Broken by Beckett: Red Sox 5, Tigers 1

A picture of someone vomiting might have been more appropriate for tonight's recap. Although the act of vomiting is rather violent. And though some Tigers fans might feel that way right now (Watch out, small animals!), this game seemed to inspire more of an arms-folded disgust.
Was it entirely predictable that the Tigers would follow up a game in which they scored 10 runs and knocked 18 hits with a flaccid one-run, six-hit performance? I'm not saying that this lineup should've done more against Josh Beckett, because he was quite good tonight, striking out eight batters. What I am saying is that more - much more - is expected.
Justin Verlander didn't throw a very good game. You're just not going to beat many teams giving up five runs and nine hits. But how about scoring some runs for the guy? Verlander deserves to be under .500 with the way he's pitched this season. But if he gets any kind of run support, he's not dragging around a 1-6 record. Maybe that's irrelevant tonight, but don't you wonder if the tiny margin of error his team provides is getting to him? I imagine Verlander sometimes feels as if he has to throw the ball through a toilet paper tube.
By the way, has Kevin Youkilis officially been fitted for his Tigers Killer jacket? Because he's definitely in the club now, after hitting yet another home run against Detroit.
Curtis Granderson is 0-for-10 over the last two games, with seven strikeouts. He batted 2-for-18 in this series, striking out in eight of those at-bats. Miguel Cabrera batted 2-for-14. (And we'll have more on him tomorrow, though The Daily Fungo has a head start on us.) Magglio Ordonez hit 4-for-16 with one RBI.
While enduring his weekly conversation with Rob Parker, the Detroit News' Tom Gage brought up Sparky Anderson's old adage that you couldn't judge a team until it's played 40 games. Well, the Tigers have played 36 of them and are five games under .500. Bear with me because I was an English major, but even if the Tigers win their next four (and how confident do you feel about that?), they'll be one game under .500 at the 40-game mark.
Maybe we should save ourselves the trouble and pass judgment now.
Roll Call
The Tigers didn't make it worthwhile to see this game through, but here are those who chimed in before it just became a slog.
Thanks to BigAl, pfuhrmeister, ThaWalrus9, miggy4mvp, rock n rye, LosTigres, tbliggins, Tigsfan, dettigionswings'stons, Matt in Toledo, and Tony K for being willing to have their hopes crushed.
6 comments | 0 recs
Not Drastic Enough? Red Sox 6, Tigers 3
All of the pre-game hullabaloo swirled around the new lineup that Jim Leyland would pencil in tonight. Maybe it was expecting too much for the re-shuffled batting order to put a bunch of runs on the scoreboard its first time out, and perhaps we'll see different results after certain hitters get accustomed to their new roles. In its debut, however, the new lineup posted a frustratingly similar result: 11 runners left on base, only three runs scored, and a 6-3 loss to a pitcher that really should've been beaten.
The Tigers let Daisuke Matsuzaka off the hook tonight. Pitchers who walk eight batters in five innings don't usually end the evening with a win. But as we've seen too many times already this season, Detroit just couldn't follow up with a big hit and punish Dice-K for his mistakes. And maybe I'm not giving Matsuzaka enough credit for getting out of the jams he created. He only allowed two hits, consistently inducing a pop-up when he needed it.
However, Leyland's message of grinding out at-bats just may have gotten through to his hitters. Matsuzaka threw 109 pitches, so the Tigers made him work (though he put much of that burden on himself). They didn't get the key hit against Dice-K when it was needed, but they didn't just flail away at pitches out of the strike zone, either. He only posted one strikeout tonight, his lowest total this season. When Tigers batters weren't getting anything to hit, they took the walk, and that's an approach we hadn't seen much of in Detroit's first 32 games.
Now they have to start driving those runners in. Jeremy Bonderman was hardly great tonight, and it's aggravating to see the Tigers always having to claw back into the game when Bondo gives up 3-4 runs early. But who knows how his six innings might have developed had he received some run support? (Gary Sheffield certainly found his legs in left field having to run to the fence, trying to make a play on those balls Mike Lowell and Kevin Youkilis put over it.)
So I suppose how you feel about this one depends on your outlook. Was it yet another troubling loss in which the Tigers didn't follow through on their talent and the opportunities presented to them? Or is there something to build on from here?
Roll Call
We're going to try a new feature in these recaps, thanks to a applet/software thingie that was passed along by Jim McLennan, SB Nation's Arizona Diamondbacks blogger. It's just a way of thanking those who commented in the GameThread, and welcoming anyone who may have stopped by for the first time.
Thanks to Zappatista, pfuhrmeister, BobbyHigginson, bradm, Matt in Toledo, Fats Fothergill, rock n rye, ThaWalrus9, BigAl, and MackAveKurt for participating in tonight's commentary and discussion.
1 comment | 0 recs




