Who is the Face of the Detroit Tigers?
A little while ago, the folks at ESPN.com SportsNation asked me if I would be interested in participating in a series called "Face of the Franchise," in which four panelists selected their choice for the best current representative of a Major League Baseball team. The panel would consist of a writer from ESPN.com, a beat writer or columnist from that team's city, an analyst from "Baseball Tonight," and a team-specific blogger.
After briefly wondering if someone was pulling a joke on me (and doing the requisite Google search), I said "Hell yeah, I'd be interested" and started thinking hard about my choice. And when I say "thinking hard," I mean agonizing over it, like Rob in High Fidelity when the reporter asked him what his top five favorite songs were. This was going down for posterity. My name would be on this. My Tigers fan (and blogger) credibility would be at stake.
The only rule I had to follow was that my choice had to be currently associated with the team. I couldn't pick an old-timer like Ty Cobb or Al Kaline, or any of the players I grew up watching, like Alan Trammell or Kirk Gibson. A few choices came to mind right away, and I began to consider whether or not I could write an interesting paragraph on this person, and the likelihood that he could be chosen by the other panelists.
I also asked a handful of friends who they would pick as the face of the Detroit Tigers, but no clear choice stood out. Actually, that was kind of reassuring. I wasn't just being anal-retentive or indecisive.
Then I imposed a couple of my own rules. 1) My pick had to be a player. An manager, owner, or broadcaster could certainly be the face of a team. But in my mind, fans don't go to the ballpark or switch the game on because of a manager or owner. Players get us excited; they're the ones we watch. 2) Casual fans, or even people who don't follow sports had to be aware of who the player is. I probably didn't follow this rule very closely because it somewhat conflicted with the first rule. For instance, if I ask my mother about the Tigers, she'd probably mention Jim Leyland, if anyone came to mind. But if I talked to baseball fans in other cities, who might they name?
After considering all these factors, I'm not sure that my choice ended up being any different from who I was leaning toward in the first place. If you've been reading BYB regularly, you can probably guess who I picked as the face of the Tigers. But you can read the official pick here, along with those of Rob Neyer, Jon Paul Morosi, and Eric Young (whose pick will go up tomorrow).
But how about you guys? Who do you think is the current face of the Detroit Tigers? It'll be much more fun to see who you'd choose, and if we'd reach any kind of consensus. The comments section awaits your input.
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
I would've gone with Inge
I'd pick Inge
by Boney on Aug 22, 2007 3:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with your reasoning
It's a weird kinda question. The "face" of the team doesn't necessarily have to be the best player, or the highest-paid player... it's one of those dreaded intangible questions. I mean, who do fans cheer for the loudest at the ballpark? I would guess Zumaya. It would be awfully hard for a bullpen guy to be the face of the team, though.
It's hard to go wrong with Granderson. But.... hm. He's having a good year, but he's not at superstar status yet, y'know?
I'm going to have to go with Pudge. He's not my favorite player and he's not the best player on the team. But when he was signed, he was signed SPECIFICALLY to BE the face of the team, coz that team was pretty much faceless prior to his arrival. He brought credibility and star power to the Tigers. The reaction around baseball was sort of, "Oh, they have Pudge now? I guess maybe they ARE a real baseball team."
I also think that WAY more casual fans would be able to name and identify Pudge than Granderson.
by Boston Fan in Michigan on Aug 22, 2007 3:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Granderson
Grandy is far more representative of the team as it is currently constituted.
by russkiejedi on Aug 22, 2007 3:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I totally agree with you, Ian
Nice to see you and the blog get a little dap from the worldwide leader.
by Big Al on Aug 22, 2007 4:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
good call
by Ben on Aug 22, 2007 6:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Polanco
Others: Bondo, of course and Verlander.
by Germantiger on Aug 22, 2007 7:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Face of the Tigers
by densogirl on Aug 22, 2007 8:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














