t have any of his starts skipped. The Tigers have coddled him to death so far and for good reason. They didn’t want to take any chances in ruining his arm. With us, he could have a great game going, and he’d get yanked due to the pitch count or because the bullpen needed work. Just a warning, we’ll probably baby Jacob Turner the same way, and he’ll probably progress about the same as Porcello. What matters most though, is that Porcello keeps us in the game, and gives us a good chance to win during the majority of his starts. His stats and peripherals should only get better.
Maybe his future isn’t with the Tigers though. He might be better off on another team that is desperate for pitching. A team where he’ll be given a super long leash and that has better defense around him. On the Tigers, he might always be Kid Rick and be in Verlander’s shadow. For some kids, they just have get away from the coddling and shadows to make that next step towards becoming the man. Or maybe he just needs a younger kid around, like a little brother, so he won’t be the kid anymore. That could be Jacob Turner. Or maybe then he’ll be like a middle child and get ignored and under-appreciated.
It appears to my untrained, uneducated, ignorant eye ...
That Porcello is improving incrementally. Getting better and better.
Does this kind of slow(er) improvement mean that once he attains the level of possibly the best #2 starter in baseball, he’ll hold on to it longer since his improvements were taken in smaller steps? In my uninformed opinion … yes.
That’s my story and I’m stickin’ to it.
Justin can now let the fungus grow back on his shower shoes.
I think he got better but didn't' have the results to show for it
the real problem was that his rookie year the results — which far outpaced expected numbers — threw off expectations. so when he shows incremental year to year improvement, compared to 2009 he doesn’t look as good when he might actually be better
by Kurt Mensching on Jan 7, 2012 5:19 PM EST up reply actions

by 




























